PDF(2050 KB)
Characteristics of forest carbon storage in Jiangsu Province based on the 9th forest resources inventory data
Zhang Lijia, Ruan Honghua, Ni Jianzhong, Wang Guobing, Yang Yan, Zha Quanzhi, Xie Youchao
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 161-170.
PDF(2050 KB)
PDF(2050 KB)
Characteristics of forest carbon storage in Jiangsu Province based on the 9th forest resources inventory data
【Objective】By constructing a vegetation-soil whole-ecosystem carbon storage assessment system, the carbon sequestration capacity of the forest ecosystem in Jiangsu Province is systematically evaluated. The current status and existing issues of forest carbon storage in Jiangsu Province are revealed, providing a scientific basis for formulating effective forest resource management and carbon sink management policies.【Method】Based on the 9th National Forest Resource Inventory data of China (2014—2018), combined with field survey data of typical plots and relevant literature data, the continuous function estimation model of volume-biomass conversion factor was used to estimate the carbon storage and carbon density distribution of forest resources in Jiangsu Province. The distribution patterns of carbon storage among different dominant tree species, age classes, stand origins, and forest types were compared and analyzed. Carbon storage of understory shrub layer, herb layer, and litter layer was estimated based on the biomass density, carbon coefficient of each spatial layer in the ecosystem, as well as vegetation area. In addition, carbon storage of the one-meter-deep soil layer was estimated based on soil organic carbon content and bulk density at different soil depth.【Result】(1) The total vegetation carbon storage of different forest types in Jiangsu Province is 4.752 36×107 t,among which arbor forest accounts for 68.26% of the total carbon storage, with a carbon density of 25.49 t/hm2. Bamboo forest has the highest carbon density (35.75 t/hm2).(2) Among different dominant tree species, Populus spp. occupies the highest proportion, and its carbon storage accounts for 56.90% of the total. The carbon storage of arbor forests is dominated by young and middle-aged stands, with the order from high to low: middle-aged forests > young forests > near-mature forests > mature forests > over-mature forests. Carbon density shows a trend of increasing with stand age.(3) In terms of different origins, the carbon storage of planted forests is much higher than that of natural secondary forests. Planted forests account for 96.41% of the total carbon storage, reaching 3.127 06×107 t.(4) The order of carbon density among different forest types is: timber forests > protective forests > special-purpose forests > non-timber forests, and the order of carbon storage was consistent with this. Timber forests account for 66.50%.(5) From the perspective of the ecosystem, the total carbon storage of the forest ecosystem is 2.080 4×108 t. The order of spatial distribution of carbon storage in the forest ecosystem is: soil layer > arbor layer > shrub layer > herb layer > litter layer. The carbon storage of the soil layer is 1.588 8×108 t, accounting for 76.37% of the total forest ecosystem carbon storage, followed by the arbor layer(16.16%).【Conclusion】Jiangsu Province demonstrates a substantial growth trend in its forest carbon sequestration. The ratio of aboveground forest carbon storage to underground soil carbon storage is approximately 3∶7. Compared to the national average, the forest carbon density in Jiangsu Province is relatively low, with planted forests as the main type, an excessively high proportion of Populus spp. area, and young and middle-aged stands as dominant forest types. The results provide a data reference for improving the carbon sequestration capacity per unit area of forests, which is conducive to the protection and sustainable development of forest resources—especially the protection of understory shrubs, herbs, and litter layers to increase soil carbon storage and to construct a reasonable forest management model.
carbon storage / carbon density / forest carbon sink / poplar plantation / forest ecosystem / soil layer
| [1] |
刘世荣, 王晖, 李海奎, 等. 碳中和目标下中国森林碳储量、碳汇变化预估与潜力提升途径[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(4): 157-172.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
李伟, 张翠萍, 李士美. 基于第8次森林资源清查数据的广西森林碳储量特征研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2017, 37(3): 127-133.
|
| [5] |
王会荣, 李爱琴, 王晶晶, 等. 基于第8次森林资源清查数据的安徽森林碳储量特征研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(7): 78-86.
|
| [6] |
涂宏涛, 周红斌, 马国强, 等. 基于第九次森林资源清查的云南森林碳储量特征研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(3): 185-193.
|
| [7] |
王磊, 丁晶晶, 季永华, 等. 江苏省森林碳储量动态变化及其经济价值评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(2): 1-5.
|
| [8] |
贾松伟. 基于森林资源清查资料的河南省森林碳储量及其经济价值研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016, 55(6): 1612-1616.
|
| [9] |
杨加猛, 杜丽永, 蔡志坚, 等. 江苏省森林碳储量的区域分布研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(7): 84-89.
|
| [10] |
徐钊, 曹国华, 李思刚, 等. 江苏省森林植被碳储量分布结构及变化特征[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(2): 69-75+91.
|
| [11] |
聂昊, 王绍强, 周蕾, 等. 基于森林清查资料的江西和浙江森林植被固碳潜力[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(10): 2581-2588.
|
| [12] |
林虹, 马旭, 何再华, 等. 江苏省森林生态系统碳汇现状研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(1): 89-97..
|
| [13] |
赵栋. 江苏省森林生态系统碳储量及碳密度研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2014.
|
| [14] |
郑刚, 戎慧, 程小义, 等. 基于森林资源连续清查的江苏省森林资源动态变化分析[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2017, 44(2): 43-47.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
曾伟生. 云南省森林生物量与生产力研究[J]. 中南林业调查规划, 2005, 24(4):1-3,13.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
田勇燕, 秦飞, 关庆伟. 江苏徐州市果树经济林的碳储量估算[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2014, 30(5): 50-52.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
刘成杰. 基于典型样地的山东省森林碳储量及碳密度研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014.
|
| [22] |
GB/T 43648-2024.主要树种立木生物量模型与碳计量参数[S].
GB/T 43648-2024. Tree biomass models and related parameters to carbon accounting for major tree species[S].
|
| [23] |
田勇燕, 秦飞, 言华, 等. 我国常见木本植物的含碳率[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(26): 16166-16169.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
陈俊华, 刘威君, 蒋川东, 等. 川中丘陵区人工柏木林生物量模型及碳计量参数[J]. 四川林业科技, 2023, 44(6): 32-39.
|
| [26] |
樊星, 田大伦, 樊巍, 等. 黄淮海平原主要农林复合树种的含碳率研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(6): 85-87,93.
|
| [27] |
吴国训, 唐学君, 阮宏华, 等. 基于森林资源清查的江西省森林碳储量及固碳潜力研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(1): 105-110.
|
| [28] |
郭琦, 王新杰. 不同混交模式杉木人工林林下植被生物量与土壤物理性质研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(5): 70-74.
|
| [29] |
温卫华. 不同起源毛竹林生态系统生物量与碳储量研究[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2016.
|
| [30] |
戴巍, 赵科理, 高智群, 等. 典型亚热带森林生态系统碳密度及储量空间变异特征[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(22): 7528-7538.
|
| [31] |
肖君. 福州市主要森林类型林下灌木层生物量和碳密度研究[J]. 林业勘察设计, 2023, 43(1): 1-4.
|
| [32] |
王昭生. 1982-2020年NDVI数据驱动随机森林模型模拟中国森林凋落物碳密度的研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2023, 38(6):1381-1389.
|
| [33] |
王深华, 江军, 刘丰彩, 等. 中国成熟天然林土壤有机碳垂直分异特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2371-2377.
|
| [34] |
樊子豪, 崔鸿侠, 沈琛琛, 等. 神农架林区天然次生林土壤有机碳分布及影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(16): 7130-7139.
|
| [35] |
于法展, 陈龙乾, 沈正平, 等. 苏北低山丘陵区典型性森林土壤有机碳空间分布特征[J]. 测绘科学, 2013, 38(6): 52-54,42.
|
| [36] |
刘曦乔, 梁萌杰, 陈龙池, 等. 湖南省森林生态系统碳储量、碳密度及其空间分布[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(9): 2385-2393.
|
| [37] |
周纯亮, 吴明, 刘满强, 等. 中亚热带3种人工林土壤有机碳含量与碳密度的动态变化[J]. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(3): 568-572.
|
| [38] |
王大鹏, 王文斌, 郑亮, 等. 中国主要人工林土壤有机碳的比较[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(4): 698-704.
|
| [39] |
高述超, 陈毅青, 陈宗铸, 等. 海南岛森林生态系统碳储量及其空间分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(9): 3558-3570.
|
| [40] |
贾黎明, 刘诗琦, 祝令辉, 等. 我国杨树林的碳储量和碳密度[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(2): 1-7.
|
| [41] |
张青青, 张桂莲, 伍海兵, 等. 上海市林地土壤有机碳分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(6): 1087-1095.
|
| [42] |
袁在翔, 金雪梅, 翟凯燕, 等. 常见绿化树种对土壤碳氮垂直分布及有机碳储量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(3): 153-158.
|
| [43] |
敖贵艳, 刘强, 吴伟光, 等. 基于CiteSpace的全球竹林碳汇研究回顾及展望[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(4): 861-870.
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
刘磊, 贾炜玮, 张小勇, 等. 北方森林乔木层碳储量的估计及空间分析[J]. 森林工程, 2024, 40(4):137-149.
|
| [47] |
张煜星, 王雪军, 蒲莹, 等. 1949-2018年中国森林资源碳储量变化研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(5): 1-14.
|
| [48] |
康义, 辛学兵, 裴顺祥, 等. 华北落叶松人工林林下物种多样性特征研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2025, 40(1): 23-31, 82.
|
| [49] |
李奇, 朱建华, 冯源, 等. 中国森林乔木林碳储量及其固碳潜力预测[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2018, 14(3): 287-294.
|
| [50] |
刘领, 王艳芳, 悦飞雪, 等. 基于森林清查资料的河南省森林植被碳储量动态变化[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(3): 864-873.
|
| [51] |
杨立青, 刘帅, 吴诗婷, 等. 林下蚯蚓养殖对杨树人工林土壤有机碳含量和组成的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2026, 42(3): 405-411.
|
| [52] |
郑辉杰, 彭翔, 李涛, 等. 滨海盐碱地典型人工林土壤有机碳分布特征与关键影响因素研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2025[2026-04-07]. https://doi.org/10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2025.0129.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |