Estimation of aboveground biomass in a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata)forest combining data of Sentinel⁃1 and Sentinel⁃2

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811012

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 149-156.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811012

Previous Articles Next Articles

Estimation of aboveground biomass in a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata)forest combining data of Sentinel⁃1 and Sentinel⁃2

PAN Lei¹(), SUN Yujun¹(), WANG Yifu¹, CHEN Liping², CAO Yuanshuai³

^1.State Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resources & Environmental Management, College of Forest, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
^2.Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China
^3.East China Inventory and Planning Institute, State Forestry Administration, Hangzhou 310019, China

Received:2018-11-05 Revised:2019-01-24 Online:2020-05-30 Published:2020-06-11
Contact: SUN Yujun E-mail:1072344791@qq.com;panlb@bjfu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract: Objective

Forest above-ground biomass (AGB) is the main storage site of carbon, which plays an important role in the regional and global carbon cycle. In studies on AGB estimation based on remote sensing, saturation of optical and radar data is a well-known phenomenon, however, it is unclear so far as to how this problem may be reduced in order to improve AGB estimations. Optical and radar data offer different advantages for recording forest stand structures, thus optimized use of their features may help improve AGB estimation. This study was conducted to assess whether forest AGB estimations can be produced in a subtropical area based on data produced using Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and Sentinel-2 multispectral instruments.

Method

A stand of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) in a state-owned forest farm in Jiangle, Fujian Province, China, and Sentinel-1 SAR data and Sentinel-2 multispectral optical data were used. Backscatter coefficients of Sentinel-1 images in different polarization modes (VH, VV, VH/VV) and second-order texture measures of a gray level co-occurrence matrix in different window sizes (3×3, 5×5, 7×7 and 9×9) were recorded, and band values, vegetation indices, and second-order texture measures in 3 × 3 windows of Sentinel-2 image were extracted as remote sensing factors. Models were fitted using multiple linear stepwise regression. AGB estimation models based on Sentinel-2 remote sensing factors only and on cooperative Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-1 remote sensing were established. Determination coefficient (R2), adjusted determination coefficient (R $a d j 2$ ), root mean square error (RMSE), and variance inflation factor were selected for assessing the models. The ability of Sentinel-2 optical data and Sentinel-2 optical data combined with Sentinel-1 SAR data to estimate forest AGB was compared and analyzed.

Result

The results showed that when Sentinel-2 band values, vegetation indices and texture measures were used as dependent variables to predict AGB, the estimation effect was inadequate, and the R $a d j 2$ values of the models were 0.319, 0.303 and 0.455, respectively; an AGB estimation model based on all remote sensing factors of Sentinel-2 optical data (Model-1) produced an R $a d j 2$ value of 0.501, while RMSE was 64.04 Mg/hm². When the Sentinel-1 remote sensing factor was added, the AGB estimation model based on Sentinel-2 optical data and Sentinel-1 SAR data was improved, with a model adjustment coefficient (R $a d j 2$ ) and RMSE were 0.575 and 59.13 Mg/hm². Compared with Model-1, the accuracy of Model-2 was considerably improved, thus the second-order texture measures of Sentinel-1 VH polarimetric imaging plays an important role.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that multispectral optical data of the Sentinel-2 satellite can be used as reliable data source for estimating forest AGB in subtropical areas, and the combination of Sentinel-1 SAR data and Sentinel-2 multispectral optical data can substantially improve accuracy of estimating forest AGB. Estimations of forest ABG by combining multispectral optical remote sensing images and space-borne polarimetric SAR data offers considerable advantages. The results of the present study may help improve accuracy of forest AGB estimation, and it provides a reference basis for future studies on forest AGB using different remote sensing data sources.

Key words: Chinese fir forest, aboveground biomass, Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, texture, regression model

CLC Number:

S758.5

PAN Lei, SUN Yujun, WANG Yifu, CHEN Liping, CAO Yuanshuai. Estimation of aboveground biomass in a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata)forest combining data of Sentinel⁃1 and Sentinel⁃2[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 149-156.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 29

1	HOUGHTON R A. Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance[J]. Glob Chang Biol，2005，11(6)：945-958．DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00955.x.
2	HOLLMANN R，MERCHANT C J，SAUNDERS R，et al. The ESA climate change initiative：satellite data records for essential climate variables[J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc，2013，94(10)：1541-1552. DOI:10.1175/bams-d-11-00254.1.
3	HEIMANN M，REICHSTEIN M. Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks[J]. Nature，2008，451(7176)：289-292. DOI:10.1038/nature06591.
4	刘茜，杨乐，柳钦火，等. 森林地上生物量遥感反演方法综述[J]. 遥感学报，2015，19(1)：62-74.
	LIU Q，YANG L，LIU Q H，et al．Review of forest above ground biomass inversion methods based on remote sensing technology[J]. J Remote Sens，2015，19(1)：62-74．
5	陈玲，郝文乾，高德亮. 光学影像纹理信息在林业领域的最新应用进展[J]. 北京林业大学学报，2015，37(3)：1-12.
	CHEN L，HAO W Q，GAO D L. The latest applications of optical image texture in forestry[J]. J Beijing For Univ，2015，37(3)：1-12．DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140304.
6	张佳华，符淙斌. 生物量估测模型中遥感信息与植被光合参数的关系研究[J]. 测绘学报，1999，28(2)：128-132.
	ZHANG J H，FU C B. A study on relationships between remote sensing information and plant photosynthetic parameters in estimating biomass model[J]. Acta Geod Et Cartogr Sin，1999，28(2)：128-132．DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1595.1999.02.004.
7	李明诗，谭莹，潘洁，等. 结合光谱、纹理及地形特征的森林生物量建模研究[J]. 遥感信息，2006，21(6)：6-9，66.
	LI M S，TAN Y，PAN J，et al. Modeling forest aboveground biomass by combining the spectrum，textures with topographic features[J]. Remote Sens Inf，2006，21(6)：6-9，66. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3177.2006.06.003.
8	王长委，胡月明，沈德才，等. 基于CBERS数据的亚热带森林地上碳储量估算[J]. 林业科学，2014，50(1)：88-96.
	WANG C W，HU Y M，SHEN D C，et al. Assessing the capability of CBERS⁃02B CCD for estimating subtropical forest above ground carbon storage[J]. Sci Silvae Sin，2014，50(1)：88-96. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20140114.
9	ZHANG L J，SHAO Z F，WANG Z G. Estimation of forest aboveground biomass using the integration of spectral and textural features from GF⁃1 satellite image[C]//2016 4th International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications (EORSA)，July4-6,2016.
10	向安民，刘凤伶，于宝义，等．基于k⁃NN方法和GF遥感影像的森林蓄积量估测[J]. 浙江农林大学学报，2017，34(3)：406-412.
	XIANG A M，LIU F L，YU B Y，et al. Forest stock volume estimation based on the k⁃NN method and GF remote sensing data[J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ，2017，34(3)：406-412．DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.03.004.
11	HYDE P，DUBAYAH R，WALKER W，et al. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi⁃sensor (LiDAR，SAR/InSAR，ETM+，Quickbird) synergy[J]. Remote Sens Environ，2006，102(1/2)：63-73. DOI:10.1016/j.rse. 2006.01.021.
12	ECKERT S. Improved forest biomass and carbon estimations using texture measures from WorldView⁃2 satellite data[J]. Remote Sens，2012，4(4)：810-829. DOI:10.3390/rs4040810.
13	黄金龙，居为民，郑光，等. 基于高分辨率遥感影像的森林地上生物量估算[J]. 生态学报，2013，33(20)：6497-6508．
	HUANG J L，JU W M，ZHENG G，et al. Estimation of forest aboveground biomass using high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery[J]. Acta Ecol Sin，2013，33(20)：6497-6508．DOI:10.5846/stxb201212211841.
