Research progress in Stress Responses of Ulmus pumila

ZHU Jianfeng, GAO Yi, ZOU Rongsong, ZHANG Huilong, LUO Qinghong, LUO Zhibin

Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition） ›› 0

PDF(627 KB)
南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）
PDF(627 KB)
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition） ›› 0 DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202508003

Research progress in Stress Responses of Ulmus pumila

  • ZHU Jianfeng1,2,3, GAO Yi1,2,3, ZOU Rongsong1,2,3, ZHANG Huilong1,2,3, LUO Qinghong4, LUO Zhibin1,2,3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Ulmus pumila, characterized by its high adaptability, is a crucial afforestation tree species in China’s Three-North and northern coastal regions, possessing significant ecological and economic value. Abiotic and biotic stresses are major factors limiting ecological and economic values of this species. In China, long-term breeding programs for resistant elite varieties of U. pumila have established an important genetic foundation and provided key materials for research on the tolerance to stressors in this species. This review systematically summarizes the research progress in tolerance of U. pumila on various stresses, focusing on the foundation of resistance breeding as well as the adaptative mechanisms to both abiotic and biotic stresses, highlighting the breeding achievements and the multi-level regulatory strategies of this species in adaptation to stresses. Previous studies have indicated that U. pumila mitigates damages caused by abiotic stresses including drought and salinity through reductions in xylem hydraulic conductivity, regulation of ion compartmentalization, activation of ABA signaling pathways, and upregulation of stress-responsive genes such as HXK1 and DREB1, thereby maintaining water use efficiency, ion homeostasis, and carbon metabolism. Under biotic stresses, resistance to insects of U. pumila is enhanced through increased trichome density and cuticular wax thickness, the accumulation of phenolic compounds, the activation of jasmonic acid signaling, and the emission of volatile compounds. Moreover, resistance to diseases of U. pumila is improved by reducing vessel diameter, accumulating starch, cellulose and lignin, and inducing the production of H2O2. These results have provided theoretical guidance for traditional resistance breeding of U. pumila and indicated a transition toward precision molecular breeding for this species. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance of U. pumila to abiotic and biotic stresses are not completely understood, and the effective integration between the resistance mechanism research and the breeding practice is lacking. Future studies should build upon existing germplasm resources and breeding foundations to further clarify the genetic characteristics of key traits in resistance, promote the integration of the resistance mechanism research and breeding applications, and advance the functional characterization of key genes involved in resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses and the establishment of genetic transformation systems, thereby providing theoretical support and technical bases for genetic improvement and molecular breeding of U. pumila.

Key words

Ulmus pumila / abiotic stress / biotic stress / stress tolerance

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
ZHU Jianfeng, GAO Yi, ZOU Rongsong, ZHANG Huilong, LUO Qinghong, LUO Zhibin. Research progress in Stress Responses of Ulmus pumila[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition）. 0 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202508003

References

[1] 韩淑敏,闫伟,杨雪栋,等. 白榆在我国的潜在分布格局及未来变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,47(03): 103-110. DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202110031.
HAN S M,YAN W,YANG X D, et al.Potential distribution patterns and future changes of Ulmus pumila in China based on the MaxEnt model[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed),2023,47(03): 103-110.
[2] 蔺鑫,李想,王安宁,等. 冀东滨海盐碱地造林密度对白榆生长和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报,2018,33(05): 66-74. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.05.10.
LIN X,LI X,WANG A N, et al.Effects of planting densities on the growth and soil physico-chemical properties of Ulmus pumila in seashore saline-alkali land of Jidong[J]. J Northwest For Univ,2018,33(05): 66-74.
[3] 朱建峰,乔来秋,张华新. 白榆研究利用现状及我国白榆良种化探讨与展望[J]. 世界林业研究,2016,29(03):46-51. DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2016.0020.y.
ZHU J F,QIAO L Q,ZHANG H X.Research and utilization of Ulmus pumila and discussion and prospect on its variety improvement in China[J]. World For Res, 2016,29(03):46-51.
[4] 齐宏飞,阳小成. 植物抗逆性研究概述[J]. 安徽农业科学,2008,36(32): 13943-13946. DOI:10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2008.32.038.
QI H F,YANG X C.Review of the research on plant stress resistance[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci,2008,36(32): 13943-13946.
[5] ZHANG Y,XU J,LI R F, et al.Plants' response to abiotic stress: Mechanisms and strategies[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2023,24(13). DOI:10.3390/ijms241310915.
[6] 严锡林,肖国荣,朱宁华,等. 白榆地理变异模式及种源区划研究[J]. 湖南林业科技,1996,(04): 22-30+21.
YAN X L,XIAO G R,ZHU N H, et al. Geographical variation patterns and zonation of Ulmus pumila provenances[J]. Hunan For Sci & Technol,1996,(04): 22-30+21.
[7] 蔡玉成,王政琦,贾福琴. 白榆不同地理种源抗旱性的比较[J]. 甘肃林业科技,1988,(02): 6-11.
CAI Y C,WANG Z Q,JIA F Q.Drought-resistance comparison among Ulmus pumila geographical provenances[J]. J Gansu For Sci Technol,1988,(02): 6-11.
[8] 王娴贞,荆翠英. 白榆种源苗期试验[J]. 新疆林业,1983,(01): 17-20.
WANG X Z,JING C Y.Seedling-stage trial of Ulmus pumila provenances[J]. For Xinjiang,1983,(01): 17-20.
[9] 伍海芳. 白榆种源试验苗期阶段研究报告[J]. 青海农林科技,1983,(03): 46-56.
WU H F.Seedling-stage trial research report on Ulmus pumila provenances[J]. Sci Technol Qinghai Agric For,1983,(03): 46-56.
[10] 李书靖,周建文. 白榆种源试验幼林初期观察报告[J]. 甘肃林业科技,1984,(04): 1-7.
LI S J,ZHOU J W.Preliminary observation report on young stands in the Ulmus pumila provenance trial[J]. J Gansu For Sci Technol,1984,(04): 1-7.
[11] 张庆连,胡长华. 白榆良种造林初探[J]. 河南科技,1984,(06): 14-16.
ZHANG Q L,HU C H.A preliminary study on Ulmus pumila superior seeds for afforestation[J]. J Henan Sci Technol,1984,(06): 14-16.
[12] 王思恭,杜长坪,张葳,等. 白榆优良种源和家系配合选择[J]. 陕西林业科技,1991,(03): 6-12.
WANG S G,DU C P,ZHANG W, et al.The coordination selection of superior provenance and family of white elm[J]. Shaanxi For Sci Technol,1991,(03): 6-12.
[13] 茹桃勤,朱延林,董铁民,等. 白榆优良无性系65212对榆毛胸萤叶甲的抗虫性研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,1996,(04): 35-40. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.1996.04.006.
RU T Q,ZHU Y L,DONG T M, et al.Study on the resistance of Siberian elm clone 65212 to beetle[J]. J Beijing For Univ,1996,(04): 35-40.
[14] 杨志岩,阎中林,杨成超,等. 科间远缘杂交种—银白杨×白榆[J]. 辽宁林业科技,2006,(04): 18-20.
YANG Z Y,YAN Z L,YANG C C, et al.Intergeneric distant hybrid: Populus alba×Ulmus pumila[J]. Liaoning For Sci Technol,2006,(04): 18-20.
[15] 苏春莉,段姚,顾振瀛,等. 水分胁迫对闽楠幼苗生理及光合特性的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2022,42(06): 85-92. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2022.06.009.
SU C L,DUAN Y,GU Z Y, et al.Effects of water stress on the physiological and photosynthetic characteristics of Phoebe bournei seedlings[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol,2022,42(06): 85-92.
[16] 张涛. 水分胁迫对榆树和毛白杨生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 山西林业科技,2022,51(03): 26-28+40. DOI:10.19989/j.cnki.1007-726X.20220308.
ZHANG T. Effects of water stress on growth and physiological characteristics of Ulmus Pumila and Populus Tomentosa[J]. Shanxi For Sci Technol,2022,51(03): 26-28+40.
[17] 赵宇航,龚雪伟,宁秋蕊,等. 沿降水梯度白榆的枝叶性状可塑性与协同变异[J]. 应用生态学报,2023,34(02): 324-332. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202302.007.
ZHAO Y H,GONG X W,NING Q R, et al.Plasticity and coordination of branch and leaf traits in Ulmus pumila along a precipitation gradient[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol,2023,34(02): 324-332.
[18] 李吉跃,张建国. 北方主要造林树种耐旱机理及其分类模型的研究(Ⅰ)—苗木叶水势与土壤含水量的关系及分类[J]. 北京林业大学学报,1993,(03): 1-11. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.1993.03.001.
LI J Y,ZHANG J G.Studies on classification models and mechanisms of drought tolerance of chief afforestation species in the northern part of China(Ⅰ)—The classification of relationships between seedling leaf water potential and soil water content[J]. J Beijing For Univ,1993,(03): 1-11.
[19] 夏尚光,张金池,梁淑英. 水分胁迫下3种榆树幼苗生理变化与抗旱性的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,(03): 131-134.
XIA S G,ZHANG J C,LIANG S Y.Relationship between drought resistance and physiological change of three elm trees seedling under water stress[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed),2008,(03): 131-134.
[20] 韩蕊莲,侯庆春. 三种苗木在不同供水条件下生理适应性及耗水特性研究[J]. 西北植物学报,1996,(06): 88-91.
HAN R L,HOU Q C.Study on adaptability and water consumption properties of three species of nursery stocks in different water condition[J]. Acta Bot Boreal-Occiden Sin,1996,(06):88-91.
[21] 张硕新,申卫军,张远迎,等. 几个抗旱树种木质部栓塞脆弱性的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,1997,(02): 2-7.
ZHANG S X,SHEN W J,ZHANG Y Y, et al.The vulnerability of xylem embolism in twigs of some drought—resistent tree species[J]. J Northwest For Univ,1997,(02): 2-7.
[22] ZHANG X J,WU Z C,FAN S J, et al.Morphological, physiological, and transcriptional responses to drought stress in sensitive and tolerant elm (Ulmus pumila L.) varieties[J]. Forests,2025,16(1): 72. DOI:10.3390/f16010072.
[23] 张晓磊,史宝胜,刘冬云,等. 水分胁迫对中华金叶榆生理生化的影响[C]//张启翔. 2007年中国园艺学会观赏园艺专业委员会年会论文集. 北京: 中国林业出版社,2007: 486-490.
ZHANG X L,SHI B S,LIU D Y, et al.Effects of Water Stress on the Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Ulmus pumila ‘Zhonghua jinye’[C]//ZHANG Q X. Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the Chinese Society for Horticultural Science-Ornamental Horticulture Committee. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House,2007: 486-490.
[24] KOTAK S,LARKINDALE J,LEE U, et al.Complexity of the heat stress response in plants[J]. Curr Opin Plant Biol,2007,10(3): 310-316. DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.011.
[25] THOMASHOW M F.Plant cold acclimation: Freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms[J]. Annu Rev Plant Physiol,1999,50: 571-599. DOI:10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.571.
[26] 陈思琪,孙敬爽,麻文俊,等. 植物低温胁迫调控机制研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报,2022,38(17): 51-61.
CHEN S Q,SUN J S,MA W J.Regulation mechanism of low temperature stress on plants: Research progress[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull,2022,38(17): 51-61.
[27] 代波,黄印冉,曹书敏,等. 彩叶乔木树种“金叶榆”的抗寒性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2011,39(16): 9647-9649. DOI:10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2011.16.206.
DAI B,HUANG Y R,CAO S M, et al.Research on the resistance of the Ulmus pumila ‘Jinye’ to cold[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci,2011,39(16): 9647-9649.
[28] 王晶. 高寒干旱荒漠地区引种的观赏榆抗寒性研究[J]. 防护林科技,2018,(12): 9-12+53. DOI:10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2018.12.003.
WANG J. Cold resistance of several newly introduced ornamental Ulmus pumila in alpine and arid desert areas[J]. Prot For Sci Technol,2018,(12): 9-12+53.
[29] 刘栋,史宝胜,黄印冉. 金叶榆和白榆枝条抗寒性比较[J]. 上海农业学报,2011,27(03): 80-83.
LIU D,SHI B S,HUANG Y R.Comparison of cold resistance between golden leaf elm and Siberian elm[J]. Acta Agric Shanghai,2011,27(03): 80-83.
[30] ZHANG L Y,YANG C,WU Z C, et al.Comprehensive time-course transcriptome reveals the crucial biological pathways involved in the seasonal branch growth in Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila)[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2023,24(19): 14976. DOI:10.3390/ijms241914976.
[31] ZHOU C,Wu S J,Li C C, et al.Response mechanisms of woody plants to high-temperature stress[J]. Plants,2023,12(20): 3643. DOI:10.3390/plants12203643.
[32] 朱小虎,马兰菊. 不同温度下4种榆树种子发芽特征[J]. 防护林科技,2010,(06): 5-7. DOI:10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2010.06.018.
ZHU X H,MA L J.Influence of different temperature on seeds germination of 4 elm species[J]. Prot For Sci Technol,2010,(06): 5-7.
[33] 徐静平,徐振华,杜克久. 8种屋顶绿化木本植物的耐热性比较[J]. 中国农学通报,2011,27(06): 1-5.
XU J P,XU Z H,DU K J.Comparison of heat resistance of eight kinds of roof greening woody plant[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull,2011,27(06): 1-5.
[34] PARK G E,LEE D K,KIM K W, et al.Morphological characteristics and water-use efficiency of Siberian elm trees (Ulmus pumila L.) within arid regions of northeast Asia[J]. Forests,2016,7(11): 280. DOI:10.3390/f7110280.
[35] 韩磊,黄晓宇,韩永贵,等. 白榆冠层蒸腾及其对环境因子响应的边界线[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2019,47(12): 22-27. DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2019.12.004.
HAN L,HUANG X Y,HAN Y G, et al.Characteristics and boundary line analysis of canopy transpiration of Ulmus pumila to environmental driving factors[J]. J Northeast For Univ,2019,47(12): 22-27.
[36] CHO S,SER-ODDAMBA B,BATKHUU N-O, et al.Comparison of water use efficiency and biomass production in 10-year-old Populus sibirica and Ulmus pumila plantations in Lun soum, Mongolia[J]. For Sci Technol,2019,15(3): 147-58. DOI:10.1080/21580103.2019.1634646.
[37] YANG B,TANG J,YU Z H, et al.Light stress responses and prospects for engineering light stress tolerance in crop plants[J]. J Plant Growth Regul,2019,38(4): 1489-1506. DOI:10.1007/s00344-019-09951-8.
[38] 何炎红,郭连生,田有亮. 7种针阔叶树种不同光照强度下叶绿素荧光猝灭特征[J]. 林业科学,2006,(02): 27-31.
HE Y H,GUO L S,TIAN Y L.Chlorophyll fluorescence quenching characteristics of seven coniferous and broadleaved species in different light intensities[J]. Sci Silvae Sin,2006,(02): 27-31.
[39] KWON M Y,WOO S Y.Anatomical differences of Ulmus pumila seedlings under different water irrigation and light intensity[J]. For Sci Technol,2015,11(4): 228-30. DOI:10.1080/21580103.2015.1018964.
[40] 楚乐乐,罗成科,田蕾,等. 植物对碱胁迫适应机制的研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2019,20(04): 836-844. DOI:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20181129004.
CHU L L,LUO C K,TIAN L, et al.Research advance in plants' adaptation to alkali stress[J]. J Plant Genet Resour,2019,20(04): 836-844.
[41] 赵怀玉,林鸿宣. 植物响应盐碱胁迫的分子机制[J]. 土壤与作物,2020,9(02): 103-113. DOI:10.11689/j.issn.2095-3961.2020.02.001.
ZHAO H Y,LIN H X.Molecular mechanism of plants in responses to salt and alkali stress[J]. Soils Crops,2020,9(02): 103-113.
[42] ZHAO S S,ZHANG Q K,LIU M Y, et al.Regulation of plant responses to salt stress[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2021,22(9). DOI:10.3390/ijms22094609.
[43] 王伟伟,未敏,教忠意,等. 不同盐分立地对榆树生长及Na+、K+、Ca2+、Mg2+在体内分配的影响[J]. 江苏林业科技,2017,44(03): 1-4. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2017.03.001.
WANG W W,WEI M,JIAO Z Y, et al.Effects of different salt discrete locations on the growth and distribution of Na+ K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ in elm trees[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol,2017,44(03): 1-4.
[44] 苏丹,殷小琳,董智,等. 白榆无性系生长特性及离子分布对NaCl胁迫的响应[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2017,39(05): 48-57. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160279.
SU D,YIN X L,DONG Z, et al.Response in growth and ionic distribution of elm clones under NaCl stress[J]. J Beijing For Univ,2017,39(05): 48-57.
[45] MU D Y,DING C.Developing a salinity tolerance indicator for tree varieties at challenging sites and urban forests based on inferences of physiological responses: An example of Ulmus pumila[J]. Trees,2021,36(2): 1-15. DOI:10.1007/s00468-021-02232-6.
[46] 程丽芬. 盐胁迫对榆树生长及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 山西林业科技,2018,47(03): 31-33.
CHENG L F.Effect of salt stress on the growth and antioxidant enzyme activity of Ulmus Pumila L[J]. Shanxi For Sci Technol,2018,47(03): 31-33.
[47] 甘红豪,公帅,刘浩,等. 3种我国造林树种幼苗耐盐性评价及指标筛选[J]. 林业科学研究,2024,37(03): 156-168. DOI:10.12403/j.1001-1498.20230319.
GAN H H,GONG S,LIU H, et al.Comprehensive evaluation and index screening of salt tolerance for three afforestation specie seedlings in China[J]. For Res,2024,37(03): 156-168.
[48] 唐凌凌,教忠意. 榆树繁育技术及抗逆性研究进展[J]. 江苏林业科技,2016,43(06): 45-8. DOI:10.3936/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.06.012.
TANG L L,JIAO Z Y.Recent advances in the breeding technology and stress resistance of elm trees[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol,2016,43(06): 45-8.
[49] CHEN P F,LIU P,ZHANG Q F, et al.Gene coexpression network analysis indicates that HUB genes related to photosynthesis and starch synthesis modulate salt stress tolerance in Ulmus pumila[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2021,22(9): 4410-4410. DOI:10.3390/ijms22094410.
[50] 金微微,张会慧,滕志远,等. 盐碱互作胁迫对高丹草叶片叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(10): 2090-2098. DOI:10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0065.
