PDF(2099 KB)
Effects of simulated sulfuric acid rain on root physiological characteristics of Chinese fir seedlings under the condition of nitrogen deposition
ZHOU Yuexiang, WANG Yuhao, ZHANG Jinchi, CAI Qi, LIAO Yi, XUE Rengui, LIU Xin
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3) : 45-53.
PDF(2099 KB)
PDF(2099 KB)
Effects of simulated sulfuric acid rain on root physiological characteristics of Chinese fir seedlings under the condition of nitrogen deposition
【Objective】This study aims to elucidate the effects of sulfuric acid rain acidity on the physiological characteristics of Cunninghamia lanceolata (Chinese fir) seedling roots under nitrogen deposition, providing a theoretical basis for the sustainable management of Chinese fir plantations in acid-nitrogen deposition area.【Method】A pot experiment was conducted using one-year-old Chinese fir seedlings to simulate different levels of nitrogen deposition (no nitrogen addition (N0), low nitrogen addition at 5 g/(m2·a) (N1), and high nitrogen addition at 15 g/(m2·a) (N2))and acid rain (no acid addition (pH 7.0, S0), weak acid addition (pH 4.5, S1), and strong acid addition (pH 2.5, S2)). The experiment investigated the effects of these treatments on seedling root physiology and soil nutrient dynamics.【Result】Under no nitrogen treatment (N0), decreasing pH of sulfuric acid rain significantly reduced root activity and soluble protein content, while increasing root malondialdehyde (MDA) content, peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) activities, and root biomass. Similarly, under no acid rain treatment (S0), nitrogen addition significantly decreased soluble protein content, while root biomass increased with higher nitrogen addition. Low nitrogen addition (N1) had no significant effect on root activity, MDA content, or CAT activity, whereas high nitrogen addition (N2) significantly reduced root activity and increased MDA content and CAT activity. Under N1 and N2 treatments, root activity and soluble protein content were significantly lower in weak acid (S1) than in strong acid (S2) treatments. In the N1 treatment, sulfuric acid rain significantly increased root MDA content, POD, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities. Under the N2 treatment, decreasing pH of sulfuric acid rain gradually reduced root MDA content and SOD activity, while POD activity initially decreased and then increased. Additionally, both sulfuric acid rain and nitrogen addition reduced soil pH, with nitrogen addition significantly lowering soil pH under weak acid treatment but showing no significant effect under strong acid treatment. High nitrogen addition alone increased soil nitrate and ammonium nitrogen content (N${\mathrm{O}}_{3}^{-}$-N and N${\mathrm{H}}_{4}^{+}$-N). In the low nitrogen (N1) treatment, weak acid (S1) resulted in the highest soil N${\mathrm{O}}_{3}^{-}$-N content, significantly higher than strong acid (S2). Under high nitrogen (N2) treatment, sulfuric acid rain significantly reduced both nitrate and ammonium nitrogen content. In the no nitrogen (N0) treatment, sulfuric acid rain significantly decreased soil N${\mathrm{O}}_{3}^{-}$-N and available phosphorus content.【Conclusion】Sulfuric acid rain and nitrogen deposition exhibited significant interactive effects on the physiological characteristics of Chinese fir roots. Although the intensity of sulfuric acid rain in China has gradually decreased, the synergistic effect of mild acid rain and nitrogen deposition may still exacerbate soil acidification, reversing the beneficial impact of low nitrogen deposition on root physiology, reducing seedling root activity, and hindering the sustainable management of Chinese fir plantations.
sulfuric acid rain / nitrogen deposition / Cunninghamia lanceolata (Chinese fir) / root activity / soil nutrients
| [1] |
蔡朋程. 浅析中国的酸雨分布现状及其成因[J]. 科技资讯, 2018, 16(15):127-128.
|
| [2] |
徐仁扣, 李九玉, 周世伟, 等. 我国农田土壤酸化调控的科学问题与技术措施[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2):160-167.
|
| [3] |
2023年中国生态环境状况公报(摘录)[J]. 环境保护, 2024, 52(11):53-65.
China ecological environment status bulletin 2023(excerpt)[J]. Environmental Protection, 2024,52(11):53-65. DOI: 10.19864/j.cnki.jxye.2024.05.009.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
顾峰雪, 黄玫, 张远东, 等. 1961—2010年中国区域氮沉降时空格局模拟研究[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(12):3591-3600.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
孙佳慧, 史海兰, 陈科宇, 等. 植物细根功能性状的权衡关系研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8):1055-1070.
|
| [8] |
朱君琳, 侯瑞萍, 王云琦, 等. 重庆缙云山植物幼苗根系及土壤对酸雨的响应机制[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2023, 21(6):121-130.
|
| [9] |
杨凤, 刘安芳, 王云琦, 等. 酸雨对三峡库区4种植物幼苗光合生理及根际土壤的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2022, 42(2):280-292.
|
| [10] |
周思婕, 王平, 张敏, 等. 大气酸沉降对马尾松幼苗根系生理特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(4):111-118.
|
| [11] |
王涓, 边妍妍, 朱玉璘, 等. 氮添加和干旱对亚热带4种幼树生长的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2024, 32(4):475-482.
|
| [12] |
沙涛, 张玲卫, 刘会良, 等. 降水、氮沉降对尖喙牻牛儿苗隔代生理可塑性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(10):1753-1766.
|
| [13] |
朱乐洋, 张西哲, 陶江, 等. 氮沉降对土壤呼吸影响的研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(10):1-11.
|
| [14] |
李晓东, 苏连波, 王克勤, 等. 模拟氮沉降对云南中部亚高山华山松林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024, 44(5):38-47.
|
| [15] |
李沁宇, 刘鑫, 张金池. 长三角区域酸雨类型转变趋势研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1):168-174.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
盛炜彤. 关于我国人工林长期生产力的保持[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(1):1-14.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
任丽红, 索沛蘅, 唐楚珺, 等. 不同连栽代数杉木人工林土壤氮素季节变化特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(5):22-28,34.
|
| [20] |
裴昊斐, 高卫东, 方娇阳, 等. 模拟氮沉降对一年生香椿幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(10):1546-1552.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
郝建军, 康宗利, 于洋. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1978.
Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Physical and chemical analysis of soil[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1978.
|
| [27] |
丁咏, 刘鑫, 张金池, 等. 酸雨类型转变对杉木林地土壤和细根生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3):90-98.
|
| [28] |
赵英, 吴敏, 周兴文. 模拟酸雨胁迫对罗汉果幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2020, 49(3):62-66.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
王梅, 王智慧, 石孝均, 等. 长期不同施肥量对全程氨氧化细菌丰度的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(10):4727-4734.
|
| [32] |
杨仕明, 蔡乾坤, 刘文飞, 等. 杉木人工林土壤氮矿化对长期氮添加和季节的响应[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(5):945-952.
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
刘灵芝, 钟广蓉, 熊莲, 等. 过氧化氢酶的研究与应用新进展[J]. 化学与生物工程, 2009, 26(3):15-18.
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
李一凡, 王玉杰, 王彬, 等. 西南酸雨区重庆缙云山常绿阔叶林土壤氮矿化特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6):1-12.
|
| [41] |
王硕, 张进如, 姚晓东, 等. 亚热带常绿阔叶林根系生物量和形态特征对长期施氮的响应[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2025, 33(1):65-73.
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
麦志宏. 浅析酸雨对菜园土硝态氮淋失的影响[J]. 广东化工, 2023, 50(18):137-139.
|
| [44] |
沈凌, 丁贵杰, 李默然. 一二代马尾松林土壤养分特点及其对幼苗生长的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2012, 40(5):153-156.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |