
Dynamic characteristics of cutting rooting of Catalpa bungei with tender branches
WANG Gaiping, WANG Lianggui, WANG Xiaocong, ZHANG Chen, ZHANG Lei, LIU Bin
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6) : 94-102.
Dynamic characteristics of cutting rooting of Catalpa bungei with tender branches
【Objective】Catalpa bungei is a precious wood tree species in China. Most C. bugein trees are self-sterile and their seedlings are mainly obtained through vegetative propagation. However, a low propagation coefficient and lack of high-quality cutting seedlings have restrained the development of C. bungei plantation. In order to explore the mechanism of C. bungei rooting and to select a suitable method for cutting rooting of C. bungei, the characteristics of root and principles of adventitious root formation were studied using different treatment methods.【Method】Using variety ‘8611’ of C. bungei as materials, a two factor (rooting agent, branch position) completely randomized design experiment was conducted in this study. The dynamic changes of cuttings and rooting stages were observed and divided during the process of rooting, and then the anatomical structure of cuttings at different rooting stages was analyzed using the paraffin section method. Finally, the related indexes of root system were measured using a root scanner and the correlation analysis and multiple comparison of various index data were carried out to obtain the best root handle.【Result】The rooting process of C. bungei cuttings was divided into four stages: 3-7 days as a callus induction period; 7-18 days as a callus and adventitious roots formation stage; 18-20 days as a large-scale form of adventitious roots of cutting stage; and after 20 days as an adventitious roots elongation period. Different hormones and branch positions had significant effects on shoot rooting. Cuttings made from the upper position of branches easily took root, but were perishable; however, cuttings from the middle position of branches had the best rooting effectiveness. The cuttings treated with GGR-6 were easier in taking root and had the best root formation. Comprehensively, the best treatment was that of the cuttings from the middle position of branches with 1 000 mg/kg GGR-6, in which the rooting rate was approximately 92%. No latent root primordium was found based on morphological and anatomical observations and it is speculated that variety ‘8611’ belongs to the induced root primordium type.【Conclusion】The rooting time of C. bungei was about 20 days, which is likely to be the time of induced rooting. The optimal treatment for cutting rooting of C. bungei was the middle position of the tender branches treated with 1 000 mg/kg GGR-6.
Catalpa bungei / shoot cutting / anatomy observation / root development / rooting rate
[1] |
张锦. 国粹楸树材貌绝伦[J].中国林业, 2004(6):34.
|
[2] |
郭明. 木王楸树[J].国土绿化, 2002(2):29.
|
[3] |
张瑞波, 张本强, 赵金娟, 等. 几个楸树无性系引种造林试验[J]. 山东林业科技, 2011,41(4):67-69.
|
[4] |
韩东花, 杨桂娟, 肖遥, 等. 楸树无性系早期生长变异和优选[J]. 林业科学研究, 2019,32(4):96-104.
|
[5] |
梁有旺, 彭方仁, 王顺才. 楸树嫩枝扦插试验初报[J]. 林业科技开发, 2006,20(1):67-69.
|
[6] |
王改萍, 岑显超, 彭方仁, 等. 不同楸树品种的抗旱性鉴定[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2009,26(6):815-821.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
张恩亮, 马玲玲, 杨如同, 等. IBA诱导楸树嫩枝扦插不定根发育的转录组分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018,54(5):48-61.
|
[9] |
韦东山, 张秋良, 常金宝. 美国薄荷嫩枝扦插繁殖及生根机理研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,42(5):39-45.
|
[10] |
梁有旺, 杜旭华, 王顺财, 等. 楸树嫩枝扦插生根的主要影响因子分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2008,17(4):46-50.
|
[11] |
王凯基, 倪德祥. 几种木本植物组织培养的愈伤组织形成和器官再生[J]. 植物学报, 1981,23(2):97-103.
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
卢乃会, 陈杰, 韩成友. 不同激素处理对母生枝条扦插繁殖的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016,44(13):217-219.
|
[14] |
郭素娟. 林木扦插生根的解剖学及生理学研究进展[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1997(4):66-71.
|
[15] |
林艳, 詹亚光, 刘玉喜, 等. 白桦嫩枝扦插不定根形成的解剖观察[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1996(3):15-19.
|
[16] |
曹凡. 美国山核桃扦插繁殖技术及生根机理研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2015.
|
[17] |
宋晓深, 刘玉香, 肖复明, 等. 棱角山矾扦插生根解剖学机理研究[J]. 江西林业科技, 2012 ( 5):14-16.
|
[18] |
哈德曼H T. 植物繁殖原理和技术[M]. 郑开文, 吴应祥,李嘉乐,等,译.北京:中国林业出版社, 1985.
|
[19] |
梁晓静, 朱昌叁, 安家成, 等. 小叶芳樟扦插育苗技术及其不定根形成机理[J]. 广西林业科学, 2020,49(1):7-12.
|
[20] |
森下义朗. 植物扦插理论与技术[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1988.
|
[21] |
梁玉堂. 树木营养繁殖原理和技术[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1993.
|
[22] |
张新宇. 磁化处理对楸树嫩枝扦插生根的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2017.
|
[23] |
邓华平, 王正超. 不同扦插设施条件下金丝楸嫩枝扦插的研究[J]. 河北林果研究, 2009,24(4):381-384.
|
[24] |
魏黔春, 江泽平, 刘建锋, 等. 侧柏古树扦插试验及插穗营养物质变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,44(1):63-71.
|
[25] |
吕运舟, 樊厚宏, 施士争, 等. 元宝枫嫩枝扦插试验[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2019,46(3):10-13.
|
[26] |
许晓岗. 垂丝海棠、楸子的扦插生根机理研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2006.
|
[27] |
孟丙南. 四倍体刺槐扦插技术优化及生根机理研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2010.
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
袁利利. 华北五角枫扦插繁殖技术及生根机理的研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2012.
|
[30] |
王东光. 闽楠嫩枝扦插繁殖技术及生根机理研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2013.
|
[31] |
李恩佳. 不同基质、生根剂及其质量浓度对美国红火球紫薇嫩枝扦插生根的交互影响[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2018,45(1):10-13.
|
[32] |
刘建明, 吕跃东, 姚颖. 不同处理方法对不同沙棘品种扦插生根的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2018,34(1):13-15.
|
[33] |
赵翔, 李清莹, 姜清彬, 等. 不同基质和促根剂对灰木莲嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,43(2):23-30.
|
[34] |
仝伯强, 赵永军, 杨海平, 等. 我国北方楸树资源(Sect. Sinocatalpa)繁育技术研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019,47(14):1-3,17.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |