PDF(2749 KB)
Evaluation of the fruit quality in 20 fresh jujube cultivars in Henan Province
ZHI Zhaokun, ZHANG Mengmeng, CHEN Zhuo, GUO Yanmeng, LIU Yiteng, YUE Huafeng, LI Fangdong, ZHU Gaopu, ZHANG Shulin
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2) : 57-66.
PDF(2749 KB)
PDF(2749 KB)
Evaluation of the fruit quality in 20 fresh jujube cultivars in Henan Province
【Objective】This study aims to investigate the differences in fruit quality among different jujube germplasm resources, so as to providing a scientific basis for the breeding and improvement of jujube varieties, and for the selection of cultivated varieties in Henan Province.【Method】Mature fruits of 20 main jujube cultivars in Huang-Huai region were used as experimental materials. Eight quality indicators were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis, and the expression levels of five genes related to fruit quality traits were detected by qRT-PCR.【Result】Significant differences were observed in the phenotypic traits of fruits among the cultivars: ‘Shiyuehong’ had the largest single fruit weight (16.79 g), ‘Lajiaozao’ had the highest fruit shape index (2.62), ‘Songxian Dazao’ had the highest hardness (12.03 N), ‘Beijing Benzao’ had the highest soluble solid content (mass fraction 34.95%), and ‘Jixinhong 6’ had the highest titratable acid content (volume fraction 0.767%). Correlation analysis showed that fruit hardness was significantly positively correlated with brittleness. Soluble solid content was significantly positively correlated with soluble sugar content, but significantly negatively correlated with single fruit weight and transverse diameter. In addition, single fruit weight was significantly positively correlated with transverse diameter, while fruit type index was significantly negatively correlated with transverse diameter and significantly positively correlated with vertical diameter. Gene expression analysis revealed significant differences in the expression levels of quality-related genes among cultivars. For example, the expression level of the sugar metabolism-related gene Zj.jz036789032 in ‘Jixinzao’ was about 150 times higher than that of ‘Beijing Benzao’.【Conclusion】Significant differences were found in the fruit quality traits of the 20 jujube cultivars studied. These cultivars can be divided into three categories: high hardness and high acidity, high sugar and low acidity, and low single fruit weight and low hardness. The fruit characteristics of the three types are significantly different, indicating distinct edible and market values.
jujube cultivars / quality traits / gene expression / correlation analysis / quality evaluation / Henan Province
| [1] |
宗亦臣. 不同处理对枣果贮藏效果的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2004, 25(10):319-322.
|
| [2] |
吾尔古丽·托合图木, 王振磊, 张川疆, 等. 不同鲜食枣品种果实品质的比较[J]. 塔里木大学学报, 2022, 34(3):47-52.
Wuerguli·Tuohetumu,
|
| [3] |
陶佳淋, 刘新月, 李天宇, 等. 不同成熟度鲜枣果实冰点温度及其影响因素[J]. 经济林研究, 2023, 41(4):191-199+208.
|
| [4] |
周晨城. 中国鲜食枣产业现状调研[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2023.
|
| [5] |
张坚, 赵文华, 陈君石. 营养素度量法——一个新的食物营养评价指标[J]. 营养学报, 2009, 31(1):1-5.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
徐海泉, 卢士军, 周琳, 等. 以营养当量评价食物营养价值的方法学研究[J]. 营养学报, 2016, 38(4):341-344.
|
| [15] |
周昇昇, 李磊, 张丁, 等. 一种新的食物营养评价指数的初步建立和应用[J]. 营养学报, 2014, 36(1):63-68.
|
| [16] |
杜改改, 李泰山, 刁松锋, 等. 6个杏李品种果实甜酸风味品质分析[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(1):41-49.
|
| [17] |
李丹, 胡孟豪, 王连春, 等. 12个鲜食枣品种的综合评价[C]// 中国园艺学会2017年论文摘要集. 昆明: 西南林业大学林学院, 2017:60.
|
| [18] |
艾海提·克然木, 木合塔尔·扎热, 吴正保. ‘灰枣’果实外观品质性状相关性分析[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2023, 43(1):89-93.
|
| [19] |
申才蕊, 林敏娟, 吴翠云, 等. 16株枣实生优株生物学特性比较及其果实品质评价[J]. 经济林研究, 2023, 41(2):171-181.
|
| [20] |
杨磊, 贾平平, 靳娟, 等. 118个枣品种表型性状多样性分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2023, 32(1):50-60.
|
| [21] |
赵慧芳, 吴文龙, 黄正金, 等. 34个蓝莓品种果实品质评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2023, 32(4):44-53,72.
|
| [22] |
唐海霞, 裴广营, 张琼, 等. 枣果实相关性状QTL定位分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(4):754-764.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
陈红艳, 苑婷婷, 储成群. 微波消解-ICP-OES法测定拐枣中几种矿质元素的含量[J]. 山东化工, 2018, 47(9):63-65.
|
| [26] |
谢勇, 杨银, 徐智虎, 等. 拐枣氨基酸测定及其糖的制备工艺[J]. 铜仁学院学报, 2018, 20(9):24-29.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
叶文斌, 樊亮, 王昱, 等. 拐枣多糖对环磷酰胺诱导免疫低下小鼠免疫功能的影响[J]. 现代食品科技, 2016, 32(7):26-32.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
李欢. 枣果实成熟软化的细胞壁物质代谢及其基因表达研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
|
| [32] |
许玲, 魏秀清, 章希娟, 等. 质构仪整果穿刺法评价3个毛叶枣品种果实质地参数[J]. 福建农业学报, 2018, 33(6):621-625.
|
| [33] |
段艳军, 田春娇, 朱英, 等. 不同取汁方法对枣果可溶性固形物含量测定的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2022, 51(6):218-220.
|
| [34] |
吴梦嘉. 枣和酸枣有机酸含量差异分析以及关键基因筛选[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2021.
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
吴晗彬, 王志勇, 袁稼营, 等. 新疆4个优质红枣品种果实营养成分评价[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2023, 41(3):416-424,445.
|
| [38] |
孙佩光, 程志号, 孙长君, 等. 16份火龙果种质资源果实营养品质分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(19):6585-6592.
|
| [39] |
李慧, 魏天军. 30个鲜食枣种质果实品质综合评价[J]. 中国果树, 2024(2):68-74.
|
| [40] |
李世鹏, 陈叶, 郭明欣, 等. 86份酸枣种质资源筛选和遗传多样性分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(11):51-55.
|
| [41] |
刘秀云, 李慧, 刘志国. 基于SSR标记的255个枣品种亲缘关系和群体遗传结构分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(14):2772-2791.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |