
Suitability evaluation of functional layout of National Urban Wetland Park in Jiangsu Province
XU Xinzhou, LU Zhichao, QIU Bing, WANG Hao
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 152-158.
Suitability evaluation of functional layout of National Urban Wetland Park in Jiangsu Province
【Objective】 In view of the phenomenon of ecological protection function, neglect of functional layout and insufficiency of function in the National Urban Wetland Park, it is helpful to improve the theoretical system of Urban Wetland Park and solve the practical problems of urban wetland park construction.【Method】Five national urban wetland parks in southern Jiangsu (Changguangxi, Shajiabang, Gucheng Lake, Kunshan and Lushuiwan) were selected with the help of landscape architecture and sociological investigation methods, through questionnaires, interviews, and mathematical statistics, and both relevant indicators and evaluation index systems were established to assess the suitability of the functional layout of urban wetland parks. 【Result】 The selected professional evaluation indicators included the integrity and suitability of the overall functional layout and the integrity of the regional functional layout, whereas the selected user satisfaction indicators included ecological environment, popular science exhibition, tourism activities, and management service satisfaction. Comprehensive evaluation indicated that the functional layout of Shajiabang Urban Wetland Park was suitable, whereas that of Gucheng Lake Urban Wetland Park was not suitable, and that of the other three parks was generally suitable. 【Conclusion】 The main problems with the functional layout of Jiangsu National Urban Wetland Park were the lack of ecological protection areas and ecological buffer zones and the unreasonable relationship between ecological protection functions and tourist activities. Therefore, the future planning and construction of urban wetland parks should consider both the social and economic benefits of parks, as well as the ecological benefits of wetland ecological environment optimization. In addition, from the perspective of tourists’ needs and experiences, future planning and construction should also aim to improve relevant supporting service facilities. At the same time, combined with the planning and design of the park, the planning and design of the urban wetland park should be integrated and integrated.
Jiangsu urban wetland park / functional layout / suitability analysis
[1] |
|
[2] |
李洪波, 韦妮妮. 城市湿地生态系统服务的空间流转过程研究: 以泉州湾河口湿地为例[J]. 湿地科学, 2015, 13(1):98-102. DOI: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2015.01.014.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
曹牧, 薛建辉. 崇明东滩湿地生态系统服务功能与价值评估研究述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5):163-169. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.026.
|
[5] |
刘源, 张凯云, 王浩. 城市公园绿地整体性发展分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(6):101-106.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.06.020.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
费文君, 丁佳颖, 曹颖. 从“泄洪沟”到“海绵园”的滨水绿地适用性设计[J]. 中国园林, 2018, 34(2):106-111. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2018.02.025.
|
[8] |
徐跃. 草海、洪河湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估及对比分析[D]. 北京:首都师范大学, 2014.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
李伟, 崔丽娟, 赵欣胜, 等. 中国滨海湿地及其生态系统服务功能研究概述[J]. 林业调查规划, 2014, 39(4):24-30.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2014.04.006.
|
[11] |
江波, 欧阳志云, 苗鸿, 等. 海河流域湿地生态系统服务功能价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(8):2236-2244.
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
赵欣胜, 崔丽娟, 李伟, 等. 吉林省湿地调蓄洪水功能分析及其价值评估[J]. 水资源保护, 2016, 32(4):27-33.
|
[14] |
陆智超. 江苏省国家城市湿地公园功能布局适宜性调查研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2018.
|
[15] |
邓志平, 俞青青, 朱炜, 等. 生态恢复在城市湿地公园植物景观营造中的应用: 以西溪国家湿地公园为例[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2009, 24(6):162-165, 176.
|
[16] |
潘健, 于丹丹, 何振芳, 等. 东平湖湿地景观演变对人类活动的响应机制[J]. 水资源保护, 2017, 33(4):88-94.DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2017.04.014.
|
[17] |
国家林业局《湿地公约》履约办公室. 湿地公约履约指南[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
徐惠强. 江苏湿地[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2012.
|
[20] |
胡伟, 龙庆华, 钱茂, 刘广兵. 基于层次分析法的企业污水治理评价指标体系权重确定[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2014, 36(2):88-91,95.
|
[21] |
李彦螓, 李锦馨, 马生花, 等. 基于AHP法的花博园景观评价分析——以银川市花博园为例[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2019(4):1-6.
|
[22] |
费文君, 史莹, 徐爽. 常州青枫公园防灾避险适宜性分析研究[J]. 绿色科技, 2017(11):1-4.
|
[23] |
方国华, 袁婷, 林榕杰. 长江江苏段饮用水水源地生态风险评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2018, 34(6):12-16. DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2018.06.02.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |