Study on the evolution of landscape pattern of Baiyangdian wetland in the last 30 years

GUO Yongjiu, ZHANG Zitong, ZHANG Songrui, YANG Dongdong

Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1) : 82-92.

PDF(23052 KB)
PDF(23052 KB)
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1) : 82-92. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202407027

Study on the evolution of landscape pattern of Baiyangdian wetland in the last 30 years

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 The Baiyangdian wetland, located within the Xiong’an New Area of China, is a principal component of the Daqing River system, a major branch of the Haihe River basin. In recent years, the restoration and reutilization of disconnected river courses in the Haihe basin—an ecological lifeline for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region—have become critical research topics for Chinese scholars. Baiyangdian is not only the largest freshwater wetland in the Daqing River system but also a vital ecological source within the regional ecosystem, serving as a key node for material cycling and energy exchange. Clarifying the spatial distribution and evolutionary of Baiyangdian’s landscape patterns provides essential theoretical support for future ecological restoration and resource reutilization strategies in similar river-basin wetlands across China. 【Method】Taking Baiyangdian wetland as the research subject, this study utilized eight periods of remote sensing imagery from 1993 to 2022, obtained from the Geospatial Data Cloud, to classify landscape types. Nine landscape pattern indices were calculated at both the landscape and type levels to evaluate landscape dominance. The morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA), a landscape ecology methodology, was applied to identify ecological source areas in the wetland core zone. Correlation analyses were then conducted between landscape indices and both social and natural driving factors to reveal the evolutionary and determinants of landscape pattern change. On this basis, the likely future trajectory of Baiyangdian’s landscape evolution was predicted. 【Result】(1) Cropland and water bodies were consistently identified as the two dominant landscape types in the Baiyangdian Wetland, together occupying approximately 90% of the total wetland area. Landscape changes were concentrated in the decade between 1993 and 2003, when overall spatial integrity markedly declined and fragmentation intensified. Forest and water body areas jointly decreased by 58.78 km2, primarily converted into cropland and built-up land.(2) The evolution of landscape patterns exhibited distinct stages. Between 1993 and 1998, the wetland remained in a relatively stable phase, with evenly distributed patches, although some southwestern patches shrank toward the central area. From 2003 to 2009, the system entered a turbulent phase characterized by markedly increased fragmentation and edge effects. Between 2013 and 2022, the landscape entered a developmental phase, with a growing number of core-zone patches, significant expansion of the core area by 2022, and an overall improvement in ecological source quality.(3) MSPA results confirmed that the area of core ecological sources increased steadily between 2013 and 2022, indicating a positive trend in future landscape development.(4) Correlation analysis revealed that landscape pattern evolution was significantly associated with socioeconomic factors, including gross domestic product (GDP), total population, and the output of the tertiary industry, while no significant relationships were observed with natural drivers such as temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, or sunshine duration. 【Conclusion】(1) Between 1993 and 2003, cropland area in Baiyangdian increased by 54.31 km2, while forest and grassland declined. From 2003 to 2021, cropland was gradually converted into grassland, water bodies, and built-up land. Following the promulgation of land-use policies by the State Council in 2003, cropland areas steadily decreased, primarily in the northern and southwestern parts of the wetland. (2) Prior to 2003, intense human activity had heightened fragmentation and reduced spatial density of landscape patches. Subsequently, through artificial regulation and policy reforms, the structure of the landscape became more diverse and balanced. From the perspective of future trends, the area of core ecological sources is expected to continue increasing, accompanied by growth in the number of suitable habitats for ecological species. (3) MSPA results further demonstrated that both the number and area of core patches were expanding. The maximum recorded extent of the core zone was 56.60 km2 in 1993. Between 2003 and 2022, the ecological network within Baiyangdian Wetland regained vitality, with enlarged habitat areas and improved ecological source quality.(4) Among driving forces, socioeconomic factors—particularly Anxin County’s GDP, total population, and tertiary industry output—were significantly correlated with landscape pattern evolution, making them the primary determinants of change. By contrast, natural drivers showed no significant effects. On the basis of these findings, it is imperative to continue strengthening the protection of core ecological source areas and to consistently implement ecological governance measures. Such actions are essential to the sustainable development of Baiyangdian Wetland.

Key words

Baiyangdian wetland / landscape pattern evolution / MSPA analysis / drivering factors / wetland ecology / biodiversity conservation

Cite this article

Download Citations
GUO Yongjiu , ZHANG Zitong , ZHANG Songrui , et al. Study on the evolution of landscape pattern of Baiyangdian wetland in the last 30 years[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(1): 82-92 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202407027

References

[1]
王瑞卿, 张明祥, 武海涛, 等. 从《中华人民共和国湿地保护法》解析湿地定义与分类[J]. 湿地科学, 2022, 20(3):404-412.
WANG R Q, ZHANG M X, WU H T, et al. Analysis on wetland definition and classification of the wetland conservation law of the people’s republic of China[J]. Wetland Science, 2022, 20(3):404-412.DOI: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2022.03.014.
[2]
唐双娥. 我国湿地生态空间用途管制制度的困境与破解[J]. 清华法学, 2024, 18(4):173-191.
TANG S E. The dilemmas and improvement of wetland ecological space use control system in China[J]. Tsinghua Law Review, 2024, 18(4):173-191.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3290.2013.03.16.
[3]
张明薇, 吕鸿达, 高世鑫, 等. 基于景观格局的扎龙国家级自然保护区湿地保护成效评估[J]. 自然保护地, 2023, 3(3):67-76.
ZHANG M W, LYU H D, GAO S X, et al. Evaluation of wetland conservation effectiveness based on landscape pattern in Zhalong National Nature Reserve[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2023, 3(3):67-76.DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2022100503.
[4]
王佳, 于莉莉, 耿林, 等. 大沽河流域滨海湿地景观格局变化及其驱动机制[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2023, 39(8):29-37.
WANG J, YU L L, GENG L, et al. Effects of human activities on landscape alteration and aquatic environment of coastal wetland in Dagu River basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(8):29-37.DOI: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2023.129.
[5]
鲁宏旺, 胡文敏, 佘济云, 等. 生态退杨对洞庭湖湿地景观格局变化影响研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(3):171-178.
LU H W, HU W M, SHE J Y, et al. Study on the influence of Ecological Poplar Withdrawal on the landscape pattern of Dongting Lake wetland[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 44(3):171-178.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201904008.
[6]
宋小梅, 常晓丽, 丁辰. 近30年根河流域湿地景观格局变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(2):294-303.
SONG X M, CHANG X L, DING C. Analysis of the changes in wetland landscape pattern and driving factors in the Genhe basin over the past 30 years[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 38(2):294-303.DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.02.035.
[7]
赵志强, 许晓龙, 袁青, 等. 哈尔滨段松花江湿地景观格局演变及驱动因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2):219-226.
ZHAO Z Q, XU X L, YUAN Q, et al. Landscape pattern evolution and driving factors of Songhua River wetland in Harbin from 2000 to 2020[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(2):219-226.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202301009.
[8]
贾艳艳, 唐晓岚, 唐芳林, 等. 1995—2015年长江中下游流域景观格局时空演变[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(3):185-194.
JIA Y Y, TANG X L, TANG F L, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of landscape pattern in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin from 1995 to 2015[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 44(3):185-194.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903079.
[9]
陈雁飞, 汤臣栋, 马强, 等. 崇明东滩自然保护区景观格局动态分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(1):1-8.
CHEN Y F, TANG C D, MA Q, et al. Landscape pattern change of Chongming Dongtan Nature Reserve of Shanghai from 2011 to 2015[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 41(1):1-8.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.001.
[10]
任琼, 佟光臣, 张金池. 鄱阳湖区域景观格局动态变化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(3):94-100.
REN Q, TONG G C, ZHANG J C. Dynamics of Poyang Lake watershed landscape pattern[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 40(3):94-100.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.03.016.
[11]
张佳敏, 刘小燕, 邓懿, 等. 无锡市小微湿地演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2):27-36.
ZHANG J M, LIU X Y, DENG Y, et al. Changing features and influencing factors of small and micro wetlands in Wuxi City[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(2):27-36.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202204038.
[12]
尹小岚, 谭程月, 柯樱海, 等. 1973—2020年黄河三角洲滨海盐沼湿地景观格局演化模式和驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(1):67-80.
YIN X L, TAN C Y, KE Y H, et al. Evolution and driving factors of salt marsh wetland landscape pattern in the Yellow River Delta in 1973—2020[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(1):67-80.DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202211203355.
[13]
范育蕾, 夏哲一, 魏雪, 等. 四个时期长江经济带湿地生态系统服务对景观格局响应研究[J]. 湿地科学, 2024, 22(1):139-147.
FAN Y L, XIA Z Y, WEI X, et al. The response of wetland ecosystem services to landscape pattern of the Yangtze River economic belt during four periods[J]. Wetland Science, 2024, 22(1):139-147.DOI: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2024.01.015.
[14]
闫欣, 牛振国. 1990—2017年白洋淀的时空变化特征[J]. 湿地科学, 2019, 17(4):436-444.
YAN X, NIU Z G. Spatial-temporal variation characteristics of Baiyangdian from 1990 to 2017[J]. Wetland Science, 2019, 17(4):436-444.DOI: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2019.04.008.
[15]
孟斌, 郅晓沙, 王晨, 等. 白洋淀流域河流干涸断流遥感监测[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(9):3827-3833.
MENG B, ZHI X S, WANG C, et al. Remote sensing monitoring of dry river beds in Baiyangdian Lake basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(9):3827-3833. DOI: CNKI:SUN:KXJS.0.2022-09-054.
[16]
朱金峰, 周艺, 王世新, 等. 白洋淀湿地生态功能评价及分区[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(2):459-472.
ZHU J F, ZHOU Y, WANG S X, et al. Ecological function evaluation and regionalization in Baiyangdian wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(2):459-472.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201901280209.
[17]
夏慧琪, 龚家国, 王浩, 等. 白洋淀生境空间格局演变分析[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2023, 54(8):134-143.
XIA H Q, GONG J G, WANG H, et al. Analysis of the spatial pattern evolution of Baiyangdian habitat[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2023, 54(8):134-143.DOI: 10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2023.08.012.
[18]
戴菲, 毕世波, 陈明, 等. 基于MSPA与混淆矩阵的绿地系统格局演化及其驱动因子研究:以伦敦为例[J]. 中国园林, 2020, 36(11):34-39.
DAI F, BI S B, CHEN M, et al. Research on green space system pattern evolution and its driving factors based on MSPA and confusion matrix:taking London as an example[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2020, 36(11):34-39.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2020.11.0034.
[19]
谢于松, 王倩娜, 罗言云. 基于MSPA的市域尺度绿色基础设施评价指标体系构建及应用:以四川省主要城市为例[J]. 中国园林, 2020, 36(7):87-92.
XIE Y S, WANG Q N, LUO Y Y. City-level urban green infrastructure evaluation index system based on MSPA:a case study of major cities in Sichuan Province[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2020, 36(7):87-92.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2020.07.0087.
[20]
许涛, 樊鹤翔, 周可钦, 等. 基于MSPA-MCR-CIRCUIT的山西省运城市景观生态网络构建[J]. 中国园林, 2024, 40(3):114-118.
XU T, FAN H X, ZHOU K Q, et al. Construction of landscape ecological network in Yuncheng City of Shanxi Province based on MSPA-MCR-CIRCUIT[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2024, 40(3):114-118.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2024.03.0114.
[21]
马银, 郑敏睿, 郑新奇, 等. 基于CA-Markov和MSPA的绿色基础设施预测与时空演变分析:以京津冀城市群为例[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(16):6785-6797.
MA Y, ZHENG M R, ZHENG X Q, et al. Prediction and spatiotemporal evolution analysis of green infrastructure based on CA-Markov and MSPA:a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(16):6785-6797.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202201050027.
[22]
成文青, 陶宇, 吴未, 等. 基于MSPA-连接度-空间句法的生态保护空间及优先级识别:以苏锡常地区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(5):1789-1798.
CHENG W Q, TAO Y, WU W, et al. Priority evaluation of ecological protect areas based on MSPA,landscape connectivity,and spatial syntax methods in the Su-Xi-Chang Region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(5):1789-1798.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201901140109.
[23]
国家统计局农村社会经济调查司. 中国县域统计年鉴:2021-县市卷[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2022.
Department of Rural Socio-Economic Survey, National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China statistical yearbook(county-level)[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2022.
[24]
陈博, 赵立宁, 董四君. 白洋淀生态环境的演变[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2021, 51(9):1274-1286.
CHEN B, ZHAO L N, DONG S J. Evolution of the ecosystem in Baiyangdian Lake[J]. Scientia Sinica (Vitae), 2021, 51(9):1274-1286.DOI: 10.1360/SSV-2021-0306.
[25]
尹德超, 王旭清, 王雨山, 等. 近60年来白洋淀流域河川径流演变及湿地生态响应[J]. 湖泊科学, 2022, 34(6):2122-2133.
YIN D C, WANG X Q, WANG Y S, et al. Runoff evolution and wetland ecological response in Lake Baiyangdian basin in recent 60 years[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2022, 34(6):2122-2133.DOI:10.18307/2022.0624.
[26]
谷岩, 陈方方. 水适应性视角下的黄泛平原历史城镇空间营建研究[J]. 室内设计与装修, 2024(11):112-113.
GU Y, CHEN F F. Study on the spatial construction of historical towns in the Yellow River flood-plain from the perspective of water adaptability[J]. Interior Design Construction, 2024(11):112-113. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7374.2024.11.022.
[27]
赵磊, 吴文智, 李健, 等. 基于游客感知价值的生态旅游景区游客忠诚形成机制研究:以西溪国家湿地公园为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(19):7135-7147.
ZHAO L, WU W Z, LI J, et al. The formation mechanism of tourist loyalty in ecotourism scenic spots from the perspective of tourist perceived value:evidence from Xixi National Wetland Park[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(19):7135-7147.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201707291366.
[28]
吴健, 于元赫, 龚亚珍, 等. 湿地保护、生态旅游与农民增收:以云南拉市海湿地为例[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(7):2663-2675.
WU J, YU Y H, GONG Y Z, et al. Wetland conservation,ecotourism and farmers’ income:a case study of Lashihai wetland in Yunnan,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(7):2663-2675.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202201100080.
[29]
曾瑜皙, 钟林生, 王灵恩. 1970—2020年三江源地区景观格局演变及其对生态旅游发展的启示[J]. 资源与生态学报(英文), 2023, 14(2):230-238.
ZENG Y X, ZHONG L S, WANG L E. Changes in the landscape pattern in Sanjiangyuan during 1970—2020 and implications for ecotourism development[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2023, 14(2):230-238.DOI:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.02.002.
[30]
顾虹, 苏胜昔. 白洋淀湿地保护与旅游可持续发展的关系探讨[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(6):3456-3457.
GU H, SU S X. Discussion on the relationship between wetland protection of Baiyangdian and sustainable development of its tourism[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(6):3456-3457.DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2011.06.057.
[31]
王瑾, 张玉钧, 石玲. 可持续生计目标下的生态旅游发展模式:以河北白洋淀湿地自然保护区王家寨社区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(9):2388-2400.
WANG J, ZHANG Y J, SHI L. Evaluation index system of sustainable livelihoods ecotourism strategy:a case study of Wangjiazhai Community in Baiyangdian Wetland Nature Reserve,Hebei[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(9):2388-2400.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201210271490.
PDF(23052 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/