Risk analysis ofZeuzera coffeae Nietner in Jiangsu Province

JU Yunwei, ZHU Chenxi, YAN Xiaoru, ZHANG Yu, WU Yali, ZHAO Yuling, WANG Kechun, LI Yongrong

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 207-210.

PDF(1363 KB)
南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）
PDF(1363 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 207-210. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901032

Risk analysis ofZeuzera coffeae Nietner in Jiangsu Province

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】The risk analysis of Carya illinoinensis Koch harmed by Zeuzera coffeae Nietner was conducted to determine the degree of hazard, which provided a reference for the prevention and control of Z. coffeae in the production of C. illinoinensis.【Method】From 2016 to 2017, four sample lands (50 m × 50 m) of C. illinoinensis Koch planting bases in Luhe of Nanjing and Jurong of Zhenjiang of Jiangsu Province, were investigated for the damage caused by Z. coffeae Nietner to the C. illinoinensis Koch forest. Seven sample plots were selected from each sample land by the diagonal method, and ten sample plots from each sample were selected by interlaced sampling. The calculation method of the damaged rate ofC. illinoinensis Koch is the total number of damaged C. illinoinensis Koch divided by the total number of plants investigated. According to the evaluation criteria of forestry pest risk analysis, the risk degree of Z. coffeae was quantitatively analyzed for the first time, and the risk analysis was carried out by a comprehensive analysis method.【Result】The damaged rate of C. illinoinensis Koch was 41.43% for 3-year-old victims; the rate of 4-year-old victims was 32.86%; the rate of 5-year-old victims was 22.14%; the rate of 6-year-old victims was 17.86%. Based on the rules of pest risk analysis, we categorized the risk level of Z. coffeae Nietner using five indexes: the distribution, potential degree of damage, economical value of infected host plants, possibility of transmission and spreading, and difficulty of risk management in Jiangsu. The values of the five indexes were calculated as 2.00, 3.00, 1.80, 3.00 and 1.67, respectively. The overall risk value of Z. coffeae Nietner was 2.22. 【Conclusion】Through the analysis of the spread, harm, and risk of Z. coffeae Nietner, it is considered to be a highly dangerous pest for C. illinoinensis Koch. During production, the monitoring of Z. coffeae Nietner should be strengthened, and timely detection and prevention should be carried out to control the density of this insect population; this will reduce the negative impact on the economic and ecological benefits of C. illinoinensis.

Key words

Carya illinoinensis Koch / Zeuzera coffeae Nietner / risk analysis / Jiangsu

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
JU Yunwei , ZHU Chenxi , YAN Xiaoru , et al . Risk analysis ofZeuzera coffeae Nietner in Jiangsu Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2019, 43(6): 207-210 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901032

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis
[1]
刘联仁. 咖啡豹蠹蛾生物学特性的初步观察[J]. 四川果树, 1995(3):12-13.
LIU L R. Preliminary observation on the biological characteristics of Zeuzera coffeae Nietner [J]. Sichuan Fruits, 1995(3):12-13.
Cited in this article [3]
[2]
冯荣扬, 郭良珍, 梁恩义, 等. 咖啡豹蠹蛾生物学特性及其防治[J]. 植物保护, 2000, 26(4):12-14.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2000.04.005.
10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2000.04.005
FENG R Y, GUO L Z, LIANG E Y, et al. Bionomics and control of Zeuzera coffeae Nietner [J]. Plant Protection, 2000, 26(4):12-14.
Cited in this article [1]
[3]
薛婷婷, 刘嘉, 沈永宝, 等. 温度对薄壳山核桃种子萌发的影响及其机制初探[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(11):42-50.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.11.008.
10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.11.008
XUE T T, LIU J, SHEN Y B, et al. Study on the seed germination characteristic of Carya illinoensis [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(11):42-50.
Cited in this article [1]
[4]
韩杰, 张明, 林苏宝, 等. 不同修剪措施对薄壳山核桃幼树光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(6):13-18.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703024.
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703024
HAN J, ZHANG M, LIN S B, et al. Effects of different pruning measures on the photosynthetic characteristics of pecan seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 41(6):13-18.
Cited in this article [1]
[5]
刘壮壮, 曹凡, 张瑞, 等. 5个薄壳山核桃品种花粉形态电镜扫描观察[J]. 经济林研究, 2016, 34(2):137-142. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2016.02.025.
10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2016.02.025
LIU Z Z, CAO F, ZHANG R, et al. Observation of pollen morphologies in five cultivars of Carya illinoensis by SEM [J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2016, 34(2):137-142.
Cited in this article [1]
[6]
郭新峰. 宁国市山核桃蛀干性害虫的发生规律及防治技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(7):202-203. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2010.07.139.
10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2010.07.139
GUO X F. Occurrence and control techniques of stem borers onCarya cathayensis Sarg. in Ningguo City [J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010(7):202-203.
Cited in this article [1]
[7]
朱广奇, 龚巧枝. 山核桃园咖啡木蠹蛾的发生与防治[J]. 安徽林业, 2005(4):43.
ZHU G Q, GONG Q Z. Occurrence and control of Zeuzera coffeae Nietner in pecan garden [J]. Anhui Forestry Journal, 2005(4):43.
Cited in this article [1]
[8]
蔡彤. 汪清林业局森林昆虫多样性及其对林木危害评估的初步研究[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2016.
CAI T. Preliminary studies of forest insect diversity and damage assessment of forest insect pests in Wangqing Forestry Bureau[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2016.
Cited in this article [4]
[9]
彭方仁, 李永荣, 郝明灼, 等. 我国薄壳山核桃生产现状与产业化发展策略[J]. 林业科技开发, 2012, 26(4):1-4.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2012.04.001.
10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2012.04.001
PENG F R, LI Y R, HAO M Z, et al. Production status and industrialization development strategy of Carya illinoensis Koch in China [J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2012, 26(4):1-4.
Cited in this article [2]
[10]
蒋志新. 江苏薄壳山核桃发展态势分析与策略[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2011, 38(4):51-53.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2011.04.015.
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2011.04.015
JIANG Z X. Development situation analysis and strategy of Jiangsu Carya illinoensis Koch [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2011, 38(4):51-53.
Cited in this article [2]
[11]
吴文龙, 闾连飞. 薄壳山核桃的引种栽培[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2003(1):11-13.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2003.01.004.
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2003.01.004
WU W L, LYU L F. Cultivation of Carya illinoensis(Wangenn.)K.Koch as an exotic species [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2003, 30(1):11-13.
Cited in this article [2]
[12]
王曼, 李贤忠, 宁德鲁, 等. 薄壳山核桃研究概况及发展趋势[J]. 林业调查规划, 2009, 34(6):93-95.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2009.06.024.
10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2009.06.024
WANG M, LI X Z, NING D L, et al. The research summary and developmental trend of Carya illinoensis [J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2009, 34(6):93-95.
Cited in this article [1]
[13]
陈克, 范晓虹, 李尉民. 有害生物的定性与定量风险分析[J]. 植物检疫, 2002, 16(5):257-261.DOI: 10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2002.05.001.
10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2002.05.001
CHEN K, FAN X H, LI W M. Qualitative and quantitative pest risk analysis[J]. Plant Quarantine, 2002, 16(5):257-261.
Cited in this article [1]
[14]
严晓茹, 熊大斌, 周际丰, 等. 南方板栗林黑星天牛的风险分析[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2017, 36(5):22-25.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2017.05.006.
10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2017.05.006
YAN X R, XIONG D B, ZHOU J F, et al. Risk analysis of Anoplophora leechi (Gahan) in southern chestnut forests [J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2017, 36(5):22-25, 46.
Cited in this article [1]
[15]
李杰, 李峰, 王建海. 界首市美国白蛾风险分析[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2017, 43(3):24-28.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0152.2017.03.005.
10.3969/j.issn.2095-0152.2017.03.005
LI J, LI F, WANG J H. Risk analysis on Hyphantria cunea in Jieshou City [J]. Anhui Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 43(3):24-28.
[16]
刘丽, 陈楠, 郑奋, 等. 海南主要林业有害生物风险评估信息系统的开发[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(2):282-289. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2018.02.6.
10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2018.02.6
LIU L, CHEN N, ZHENG F, et al. Development of risk assessment information system of main forest pest in Hainan[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2018, 40(2):282-289.
[17]
孙小霞, 蔡继增, 李小燕, 等. 林业有害生物云杉大小蠹风险分析[J]. 甘肃科技, 2014, 30(8):143-145.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0952.2014.08.052.
10.3969/j.issn.1000-0952.2014.08.052
SUN X X, CAI J Z, LI X Y, et al. Risk analysis of forest pests Dendroctonus micans(Kugelann) [J]. Gansu Science and Technology, 2014, 30(8):143-145.
Cited in this article [1]
[18]
李娟, 赵宇翔, 陈小平, 等. 林业有害生物风险分析指标体系及赋分标准的探讨[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2013, 32(3):10-15.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2013.03.003.
10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2013.03.003
LI J, ZHAO Y X, CHEN X P, et al. Discussion on the forest pest risk analysis index system and standard of natural endowments[J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2013, 32(3):10-15.
Cited in this article [2]
[19]
巨云为, 曹霞, 叶健, 等. 美国薄壳山核桃虫害研究综述[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2014, 33(1):29-34.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2014.01.009.
10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2014.01.009
JU Y W, CAO X, YE J, et al. Research advances on pests attacking Carya illinoensis [J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2014, 33(1):29-34, 43.
Cited in this article [1]
[20]
周祖琳. 咖啡豹蠹蛾危害葡萄[J]. 植物保护, 1993, 19(6):45-46.
ZHOU Z L. Zeuzera coffeae Nietner harms grapes [J]. Plant Protection, 1993, 19(6):45-46.
Cited in this article [1]
[21]
胡淼. 越桔两种蛀干害虫的发生与防治[J]. 昆虫知识, 2001, 38(3):221-222.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0452-8255.2001.03.018.
10.3969/j.issn.0452-8255.2001.03.018
HU M. Occurence and control of two stem borers on blueberry[J]. Entomological Knowledge, 2001, 38(3):221-222.
Cited in this article [1]

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2019
PDF(1363 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

Author

Reader

Reviewer

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

/

〈 〉