14	徐小军，周国模，杜华强，等. 基于Landsat TM数据估算雷竹林地上生物量[J]. 林业科学，2011，47(9)：1-6.
	XU X J，ZHOU G M，DU H Q，et al. Estimation of aboveground biomass of Phyllostachyspraecox forest based on Landsat Thematic Mapper image[J]. Sci Silvae Sin，2011，47(9)：1-6．
15	LU D S，BATISTELLA M. Exploring TM image texture and its relationships with biomass estimation in Rondônia，Brazilian Amazon[J]. Acta Amaz，2005，35(2)：249-257. DOI:10.1590/s0044-59672005000200015.
16	YANG C J，HUANG H，WANG S Y. Estimation of tropical forest biomass using Landsat TM imagery and permanent plot data in Xishuangbanna，China[J]. Int J Remote Sens，2011，32(20)：5741-5756. DOI:10.1080/01431161.2010.507677.
17	郭云，李增元，陈尔学，等. 甘肃黑河流域上游森林地上生物量的多光谱遥感估测[J]. 林业科学，2015，51(1)：140-149．
	GUO Y，LI Z Y，CHEN E X，et al. Estimating forest above‍⁃ground biomass in the upper reaches of Heihe River basin using multi⁃spectral remote sensing[J]. Sci Silvae Sin，2015，51(1)：140-149. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150117.
18	李明阳，吴军，余超，等. 福建武夷山自然保护区森林碳储量遥感估测方法与空间分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)，2014，38(6)：6-10.
	LI M Y，WU J，YU C，et al. Estimation and spatial analysis of forest carbon stocks based on remote sensing technology in Wuyi Mountain National Reserve of Fujian Province[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed)，2014，38(6)：6-10. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.06.002.
19	王月婷，张晓丽，杨慧乔，等. 基于Landsat 8卫星光谱与纹理信息的森林蓄积量估算[J]. 浙江农林大学学报，2015，32(3)：384-391.
	WANG Y T，ZHANG X L，YANG H Q，et al．Forest volume estimation based on spectral and textural information from the Landsat 8 satellite[J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ，2015，32(3)：384-391. DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.03.008.
20	孙玉军，王新杰，马炜，等. 林改区域典型树种森林碳储量监测技术研究[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2014：34-67.
21	HARALICK R M. Statistical and structural approaches to texture[J]. Proc IEEE，1979，67(5)：786-804. DOI:10.1109/proc. 1979.11328.
22	LU D S，CHEN Q，WANG G X，et al. Aboveground forest biomass estimation with landsat and LiDAR data and uncertainty analysis of the estimates[J]. Int J For Res，2012，2012：ID436537:1-16. DOI:10.1155/2012/436537.
23	ZHAO P P，LU D S，WANG G X，et al. Examining spectral reflectance saturation in landsat imagery and corresponding solutions to improve forest aboveground biomass estimation[J]. Remote Sens，2016，8(6)：469. DOI:10.3390/rs8060469.
24	LU D. Aboveground biomass estimation using Landsat TM data in the Brazilian Amazon[J]. Int J Remote Sens，2005，26(12)：2509-2525. DOI:10.1080/01431160500142145.
25	STEININGER M K. Satellite estimation of tropical secondary forest above⁃ground biomass：data from Brazil and Bolivia[J]. Int J Remote Sens，2000，21(6/7)：1139-1157. DOI:10.1080/014311600210119.
26	KUPLICH T M，CURRAN P J，ATKINSON P M. Relating SAR image texture to the biomass of regenerating tropical forests[J]．Int J Remote Sens，2005，26(21)：4829-4854. DOI:10.1080/01431160500239107.
27	SARKER L R，NICHOL J E. Improved forest biomass estimates using ALOS AVNIR⁃2 texture indices[J]. Remote Sens Environ，2011，115(4)：968-977. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2010.11.010.
28	FUCHS H，MAGDON P，KLEINN C，et al. Estimating aboveground carbon in a catchment of the Siberian forest tundra：Combining satellite imagery and field inventory[J]. Remote Sens Environ,2009,113(3)：518-531.DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2008.07.017.
29	CUTLER M E J，BOYD D S，FOODY G M，et al. Estimating tropical forest biomass with a combination of SAR image texture and Landsat TM data：an assessment of predictions between regions[J]. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens，2012，70：66-77. DOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.03.011.

Related Articles 15

[1]	HAN Sen, RUAN Renzong, FU Qiaoni, XU Hanwei, HENG Xuebiao. Extraction of aquatic vegetation in Hongze Lake National Wetland Park based on Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 images [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 19-26.
[2]	ZHOU Youfeng, XIE Binglou, LI Mingshi. Mapping regional forest aboveground biomass from random forest Co-Kriging approach: a case study from north Guangdong [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 169-178.
[3]	DONG Yujie, MAO Lingfeng, ZHANG Min, LU Xudong, WU Xiuping. Relationship between aboveground biomass and environmental factors of subtropical typical evergreen broad-leaved forest in east China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 74-80.
[4]	WANG Yanfang, TAN Lu, GUO Hongli, WU Fang, QI Fei, MENG Wenting, XU Yannan. Study on spatial and temporal variation of forest fractional vegetation cover in Liyang based on multi-source remote sensing data [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 183-191.
[5]	WANG Youdi, XU Kefu. Analyses of Huizhou landscape on distribution and texture of traditional villages [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 205-212.
[6]	JU Yilin, JI Yongjie, HUANG Jimao, ZHANG Wangfei. Inversion of forest aboveground biomass using combination of LiDAR and multispectral data [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(1): 58-68.
[7]	ZHANG Guofei, YUE Cairong, LUO Hongbin, GU Lei, ZHU Bodong. Based polarization orientation angle compensation for Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis forest aboveground biomass estimation [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(6): 185-192.
[8]	ZHAO Yinghui, GUO Xinlong, ZHEN Zhen. Estimation of aboveground biomass of natural secondary forests based on optical-ALS variable combination and non-parametric models [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(4): 49-57.
[9]	DONG Lingbo, LIU Zhaogang. Forest health assessments and multi-scale conversion methods [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(3): 206-216.
[10]	ZHANG Yunqi, LIU Chen, LIU Yang, YE Changqi, ZHANG Meng, JIA Liming, HAO Yanbin, SU Shuchai. Effects of canopy micro-environment on fruit yield and quality characteristics of Sapindus mukorossi [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(5): 189-198.
[11]	ZHOU Hua, MENG Shengwang, LIU Qijing. Allometric equations for estimating aboveground biomass of broad-leaved forests saplings and shrubs in subtropical China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(06): 79-86.
[12]	YU Chao, SONG Liyi, LI Mingyang, Omidreza Shobairi SEYED, ZHANG Xiangyang. Spatio-temporal dynamics of forest aboveground biomass in Xixia County, Henan Province, China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(06): 93-101.
[13]	MIAO Zheng, DONG Lihu, LI Fengri, BAI Dongxue, WANG Jiahui . Modelling the vertical variation in the number of second order branches of Pinus koraiensis plantation trees through GLMM [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(04): 121-128.
[14]	WANG Jianjun, MENG Jinghui. Determining optimal window size based on correlation between texture information and stand structural diversity indices [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(03): 112-116.
[15]	YANG Ming,WANG Yueting,ZHANG Xiaoli. Study on the model for estimating forest volume of Chinese fir based on bi-source remote sensing data [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(05): 107-114.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

地上生物量水平/(Mg·hm^-2) AGB class	样地数number of plots	地上生物量/(Mg·hm^-2) aboveground biomass weight	占比/% ratio
<100	8	23.73、 29.00、 33.00、 38.90、 52.91、 75.79、 86.35、 93.62	16
≥100~200	20	100.69、 105.00、 105.14 、 113.01、 122.99 、 124.63、 127.90 、 128.64、 135.18、 144.82、 146.47、 154.32、 159.18、 161.26、 177.21、 182.20、 182.44 、 185.66、 189.07、 199.66	40
≥200~300	18	200.63、 211.47、 219.30、 219.33、 219.74、 219.04、 226.75、 245.71、 248.61、 256.27、 256.43、 262.37、 274.59、 279.18、 284.16、 286.27、 295.10、 299.83	36
≥300	4	300.75、 310.67、 394.53、 401.22	8

植被指数 vegetable index	计算公式 calculation formula
土壤调整植被指数 soil adjusted vegetation index（I_SAV）	I_SAV=1.5（ρ_nir–ρ_red）/（ρ_nir+ρ_red+0.5）
归一化植被指数 normalized difference vegetation index（I_NDV）	I_NDV=（ρ_nir–ρ_red）/（ρ_nir+ρ_red）
第二修正土壤调整植被指数 second modified soil adjusted vegetation index（I_MSAV2）	I_MSAV2=0.5[2(ρ_nir+1)-sqrt[(2ρ_nir+1)(2ρ_nir+1)-8(ρ_nir-ρ_red)]]
差值植被指数 difference vegetation index（I_DV）	I_DV=ρ_nir–ρ_red
比值植被指数 ratio vegetation index（I_RV）	I_RV=ρ_nir/ρ_red
垂直植被指数 perpendicular vegetation index（I_PV）	I_PV=sin (a)ρ_nir-cos (a)ρ_red（a=45°）
红外比率植被指数 infrared percentage vegetation index（I_IPV）	I_IPV=ρ_nir/(ρ_nir+ρ_red)
加权差异植被指数 weighted difference vegetation index（I_WDV）	I_WDV=ρ_nir–0.5 ρ_red
转换归一化植被指数 transformed normalized difference vegetation index (I_TNDV)	I_TNDV=sqrt[(ρ_nir-ρ_red)/(ρ_nir+ρ_red)+0.5]
绿度归一化植被指数 green normalized difference vegetation index (I_GNDV)	I_GNDV=(ρ_nir–ρ_green)/(ρ_nir+ρ_green)
颜色指数 colour index (I_C)	I_C=(ρ_red-ρ_green)/(ρ_red+ρ_green)
大气修正植被指数atmospherically resistant vegetation index（I_ARV）	I_ARV=(ρ_nir-r_b)/(ρ_nir+r_b) r_b=(ρ_red)-γ(ρ_blue-ρ_red), with γ=1

遥感因子类型 remote sensing factors	模型拟合参数 model fitting parameters				截距和变量的拟合参数 fitting parameters for intercept and variables
遥感因子类型 remote sensing factors	R2	R2_adj	均方根误差/ (Mg·hm^-2) RMSE	P	截距和变量 intercept & variables	系数 coefficient	系数标准误 SE. of coefficient	P	方差膨胀因子 VIF
单波段 band	0.347	0.319	74.81	4.5×10^-5	截距	258.40	43.70	3.6×10^-7***	―
					B₂	-1.69	0.36	2.3×10^-5***	2.10
					B₈	0.11	0.02	3.6×10^-5***	2.10
植被指数 VI	0.346	0.303	75.69	0.000 2	截距	812.83	331.57	0.018 1^*	―
					I_MSAV2	-332.92	158.55	0.041 2^*	2.46
					I_RV	73.46	18.51	0.000 3^***	8.76
					I_ARV	1 348.28	558.82	0.019 8^*	5.85
纹理 texture	0.477	0.455	66.94	2.4×10^-7	截距	159.13	32.92	1.5×10^-5***	—
					C_B3	128.33	27.53	2.6×10^-5***	1.00
					E_TNDVI	-67.12	18.69	0.000 8^***	1.00
所有因子 all factors	0.542	0.501	64.04	3.1×10^-7	截距	238.47	52.40	4.0×10^-5***	—
					B₂	-0.87	0.356	0.02^*	2.84
					B₁₂	0.19	0.08	0.02^*	2.99
					C_B3	124.76	26.58	2.5×10^-5***	1.10
					E_TNDVI	-75.84	18.69	0.000 2^***	1.14

模型拟合参数 model fitting parameters				截距和变量的拟合参数 fitting parameters for intercept and variables
R2	R2_adj	均方根误差/ (Mg·hm^-2) RMSE	P	截距和变量 intercept & variables	系数 coefficient	系数标准误 SE. of coefficient	P	方差膨胀因子 VIF
0.629	0.575	59.13	6.9×10^-8	截距	232.32	48.53	2.0×10^-5***	—
				B₂	-0.77	0.35	0.032 8*	3.17
				B₁₂	0.18	0.08	0.002 2*	3.08
				C_B3	108.81	25.11	8.7×10^-5***	1.11
				E_TNOVI	-83.01	17.43	2.2×10^-5***	1.16
				C_VH5	-95.60	42.84	0.030 9*	1.32
				D_VH9	17.46	6.23	0.007 3**	1.17

Estimation of aboveground biomass in a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata)forest combining data of Sentinel⁃1 and Sentinel⁃2

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 29

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

波段号 band No.	中心波长/nm wave length	波段宽度/nm band width	空间分辨率/m spatial resolution
1	443	20	60
2	490	65	10
3	560	35	10
4	665	30	10
5	705	15	20
6	740	15	20
7	783	20	20
8	842	115	10
8b	865	20	20
9	945	20	60
10	1 380	30	60
11	1 610	90	20
12	2 190	180	20