JIN W W,ZHANG H H,TENG Z Y, et al.Effects of salt and alkali interaction stress on chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense[J]. Pratacultural Sci,2017,34(10): 2090-2098.
[51] WANG L X,FANG C,WANG K.Physiological responses of Leymus Chinensis to long-term salt, alkali and mixed salt-alkali stresses[J]. J Plant Nutr,2015,38(4): 526-540. DOI:10.1080/01904167.2014.937874.
[52] 郭成元,杨寿祥,刘杏林. 寿光滨海平原白榆耐碱力的研究[J]. 山东林业科技,1990,(03): 30-33.
GUO C Y,YANG S X,LIU X L.Research on alkali resistance of Ulmus pumila in Shouguang coastal plain[J]. J Shandong For Sci Technol,1990,(03): 30-33.
[53] 刘强,王庆成,王占武. 5种木本植物对NaHCO3胁迫的光合生理响应[J]. 植物研究,2014,34(06): 765-769.
LIU Q,WANG Q C,WANG Z W.Photosynthetic physiological responses of five woody plants to NaHCO3 stress[J]. Bull Bot Res,2014,34(06): 765-769.
[54] 郝艳玲. 盐碱胁迫对白榆幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学,2021.
HAO Y L.Effects of salt-alkali stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of Ulmus pumila seedlings[D]. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2021.
[55] 朱永琪,冯兰兰,赵子帆,等. 苔藓植物在重金属胁迫响应及污染监测方面的研究进展[J]. 生命科学,2024,36(12): 1552-1561. DOI:10.13376/j.cbls/2024183.
ZHU Y Q,FENG L L,ZHAO Z F.Research progress of bryophytes on heavy metal enrichment and stress response and pollution monitoring[J]. Chin Bull Life Sci,2024,36(12): 1552-1561.
[56] ĐUKIĆ M,ĐUNISIJEVIĆ-BOJOVIĆ D,SAMUILOV S.The influence of cadmium and lead on Ulmus pumila L. seed germination and early seedling growth[J]. Arch Biol Sci,2014,66(1): 253-259. DOI:10.2298/abs1401253d.
[57] 韩淑敏,杨立科,布和,等. 重金属镉及盐胁迫对白榆幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 森林工程,2022,38(06): 19-26. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2022.06.003.
HAN S M,YANG L K,BU H, et al.Effects of heavy metal Cd and salt stress on physiological characteristics of Ulmus pumila seedlings[J]. For Eng,2022,38(06): 19-26.
[58] 张永超. 白榆对铅、镉吸收累积特性及光合响应研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学,2010.
ZHANG Y C.Effect of Pb and Cr on the character of accumulation and photosynthetic of Ulmus pumila L[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University,2010.
[59] 苗秀莲,刘传栋,吕艳伟. 重金属镍对白榆(Ulmus pumila L.)种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 种子,2015,34(10): 4-7. DOI:10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2015.10.004.
MIAO X L,LIU C D,LÜ Y W.Effect of nickel on seed germination and seedling growth of Ulmus pumila L[J]. Seed,2015,34(10): 4-7.
[60] 韩建勋,张玉洋. 工业废气—SO2的大气污染与树木叶片中叶绿素含量的关系[J]. 黑龙江环境通报,2005,29(02): 54-55.
HAN J X,ZHANG Y Y.Industrial waste gas—SO2 atmospheric pollution and its relationship with chlorophyll content in tree leaves[J]. Heilongjiang Environ J,2005,29(02): 54-55.
[61] 韩梅梅,岳桦. 白榆和黒榆在哈尔滨不同环境下5个生理指标的比较[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2014,37(02): 53-57. DOI:10.13320/j.cnki.jauh.2014.0037.
HAN M M,YUE H.The comparison of five physiological indexes between Ulmus pumila L.and Ulmus davidiana var. mandshurica Skv. under different environment in Harbin[J]. J Agric Univ Hebei,2014,37(02): 53-57.
[62] 童贯和. SO2污染对树木叶片中可溶性糖及叶绿素含量的影响[J]. 淮北煤师院学报(自然科学版),2002,23(02): 55-57.
TONG G H.The impact of SO2 pollution upon the dissoluble sugar and the content of chlorophyll of lamina[J]. J Huaibei Norm Univ (Nat Sci),2002,23(02): 55-57.
[63] 赵永志,潘丽华,陈淑霞. 北方常见绿化树木对石油化工大气污染的抗性研究[J]. 黑龙江环境通报,2000,24(01): 77-78.
ZHAO Y Z,PAN L H,CHEN S X.Resistance of Common Northern Greening Trees to Petrochemical Air Pollution[J]. Heilongjiang Environ J,2000,24(01): 77-78.
[64] 张培,吴晶,余本渊,等. 我国榆树害虫发生及研究现状[J]. 江苏林业科技,2014,41(01): 46-49. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2014.01.013.
ZHANG P,WU J,YU B Y, et al.Occurrence and research status of elm pests in China[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol,2014,41(01): 46-49.
[65] 赵治军. 榆树常见虫害及其综合防治方法[J]. 黑龙江科技信息,2010,(03): 116.
ZHAO Z J.Common insect pests of elm and their integrated control methods[J]. Sci Technol Innov,2010,(03): 116.
[66] 罗晓雅. 白榆优良速生品种抗虫研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学,2016.
LUO X Y.Study on the fast-growing varieties of Ulmus pumila excellent clones[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology,2016.
[67] WEI H R,LI F L,ZHU Y L, et al.Some relationships between leaf structure and resistance to insects of elms[J]. For Ecosyst,1995,4(1): 17-26.
[68] 程彬,陈平,任立伟,等. 虫害诱导家榆挥发物的日释放节律分析[J]. 吉林林业科技,2015,44(02): 18-22. DOI:10.16115/j.cnki.issn.1005-7129.2015.02.006.
CHENG B,CHEN P,REN L W, et al.The diurnal release rhythm analysis of insect attack inducing Ulmus pumila volatile matter[J]. J Jilin For Sci Technol,2015,44(02): 18-22.
[69] 陈钦华,姜平,王永顺. 不同品种榆树抗榆蓝叶甲危害能力的研究[J]. 防护林科技,2010,(03): 18-20. DOI:10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2010.03.032.
CHEN Q H,JIANG P,WANG Y S.Harm protection ability of different varieties of Ulmus pumila for Pyrrhalta aenescens[J]. Prot For Sci Technol,2010,(03): 18-20.
[70] 黄智鸿,刘洋,史宝林,等. 榆树叶片虫瘿形成过程中茉莉酸含量及相关防御酶活性的变化[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2016,39(03): 42-48. DOI:10.13320/j.cnki.jauh.2016.0057.
HUANG Z H,LIU Y,SHI B L, et al.Activity changes of defense enzymes and jasmonic acid content during the galls formation in leaves of Ulmus pumila[J]. J Agric Univ Hebei,2016,39(03): 42-48.
[71] 李轩,黄智鸿. 榆瘿蚜对榆树叶片生理的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2019,47(10): 131-134. DOI:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2019.10.028.
LI X,HUANG Z H.Physiological effects of Tetraneura ulmi infestation on elm leaves[J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci,2019,47(10): 131-134.
[72] 李轩,黄智鸿. 榆树叶片形成虫瘿过程中转录组学分析[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学,2019,38(02): 737-746. DOI:10.13417/j.gab.038.000737.
LI X,HUANG Z H.Transcriptome analysis in the process of insect gall formation of elm leaves[J]. Genom Appl Biol,2019,38(02): 737-746.
[73] 于兰芳. 榆树常见蛀干害虫的发生与防治[J]. 现代农村科技,2015,(04): 21.
YU L F.The occurrence and control of common dry-boring pests in elm[J]. Mod Rural Sci Technol,2015,(04): 21.
[74] 贺治坤,王爱静,刘宏光,等. 白榆抗虫性及其抗性物质的初步研究[J]. 新疆农业科学,1999,(06): 283-284.
HE Z K,WANG A J,LIU H G, et al.A preliminary study of insect resistance and resistant substances in Ulmus pumila[J]. Xinjiang Agric Sci,1999,(06): 283-284.
[75] BONELLO P.Complex forest tree diseases-diagnostics beyond Koch's postulates[J]. Curr For Rep,2024,10(4): 273-280. DOI:10.1007/s40725-024-00220-w.
[76] VAINIO E J,RUMBOU A,DIEZ J J, et al.Forest tree virome as a source of tree diseases and biological control agents[J]. Curr For Rep,2024,10(3): 153-174. DOI:10.1007/s40725-024-00214-8.
[77] 叶建仁,吴小芹. 树木抗病的生理生化学研究进展[J]. 林业科学研究,1996,(03): 311-317. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.1996.03.016.
YE J R,WU X Q.Advances on the physiological and biochemical aspects of resistance to diseases in trees[J]. For Res,1996,(03): 311-317.
