
DNA barcoding of Artiodactyla in cases involved in wildlife for species identification
LIU Dawei, HOU Senlin, ZHOU Yongwu, FEI Yiling, HE Jian
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6) : 27-32.
DNA barcoding of Artiodactyla in cases involved in wildlife for species identification
【Objective】In this study, we aimed to identify Artiodactyla species in cases of wildlife destruction, using mitochondrial DNA barcoding. 【Method】COI and Cyt b sequences in 67 samples from 16 species were amplified. Animal samples were identified using Blast search on the GenBank sequences. Intra-and inter-specific genetic distances were compared, and phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA 7.0. 【Result】In a homology analysis, the Cyt b sequences of Capreolus pygargus and Capreolus capreouls were 99.64%-99.82% homologous; this sequence could not distinguish two closely related species, whereas other COI and Cyt b sequences could. The intra-specific genetic distance was 0-1.4% for COI and 0-0.5% for Cyt b, whereas the inter-specific genetic distance was 1.8%-18.8% for COI and 4.0%-15.8% for Cyt b. An obvious barcoding gap was detected in both markers for all species. The phylogenetic tree showed that samples from the same species formed monophyletic groups with high support values. The gaps between different species were clear, and all samples from each species formed a single branch with a high support value.【Conclusion】COI and Cyt b may serve as molecular markers for Artiodactyla identification in cases involving wildlife resources. To minimize the risk of false identification, the two DNA barcodes could be used simultaneously, especially for the closely related species.
Artiodactyla / DNA barcoding / species identification / COI / Cyt b / gene fragment
[1] |
|
[2] |
杨倩倩, 刘苏汶, 俞晓平. DNA条形码分析方法研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018,29(3):1006-1014.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
赵志鹏, 向余劲攻, 何鑫, 等.用mtDNA序列鉴定出上海海域须鲸科物种大村鲸[J]. 动物学杂志, 2019, 54(4):493-500.
|
[6] |
程希婷, 王爱民, 顾志峰, 等. DNA条形码研究进展[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2011,30(6):748-758.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
梁刚, 张卫, 雷富民, 等. 雀形目15种鸟类COⅠ与Cytb基因序列的比较[J]. 动物分类学报, 2007,32(3):613-620.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
李楠, 王佳慧, 韩春卉, 等. COI及Cyt b基因对河鲀鱼鱼种鉴定的适用性研究[J]. 中国食品卫生杂志, 2018,30(1):6-11.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
冯成利, 冯慧, 王艳. 陕西省非法贸易动物分布及现状[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2012,58(4):179-184.
|
[16] |
胡诗佳, 彭建军, 于冬梅, 等. 华南地区兽类野生动物非法贸易状况及分析[J]. 四川动物, 2011,30(2):293.
|
[17] |
熊小倩, 尤炜轩, 张玲, 等. 北京地区野生动物资源非法利用状况分析[J]. 野生动物学报, 2017,38(3):376-385.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
Trade in ivory from extant elephant species namely Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana) and African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis) is regulated internationally, while the trade in ivory from extinct species of Elephantidae, including woolly mammoth, is unregulated. This distinction creates opportunity for laundering and trading elephant ivory as mammoth ivory. The existing morphological and molecular genetics methods do not reliably distinguish the source of ivory items that lack clear identification characteristics or for which the quality of extracted DNA cannot support amplification of large gene fragments. We present a PCR-sequencing method based on 116 bp target sequence of the cytochrome b gene to specifically amplify elephantid DNA while simultaneously excluding non-elephantid species and ivory substitutes, and while avoiding contamination by human DNA. The partial Cytochrome b gene sequence enabled accurate association of ivory samples with their species of origin for all three extant elephants and from mammoth. The detection limit of the PCR system was as low as 10 copy numbers of target DNA. The amplification and sequencing success reached 96.7% for woolly mammoth ivory and 100% for African savanna elephant and African forest elephant ivory. This is the first validated method for distinguishing elephant from mammoth ivory and it provides forensic support for investigation of ivory laundering cases.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
秦啼, 王东权, 曲宁新, 等. 基于粪便DNA技术的鸟类物种鉴定体系研究[J]. 野生动物学报, 2020,41(1):145-151.
|
[22] |
侯森林, 费宜玲, 赵国清, 等. 3种鹿科动物针毛扫描电镜观察[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2018,45(5):35-38.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
王业磷, 章群, 邓春兴. 基于线粒体COI基因的马鲅科鱼类DNA条形码研究[J]. 海洋渔业, 2020,42(1):1-9.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
Fruit flies in the family Tephritidae are the economically important pests that have many species complexes. DNA barcoding has gradually been verified as an effective tool for identifying species in a wide range of taxonomic groups, and there are several publications on rapid and accurate identification of fruit flies based on this technique; however, comprehensive analyses of large and new taxa for the effectiveness of DNA barcoding for fruit flies identification have been rare. In this study, we evaluated the COI barcode sequences for the diagnosis of fruit flies using 1426 sequences for 73 species of Bactrocera distributed worldwide. Tree-based [neighbour-joining (NJ)]; distance-based, such as Best Match (BM), Best Close Match (BCM) and Minimum Distance (MD); and character-based methods were used to evaluate the barcoding success rates obtained with maintaining the species complex in the data set, treating a species complex as a single taxon unit, and removing the species complex. Our results indicate that the average divergence between species was 14.04% (0.00-25.16%), whereas within a species this was 0.81% (0.00-9.71%); the existence of species complexes largely reduced the barcoding success for Tephritidae, for example relatively low success rates (74.4% based on BM and BCM and 84.8% based on MD) were obtained when the sequences from species complexes were included in the analysis, whereas significantly higher success rates were achieved if the species complexes were treated as a single taxon or removed from the data set - BM (98.9%), BCM (98.5%) and MD (97.5%), or BM (98.1%), BCM (97.4%) and MD (98.2%).
|
[29] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |