DNA barcoding of Artiodactyla in cases involved in wildlife for species identification

LIU Dawei, HOU Senlin, ZHOU Yongwu, FEI Yiling, HE Jian

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6) : 27-32.

PDF(1658 KB)
PDF(1658 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6) : 27-32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202004013

DNA barcoding of Artiodactyla in cases involved in wildlife for species identification

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】In this study, we aimed to identify Artiodactyla species in cases of wildlife destruction, using mitochondrial DNA barcoding. 【Method】COI and Cyt b sequences in 67 samples from 16 species were amplified. Animal samples were identified using Blast search on the GenBank sequences. Intra-and inter-specific genetic distances were compared, and phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA 7.0. 【Result】In a homology analysis, the Cyt b sequences of Capreolus pygargus and Capreolus capreouls were 99.64%-99.82% homologous; this sequence could not distinguish two closely related species, whereas other COI and Cyt b sequences could. The intra-specific genetic distance was 0-1.4% for COI and 0-0.5% for Cyt b, whereas the inter-specific genetic distance was 1.8%-18.8% for COI and 4.0%-15.8% for Cyt b. An obvious barcoding gap was detected in both markers for all species. The phylogenetic tree showed that samples from the same species formed monophyletic groups with high support values. The gaps between different species were clear, and all samples from each species formed a single branch with a high support value.【Conclusion】COI and Cyt b may serve as molecular markers for Artiodactyla identification in cases involving wildlife resources. To minimize the risk of false identification, the two DNA barcodes could be used simultaneously, especially for the closely related species.

Key words

Artiodactyla / DNA barcoding / species identification / COI / Cyt b / gene fragment

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Dawei , HOU Senlin , ZHOU Yongwu , et al . DNA barcoding of Artiodactyla in cases involved in wildlife for species identification[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2020, 44(6): 27-32 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202004013

References

[1]
HEBERT P D N, CYWINSKA A, BALL S L, et al. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.Series B: Biological Sciences, 2003,270:313-321.DOI: 10.2307/3558697.
[2]
杨倩倩, 刘苏汶, 俞晓平. DNA条形码分析方法研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018,29(3):1006-1014.
YANG Q Q, LIU S W, YU X P. Research progress on DNA barcoding analysis methods[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2018,29(3):1006-1014.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201803.032.
[3]
HOFMANN T, KNEBELSBERGER T, KLOPPMANN M, et al. Egg identification of three economical important fish species using DNA barcoding in comparison to a morphological determination[J]. J Appl Ichthyol, 2017,33(5):925-932.DOI: 10.1111/jai.13389.
[4]
YU M, JIAO L C, GUO J, et al. DNA barcoding of vouchered xylarium wood specimens of nine endangered Dalbergia species[J]. Planta, 2017,246(6):1165-1176.DOI: 10.1007/s00425-017-2758-9.
[5]
赵志鹏, 向余劲攻, 何鑫, 等.用mtDNA序列鉴定出上海海域须鲸科物种大村鲸[J]. 动物学杂志, 2019, 54(4):493-500.
ZHAO Z P, XIANGYU J G, HE X, et al. Identification of Balaenoptera omurai (Balaenopteridae) from Shanghai seas by sing mtDNA gene sequences[J]. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2019,54(4):493-500.DOI: 10.13859/j.cjz.201904006.
[6]
程希婷, 王爱民, 顾志峰, 等. DNA条形码研究进展[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2011,30(6):748-758.
CHENG X T, WANG A M, GU Z F, et al. Current progress of DNA barcoding[J]. Genom Appl Biol, 2011,30(6):748-758.DOI: 10.3969/gab.030.000748.
[7]
RATNASINGHAM S, HEBERT P D N.BOLD: the barcode of life data system[J]. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2007,7:355-364.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00318.x.
[8]
SHEARER T L, VAN OPPEN M J H, ROMANO S L, et al.Slow mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution in the Anthozoa (Cnidaria)[J]. Mol Ecol, 2002,11(12):2475-2487.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01652.x.
[9]
梁刚, 张卫, 雷富民, 等. 雀形目15种鸟类COⅠ与Cytb基因序列的比较[J]. 动物分类学报, 2007,32(3):613-620.
LIANG G, ZHANG W, LEI F M, et al. Comparison of cyt b and COI gene sequences from 15 species in Passeriformes[J]. Acta Zootaxonomica Sin, 2007,32(3):613-620.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0739.2007.03.027.
[10]
MCFADDEN C S, BENAYAHU Y, PANTE E, et al. Limitations of mitochondrial gene barcoding in Octocorallia[J]. Mol Ecol Resour, 2011,11(1):19-31.DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02875.x.
[11]
KOCHER T D, THOMAS W K, MEYER A, et al. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals:amplification and sequencing with conserved primers[J]. PNAS, 1989,86(16):6196-6200.DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6196.
[12]
JOHNSON T A, IYENGAR A. Phylogenetic evidence for a case of misleading rather than mislabeling in caviar in the United Kingdom[J]. J Forensic Sci, 2015,60:S248-S253.DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12583.
[13]
李楠, 王佳慧, 韩春卉, 等. COI及Cyt b基因对河鲀鱼鱼种鉴定的适用性研究[J]. 中国食品卫生杂志, 2018,30(1):6-11.
LI N, WANG J H, HAN C H, et al. Application of COI and Cyt b gene in species identification of pufferfish[J]. Chin J Food Hyg, 2018,30(1):6-11.DOI: 10.13590/j.cjfh.2018.01.002.
[14]
KUMAR S, STECHER G, TAMURA K. MEGA7:molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2016,33(7):1870-1874.DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw054.
[15]
冯成利, 冯慧, 王艳. 陕西省非法贸易动物分布及现状[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2012,58(4):179-184.
FENG C L, FENG H, WANG Y. Distribution of illegal trade animal in Shaanxi Province[J]. Shaanxi J Agric Sci, 2012,58(4):179-184.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0488-5368.2012.04.061.
[16]
胡诗佳, 彭建军, 于冬梅, 等. 华南地区兽类野生动物非法贸易状况及分析[J]. 四川动物, 2011,30(2):293.
HU S J, PENG J J, YU D M, et al. Analysis on the illegal trade of wild animals in South China[J]. Sichuan J Zool, 2011,30(2):293.
[17]
熊小倩, 尤炜轩, 张玲, 等. 北京地区野生动物资源非法利用状况分析[J]. 野生动物学报, 2017,38(3):376-385.
XIONG X Q, YOU W X, ZHANG L, et al.Status of illegal use of wildlife resources in Beijing[J]. Chin J Wildl, 2017,38(3):376-385.DOI: 10.19711/j.cnki.issn2310-1490.2017.03.006.
[18]
ZENG Y, WU Z Z, ZHANG C G, et al. DNA barcoding of mobulid ray gill rakers for implementing CITES on elasmobranch in China[J]. Sci Rep, 2016,6(1):37567.DOI: 10.1038/srep37567.
[19]
NGATIA J N, LAN T M, MA Y, et al. Distinguishing extant elephants Ivory from mammoth ivory using a short sequence of cytochrome b gene[J]. Sci Rep, 2019,9:18863.DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55094-x.