[78] 屈秋耘,贾艳梅,郭中华,等. 白榆干枯病发生规律的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,1999,(02): 45-50.
QU Q Y,JIA Y M,GUO Z H, et al.A study on occurrence regularity of Ulmus pumila withered disease[J]. J Northwest For Univ,1999,(02): 45-50.
[79] 王莉. 榆树种植价值及病虫害防治措施[J]. 种子科技,2021,39(13): 75-76. DOI:10.19904/j.cnki.cn14-1160/s.2021.13.035.
Wang L.The planting value of elm trees and pest control measures[J]. Seed Sci Technol,2021,39(13): 75-76.
[80] COPELAND C H,HARPER R W,BRAZEE N J, et al.A review of Dutch elm disease and new prospects for Ulmus americana in the urban environment[J]. Arboric J,2023,45(1): 3-29. DOI:10.1080/03071375.2022.2082177.
[81] 李晓飞. 榆树主要病害及防治技术[J]. 江西农业,2017,(13): 88. DOI:10.19394/j.cnki.issn1674-4179.2017.13.073.
LI X F.Main elm diseases and control techniques[J]. Jiangxi Agric,2017,(13): 88.
[82] 郭志臣,段银昌,李运成,等. 榆叶炭疽病及荷兰病的发生与防治[J]. 现代农村科技,2012,(09): 28-29.
GUO Z C,DUAN Y C,LI Y C, et al.Occurrence and control of elm anthracnose and Dutch disease[J]. Mod Rural Sci Technol,2012,(09): 28-29.
[83] 解彩霞,王淑清,王振军,等. 榆树溃疡病及其防治技术研究[J]. 林业科技通讯,1990,(10): 1-5. DOI:10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.1990.10.002.
XIE C X,WANG S Q,WANG Z J, et al.Research on elm canker disease and its control technology[J]. For Sci Technol,1990,(10): 1-5.
[84] 祝文博,刘建荣,王永,等. 榆树枯枝病病原菌的形态学鉴定[J]. 森林工程,2020,36(01): 19-24. DOI:10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2020.01.003.
ZHU W B,LIU J R,WANG Y.Morphological identification of the branch wilt pathogen of Ulmus pumila L. For Eng,2020,36(01): 19-24.
[85] 付爽. 榆树种植价值及病虫害防治措施[J]. 农技服务,2017,34(20): 63.
FU S.The planting value of elm trees and pest control measures[J]. Agric Technol Serv,2017,34(20): 63.
[86] ZALAPA J E, BRUNET J,GURIES R P.Genetic diversity and relationships among Dutch elm disease tolerant Ulmus pumila L. accessions from China[J]. Genome,2008,51(7): 492-500. DOI:10.1139/g08-034.
[87] MARTÍN J A,DOMÍNGUEZ J,SOLLA A, et al. Complexities underlying the breeding and deployment of Dutch elm disease resistant elms[J]. New For,2021,54(4): 661-696. DOI:10.1007/s11056-021-09865-y.
[88] SOLLA A,MARTÍN J A,CORRAL P, et al. Seasonal changes in wood formation of Ulmus pumila and U. minor and its relation with Dutch elm disease[J]. New phytol,2005,166(3): 1025-1034. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01384.x.
[89] MARTÍN J A,SOLLA A,COIMBRA M A, et al. Metabolic fingerprinting allows discrimination between Ulmus pumila and U. minor, and between U. minor clones of different susceptibility to Dutch elm disease[J]. For Pathol,2008,38(4): 244-256. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0329.2007.00542.x.
[90] DE RAFAE M A,VALLE T,BABIANO M J, et al. Correlation of resistance and H2O2 production in Ulmus pumila and Ulmus campestris cell suspension cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma novo‐ulmi[J]. Physiol Plant,2001,111(4): 512-518. DOI:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1110411.x.
[91] MARTÍN J A,WITZELL J,BLUMENSTEIN K, et al. Resistance to Dutch elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in elms (Ulmus spp.)[J]. PLoS One,2017,8(2): e56987. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0056987.
PDF(627 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

Author

Reader

Reviewer

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

/

〈 〉