Effects of shelf life on growth promotion and disease resistance of Bacillus velezensis YH-18 inoculant in peach seedlings

LIU Kuiying, SHI Huimin, TIAN Wenbai, YE Jianren

Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 0

PDF(887 KB)
PDF(887 KB)
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 0 DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202512011

Effects of shelf life on growth promotion and disease resistance of Bacillus velezensis YH-18 inoculant in peach seedlings

  • LIU Kuiying, SHI Huimin, TIAN Wenbai, YE Jianren*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 This study investigates the effects of shelf life on the quality , growth-promoting and disease-control efficacy of Bacillus velezensis YH-18 inoculant, aiming to provide a scientific basis for ensuring its effectiveness and for its popularization and application.【Method】YH-18 inoculants with different shelf lives ( 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 a ) were used as test materials. The viable counts of YH-18 inoculants and their antagonistic activity against pathogenic bacteria were determined by the dilution plating method and the plate confrontation method. The contents of K, Ga and Mg in the inoculants at different shelf lives were measured by flame emission spectrometry and atomic absorption spectrometry. The total sugar content of YH-18 inoculants at different shelf lives was determined by the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid method. In pot experiments, growth indices of peach seedlings, including plant height, ground diameter, chlorophyll content, and leaf area, were measured after treatment with inoculants of different shelf lives. The disease incidence, nodule number and diameter, disease index, and control efficacy were calculated.【Result】When the shelf life of YH-18 inoculant was 0.5 a and 1 a, the number of effective viable bacteria remained in the same order of magnitude as that of the initial inoculant. In contrast, the effective viable count of YH-18 inoculant with a shelf life of 1.5 a and 2 a decreased by one order of magnitude compared with that of the initial inoculant. In the plate confrontation assay, the antagonistic ability of inoculants stored for 1 a and beyond was significantly lower than that of the initial inoculant. The antagonistic ability of the bacterial suspension prepared from inoculants stored for 1.5 a and 2 a was also significantly lower than that of the initial inoculant. Furthermore, the sterile fermentation filtrate prepared from inoculants stored for 0.5 a and beyond completely lost its antagonistic activity. Shelf life had no significant effect on the contents of inorganic elements in the inoculant. However, the total sugar content of inoculants stored for 1 a and beyond was significantly lower than that of the initial inoculant. Pot experiments showed that YH-18 inoculants with different shelf lives all promoted increases in plant height, ground diameter, chlorophyll content, and leaf area of peach seedlings. The growth-promoting effect decreased with prolonged shelf life, but no significant difference was observed compared with the initial inoculant. The control efficacy against crown gall disease decreased with extended shelf life. Compared with the initial inoculant, the preventive efficacy of inoculants stored for 0.5 a and 1 a decreased to 53.33% and 46.67%, respectively, from 80.00% for the initial inoculant, respectively, indicating a relatively small reduction. In contrast, the preventive efficacy of inoculants stored for 1.5 a and 2 a dropped to 19.99% and 10.00%, respectively, from 80.00% for the initial inoculant.【Conclusion】The recommended shelf life of YH-18 inoculant is within 1 year, which can substantially maintain its growth-promoting and disease-control efficacy.

Key words

shelf life / Bacillus velezensis YH-18 / bacterial agent quality / crown gall disease / growth promotion and disease resistance

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Kuiying, SHI Huimin, TIAN Wenbai, YE Jianren. Effects of shelf life on growth promotion and disease resistance of Bacillus velezensis YH-18 inoculant in peach seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 0 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202512011

References

[1] 史梦雅,侯乾,李荣德,等.我国果树品种登记现状及发展建议[J].中国果树, 2025,(06):136-139. SHI M Y, HOU Q, LI R D, et al. Current situation and development suggestions for fruit tree variety registration in China[J]. China Fruits, 2025, (06):136-139. DOI:10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2025.06.021.
[2] 郑晓翠, 杨振锋, 许换平, 等. 我国桃品种登记现状探究[J]. 果树实用技术与信息, 2023,(12):47-48. ZHENG X C, YANG Z F, XU H P, et al. Investigation on the Current Status of Peach Variety Registration in China[J]. Practical Techniques and Information of Fruit Trees, 2023, (12):47-48.
[3] 罗维德, 杨金兰, 杨永启.桃树根癌病防治技术探讨[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2004, 24(3):13-17. LUO W D, YANG J L, YANG Y Q. Discussion on the Prevention and Control Techniques of Peach Tree Crown Gall Disease[J]. China Plant Protection Guide, 2004, 24(3):13-17.
[4] 赵丽君, 阿布都外力·木米尼, 曲艳华, 等. 山桃对根癌病的抗性评价[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2014, 19(06):148-154. ZHAO L J, MUMINI A, QU Y H, et al. Evaluation of Resistance of Peach to Crown Gall Disease[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2014, 19(06):148-154.
[5] Food and Agriculture Organization. The international code of conduct on pesticide management[R]. Rome: FAO, 2020.
[6] PRETTY J.Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, principles and evidence[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2008, 363(1491):447-465. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2007.2163.
[7] TILMAN D, CASSMAN K G, MATSON P A, et al.Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices[J]. Nature, 2002, 418(6898):671-677. DOI:10.1038/nature01014.
[8] EILENBERG J, HAJEK A E, LOMER C J.Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control[J]. BioControl, 2001, 46(4):387-400. DOI:10.1023/A:1014193329979.
[9] STENBERG J A, SUNDH I, BECHER P G, et al.When is it biological control? A framework of definitions, mechanisms, and classifications[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2021, 94(3):665-676. DOI:10.1007/s10340-021-01354-7.
[10] PIETERSE C M J, ZAMIOUDIS C, BERENDSEN R L, et al. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2014, 52:347-375. DOI:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340.
[11] BASHAN Y, de-BASHAN L, et al. Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: Formulations and practical perspectives(1998-2013)[J]. Plant and Soil, 2014, 378:1-33. DOI:10.1007/s11104-013-1956-x.
[12] GE M S, ZHOU H B, SHEN Y J, et al.Effect of aeration rates on enzymatic activity and bacterial community succession during cattle manure composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 304: 122928. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122928.
[13] 李俊州, 文才艺. 植物病害生防细菌研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(10):1-7. LI J Z, WEN C Y. Research Progress on Biological Control Bacteria of Plant Diseases[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences,2015,44(10):1-7. DOI:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2015.10.001.
[14] HERRMANN L, LESUEUR D.Challenges of formulation and quality of biofertilizers for successful inoculation[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 97(9):8859-8873. DOI:10.1007/s00253-013-5228-8.
[15] ELSAKHAWY T, GHAZI A, ABDEL-RAHMAN M A, et al. Developing liquid rhizobium inoculants with enhanced long-term survival, storage stability, and plant growth promotion using ectoine additive[J]. Current Microbiology, 2021, 78(10):282-291. DOI:10.1007/s00284-020-02265-z.
[16] KANISHKA S, GNANACHITRA M, KUMUTHA K, et al.Formulation breakthroughs: the key to tackling biofertilizer shelf life and quality challenges[J]. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 2025, 19(4):2470-2494. DOI:10.22207/JPAM.19.4.25.
[17] 梁玉婷, 任兴平, 李惠霞, 等. 生防芽孢杆菌种子处理剂WS20的研制及对甘蓝枯萎病的防治效果[J]. 农药学学报, 2024, 26(3):622-630. LIANG Y T, REN X P, LI H X, et al. Development of the Biological Control Bacillus Seed Treatment Agent WS20 and Its Control Effect on Cabbage Fusarium Wilt[J]. Journal of Pesticide Science, 2024, 26(3):622-630. DOI:10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2024.0059.
[18] 曹灏, 陈智磊, 李雪松,等. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌TCS001悬浮剂配方优化及对草莓炭疽病的防治效果[J]. 农药学学报, 2024, 26(5):911-921. CAO H, CHEN Z L, LI X S, et al. Optimization of the TCS001 Bacillus cereus Suspension Formulation and Its Control Effect on Strawberry Anthracnose[J]. Journal of Pesticide Science, 2024, 26(5):911-921. DOI:10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2024.0067.
[19] 赵国群, 胡伟, 白敬. 枯草芽孢杆菌KD03液态菌剂的保存方法研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022,(09):203-208. ZHAO G Q, HU W, BAI J. Study on the Preservation Methods of Bacillus subtilis KD03 Liquid Inoculant[J]. China Soils and Fertilizers, 2022, (09):203-208.
[20] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局、中国国家标准化管理委员会. 农用微生物菌剂: GB 20287-2006[S]. 2006. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China. Microbial Agents for Agricultural Use: GB 20287-2006[S]. 2006.
[21] 江明明. 几株优良内生菌的分离及鉴定[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2016. JIANG M M. Isolation and Identification of Several Excellent Endophytic Bacteria[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2016.
[22] 魏奇. 几株优良内生细菌在上海生态林上的应用研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2017. WEI Q. Research on the Application of Several Excellent Endophytic Bacteria in Shanghai Ecological Forests[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2017.
[23] 陆蓝翔. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌YH-18对植物根癌病的防控作用[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2022. LU L X. The Role of Bacillus velezensis YH-18 in the Prevention and Control of Plant Crown Gall Disease[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2022.
