Root morphology of different poplar clone stecklings under waterlogging and flooding treatment

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201808044

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1-8.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201808044

Previous Articles Next Articles

Root morphology of different poplar clone stecklings under waterlogging and flooding treatment

ZHAO Xiaojun(), CHENG Fang, ZHANG Kang, HUANG Kaidong, NI Yun, MENG Xiao, TANG Luozhong^*()

Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China,College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2018-08-23 Revised:2019-01-02 Online:2019-10-08 Published:2019-10-08
Contact: TANG Luozhong E-mail:2811498726@qq.com;luozhongtang@njfu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 In this study, the root morphology of different poplar (Populus sp.) clone seedlings under waterlogging and flooding treatment was explored, and the adaptive strategies of the poplar root system were elucidated to provide a scientific basis for the selection of poplar clones. 【Method】 Five poplar clones, i.e., 3804, 1388, 895, 110 and 328, were selected, and three treatments, i.e., control, waterlogging and flooding, were set up to determine the effects of different treatments on root characteristics such as biomass, total length, quantity, surface area and volume. 【Result】 ① There was no significant difference between the control and waterlogging groups in terms of poplar root biomass; however, in the flooding group, root biomass was significantly lower than that in the control group. ② No significant difference was found in terms of the number of first-order roots of most poplar clone stecklings between the treatment and control groups, but the total root length, projection area, surface area and volume were greater in the treatment groups than in the control group. ③ Compared with the control group, the treatment groups had decreased average root diameter but had increased number of root tips, root forks and root crossings. ④ The cumulative contribution rate of the two principal components extracted by principal component analysis was 88.58%, which may reflect the root morphological characteristics of poplar clone stecklings. 【Conclusion】 Subordinate function analysis showed that the order of the poplar clone stecklings based on root morphological performance for both treatment was as follows: waterlogging treatment, poplar 1388 > poplar 895>poplar 3804>poplar 110>poplar 328 and flooding treatment, poplar 1388>poplar 895>poplar 110>poplar 328>poplar 3804. In conclusion, based on the root morphology, we suggest that poplar 1388 and poplar 895 are more resistant to waterlogging and flooding among all studied poplar clone stecklings.

Key words: poplar (Populus spp.) clone, waterlogging treatment, flooding treatment, root morphology, comprehensive evaluation

CLC Number:

S718

ZHAO Xiaojun, CHENG Fang, ZHANG Kang, HUANG Kaidong, NI Yun, MENG Xiao, TANG Luozhong. Root morphology of different poplar clone stecklings under waterlogging and flooding treatment[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(5): 1-8.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

References 22

[1]	李合生. 现代植物生理学[M]. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2012.
	LI H S. Modern plant physiology [M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012.
[2]	汪贵斌, 蔡金峰, 何肖华. 涝渍胁迫对喜树幼苗形态和生理的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(1):134-140. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264X.2009.01.015. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.01.015
	WANG G B, CAI J F, HE X H. Effects of waterlogging stress on morphology and physiology of Camptotheca acuminata [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(1):134-140.
[3]	GOMES A R S, KOZLOWSKI T T. Effects of flooding on Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Eucalyptus globulus seedlings[J]. Oecologia, 1980, 46(2):139-142. DOI: 10.1007/BF00540117. doi: 10.1007/BF00540117
[4]	卢妍. 湿地植物对淹水条件的响应机制[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2010, 19(4):147-151. DOI: 10.13577/j.jnd.2010.0423.
	LU Y. Response mechanism of wetland plants to submerged conditions[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2010, 19(4):147-151.
[5]	吴泽民, 孙启祥, 段文秀. 安徽长江滩地杨树人工林个体生长与水淹状况的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11(1):25-29. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2000.0007.
	WU Z M, SUN Q X, DUAN W X. Relationship between flooded situation and poplar growth on beach land of Yangtze River in Anhui[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2000, 11(1):25-29.
[6]	汤玉喜, 吴立勋, 徐世凤, 等. 滩地淹水胁迫对杨树生长影响的研究[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2002, 29(1):14-17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2002.01.004.
	TANG Y X, WU L X, XU S F. et al. The effect on poplar growth from beach flooding[J]. Hunan Forestry Science and Technology, 2002, 29(1):14-17.
[7]	唐罗忠, 徐锡增, 方升佐. 土壤涝渍对杨树和柳树苗期生长及生理性状影响的研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 1998, 9(5):471-474. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.1998.0101.
	TANG L Z, XU X Z, FANG S Z. Influence of soil waterlogging on growth and physiological properties of poplar and willow seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1998, 9(5):471-474.
[8]	GONG J R, ZHANG X S, HUANG Y M, et al. The effects of flooding on several hybrid poplar clones in Northern China[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2007, 69(1):77-88. DOI: 10.1007/s10457-006-9019-4. doi: 10.1007/s10457-006-9019-4
[9]	IMADA S, YAMANAKA N, TAMAI S. Water table depth affects Populus alba fine root growth and whole plant biomass[J]. Functional Ecology, 2008, 22(6):1018-1026. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01454.x. doi: 10.1111/fec.2008.22.issue-6
[10]	徐锡增, 唐罗忠, 程淑婉. 涝渍胁迫下杨树内源激素及其它生理反应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 23(1):1-5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.1999.01.001.
	XU X Z, TANG L Z, CHENG S W. A study on hormones and other physiological effects of poplar clones under flooding stress[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 1999, 23(1):1-5.
[11]	高健, 侯成林, 吴泽民. 淹水胁迫对I-69/55杨蒸腾作用的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11(4):518-522. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2000.0127.
	GAO J, HOU C L, WU Z M. Effect of flooding stress on transpiration of poplar I-69/55[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2000, 11(4):518-522.
[12]	杜克兵, 许林, 涂炳坤, 等. 淹水胁迫对2种杨树1年生苗叶片超微结构和光合特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(6):58-64. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100609.
	DU K B, XU L, TU B K, et al. Influences of soil flooding on ultrastructure and photosynthetic capacity of leaves of one-year oldseedlings of two poplar clones[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(6):58-64.
[13]	洪光宇, 鲍雅静, 周延林, 等. 退化草原羊草种群根系形态特征对水分梯度的响应[J]. 中国草地学报, 2013, 35(1):73-78. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5021.2013.01.012.
	HONG G Y, BAO Y J, ZHOU Y L, et al. Response of root system of Leymus chinensis population to water gradient in degraded grassland [J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2013, 35(1):73-78.
[14]	李帅, 赵国靖, 徐伟洲, 等. 白羊草根系形态特征对土壤水分阶段变化的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(2):169-177. DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2015171.
	LI S, ZHAO G J, XU W Z, et al. Responses of old world bluestem root systems to changes in soil water conditions[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(2):169-177.
[15]	DASA K K, PANDAA D, SARKARA R K, et al. Submergence tolerance in relation to variable floodwater conditions in rice[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2009, 66(3):425-434. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.02.015. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.02.015
[16]	朱桂才, 高树杰, 张霞. 李氏禾根系生长对淹水胁迫及解除的响应[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 7(4):52-55. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1409(S).2010.04.015.
	ZHU G C, GAO S J, ZHANG X. Response of Leersia herxandra root growth status subjected to flooding stress and rescission [J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 7(4):52-55.
[17]	BAYUELOJIMENEZ J S, GALLARDOVALDEZ M, PEREZDECELIS V A, et al. Genotypic variation for root traits of maize (Zea mays L.) from the Purhepecha plateau under contrasting phosphorus availability[J]. Field Crops Research, 2011, 121(3):350-362. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.001. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.001
[18]	蔡丽平, 吴鹏飞, 侯晓龙, 等. 类芦根系对不同强度干旱胁迫的形态学响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(28):44-48. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.28.008.
	CAI L P, WU P F, HOU X L, et al. Morphological response to different drought stress in the roots of Neyraudia reynaudiana [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(28):44-48.
[19]	任爱天, 鲁为华, 杨洁晶, 等. 棉花、苜蓿细根生长和死亡的季节变化[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(6):213-219. DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2014319.
	REN A T, LU W H, YANG J J, et al. Seasonal change patterns in the production and mortality of fine roots in cotton and alfalfa[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(6):213-219.
[20]	CLARK L J, PRICE A H, STEELE K A, et al. Evidence from near-isogenic lines that root penetration increases with root diameter and bending stiffness in rice[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2008, 35(11):1163-1171. DOI: 10.1071/FP08132. doi: 10.1071/FP08132
[21]	BAILEY-SERRES J, VOESENEK L A C J. Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59:313-339. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752
[22]	SAIRAM R K, KUMUTHA D, EZHILMATHI K, et al. Physiology and biochemistry of waterlogging tolerance in plants[J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2008, 52(3):401-412. DOI: 10.1007/s10535-008-0084-6. doi: 10.1007/s10535-008-0084-6

Related Articles 15

[1]	FAN Xiaoyun, GUO Sujuan, LI Yanhua, JIANG Xibing. Study on correlation between browning degree of chestnut fruit and total phenols and flavonoids [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 159-166.
[2]	ZHANG Yunqi, DONG Ningguang, HAO Yanbin, CHEN Yonghao, ZHANG Junpei, HOU Zhixia, SU Shuchai, WU Jiaqing, QI Jianxun. Nuts’ phenotypic diversity analysis and character evaluation of 109 high-yield walnut individual trees [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 87-96.
[3]	LI Zhenshuang, WANG Qian, ZHU Yuan, YANG Fucheng, LIANG Junfeng, LU Junkun. Effects of exogenous signal substances on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Santalum album seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(6): 271-278.
[4]	LIANG Wenchao, BU Xing, LUO Siqian, XIE Yinfeng, ZHANG Wangxiang, HU Jialin. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium compound fertilization on the physiological characteristics of Chaenomeles speciosa ‘Changshouguan’ after processing of warming in the post floral stage [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(5): 81-88.
[5]	LIU Zemao, YAN Xin, WU Wen, ZHANG Yuhui, YU Fangyuan. Effects of bamboo charcoal on the growth and nutrient status of Zelkova schneideriana container seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(2): 111-118.
[6]	LI Qingshun, JIN Wanzhou, WANG Dejun, SUN Jingmei, LI Hongtao. A comprehensive evaluation of forest land quality using multi tree site form index [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(6): 81-89.
[7]	YANG Yang, SHI Haoran, JI Li, YANG Lixue. Effects of exponential fertilization on growth and root morphology of Tilia amurensis seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(2): 91-97.
[8]	DONG Yufeng, ZHU Wanrui, DING Changjun, Huang Qinjun, WANG Huatian, LI Shanwen, WANG Yanping. Root order-dependent responses of poplar fine root morphology to phenolic acids [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(1): 39-46.
[9]	LIU Shiling, CHEN Lin, YANG Baoguo, JIA Hongyan, PANG Shengjiang, ZHANG Pei, WANG Hui. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on biomass allocation and root morphology in Betula alnoides clones [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(5): 23-29.
[10]	ZHAI Dacai, FANG Zhen, WU Jinfei, YAO Qi, BAI Xiaohui, YANG Lichun, HAO Qingqing, ZHANG Yan. Analysis on the character diversity of Ormosia hosiei seeds from different producing regions [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 62(04): 63-69.
[11]	YANG Yifan, ZHOU Ting, FAN Junjun, MU Qian, ZHANG Jing, ZHANG Wangxiang, YU Zhongming. Cultivar evaluation and selection in ornamental crabapple for cut flower application [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 62(04): 70-76.
[12]	HUANG Zhengjin, WEI Yunli, ZHANG Chunhong, LYU Lianfei, LI Weilin, WU Wenlong. Comprehensive evaluation of five blackberry hybrid strains by analytic hierarchy process(AHP) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 62(01): 135-140.
[13]	PU Jing,ZHANG Jing, ZHAO Cong, FAN Junjun, JIANG Wenlong, ZHANG Wangxiang,WANG Gaiping. Analysis and evaluation on flower color characteristics of the Malus ‘Purple Prince' half-sib progenies [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 62(01): 18-24.
[14]	WEI Ruping, HU Dehuo, CHEN Jinhui, SHI Jisen. Response of roots morphological characteristics and nutrient utilization to low phosphorus stress among five clones of Cunninghamia lanceolate(Lamb.)Hook. [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 61(02): 1-8.
[15]	WANG Jin, NIE Ying. A comprehensive evaluation method of Chinese rosin trade risk [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 61(02): 207-212.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

成分 component	初始特征值initial eigenvalue
成分 component	特征值 eigenvalue	贡献率/% contribution rate	累积贡献率/% cumulative contribution rate
1	9.27	77.26	77.26
2	1.36	11.32	88.58
3	0.63	5.22	93.80
4	0.30	2.52	96.32
5	0.24	2.02	98.34
6	0.10	0.83	99.17
7	0.07	0.57	99.74
8	0.02	0.18	99.92
9	0.01	0.06	99.97
10	0.00	0.02	99.99
11	0.00	0.00	100.00
12	0.00	0.00	100.00

指标index	主成分 principal component
指标index	1	2
根生物量root biomass(X₁)	0.79	0.44
一级根数量number of first order root(X₂)	0.74	0.33
平均根长average root length(X₃)	0.78	0.42
最长根长maximum root length(X₄)	0.85	0.21
总根长total root length(X₅)	0.99	-0.13
总根投影面积total root projection area(X₆)	0.99	-0.05
总根表面积total root surface area(X₇)	0.99	-0.05
总根体积total root volume(X₈)	0.99	0.04
根平均直径root average diameter(X₉)	-0.44	0.84
根尖数root tips number(X₁₀)	0.91	-0.18
根系分叉数root forks number(X₁₁)	0.96	-0.19
根系交叉数root crossings number(X₁₂)	0.95	-0.21

指标index	渍水waterlogging					淹水flooding
指标index	3804杨 poplar 3804	1388杨 poplar 1388	895杨 poplar 895	110杨 poplar 110	328杨 poplar 328	3804杨 poplar 3804	1388杨 poplar 1388	895杨 poplar 895	110杨 poplar 110	328杨 poplar 328
根生物量root biomass	0.99	1.00	0.65	0.53	0.00	0.13	1.00	0.69	0.50	0.00
一级根数量number of first order root	1.00	0.55	0.48	0.00	0.37	0.44	0.57	1.00	0.00	0.23
平均根长average root length	0.28	0.46	0.76	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.69	1.00	0.42	0.02
最长根长maximum root length	0.44	0.63	1.00	0.55	0.00	0.00	0.61	1.00	0.47	0.11
总根长total root length	0.77	1.00	0.86	0.74	0.00	0.00	1.00	0.82	0.25	0.97
总根投影面积total root projection area	0.83	1.00	0.66	0.48	0.00	0.00	1.00	0.73	0.15	0.09
总根表面积total root surface area	0.71	1.00	0.76	0.55	0.00	0.00	1.00	0.78	0.16	0.99
总根体积total root volume	0.85	1.00	0.65	0.35	0.00	0.00	1.00	0.95	0.09	0.08
根平均直径root average diameter	0.55	0.50	0.64	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.83	0.47	1.00	0.40
根尖数root tips number	0.95	1.00	0.92	0.72	0.00	0.37	1.00	0.66	0.01	0.00
根系分叉数root forks number	0.61	1.00	0.56	0.46	0.00	0.00	1.00	0.37	0.34	0.19
根系交叉数root crossings number	0.16	1.00	0.69	0.37	0.00	0.00	1.00	0.72	0.45	0.28
平均值average value	0.68	0.85	0.72	0.56	0.03	0.08	0.89	0.85	0.32	0.28
排序rank	3	1	2	4	5	5	1	2	3	4

Root morphology of different poplar clone stecklings under waterlogging and flooding treatment

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 22

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer