Research on the reasonable planting distance in central section of highway based on guiding the driving sight and anti-glare

FAN Yazhen, WANG Lianggui, WANG Jieming, XIANG Yanci, PENG Wengang, WANG Chenyang, LIU Bingyou

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 181-187.

PDF(1465 KB)
PDF(1465 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 181-187. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201809026

Research on the reasonable planting distance in central section of highway based on guiding the driving sight and anti-glare

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 In order to further improve highway traffic safety by meeting requirements for guiding driving sight and anti-glare, the aim of the present study was to determine reasonable planting distances for the central green belt of highways. 【Method】 A model for planting distance at different speed on straight and curved highway sections was constructed on the basis of guiding driving sight, drivers’ visual characteristics, and theHighway Engineering Technique Standard (JTG B01-2014), and a formula for planting distance was constructed on the basis of anti-glare, geometrical relationship, and Code for the Design of Traffic Safety Facilities on Highways (DB33/T 704-2013). Then, two sets of data were compared to determine a reasonable planting distance for the central green belt of highways. 【Result】 The best planting distances for optimizing plant guiding driving sight at 60, 80, 100 and 120 km/h, were 3.33, 4.44, 5.56, and 6.67 m, respectively, on straight sections of highway, and the best planting distances at 60, 80, 100 and 110 km/h, were 3.33, 4.44, 5.56 and 6.11 m on curved sections of highway. Meanwhile, the best planting distances for optimizing anti-glare were 2.45-17.14 m on straight sections of highway and 2.29-16.00 m on curved sections of highway. 【Conclusion】The best planting distances for meeting both requirements at 60, 80, 100 and 120 km/h were 2.45-3.33, 2.45-4.44, 2.45-5.56 and 2.45-6.67 m, respectively on straight sections of highway, and the best planting distances for meeting both requirements at 60, 80, 100 and 110 km/h were 2.29-3.33, 2.29-4.44, 2.29-5.56 and 2.29-6.11 m on curved sections of highway.

Key words

highway / plants in central section of expressway / planting distance / driving sight guidance / anti-glare

Cite this article

Download Citations
FAN Yazhen , WANG Lianggui , WANG Jieming , et al . Research on the reasonable planting distance in central section of highway based on guiding the driving sight and anti-glare[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2019, 43(6): 181-187 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201809026

References

[1]
仇培飞. 高速公路绿化对行车安全的影响及其改善[J]. 江西建材, 2015(20):189-192.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2890.2015.20.162.
QIU P F. Impact of expressway greening on driving safety and its improvement[J]. Jiangxi Building Materials, 2015(20):189-192.
[2]
游良旺. 南京道路绿化景观及交通安全功能研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2016.
YOU L W. Study on the green landscape and traffic safety function of road in Nanjing City[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2016.
[3]
彭武雄. 驾驶员视线诱导设施设置合理间距研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2007.
PENG W X. Research on the reasonable spacing for driver’s line of sight delineation facilities[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2007.
[4]
刘兴茂, 杨运兴, 龙文海. 高速公路中央分隔带植物合理间距及高度研究[J]. 公路交通技术, 2017, 33(5):142-145. DOI: 10.13607/j.cnki.gljt.2017.05.028.
LIU X M, YANG Y X, LONG W H. Study on reasonable spacing and height of central plant zone in expressway[J]. Technology of Highway and Transport, 2017, 33(5):142-145.
[5]
孙军, 张帆. 高速公路中央分隔带植树防眩的探讨[J]. 中外公路, 2014, 34(1):322-325.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2579.2014.01.077.
SUN J, ZHANG F. Discussion on tree planting and dizziness prevention in the central separation zone of expressway[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2014, 34(1):322-325.
[6]
肖代全, 马荣国, 李铁强. 高等级公路中央分隔带绿化植物的防眩效果[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2010, 45(3):470-475. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2010.03.026.
XIAO D Q, MA R G, LI T Q. Anti-glare effect of median green belt on high-grade highway[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiao Tong University, 2010, 45(3):470-475.
[7]
唐强, 薛志杰, 石平, 等. 高速公路中央分隔带树木种植设计与行驶车辆防眩原理及其公式构建[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2005, 36(4):466-470. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2005.04.020.
TANG Q, XUE Z J, SHI P, et al. Planting design of mid compartition strip on expressway and establishing formulas of preventing dizzy for vehicles[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2005, 36(4):466-470.
[8]
颜佑启, 沈守云, 王茂文. 公路曲线路段防眩植株栽植间距的调整[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2002, 22(3):71-73. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2002.03.022.
YAN Y Q, SHEN S Y, WANG M W. Adjustment of the planting distance between dizziness-preventing plants on curve sections of highway[J]. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 2002, 22(3):71-73.
[9]
中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路工程技术标准:JTG B01—2014[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2014.
[10]
浙江省质量技术监督局. 高速公路交通安全设施设计规范:DB 33/T 704—2013[S]. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社, 2013.
[11]
宫泽龙. 道路景观连续性对驾驶行为影响研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2014.
GONG Z L. Study on the effect of highway landscape continuity on driving behavior[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2014.
[12]
倪本会. 安全行车工程学[M]. 济南: 山东大学出版社, 2004.
NI B H. Safety driving engineering[M]. Ji’nan: Shandong University Press, 2004.
[13]
潘兵宏, 赵一飞, 梁孝忠. 动视觉原理在公路线形设计中的应用[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 24(6):20-24. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2004.06.005.
PAN B H, ZHAO Y F, LIANG X Z. Application of dynamic vision theory in highway alignment design[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2004, 24(6):20-24.
[14]
任刚, 王卫杰, 张永. 非机动化交通参与者交通行为安全性:建模、评价及决策系统[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012:54-55.
REN G, WANG W J, ZHANG Y. Traffic behavior safety of non-motorized traffic participants: modeling, evaluation and decision-making system[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012:54-55.
[15]
朱小刚. 高速公路视觉空间研究及其在景观规划中的应用[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2010.
ZHU X G. Research on highway visual space and in the application of landscape planning[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2010.
[16]
赵永平, 王建军, 罗石贵. 指示性线形诱导标设置间距探讨[J]. 河南交通科技, 1998(1):28-29.
ZHAO Y P, WANG J J, LUO S G. Discussion on setting spacing of indicative linear inducers[J]. Science and Technology of Henan Communication, 1998(1):28-29.
[17]
上海汽车灯具研究所. 汽车用灯丝灯泡前照灯:GB 4599—2007[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[18]
唐桂兰, 游良旺, 芦建国. 城市道路绿化对行车视线诱导的植物合理种植间距[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(5):180-184. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201605002.
TANG G L, YOU L W, LU J G. The reasonable planting distance of urban road greening induced by driving sight line[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 41(5):180-184.
[19]
张雪梅, 温志刚. 道路交通安全[M]. 北京: 群众出版社, 2007.
ZHANG X M, WEN Z G. Road traffic safety[M]. Beijing: Mass Press, 2007.
[20]
ZWAHLEN H T. Conspicuity of suprathreshold reflective targets in a driver’s peripheral visual field at night[M/OL]. Transportation Research Record 1213.TRB,National Research Council, 1989:35-46. ( 2018- 09- 01). http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1989/1213/1213-006.pdf.
[21]
周生滨, 解莉楠, 于向慧. 高速公路车速管理研究[J]. 商业经济, 2008(7):93-94, 96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6043.2008.07.044.
ZHOU S B, XIE L N, YU X H. Study on speed management of expressway[J]. Business Economy, 2008(7):93-94, 96.
[22]
交通部公路科学研究院. 公路交通安全设施设计规范:JTG D81—2017[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2017.
[23]
高速公路丛书编委会. 高速公路交通工程及沿线设施[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1999.
[24]
肖代全, 马荣国, 李铁强. 公路绿化对行车安全的典型影响及其评价[J]. 公路, 2011, 56(2):169-175.
XIAO D Q, MA R G, LI T Q. Typical safety impact of highway virescence and its evaluation[J]. Highway, 2011, 56(2):169-175.
[25]
张昌岳. 移动状态下的公路景观视觉安全性规划设计研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2017.
ZHANG C Y. Visual safety study of highway landscape planning and design in moving state[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2017.
[26]
谷晓旭. 山区高速公路景观研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2008.
GU X X. Research of highway’s landscape in mountain area[D]. Xi'an: Changan University, 2008.
[27]
CLAY G R, SMIDT R K. Assessing the validity and reliability of descriptor variables used in scenic highway analysis[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 66(4):239-255. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2046(03)00114-2.
[28]
LI X J, RATTI C, SEIFERLING I. Quantifying the shade provision of street trees in urban landscape: a case study in Boston, USA, using Google Street View[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 169:81-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.011.
[29]
ZWAHLEN H T, JIN Y P. Curve radius perception accuracy as function of number of delineation devices (chevrons)[J]. Thin Solid Films, 1995, 518(2):518-521.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2019
PDF(1465 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/