Spatial⁃temporal evolution of landscape pattern in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin from 1995 to 2015

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903079

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 185-194.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903079

Previous Articles Next Articles

Spatial⁃temporal evolution of landscape pattern in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin from 1995 to 2015

JIA Yanyan¹(), TANG Xiaolan¹^,²(), TANG Fanglin³(), YANG Yang¹

^1.College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
^2.NFU Academy of Chinese Ecological Progress and Forestry Development Studies, Nanjing 210037, China
^3.Plan and Research Center for National Park, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Kunming 650216, China

Received:2019-03-31 Revised:2019-08-31 Online:2020-05-30 Published:2020-06-11
Contact: TANG Xiaolan,TANG Fanglin E-mail:jiayanyan1011@163.com;398887917@qq.com;646245043@qq.com

Abstract

Abstract: Objective

Revealing the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of landscape pattern in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin quantitatively could provide a basis for further optimizing the landscape pattern and protecting the ecological environment of the Yangtze River.

Method

Utilizing the land-use data for 1995, 2005 and 2015, supported by ArcGIS10.2, Fragstats 4.2 and other software, landscape index, landscape dynamic degree, and transfer matrix were comprehensively applied to analyze the landscape pattern changes of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River at different spatial-temporal scales in combination with geomorphic features.

Result

From 1995 to 2015, the landscape structure of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River changed significantly. The area of cultivated land, forest land and grass land in the study area decreased, while the area of wetland and construction land increased. However, forest land and cultivated land were the dominant landscapes, accounting for more than 49% and 33%, respectively. The change rate of construction land and cultivated land in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River was significantly higher than that in the middle reaches. In terms of geomorphic types, more than 43% cultivated land, more than 82% wetland, and more than 64% construction land in the study area were concentrated in the plain; on the plain, human activities were the most intense and the contradiction between human and land was prominent. The hilly and mountainous areas were dominated by forest land, grass land and other natural landscapes, but the impact of human activities was also gradually deepening. The dynamic changes of cultivated land, forest land, construction land and wetland were obvious. From 1995 to 2005, the area of cultivated land transformed into construction land and wetland was 3 440.15 km² and 1 705.11 km², respectively, mainly concentrated in the plains. From 2005 to 2015, 5 747.13 km² of cultivated land and 1 432.52 km² of forest land were converted into construction land, mainly concentrated in the plain, platform and hilly areas. The analysis of landscape pattern index showed that the degree of landscape fragmentation of cultivated land and forest land increased, and that of wetland and construction land decreased. The connectivity of construction land increased, tending to gather and spread together. Between 1995 and 2015, the contagion index (CONTAG) and aggregation index (AI) of the study area decreased, while the edge density (ED), Shannon’s diversity index (SHDI) and Shannon’s evenness index (SHEI) increased continuously, indicating that the landscape heterogeneity increased and landscape pattern tended to be complicated.

Conclusion

In the past 20 years, the landscape pattern of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin has changed significantly, with obvious regional differences and increasing human interference. Therefore, the intensity of human activities must be controlled in a targeted way.

Key words: landscape pattern, landscape index, spatial-temporal evolution, the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River

CLC Number:

X171.1

JIA Yanyan, TANG Xiaolan, TANG Fanglin, YANG Yang. Spatial⁃temporal evolution of landscape pattern in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin from 1995 to 2015[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 185-194.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

References 25

1	FORMAN RTT, GODRON M. Landscape ecology[M].New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
2	PERRY G L W.Landscapes，space and equilibrium：shifting viewpoints[J].Prog Phys Geogr：Earth Environ，2002，26(3)：339-359.DOI:10.1191/0309133302pp341ra.
3	张秋菊，傅伯杰，陈利顶.关于景观格局演变研究的几个问题[J].地理科学，2003，23(3)：264-270.
	ZHANG Q J，FU B J，CHEN L D.Several problems about landscape pattern change research[J].Sci Geogr Sin，2003，23(3)： 264-270： DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2003.03.002.
4	SCHRÖDER B，SEPPELT R.Analysis of pattern⁃process interactions based on landscape models：overview，general concepts，and methodological issues[J].Ecol Model，2006，199(4)：505-516.DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.036.
5	ABDULLAH S A，NAKAGOSHI N.Changes in landscape spatial pattern in the highly developing state of Selangor，Peninsular Malaysia[J].Landsc Urban Plan，2006，77(3)：263-275.DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.03.003.
6	陈希，王克林，祁向坤，等.湘江流域景观格局变化及生态服务价值响应[J].经济地理，2016，36(5)：175-181.
	CHEN X，WANG K L，QI X K，et al.Landscape pattern changes and evaluation of ecological service value of the Xiangjiang River watershed[J].Econ Geogr，2016，36(5)： 175-181.DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2016.05.028.
7	任嘉衍，刘慧敏，丁圣彦，等.伊河流域景观格局变化及其驱动机制[J].应用生态学报，2017，28(8)：2611-2620.
	REN J Y，LIU H M，DING S Y，et al.Landscape pattern change and its driving mechanism in Yihe River basin，China[J].Chin J Appl Ecol，2017，28(8)： 2611-2620.DOI: 10.13287/ j.1001-9332.201708.023.
8	万荣荣，杨桂山.太湖流域土地利用与景观格局演变研究[J].应用生态学报，2005，16(3)：475-480.
	WAN R R，YANG G S.Changes of land use and landscape pattern in Taihu Lake basin[J].Chin J Appl Ecol，2005，16(3)：475-480.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2005.0473.
9	雷昆.长江中下游流域湿地演变历史及保护展望[J].绿色中国，2005，27(4)：34-35.
	LEI K.Evolution of wetland in lower⁃and middle section of Yangtze River and outlook to the area’s protection[J].For Econ，2005，27(4)：34-35.DOI:10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2005.04.019.
10	唐晓岚，包文渊，贾艳艳，等.太湖风景区古村古镇景观生态风险分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)，2018，42(2)：105-112.
	TANG X L，BAO W Y，JIA Y Y，et al.Study on ancient village and town landscape ecological risk in Taihu Scenic Area[J].J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed)，2018，42(2)：105-112.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201702034.
11	王芳，谢小平，陈芝聪.太湖流域景观空间格局动态演变[J].应用生态学报，2017，28(11)：3720-3730.
	WANG F，XIE X P，CHEN Z C.Dynamic evolution of landscape spatial pattern in Taihu Lake Basin，China[J].Chin J Appl Ecol，2017，28(11)：3720-3730.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201711.011.
12	任琼，佟光臣，张金池.鄱阳湖区域景观格局动态变化研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)，2016，40(3)：94-100.
	REN Q，TONG G C，ZHANG J C.Dynamics of Poyang Lake watershed landscape pattern[J].J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed)，2016，40(3)：94-100.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.03.016.
13	谭洁，赵赛男，谭雪兰，等.1996—2016年洞庭湖区土地利用及景观格局演变特征[J].生态科学，2017，36(6)：89-97.
	TAN J，ZHAO S N，TAN X L，et al.Change characteristics of land use and landscape pattern in Dongting Lake during 1996-2016[J].Ecol Sci，2017，36(6)：89-97.DOI:10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2017.06.013.
14	黄木易，何翔.巢湖流域土地景观格局变化及生态风险驱动力研究[J].长江流域资源与环境，2016，25(5)：743-750.
	HUANG M Y，HE X.Study on landscape pattern changes and driving forces of ecological risk in Chaohu Lake Basin[J].Resour Environ Yangtze Basin，2016，25(5)：743-750.DOI:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201605007.
15	徐娜，罗菊花，马荣华，等.2000-2010年长江三角洲土地利用/覆盖空间格局动态变化研究[J].第四纪研究，2014，34(4)：856-864.
	XU N，LUO J H，MA R H，et al.Dynamic changes of landscape pattern in the Yangtze River Delta from 2000 to 2010[J].Quat Sci，2014，34(4)：856-864.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7410.2014.04.18.
16	胡昕利，易扬，康宏樟，等.近25年长江中游地区土地利用时空变化格局与驱动因素[J].生态学报，2019，39(6)：1877-1886.
	HU X L，YI Y，KANG H Z，et al.Temporal and spatial variations of land use and the driving factors in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in the past 25 years[J].Acta Ecol Sin，2019，39(6)：1877-1886.DOI:10.5846/stxb201809302138.
17	韩宗祎.基于MODIS数据的长江中下游流域景观格局变化研究[D].武汉：华中农业大学，2012.
	HAN Z Y.Study on the landscape pattern change in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River basin based on MODIS data[D].Wuhan：Huazhong Agricultural University，2012.
18	孔令桥，张路，郑华，等.长江流域生态系统格局演变及驱动力[J].生态学报，2018，38(3)：741-749.
	KONG L Q，ZHANG L，ZHENG H，et al.Driving forces behind ecosystem spatial changes in the Yangtze River Basin[J].Acta Ecol Sin，2018，38(3)：741-749.DOI:10.5846/stxb201712052191.
19	CHENG W M，ZHOU C H，CHAI H X，et al.Research and compilation of the geomorphologic atlas of the People’s Republic of China (1∶1 000 000)[J].J Geogr Sci，2011，21(1)：89-100.DOI:10.1007/s11442-011-0831-z.
20	LIU J Y，KUANG W H，ZHANG Z X，et al.Spatiotemporal characteristics，patterns，and causes of land⁃use changes in China since the late 1980s[J].J Geogr Sci，2014，24(2)：195-210.DOI:10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6.
21	刘纪远，宁佳，匡文慧，等.2010—2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征[J].地理学报，2018，73(5)：789-802.
	LIU J Y，NING J，KUANG W H，et al.Spatio⁃temporal patterns and characteristics of land⁃use change in China during 2010-2015[J].Acta Geogr Sin，2018，73(5)：789-802.DOI:10.11821/dlxb201805001.
22	邬建国. 景观生态学: 格局、过程、尺度与等级[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007. WU J G. Landscape ecology pattern, process, scale and hierarchy[M]. 2nal ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007.
23	王戈，于强，刘晓希，等.包头市景观格局时空演变研究[J].农业机械学报，2019，50(8)：192-199.
	WANG G，YU Q，LIU X X，et al.Temporal and spatial evolution of landscape pattern in Baotou City[J].Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach，2019，50(8)：192-199.DOI:10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2019.08.021.
24	佟光臣，林杰，陈杭，等.1986—2013年南京市土地利用/覆被景观格局时空变化及驱动力因素分析[J].水土保持研究，2017，24(2)：240-245.
	TONG G C，LIN J，CHEN H，et al.Land use and landscape pattern changes and the driving force factors in Nanjing from 1986 to 2013[J].Res Soil Water Conserv，2017，24(2)：240-245.DOI:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc. 2017.02.039.
25	田信桥，伍佳佳.湿地保护政策比较：韩国经验与中国智慧[J].生态经济，2011，27(8)：164-169.
	TIAN X Q，WU J J.Comparing wetland protection policies：experiences of south Korea and wisdoms of China[J].Ecol Econ，2011，27(8)：164-169.

Related Articles 15

[1]	LI Sirong, SU Tongxiang. Protection policy impacts on landscape pattern changes and ecosystem service value responses in Fuxian Lake basin [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 145-154.
[2]	ZHANG Xiaorui, HE Yu, DONG Jieyun. Landscape pattern study based on evaluating the development potential of villages [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 155-164.
[3]	ZHAO Zhiqiang, XU Xiaolong, YUAN Qing, WU Yan. Landscape pattern evolution and driving factors of Songhua River wetland in Harbin [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 219-226.
[4]	ZENG Zheli, SHE Jiyun, TANG Zichao, LUO Chuying. Dynamic change of wetland landscape in Changsha based on JRC global surface water data [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 9-18.
[5]	XU Hao, JIN Ting, LIU Wei. Study on the scale and landscape pattern evolution characteristics of blue-green space in Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou metropolitan area, China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(1): 219-226.
[6]	MA Yingyi, LIU Zhifeng. Assessment of landscape ecological risk and its dynamic response with urbanization development of Jiangsu Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(5): 185-194.
[7]	ZHOU Wen, CAO Fuliang, ZHANG Rui, WANG Guibin. Multi⁃scale analysis of the effects of green space pattern on the urban surface thermal environment [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 133-141.
[8]	LU Hongwang, HU Wenmin, SHE Jiyun, ZENG Wen, SONG Yabin. Study on the influence of Ecological Poplar Withdrawal on the landscape pattern of Dongting Lake wetland [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 171-178.
[9]	LIU Zhili, YUE Depeng, YANG Hui, ZHANG Qibin, YU Qiang, XU Xiaodong. Evolvement and prediction of landscape pattern in Yixing City based on urbanization process [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(6): 105-112.
[10]	XU Haishun, DU Hongyu, CAI Chaolin. Spatial characteristics of landscape pattern based on ecological restoration in the riparian zone of Huangpu River, Shanghai City [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(04): 125-131.
[11]	DAI Tingting, XU Ming, XU Yannan. Spatio-temporal distribution charasteristics and driving factors of rural settlements: a case study in Yixian, Anhui Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 42(05): 155-162.
[12]	LYU Guoping, LIAO Chengrui, XU Yannan, ZHANG Ting, LI Haidong. Dynamic simulation of future ecosystem service value in Puding County, Guizhou Province based on CA-Markov model [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(05): 49-56.
[13]	CHEN Yanfei, TANG Chendong, MA Qiang, XUE Jianhui. Landscape pattern change of Chongming Dongtan Nature Reserve of Shanghai from 2011 to 2015 [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(01): 1-8.
[14]	REN Qiong,TONG Guangchen, ZHANG Jinchi. Dynamics of Poyang Lake watershed landscape pattern [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(03): 94-100.
[15]	YANG Qiang, WANG Tao. Spatial-temporal variation of land use/cover and the analysis of its effect on ecological vulnerability in Yulin City of Shaanxi Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(02): 79-83.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

年份 year	景观类型 landscape pattern	中游 midstream		下游 downstream		中下游流域 the middle and lower reaches
年份 year	景观类型 landscape pattern	面积/km² area	占比/% proportion	面积/km² area	占比/% proportion	面积/km² area	占比/% proportion
1995	耕地cultivated land	202 436.71	30.99	69 225.20	56.19	271 661.91	34.99
	林地forest land	355 887.50	54.49	26 885.25	21.82	382 772.75	49.31
	草地grass land	52 265.91	8.00	5 164.45	4.19	57 430.36	7.40
	湿地wetland	28 174.11	4.31	11 758.82	9.54	39 932.93	5.14
	建设用地construction land	14 257.56	2.18	10 131.89	8.22	24 389.45	3.14
	未利用地unutilized land	105.23	0.02	29.20	0.02	134.43	0.02
2005	耕地cultivated land	200 978.65	30.77	66 375.62	53.88	267 354.27	34.44
	林地forest land	355 440.14	54.42	26 837.25	21.78	382 277.39	49.24
	草地grass land	52 179.66	7.99	5 138.76	4.17	57 318.42	7.38
	湿地wetland	28 813.81	4.41	12 126.98	9.84	40 940.79	5.27
	建设用地construction land	15 613.80	2.39	12 684.67	10.30	28 298.47	3.65
	未利用地unutilized land	100.98	0.02	31.51	0.03	132.49	0.02
2015	耕地cultivated land	198 362.03	30.37	62 923.35	51.08	261 285.38	33.66
	林地forest land	354 067.76	54.21	26 718.34	21.69	380 786.10	49.05
	草地grass land	52 195.37	7.99	5 174.49	4.20	57 369.86	7.39
	湿地wetland	28 995.15	4.44	12 157.14	9.87	41 152.29	5.30
	建设用地construction land	19 405.35	2.97	16 184.60	13.14	35 589.95	4.58
	未利用地unutilized land	101.37	0.02	36.88	0.03	138.25	0.02

地貌类型 geomorphic type	占流域面积比例/% area proportion of geomorphic type	年份 year	景观类型面积占比/% area proportion of landscape type
地貌类型 geomorphic type	占流域面积比例/% area proportion of geomorphic type	年份 year	耕地 cultivated land	林地 forest land	草地 grass land	湿地 wetland	建设用地 construction land	未利用地 unutilized land
平原 plain	24.31	1995	63.79	8.86	1.53	17.34	8.46	0.01
		2005	61.96	8.82	1.53	17.76	9.93	0.01
		2015	59.85	8.73	1.52	17.85	12.05	0.01
台地 platform	17.37	1995	55.95	33.10	3.53	3.00	4.39	0.03
		2005	55.43	32.91	3.50	3.07	5.07	0.03
		2015	54.14	32.48	3.47	3.09	6.79	0.04
丘陵 hill	15.37	1995	27.94	63.70	5.83	1.36	1.15	0.02
		2005	27.86	63.60	5.79	1.42	1.31	0.02
		2015	27.62	63.22	5.83	1.43	1.88	0.02
小起伏山地 low?relief mountain	17.98	1995	15.56	74.37	9.07	0.56	0.42	0.01
		2005	15.55	74.30	9.08	0.60	0.46	0.01
		2015	15.50	74.12	9.13	0.61	0.63	0.01
中起伏山地 middle?relief mountain	19.57	1995	11.65	73.17	14.82	0.18	0.17	0.01
		2005	11.63	73.16	14.83	0.19	0.18	0.01
		2015	11.60	73.14	14.81	0.19	0.24	0.01
大起伏山地 high?relief mountain	5.40	1995	7.83	73.64	18.32	0.11	0.09	0.02
		2005	7.80	73.74	18.23	0.11	0.10	0.02
		2015	7.77	73.72	18.21	0.10	0.17	0.02

景观类型 landscape type	1995—2005		2005—2015		1995—2015
景观类型 landscape type	面积变化/km² area change	动态度/% dynamic degree	面积变化/ km² area change	动态度/% dynamic degree	面积变化/ km² area change	动态度/% dynamic degree
耕地cultivated land	-4 307.64	-0.16	-6 068.89	-0.23	-10 376.54	-0.38
林地forest land	-495.36	-0.01	-1 491.29	-0.04	-1 986.65	-0.05
草地grass land	-111.94	-0.02	51.44	0.01	-60.50	-0.01
湿地wetland	1 007.86	0.25	211.50	0.05	1 219.37	0.31
建设用地construction land	3 909.02	1.60	7 291.48	2.58	11 200.50	4.59
未利用地unutilized land	-1.94	-0.14	5.76	0.43	3.82	0.28

年份 year	景观类型 landscape type	耕地 cultivated land	林地 forest land	草地 grass land	湿地 wetland	建设用地 construction land	未利用地 unutilized land
1995—2005	耕地cultivated land	266 096.24	372.53	209.09	1705.11	3 440.15	0.89
	林地forest land	510.97	381 657.04	184.39	123.66	401.45	6.07
	草地grass land	192.60	284.07	56 863.88	48.36	32.87	0.63
	湿地wet land	627.20	53.01	50.87	39 029.22	142.21	0.01
	建设用地construction land	52.24	6.37	1.18	15.10	24 080.56	0.38
	未利用地unutilized land	1.12	3.89	1.00	1.79	2.36	123.61
2005—2015	耕地cultivated land	260 774.73	325.57	111.79	508.29	5 747.13	12.69
	林地forest land	287.96	380 139.19	448.29	64.49	1 432.52	4.10
	草地grass land	45.53	362.33	56 733.81	33.10	133.42	1.88
	湿地wet land	132.79	22.95	50.07	40 514.95	202.18	0.14
	建设用地construction land	117.11	23.29	13.66	13.21	27 931.42	0.91
	未利用地unutilized land	1.51	1.14	3.54	2.16	5.47	117.75

年份 year	景观类型 landscape type	斑块数 NP	平均斑块面积/ km²MPS	斑块密度/ （个·km^-2） PD	最大斑块指数/% LPI	景观形状指数 LSI	斑块结合度指数 COHESION
1995	耕地cultivated land	224 911	1.207 9	0.289 7	4.542 5	827.161 5	99.812 7
	林地forest land	76 444	5.007 2	0.098 5	11.381 6	563.490 2	99.942 7
	草地grass land	51 997	1.104 5	0.067 0	1.753 1	517.765 1	99.682 9
	湿地wetland	56 497	0.706 8	0.072 8	2.266 1	283.481 6	99.668 3
	建设用地construction land	206 151	0.118 3	0.265 5	0.067 3	531.829 1	86.665 2
	未利用地unutilized land	883	0.152 2	0.001 1	0.003 8	38.991 4	92.026 8
2005	耕地cultivated land	221 255	1.208 3	0.285 0	4.511 8	832.133 4	99.807 6
	林地forest land	76 294	5.010 6	0.098 3	11.343 5	562.704 4	99.942 5
	草地grass land	50 864	1.126 9	0.065 5	1.752 2	514.991 0	99.682 6
	湿地wetland	50 930	0.803 9	0.065 6	2.332 3	281.683 0	99.680 1
	建设用地construction land	196 460	0.144 0	0.253 1	0.105 3	513.614 3	90.936 9
	未利用地unutilized land	859	0.154 2	0.001 1	0.003 8	38.515 2	92.122 9
2015	耕地cultivated land	228 565	1.143 2	0.294 4	4.410 8	842.025 9	99.791 8
	林地forest land	78 995	4.820 4	0.101 8	11.322 5	565.345 2	99.942 0
	草地grass land	51 982	1.103 6	0.067 0	1.759 7	515.533 7	99.682 9
	湿地wetland	49 520	0.831 0	0.063 8	2.301 6	281.234 1	99.666 3
	建设用地constructionland	173 865	0.204 7	0.224 0	0.135 2	503.493 4	93.934 1
	未利用地unutilized land	791	0.174 8	0.001 0	0.003 7	38.025 4	92.151 0

Spatial⁃temporal evolution of landscape pattern in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin from 1995 to 2015

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 25

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer