Growth and physiological responses of four dwarf ornamental bamboo species under salt stress

Gu Hongyue, Zhou Rui, Tan Qin, Lin Shuyan, Yao Wenjing

Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 0

PDF(1562 KB)
PDF(1562 KB)
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 0 DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202512029

Growth and physiological responses of four dwarf ornamental bamboo species under salt stress

  • Gu Hongyue1,2,3, Zhou Rui1,2, Tan Qin1,2,3, Lin Shuyan1,2, Yao Wenjing1,2,*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Object】 We aim to screen out relatively salt-tolerant bamboo species by comprehensive evaluation on the salt tolerance of four dwarf ornamental bamboo species, enriching the theoretical basis of bamboo plants in salt tolerance and promoting the ecological application of relatively salt-tolerant bamboo species in coastal Tideland. 【Method】 The NaCl concentration gradients were set up as follows: CK (0‰), T1 (1.5‰), T2(3‰), T3 (4.5‰) and T4 (6‰). The morphological and physiological indexes of each bamboo species were observed and measured on the 4th, 8th, 16th, 24th and 60th days after gradient concentration of salt treatment. The growth indicators of new bamboos were also measured in the second year. The salt tolerance of four dwarf ornamental bamboos was comprehensively analyzed by both membership function method and principal component analysis method based on the above indexes. 【Result】 Under different salt stress, Indocalamus decorus and Shibataea chinensis displayed preferable morphological phenotype, and low concentration of salt stress had a certain effect on promoting the growth of shoots and new bamboos. In addition, Indocalamus decorus and Shibataea chinensis could maintain relatively high antioxidant enzyme activity and osmotic regulation ability under low and medium salt stress. The salt tolerance of four dwarf ornamental bamboo species based on membership function values, from strong to weak, is as follows: Indocalamus decorus> Shibataea chinensis>Pleioblastus argenteostriata>Pleioblastus fortune. The result of principal component analysis is Shibataea chinensis > Indocalamus decorus>Pleioblastus fortunei>Pleioblastus argenteostriata. 【Conclusion】 The evaluation results of membership function method and principal component analysis showed a consistent overall trend in the salt tolerance of the four dwarf ornamental bamboo species. Indocalamus decorus and Shibataea chinensis were rated as relatively salt-tolerant, whereas Pleioblastus argenteostriata and Pleioblastus fortunei were assessed as salt-sensitive.

Key words

dwarf ornamental bamboo / salt stress / growth indicators / physiological indexes / membership function method / principal component analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
Gu Hongyue, Zhou Rui, Tan Qin, Lin Shuyan, Yao Wenjing. Growth and physiological responses of four dwarf ornamental bamboo species under salt stress[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 0 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202512029

References

[1] 国务院第三次全国国土调查领导小组办公室,自然资源部,国家统计局.第三次全国国土调查主要数据公报[J].自然资源通讯,2021(17):7-8. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9654.2021.17.004.
[2] 华建峰, 汤诗杰. 关于江苏滨海盐碱地植物生态修复与固碳增汇协同增效的思考与建议[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(12):233-235. HUA J F, TANG S J. The Coordinated Development of Plant Ecological Restoration and Carbon Sequestration in Coastal Saline-alkali Land of Jiangsu Province: Thoughts and Suggestions[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(12):233-235. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2024.12.049.
[3] 丁雨龙, 林树燕, 魏强, 等. 竹子发育生物学研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(06):23-40. DING Y L, LIN S Y, WEI Q, et al. Advances in developmental biology of bamboos[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46(6): 23-40. DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.2022208067.
[4] 郝继祥, 邹荣松, 张华新, 等. 竹类植物在黄河三角洲盐碱地生态修复中的应用进展[J].世界竹藤通讯, 2021, 19(03):79-83. HAO J X, ZOU R S, ZHANG H X, et al. Application of Bamboo in Ecological Restoration of Saline-alkali Land in the Yellow River Delta. World Bamboo and Rattan, 2021, 19(03):79-83. DOI:10.12168 / sjzttx.2021.03.014.
[5] KOTANGALE P, AGASHE A, SAWARKAR R, et al.Unlocking the hidden power of bamboo rhizomes: A comprehensive review of their role in nutrient storage, water retention, and plant growth[J]. Advances in Bamboo Science, 2025, 10, 100122. DOI:10.1016/j.bamboo.2025.100122.
[6] 林树燕, 张涵姣, 杨青, 等. “以竹代塑”发展优势与竹资源高效培育面临的挑战[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 49(4): 1-11. LIN S Y, ZHANG H J, YANG Q, et al. The development advantages of “Bamboo as a substitute for plastic” and the challenges faced in the efficient cultivation of bamboo resources[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2025, 49(4): 1-11 DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.2022208067.
[7] 陈松河, 黄全能, 马丽娟, 等. NaCl胁迫对竹类植物形态和生长活力的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(03): 84-87. CHEN S H, HUANG Q Q, MA L J, et al. Effect of NaCl stress on morphology and growth potential of five bamboo species[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2013, 28(03): 84-87. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.03.15.
[8] 龙智慧. 鼓节竹盐胁迫和干旱胁迫的生理响应研究[D]. 福建农林大学, 2017. LONG Z H. Study on the physiological response of Salt Stress and Drought Stress of Bambusa tuldoides cv. Swolleninternode[D]. Fujian Agriculture & Forestry University, 2017.
[9] 杜娟, 陈咸吉, 王哲, 等. 基于转录组与代谢组料慈竹的耐盐机制分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 50(04): 35-41. DU J, CHEN X J, WANG Z, et al. Salt tolerance mechanism analysis of Bambusa distegia based on transcriptome and metabolome[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences), 2024, 50(04): 35-41. DOI:10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2024.04.005.
[10] 李迎春, 陈双林.竹子耐盐性研究述评[J].山地农业生物学报,2008, 27(05):451-455. LI Y C, CHEN S L. Review of studies on salt tolerance of bamboos[J]. Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology, 2008, 27(05):451-455.DOI:10.15958/j.cnki.sdnyswxb.2008.05.015.
[11] 陈松河. 竹类植物耐盐性研究与园林应用[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2014. CHEN S H. Study on Bamboo Salt Tolerance and Garden Applications[M]. Beijing: China Architecture& Building Press, 2014
[12] 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006. Gao J F. Plant Physiology Laboratory Manual[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006.
[13] 李倩,陈博,贾秉鑫,等.基于主成分分析和隶属函数法筛选耐盐碱大豆品种[J].种子, 2025, 44(05):196-205. LI Q, CHEN B, JIA B X, et al. Selection of Saline-alkali Tolerant Glycine max Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis and Membership Tunction Method. Seed, 2025, 44(05):196-205. DOI:10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2025.05.196.
[14] MUSHTAQ Z, FAIZAN S, GULZAR B.Salt stress, its impacts on plants and the strategies plants are employing against it: A review[J]. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol, 2020, 8(3): 81-91. DOI:10.7324/JABB.2020.80315.
[15] 李善春. NaCl盐胁迫下5种地被观赏竹生理特性的研究[D].南京林业大学, 2005. LI S C. Study on the physiological characteristics of five dwarf ornamental bamboo species under NaCl stress [D]. Nanjing Forestry University, 2005.
[16] 顾大形, 陈双林. 四季竹对不同浓度NaCl胁迫的生理响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2011,31(06):1209-1215. GU D X, CHEN S L. Physiological Response of Oligostachyum lubricum to Different NaCl Stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2011, 31(06):1209-1215. DOI:1000-4025(2011)06-1209-07.
[17] 孙中元. 盐胁迫下四个竹种的适应性研究[D].中国林业科学研究院, 2013. SUN Z Y. Research on the adaptability of four bamboo species under salt stress [D]. Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2013.
[18] 刘玉芳, 陈双林, 李迎春, 等. 竹子生理可塑性的环境胁迫效应研究进展[J].浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(03):473-480.LIU Y F, CHEN S L, LI Y C, et al. Environmental stress on physiological plasticity of bamboo: a review[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(03):473-480. DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.03.022.
[19] 江登辉,刘晓颖,陈乾,等.竹类植物对盐胁迫的响应及栽培养护研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2020,48(08):6-10. JIANG D H, LIU X Y, CHEN Q, et al. Research Progress on Response of Bamboo Plants to Salt Stress and Cultivation and Conservation[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020,48(08):6-10. DOI:10.3969/ j.issn.0517-6611.2020.08.002.
[20] 吴幼容. 观音竹盐胁迫的生理响应与基因表达分析[D]. 福建农林大学, 2012. WU Y R. Physiological response and analyses of geneexpression under salt stress in Guan yin bamboo[D]. Fujian Agriculture & Forestry University, 2012.
[21] 郑容妹. 沿海沙地引种绿竹等竹子的抗盐抗旱机理研究[D].福建农林大学, 2003. ZHENG R M. Study on the Resistance Salt and Drought of the Bamboo in the Dene Coast [D]. Fujian Agriculture & Forestry University, 2003.
[22] JADOON S, MALIK A.A review article on the formation, mechanism and biochemistry of MDA and MDA as a biomarker of oxidative stress[J]. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2017, 5: 811-818. DOI:10.21474/IJAR01/6024.
[23] SOLTABAYEVA A, ONGALTAY A, OMONDI J O, et al.Morphological, Physiological and Molecular Markers for Salt-Stressed Plants. Plants, 2021, 10(2): 243. DOI:10.3390/plants10020243.
[24] PULAVARTY A, SARANGI B K.Screening bamboo species for salt tolerance using growth parameters, physiological response and osmolytes accumulation as effective indicators[J]. Chemistry and Ecology, 2018, 34(4):340-354. DOI:10.1080/02757540.2018.1427227.
[25] 王建武, 吴纯华, 赵亮, 等. 6种观赏地被竹的抗逆性研究[J]. 山东林业科技, 2015, 45(05):48-51. WANG J W, WU C H, ZHAO L, et al. Study on the resistances of six ornamental dwarf bamboos[J]. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 2015, 45(05):48-51. DOI:1002-2724(2015)05-0048-04.
[26] 洪有为. 沿海沙地引种麻竹等6个竹种抗风抗盐抗旱的研究[D]. 福建农林大学, 2005. HONG Y W. Study of the Bamboos Planted in Coastal Sandy Soil on the Resistance to Wind, Salt and Drought [D]. Fujian Agriculture & Forestry University, 2005.
PDF(1562 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/