[24] 石慧敏,叶建仁,王焱,等. 响应面优化贝莱斯芽孢杆菌(Bacillus velezensis)菌株YH-18产芽孢培养基和培养条件[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 2023, 47(1):210-218. SHI H M, YE J R, WANG Y, et al. Response Surface Optimization of the Medium and Culture Conditions for Spore Production by Bacillus velezensis Strain YH-18[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 2023, 47(1):210-218. DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202111017.
[25] 龚军辉, 王晶. 稀释涂布平板法计数活菌的方法简介[J]. 生物学教学, 2018, 43(2):70-71. GONG J H, WANG J. Introduction to the Plate Count Method for Counting Viable Bacteria Using the Dilution and Coating Technique[J]. Biology Teaching, 2018, 43(2):70-71.
[26] BAUER A W, KIRBY W M, SHERRIS J C, et al.Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by a Standardized Single Disk Method[J]. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1966, 45(4):493-496. DOI:10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493.
[27] 武平, 赵文婧, 徐晓娇, 等. 测定葡萄酒中总糖方法的探讨[J]. 中国酿造, 2011,(01):163-165. WU P, ZHAO W J, XU X J, et al. Discussion on Methods for Determining Total Sugar in Wine[J]. China Brewing, 2011, (01):163-165.
[28] ZHENG Y, JIAO X Y, CHEN F, et al.Expiration Date Prediction of Biocontrol Agent Prepared with Bacillus subtilis B579 Using the Accelerated Aging Method[J]. Polish Journal of Microbiology, 2016, 65(4):461-464. DOI:10.5604/17331331.1227672.
[29] WELLER D M.Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1988, 26(1):379-407. DOI:10.1146/annurev.py.26.090188.002115.
[30] 杨然迪, 杨怡妍, 曹灏, 等. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌TCS001产脂肽类物质抑菌活性及发酵条件优化[J]. 农药学学报, 2024, 26(03):504-516. YANG R D, YANG Y Y, CAO H, et al. Antibacterial Activity of Lipopeptides Produced by Bacillus velezensis TCS001 and Optimization of Fermentation Conditions[J]. Journal of Pesticide Science, 2024, 26(03):504-516. DOI:10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2024.0041.
[31] 姚佳明, 田亚平. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌抑菌肽的分离鉴定及其抑菌谱表征[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(16):126-131. YAO J M, TIAN Y P. Isolation and Identification of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Antibacterial Peptides and Characterization of Their Antibacterial Spectrum[J]. Food Science, 2020, 41(16):126-131. DOI:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190505-020.
[32] MARC O, PHILIPPE J.Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol[J]. Trends in Microbiology, 2008, 16(3):115-125. DOI:10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009.
[33] ZHANG B, XU L L, DING J L, et al.Natural antimicrobial lipopeptides secreted by Bacillus spp. and their application in food preservation, a critical review[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2022, 127: 26-37. DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2022.06.009.
[34] XU S R, TAN P, TANG Q, et al.Enhancing the stability of antimicrobial peptides: From design strategies to applications[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 475:145923. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2023.145923.
[35] PRASAD D, MARTINS J, GEUDENS N, et al.Structural and dynamic insights into the loss of activity of tolaasin I, an antimicrobial cyclic lipopeptide[C]//XXIII GEM Meeting: Diving into the Secrets of Cellular Membranes. French Biophysics Society, 2025.
[36] YI Y, SHAN Y, LUAN P, et al.Nanoencapsulation enhances the antimicrobial and antioxidant stability of cyclic lipopeptides for controlling Fusarium graminearum[J]. Food Microbiology, 2024, 124: 104621. DOI:10.1016/j.fm.2024.104621.
[37] 赵卫松, 李社增, 鹿秀云, 等. 解淀粉芽胞杆菌PHODB35对小麦的促生作用及产量影响[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(3):399-406. ZHAO W S, LI S Z, LU X Y, et al. Growth-promotion Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PHODB35 on Wheat Plant and Yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2019, 35(3):399-406. DOI:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2019.03.011.
[38] VIANA T F C, GALEANO R M S, PAGGI G M, et al. Prospecting, identification, and effect of growth-promoting Bacillus isolates on cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. Ciência Rural, 2025, 55(11):e20240108. DOI:10.1590/0103-8478.
[39] KAUR J, PANDOVE G, KUMAR V, et al.Development, shelf stability, and in-vitro evaluation of liquid bacterial inoculant Acinetobacter lwoffii strain PAU_31LN[J]. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 2025, 65(4):e2400617. DOI:10.1002/jobm.202400617.
[40] POSADA-URIBE L F, ROMERO-TABAREZ M, VILLEGAS-ESCOBAR V. Effect of medium components and culture conditions in Bacillus subtilis EA-CB0575 spore production[J]. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2015, 38(10):1879-1888. DOI:10.1007/s00449-015-1428-1.
[41] TIBOCHA-BONILLA J D, LYDA J, RILEY E, et al. Deciphering metabolic differentiation during Bacillus subtilis sporulation[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16: 129. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-55586-z.
[42] ETESAMI H, JEONG B R, GLICK B R.Biocontrol of plant diseases by Bacillus Spp.[J]. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 2023, 126: 102048. DOI:10.1016/j.pmpp.2023.102048.
[43] 杨瑞教, 王涛, 张诺妮, 等. 一种提高贝莱斯芽孢杆菌液体菌剂货架期稳定性的方法: CN118909875A[P].2024-11-08.YANG R J, WANG T, ZHANG N N, et al. A method for improving shelf life stability of Bacillus velezensis liquid inoculant: CN118909875A[P]. 2024-11-08.
PDF(887 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/