Toxicity test and field efficacy of six insecticides against larvae of Satyrium formosanum and Serrodes compana on Sapindus mukorossi

LI Suxin, WEN Junbao, JIA Liming, LI Lu, CAI Wanting, CAO Qiuli, WENG Xuehuang, LUO Shuijing

Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition） ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1) : 247-254.

PDF(1424 KB)
南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）
PDF(1424 KB)
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition） ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1) : 247-254. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202403013

Toxicity test and field efficacy of six insecticides against larvae of Satyrium formosanum and Serrodes compana on Sapindus mukorossi

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 To control two main pests of Sapindus mukorossi in Jianning County Fujian Province, namely Satyrium formosanum and Serrodes compana, we selected six highly effective insecticides against Lepidoptera pests’ to 3rd instar larvae. This study was intended to provide some reference basis for research on the control of these two pests. 【Method】The leaf-dipping method was employed to determine the indoor toxicity of lambda-cyhalothrin, emamectin benzoate, chlorfenapyr, lufenuron, Bacillus thuringiensis and matrine against the 3rd instar larvae of Satyrium formosanum and Serrodes compana. The LC50 (median lethal concentration) values of the six insecticides were determined. The field spray trial was conducted in Sapindus mukorossi National Forest Germplasm Repository Test Area, located in Jianning County, Sanming City, Fujian Province, to evaluate the field efficacy of Satyrium formosanum and Serrodes compana. The population decline rate and corrected control efficacy were analyzed on the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after treatment to compare the efficacy of the different insecticides.【Result】The indoor toxicity results showed that emamectin benzoate and lambda-cyhalothrin exhibited high toxicity to the larvae of Satyrium formosanum and Serrodes compana, with LC50 is 0.003-0.007 and 0.030-3.735 mg/L respectively. Matrine showed high toxicity to Satyrium formosanum, with LC50 is 0.348 mg/L. The toxicity of chlorfenapyr was the lowest against these two pests, with LC50 is 37.651-118.146 mg/L. The results of field trials showed that emamectin benzoate and lambda-cyhalothrin provided effective control of both pests, with efficacy exceeding 90% three days after application. After seven days, B. thuringiensis and lufenuron showed better control of Satyrium formosanum larvae, exceeding 90%, while chlorfenapyr and matrine exhibited poor control efficacy, only 50%. Against Serrodes compana larvae, both B. thuringiensis and chlorfenapyr demonstrated satisfactory control efficacy, exceeding 80%. 【Conclusion】Therefore, emamectin benzoate and lambda-cyhalothrin can be used as quick-acting insecticides against these two pests in production, and Bacillus thuringiensis, lufenuron and chlorfenapyr can be used as alternate or mixture partners to avoid insecticide resistance.

Key words

Sapindus mukorossi / Satyrium formosanum / Serrodes compana / insecticide / toxicity bioassay / field control efficacy

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
LI Suxin , WEN Junbao , JIA Liming , et al . Toxicity test and field efficacy of six insecticides against larvae of Satyrium formosanum and Serrodes compana on Sapindus mukorossi[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition）. 2026, 50(1): 247-254 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202403013

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis
[1]
刘俊涛, 陈义勇, 王立宪, 等. 无患子‘媛华’不同物候期养分需求特征研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2024, 45(3): 533-541.
LIU J T, CHEN Y Y, WANG L X, et al. Characteristics of nutrient demand of Sapindus mukorossi ‘Yuanhua’ in different phenological periods[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2024, 45(3): 533-541.
Cited in this article [1]
[2]
刘济铭, 孙操稳, 何秋阳, 等. 国内外无患子属种质资源研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2017, 30(6): 12-18.
LIU J M, SUN C W, HE Q Y, et al. Research progress in Sapindus L. germplasm resources[J]. World Forestry Research, 2017, 30(6): 12-18. DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2017.0071.y.
Cited in this article [1]
[3]
贾黎明, 孙操稳. 生物柴油树种无患子研究进展[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2012, 17(6): 191-196.
JIA L M, SUN C W. Research progress of biodiesel tree Sapindus mukorossi[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2012, 17(6): 191-196.
Cited in this article [1]
[4]
姜翠翠, 卢新坤, 叶新福. 建宁县无患子病虫害调查初报[J]. 东南园艺, 2017, 5(6): 17-21.
JIANG C C, LU X K, YE X F. Preliminary report of diseases and pest insects on Sapindus mukorossi in Jianning County[J]. Southeast Horticulture, 2017, 5(6): 17-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5774.2017.06.005.
Cited in this article [2]
[5]
叶小瑜. 台湾洒灰蝶生物学特性及防治[J]. 福建林学院学报, 1999, 19(1): 23-25.
YE X Y. Studies on the bionomics and control of Satyrium formosanum (Matsumura)[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 1999, 19(1): 23-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.1999.01.007.
Cited in this article [1]
[6]
罗会生. 无患子病虫害防治[J]. 中国花卉园艺, 2016(2): 48-50.
LUO H S. Control of diseases and pests of Sapindus mukorossi[J]. China Flowers Horticulture, 2016(2): 48-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8496.2016.02.021.
Cited in this article [1]
[7]
黄伟玲, 王芹芹, 任学祥, 等. 20种杀虫剂对不同龄期不同地理种群草地贪夜蛾的室内毒力测定[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(6): 323-331, 337.
HUANG W L, WANG Q Q, REN X X, et al. Laboratory toxicity of 20 insecticides against the larvae of different instars from different geographical populations of Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. Plant Protection, 2023, 49(6): 323-331, 337. DOI: 10.16688/j.zwbh.2022264.
Cited in this article [1]
[8]
吴莉莉, 陈艳, 才才, 等. 4种杀虫剂对辣椒田棉铃虫的防治效果[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2022, 42(3): 80-82.
WU L L, CHEN Y, CAI C, et al. Control effects of four insecticides on cotton bollworm in pepper fields[J]. China Plant Protection, 2022, 42(3): 80-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6820.2022.03.017.
Cited in this article [1]
[9]
黎柳锋, 王凤英, 廖仁昭, 等. 广西桂平市荔枝木毒蛾的防治研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(4): 81-83.
LI L F, WANG F Y, LIAO R Z, et al. Study on the control of lychee moth in Guiping City, Guangxi[J]. South China Fruits, 2018, 47(4): 81-83. DOI: 10.13938/J.ISSN.1007-1431.20170690.
Cited in this article [1]
[10]
徐重新, 沈建兴, 金嘉凤, 等. Bt毒素表达应用及其残留风险与免疫检测研究进展[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2024, 40(12): 2387-2400.
XU C X, SHEN J X, JIN J F, et al. Research progress on the expression and application of Bt toxin and its residue risk and immunoassay[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 40(12): 2387-2400. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.12.022.
Cited in this article [1]
[11]
胡长效, 曹丹, 周梦影. 甲维盐及其复配剂对苹果小卷叶蛾幼虫室内毒力测定及田间防治效果[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(5): 137-139, 143.
HU C X, CAO D, ZHOU M Y. Indoor toxicity and field control effect of emamectin benzoate and its mixtures against Adoxophyes orana[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(5): 137-139, 143.
Cited in this article [1]
[12]
吴正伟, 李运, 徐进, 等. 虫酰肼和甲维盐对甜玉米草地贪夜蛾的生物活性及田间防效[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2019, 41(5): 968-973.
WU Z W, LI Y, XU J, et al. Control efficacy of tebufenozide and emamectin benzoate against Spodoptera frugiperda both under the lab and crop field conditions[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2019, 41(5): 968-973. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2019.05.6.
Cited in this article [1]
[13]
闫文娟, 杨帅, 谭煜婷, 等. 虫螨腈对草地贪夜蛾幼虫的室内毒力及田间防效[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2020, 42(3): 602-606.
YAN W J, YANG S, TAN Y T, et al. Toxicity and field control efficacy of chlorfenapyr on the larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2020, 42(3): 602-606. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2020.03.11.
Cited in this article [1]
[14]
程东美, 黄江华, 徐汉虹, 等. 50g/L虱螨脲乳油对草地贪夜蛾的室内活性和田间药效研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2019, 41(5): 974-978.
CHENG D M, HUANG J H, XU H H, et al. Activity and field effect trials of lufenuron 50% EC against Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2019, 41(5): 974-978. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2019.05.7.
Cited in this article [1]
[15]
詹丽, 李敬丹, 付璇, 等. 紫茉莉种子中对草地贪夜蛾的杀虫活性成分及杀虫机制[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2024, 40(1): 47-54.
ZHAN L, LI J D, FU X, et al. Insecticidal active ingredients and mechanism against Spodoptera frugiperda in Mirabilis jalapa seeds[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 40(1): 47-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.01.005.
Cited in this article [1]
[16]
张丹丹, 杨现明, 陆宴辉, 等. 六种杀虫剂对棉铃虫的毒力效果比较[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2018, 55(1): 61-66.
ZHANG D D, YANG X M, LU Y H, et al. Comparison of the toxicity of six insecticides against the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2018, 55(1): 61-66.
Cited in this article [1]
[17]
应德文. 4种杀虫剂防治紫花苜蓿田斜纹夜蛾的效果比较[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2017, 37(10): 66-67.
YING D W. Comparison of the control effects of four insecticides on Spodoptera litura in alfalfa fields[J]. China Plant Protection, 2017, 37(10): 66-67.
Cited in this article [1]
[18]
STEVENS M M, WARREN G N, MO J. Topical and dietary toxicity of emamectin benzoate, chlorantraniliprole, cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb to larvae of the common armyworm Mythimna convecta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. Pest Management Science, 2022, 78(3): 1000-1007. DOI: 10.1002/ps.6711.
Cited in this article [1]
[19]
常芳娟, 刘珍, 范巧兰, 等. 虱螨·虫螨腈对甘蓝甜菜夜蛾的田间防效[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(8): 66-68.
CHANG F J, LIU Z, FAN Q L, et al. Field Efficacy evaluation of lufenuron 2.5% + chlorfenapyr 9.5% SC against Spodoptera exigua on cabbage[J]. China Plant Protection, 2020, 40(8): 66-68.
Cited in this article [1]
[20]
张天栋. 10%虱螨脲悬浮剂防治美国白蛾试验初报[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2017, 36(4): 26-28.
ZHANG T D. Test of controlling Hyphantria cunea (Drury) with lufenuron 10% suspension concentrate[J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2017, 36(4): 26-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2017.04.007.
Cited in this article [1]
[21]
黄庆超, 戴长春, 张建萍, 等. 21种化学药剂对新疆棉田主要害虫毒力及对多异瓢虫的安全性[J]. 植物保护学报, 2021, 48(5): 1114-1124.
HUANG Q C, DAI C C, ZHANG J P, et al. Toxicities of 21 pesticides against major cotton insect pests and their safety to variegated ladybird Hippodamia variegata in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2021, 48(5): 1114-1124. DOI: 10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2021.2021864.
Cited in this article [2]
[22]
钱康华, 袁江江, 王京, 等. 10种杀虫剂对4种蓟马的毒力及对西花蓟马的田间药效评价[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(6): 343-349.
QIAN K H, YUAN J J, WANG J, et al. Toxicity of 10 insecticides to four thrips species and field efficacy to Frankliniella occidentalis[J]. Plant Protection, 2023, 49(6): 343-349. DOI: 10.16688/j.zwbh.2022604.
Cited in this article [1]
[23]
王钊贵, 徐鹏, 曹蓉, 等. 负载甲维盐介孔二氧化硅纳米球的制备及其对松材线虫的毒力性能[J]. 林业工程学报, 2023, 8(6): 131-136.
WANG Z G, XU P, CAO R, et al. Preparation of emamectin benzoate-loaded mesoporous silica nanospheres and their toxicity to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2023, 8(6): 131-136. DOI:10.13360/j.issn.2096-1359.202305026.
Cited in this article [1]
[24]
徐昭, 张瑞芝, 王佳楠, 等. Pk-αts高表达提高红松对松材线虫耐病性[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39(5):22-30.
XU Z, ZHANG R Z, WANG J N, et al. High expression of the Pk-αts increased the tolerance of Pinus koraiensis against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39(5):22-30. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2023.05.003.
Cited in this article [1]
[25]
王占锋, 蔡军. 九种杀虫剂防治苏铁小灰蝶的药效试验[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016, 55(2): 365-367, 480.
WANG Z F, CAI J. Experiments of 9 insecticides effects on the prevention and control of Chilades pandava[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 55(2): 365-367, 480. DOI: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2016.02.024.
Cited in this article [1]
[26]
修淑玲, 石祥, 李艳秋. 霓纱燕灰蝶药剂防治试验[J]. 植物保护, 2009, 35(4): 172-175.
XIU S L, SHI X, LI Y Q. Trials on chemical control of Rapala nissa[J]. Plant Protection, 2009, 35(4): 172-175. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2009.04.042.
Cited in this article [1]
[27]
张秀霞, 赵方彬, 白婷婷, 等. 几种杀虫剂对甜菜夜蛾的室内毒力及田间防效[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(12): 127-131.
ZHANG X X, ZHAO F B, BAI T T, et al. Several insecticides to Spodoptera exigua: indoor toxicity and field efficacy[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(12): 127-131.
Cited in this article [1]
[28]
李燕芳, 徐淑, 张振飞, 等. 3种药剂对广东地区草地贪夜蛾3龄幼虫室内毒力测定及其田间药效评价[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2021, 43(1): 239-244.
LI Y F, XU S, ZHANG Z F, et al. Study on laboratory toxicity and field efficacy of three insecticides against Spodoptera frugiperda larva in Guangdong Province[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2021, 43(1): 239-244. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2021.01.25.
Cited in this article [1]
[29]
王立莹. 新泰市花生田棉铃虫发生规律与防治技术研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2022.
WANG L Y. Studies on the occurrence and control technology of Helicoverpa armigera in the peanut field in Xintai City[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2022.
Cited in this article [1]
[30]
张爱红, 杨菲, 董世强, 等. 防治露地白菜鳞翅目害虫药剂筛选及应用技术[J]. 农药, 2021, 60(3): 223-225, 234.
ZHANG A H, YANG F, DONG S Q, et al. Application and screening of pesticides for controlling lepidopteran pests on Chinese cabbage in open filed[J]. Agrochemicals, 2021, 60(3): 223-225, 234. DOI: 10.16820/j.cnki.1006-0413.2021.03.016.
Cited in this article [1]
[31]
周利琳, 熊凯凡, 王攀, 等. 防治甜菜夜蛾混剂最佳配方筛选及田间防效验证[J]. 农药学学报, 2023, 25(3): 668-677.
XIONG L L, XIONG K F, WANG P, et al. Screening of optimal formulations of insecticide mixtures and validation of the field efficacy against Spodoptera exigua[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2023, 25(3): 668-677. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2022.0131.
Cited in this article [1]
[32]
章杰, 周海伟, 彭涛, 等. 苦参碱与联苯·虫螨腈混配对两种蓟马的田间防效评价[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(15): 90-93.
ZHANG J, ZHOU H W, PENG T, et al. Field efficacy evaluation of matrine mixed with Bifenthrin·Chlorfenapyr against two kinds of Thrips[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023(15): 90-93. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2023.15.024.
Cited in this article [1]
[33]
王翠翠, 陈安琪, 董文阳, 等. 虫螨腈与Bt混配对小菜蛾的田间防效及虫螨腈在西兰花上的残留消解动态[J]. 农药学学报, 2021, 23(5): 922-929.
WANG C C, CHEN A Q, DONG W Y, et al. Field efficacy of the mixture of chlorfenapyr and Bt against Plutella xylostella and the residue dissipation dynamic of chlorfenapyr in Brassica oleracea var.italica[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2021, 23(5): 922-929. DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2021.0109.
Cited in this article [1]
[34]
周利琳, 望勇, 王攀, 等. 不同类型杀虫剂对武汉甜菜夜蛾田间防效的演变[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2024, 44(3): 80-86.
ZHOU L L, WANG Y, WANG P, et al. Evolvement of field efficacy of seven kinds of insecticides on Spodoptera exigua in Wuhan[J]. China Plant Protection, 2024, 44(3): 80-86.
Cited in this article [1]
[35]
刘吉梅, 张中华, 王肖, 等. 5%甲维·虱螨脲悬浮剂防治甘蓝小菜蛾田间药效试验[J]. 中国农业文摘-农业工程, 2021, 33(3): 80-81.
LIU J M, ZHANG Z H, WANG X, et al. Field efficacy test of 5% Carbaryl-lufenuron SC against Plutella xylostella[J]. Agricultural Science and Engineering in China, 2021, 33(3): 80-81. DOI: 10.19518/j.cnki.cn11-2531/s.2021.0078.
Cited in this article [1]
PDF(1424 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

Author

Reader

Reviewer

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

/

〈 〉