 PDF(33421 KB)
						
							PDF(33421 KB) 
						
						
					 
			A comparison of fruit quality of ten high-anthocyanin blueberry cultivars
ZHAO Fengyi, FAN Sufan, ZHAO Huifang, LIU Hongxia, LYU Lianfei, WU Wenlong, WU Yaqiong, LI Weilin
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 63-72.
 PDF(33421 KB)
						
							PDF(33421 KB) 
						
						
					 PDF(33421 KB)
						
							PDF(33421 KB) 
						
						
					A comparison of fruit quality of ten high-anthocyanin blueberry cultivars
【Objective】Blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) have garnered significant attention in recent years due to their rich content of bioactive compounds, particularly anthocyanins, which exhibit a wide range of physiological functions, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and lipid-lowering effects. These functional properties make blueberries a valuable fruit for both dietary consumption and potential therapeutic applications. However, significant variations exist in fruit quality and functional component profiles among different blueberry cultivars. Understanding these variations is crucial for the selection of breeding parents, the development of functional food products, and the optimization of post-harvest processing techniques. This study aims to systematically compare the fruit quality characteristics and functional component profiles of ten high-anthocyanin blueberry cultivars, providing a scientific basis for the selection of fresh-eating varieties, the development of functional products, and the identification of superior breeding materials. 【Method】Ten high-anthocyanin blueberry cultivars, including southern highbush, northern highbush, and rabbiteye cultivars, were selected for this study. The fruits were harvested from the experimental blueberry orchard at the Nanjing Lishui Research Base of the Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, during the period from May to July in 2024. The study focused on evaluating the external characteristics (color, fruit diameter, fruit weight and firmness), nutritional components (soluble solids content, total acid content and solid-acid ratio), and functional components (polyphenols, anthocyanins, flavonoids and ellagic acid) of both whole fruits and fruit peels. The content of these components was measured using standardized methods, and correlation and cluster analyses were conducted to comprehensively evaluate the fruit quality. The study aimed to identify the key factors influencing the functional and nutritional properties of blueberries and to determine the relationships between these factors.【Result】Among all the measured indicators, the coefficient of variation for anthocyanin content was the highest (27.16%), followed by total acid content (26.61%), while the variation in soluble solid content was the lowest (2.84%). In terms of functional components, cultivars such as ‘Centurion’, ‘Elliott’, ‘Gardenblue’, ‘Zhaixuan No.4’, and ‘Lanmei No.1’ exhibited higher anthocyanin content. Specifically, ‘Centurion’ had the highest anthocyanin content in the whole fruit (3.09 mg/g), while ‘Elliott’ showed the highest anthocyanin content in the peel (41.92 mg/g). Polyphenol, flavonoid, and ellagic acid contents were significantly positively correlated with anthocyanin content, indicating a close relationship among these functional components. Additionally, the peel mass fraction was positively correlated with the content of functional components, suggesting that thicker peels are associated with higher levels of bioactive compounds. In terms of external fruit characteristics, ‘Brigitta’ had the largest single fruit weight (2.42 g), followed by ‘Brightwell’ and ‘Centurion’. ‘Lanmei No.1’ exhibited the most rounded fruit shape, while ‘Elliott’ had the flattest shape. Cultivars with more abundant fruit wax, such as ‘Bluecrop’, ‘Brigitta’ and ‘Brightwell’, showed higher fruit firmness and better storage performance. The analysis of the soluble solids-to-acid ratio (SSR) revealed that cultivars like ‘Zhaixuan No.4’, ‘Brightwell’, ‘Bluecrop’ and ‘Gardenblue’ had SSR values above 20, indicating a sweeter taste and making them more suitable for fresh consumption.【Conclusion】Among the ten cultivars studied, ‘Centurion’, ‘Elliott’, ‘Gardenblue’, ‘Homebell’ and ‘Zhaixuan No.4’ exhibited high levels of functional components, particularly anthocyanins, making them ideal candidates for the extraction of bioactive compounds and as breeding parents for high-nutrition and health-promoting blueberry varieties. On the other hand, cultivars such as ‘Bluecrop’, ‘Brigitta’ and ‘Brightwell’, with their higher SSR values and superior external qualities, are more suitable for the fresh fruit market. The study also highlighted that thicker peels are associated with higher functional component content, suggesting that cultivars with thicker peels are more suitable for processing and the extraction of bioactive compounds. Furthermore, cultivars with more abundant fruit wax demonstrated better storage performance, providing new insights for post-harvest preservation technologies in blueberries. This study systematically compared the fruit quality of ten high-anthocyanin blueberry cultivars in the Nanjing region, revealing significant differences in functional component content and external characteristics among the cultivars. The findings provide a scientific basis for blueberry breeding and processing, particularly for the selection of high-anthocyanin cultivars and the development of functional products.
 
						
							blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) / fruit quality / anthocyanins / functional components / fresh fruit
| [1] | 张志东, 李亚东, 吴林,  等. 适宜高寒山区栽培的越橘优良品种:美登[J]. 园艺学报, 1999, 26(2):135. | 
| [2] | 赵俸艺, 闾连飞, 黄正金,  等. “粉蓝” 等3个兔眼蓝莓在南京的引种表现[J]. 现代园艺, 2022(1):52-53. | 
| [3] | 吴文龙, 赵慧芳, 方亮,  等. 南京地区蓝莓品种(系)果实品质分析与评价[J]. 经济林研究, 2013, 31(4):87-92. | 
| [4] |  | 
| [5] |  | 
| [6] |  | 
| [7] | 薛宏坤, 谭佳琪, 刘钗,  等. 蓝莓果渣花色苷提取工艺优化及其提取物的抗肿瘤活性[J]. 精细化工, 2019, 36(9):1881-1890. | 
| [8] |  | 
| [9] | 李梓旋, 郭佳婧, 苏东林,  等. 蓝莓花色苷生理活性、提取纯化及稳态化研究进展[J]. 中国食品学报, 2024, 24(2):407-417. | 
| [10] |  | 
| [11] |  | 
| [12] | 刘笑宏, 李公存, 沙玉芬,  等. 不同品种蓝莓花色苷及其抗氧化活性分析[J]. 中国酿造, 2020, 39(2):120-124. | 
| [13] | 赵俸艺, 杜兰兰, 王佳鸾,  等. 南京地区5个青梅品种果实品质的调查与分析[J]. 中国南方果树, 2022, 51(4):151-155,160. | 
| [14] |  | 
| [15] |  | 
| [16] |  | 
| [17] | 周剑忠, 单成俊, 刘小莉,  等. 鲜食蓝莓冷藏保鲜技术规程: DB32/T 2266-2012[S]. 江苏: 江苏省质量技术监督局,2012年. | 
| [18] | 杨海燕, 姚蓓, 董珊珊,  等. 南京地区北高丛蓝莓果实的品质分析与比较研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(2):106-109,113. | 
| [19] | 赵慧芳, 吴文龙, 黄正金,  等. 34个蓝莓品种果实品质评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2023, 32(4):44-53,72. | 
| [20] | 徐艺格, 王兴东, 刘有春,  等. 蓝莓产业现状及技术发展趋势分析与展望[J]. 北方园艺, 2024(8):130-136. | 
| [21] | 张长青, 王倩, 黄正金,  等. 江苏省蓝莓产业发展现状与展望[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(18):155-160. | 
| [22] | 刘佳鑫, 伍婷婷, 魏文文,  等. 蓝莓花青素提取与分离研究进展[J]. 农产品加工, 2024(9):95-98. | 
| [23] | 朱金艳, 王月华, 张建丽. 不同品种蓝莓果的营养成分及花色苷种类研究[J]. 新农业, 2016(9):10-14.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4298.2016.09.003. | 
| [24] | 田密霞, 胡文忠, 李亚东,  等. 不同品种蓝莓花色苷稳定性的比较研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2015, 36(13):60-65,71. | 
| [25] | 姚蓓, 赵慧芳, 吴文龙,  等. 不同品种蓝莓花色苷色素稳定性的比较[J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(11):142-147. | 
| [26] | AGREDANO-DE LA GARZA C S,  | 
| [27] | 郜海燕, 杨帅, 陈杭君,  等. 蓝莓外表皮蜡质及其对果实软化的影响[J]. 中国食品学报, 2014, 14(2):102-108. | 
/
| 〈 |  | 〉 |