Trade in ivory from extant elephant species namely Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana) and African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis) is regulated internationally, while the trade in ivory from extinct species of Elephantidae, including woolly mammoth, is unregulated. This distinction creates opportunity for laundering and trading elephant ivory as mammoth ivory. The existing morphological and molecular genetics methods do not reliably distinguish the source of ivory items that lack clear identification characteristics or for which the quality of extracted DNA cannot support amplification of large gene fragments. We present a PCR-sequencing method based on 116 bp target sequence of the cytochrome b gene to specifically amplify elephantid DNA while simultaneously excluding non-elephantid species and ivory substitutes, and while avoiding contamination by human DNA. The partial Cytochrome b gene sequence enabled accurate association of ivory samples with their species of origin for all three extant elephants and from mammoth. The detection limit of the PCR system was as low as 10 copy numbers of target DNA. The amplification and sequencing success reached 96.7% for woolly mammoth ivory and 100% for African savanna elephant and African forest elephant ivory. This is the first validated method for distinguishing elephant from mammoth ivory and it provides forensic support for investigation of ivory laundering cases.
[20]
ROLO E A, OLIVEIRA A R, DOURADO C G, et al. Identification of sarcosaprophagous Diptera species through DNA barcoding in wildlife forensics[J]. Forensic Sci Int, 2013,228(1/2/3):160-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.038.
[21]
秦啼, 王东权, 曲宁新, 等. 基于粪便DNA技术的鸟类物种鉴定体系研究[J]. 野生动物学报, 2020,41(1):145-151.
QIN T, WANG D Q, QU N X, et al. Bird species identification using faecal DNA analysis[J]. Chin J Wildl, 2020,41(1):145-151.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0127.2020.01.020.
[22]
侯森林, 费宜玲, 赵国清, 等. 3种鹿科动物针毛扫描电镜观察[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2018,45(5):35-38.
HOU S L, FEI Y L, ZHAO G Q, et al. A survey on the micro-structural morphological character of guard hair of 3 species of deer by SEM[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2018,45(5):35-38.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.05.008.
[23]
KÖHLER F. From DNA taxonomy to barcoding-how a vague idea evolved into a biosystematic tool[J]. Zool Reihe, 2007,83(S1):44-51.DOI: 10.1002/mmnz.200600025.
[24]
HEBERT P D N, RATNASINGHAM S, DEWAARD J R. Barcoding animal life:cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species[J]. Proc Biol Sci, 2003,270(S 1):S96-S99.DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025.
[25]
SHEN Y J, GUAN L H, WANG D Q, et al. DNA barcoding and evaluation of genetic diversity in Cyprinidae fish in the midstream of the Yangtze River[J]. Ecol Evol, 2016,6(9):2702-2713.DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2060.
[26]
王业磷, 章群, 邓春兴. 基于线粒体COI基因的马鲅科鱼类DNA条形码研究[J]. 海洋渔业, 2020,42(1):1-9.
WANG Y L, ZHANG Q, DENG C X, et al. DNA barcoding of Polynemidae based on mitochondrial COI gene[J]. Marine Fisheries, 2020,42(1):1-9.DOI: 10.13233/j.cnki.mar.fish.2020.01.001.
[27]
DINH T D, NGATIA J N, CUI L Y, et al. Influence of pairwise genetic distance computation and reference sample size on the reliability of species identification using Cyt b and COI gene fragments in a group of native passerines[J]. Forensic Sci Int:Genet, 2019,40:85-95.DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.02.013.
[28]
JIANG F, JIN Q, LIANG L, et al. Existence of species complex largely reduced barcoding success for invasive species of Tephritidae:a case study in Bactrocera spp.[J]. Mol Ecol Resour, 2014,14(6):1114-1128.DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12259.
Fruit flies in the family Tephritidae are the economically important pests that have many species complexes. DNA barcoding has gradually been verified as an effective tool for identifying species in a wide range of taxonomic groups, and there are several publications on rapid and accurate identification of fruit flies based on this technique; however, comprehensive analyses of large and new taxa for the effectiveness of DNA barcoding for fruit flies identification have been rare. In this study, we evaluated the COI barcode sequences for the diagnosis of fruit flies using 1426 sequences for 73 species of Bactrocera distributed worldwide. Tree-based [neighbour-joining (NJ)]; distance-based, such as Best Match (BM), Best Close Match (BCM) and Minimum Distance (MD); and character-based methods were used to evaluate the barcoding success rates obtained with maintaining the species complex in the data set, treating a species complex as a single taxon unit, and removing the species complex. Our results indicate that the average divergence between species was 14.04% (0.00-25.16%), whereas within a species this was 0.81% (0.00-9.71%); the existence of species complexes largely reduced the barcoding success for Tephritidae, for example relatively low success rates (74.4% based on BM and BCM and 84.8% based on MD) were obtained when the sequences from species complexes were included in the analysis, whereas significantly higher success rates were achieved if the species complexes were treated as a single taxon or removed from the data set - BM (98.9%), BCM (98.5%) and MD (97.5%), or BM (98.1%), BCM (97.4%) and MD (98.2%).
[29]
ORTMAN B D, BUCKLIN A, PAGÈS F, et al. DNA Barcoding the Medusozoa using mtCOI[J]. Deep Sea Res Part II:Top Stud Oceanogr, 2010,57(24/25/26):2148-2156.DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.09.017.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2020
PDF(1658 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/