Content and vertical distribution of soil labile organic carbons in different land use types in the tidal flat area

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202001021

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 167-175.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202001021

Previous Articles Next Articles

Content and vertical distribution of soil labile organic carbons in different land use types in the tidal flat area

XU Menglu¹(), WU Wei¹, YAN Zhengming¹, CAO Guohua², SHEN Caiqin², RUAN Honghua¹()

^1.Co -Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
^2.Dongtai City Forest Farm of Jiangsu Province, Dongtai 224200, China

Received:2020-01-08 Revised:2020-03-16 Online:2020-07-22 Published:2020-08-13
Contact: RUAN Honghua E-mail:xml@njfu.edu.cn;hhruan@njfu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract: Objective

Coastal tidal flats have a high carbon sequestration potential, which may contribute to alleviating the global greenhouse effect.However, they are being reclaimed at an increasing rate because they provide important land for relieving population pressure, promoting regional economic growth, and ensuring food safety. With the largest area of tidal flats in China, a long history of coastal reclamation activities has been existed in Jiangsu Province. Tidal flat reclamation practices change the basic physical and chemical properties of soil, and accelerate changes in the soil organic carbon pool, especially the active organic carbon, which is sensitive to reclamation activities. Meanwhile, the active organic carbon components can be used to characterize the short term changes in the soil organic carbon pool. As such, studying the differences in soil organic carbon and its active components under different land use types in reclamation areas may provide a reference for the rational development and utilization of coastal wetlands. It is also important to elucidate the role of soil carbon in coastal reclamation areas.

Method

A bare tidal flat, paddy field, and area of upland and forest land in the reclamation area in Dongtai, Jiangsu were selected as research sites.At each site, soil samples were collected from different soil depth layers in order to analyze the variations in dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and easily oxidized carbon (EOC) under the different land use types.

Result

①With the increase of soil depth, the DOC content increased in soil depths of 0—40 cm soils, but decreased in soil depths of 40—100 cm.Furthermore, the MBC and EOC content decreased significantly in soil depths of 0—100 cm across the four land use types. When tested in the same soil layer, the DOC content of the bared tidal flat soil was significantly larger than that of the soil in the other three land use types. However, the MBC and EOC content descended in the following order: forest land， paddy field， upland，bared tidal flat soil.②With the increase of soil depth, the ratio of DOC to SOC and the ratio of MBC to SOC content followed the same trend in the forest land, the upland and the paddy field; first they increased in soil of 0—40 cm depth, then decreased in soil of 40—100 cm depth. However, there were no obvious changes in the bare tidal flat soil,and the ratio of EOC to SOC content did not show the same trend with the increase of soil depth. Furthermore, in soil depths of 0—40 cm, the ratios of DOC to SOC, MBC to SOC content, and EOC to SOC content in the forest land, upland and paddy field were significantly lower than those in the bared tidal flat. ③The MBC and EOC contents were significantly correlated, and were both significantly correlated with SOC, TN content and pH. However, the correlations with EC and TP content were not significant, and DOC content was not correlated with any of the indices.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that agricultural cultivation measures significantly increased the content of soil organic carbon and its active components, and improved the stability of the soil organic carbon.The forest land and paddy field had more soil active organic carbon than the other sites tested. The forest land in particular had accumulated the most soil organic carbon, indicating that the types of land may play an important role as carbon sinks in the coastal area of Jiangsu, southeastern China.Reclamation had the best effect on decreasing soil pH at the paddy field site, and as the main farming activity which is practiced at the early stages of reclaiming land fromtidal flats, this could quickly lead to desalination and decalcification of the land. In conclusion, the development and utilization of tidal flats can significantly change the natural pathway and models of the carbon cycles in the coastal wet lands, and the impacts of land use designation on the soil carbon cycle during reclamation should be fully considered in future research.

Key words: dissolved organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, easily oxidized carbon, land use type, reclamation

CLC Number:

S154.1

XU Menglu, WU Wei, YAN Zhengming, CAO Guohua, SHEN Caiqin, RUAN Honghua. Content and vertical distribution of soil labile organic carbons in different land use types in the tidal flat area[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(4): 167-175.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.1

Fig. 2

Table 3

References 47

1	WEIL R R, ISLAM K R, STINE M A, et al. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for laboratory and field use[J]. Ameri J Alter Agri, 2003, 18(1): 3-17. DOI:10.1079/AJAA200228.
2	GU L H，POST W M，KING A W．Fast labile carbon turnover obscures sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration from soil to temperature：a model analysis[J]．Global Biogeochem Cycles，2004，18(1)：GB1022．DOI:10.1029/2003gb002119.
3	沈宏，曹志洪，胡正义．土壤活性有机碳的表征及其生态效应[J]．生态学杂志，1999，18(3)：32-38．
	SHEN H，CAO Z H，HU Z Y．Characteristics and ecological effects of the active organic carbon in soil[J].Chin J Ecol，1999，18(3)：32-38．DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.1999.0038.
4	SEARCHINGER T，HEIMLICH R，HOUGHTON R A，et al．Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land⁃use change[J]．Science，2008，319(5867)：1238-1240．DOI:10.1126/science.1151861.
5	ZOU X M，RUAN H H，FU Y，et al．Estimating soil labile organic carbon and potential turnover rates using a sequential fumigation⁃incubation procedure[J]．Soil Biol Biochem，2005，37(10)：1923-1928．DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.028.
6	赵鑫，宇万太，李建东，等．不同经营管理条件下土壤有机碳及其组分研究进展[J]．应用生态学报，2006，17(11)：2203-2209．
	ZHAO X，YU W T，LI J D，et al．Research advances in soil organic carbon and its fractions under different management patterns[J]．Chin J Appl Ecol，2006，17(11)：2203-2209．DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2006.0433.
7	SUN B H，HALLETT P D，CAUL S，et al．Distribution of soil carbon and microbial biomass in arable soils under different tillage regimes[J]．Plant Soil，2011，338(1/2)：17-25．DOI:10.1007/s11104-010-0459-2.
8	侯化亭，张丛志，张佳宝，等．不同施肥水平及玉米种植对土壤微生物生物量碳氮的影响[J]．土壤，2012，44(1)：163-166．
	HOU H T，ZHANG C Z，ZHANG J B，et al．Effects of fertilization and maize growing on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen[J].Soils，2012，44(1)：163-166．DOI:10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2012.01.021.
9	蔡晓布，彭岳林，于宝政，等．不同状态高寒草原主要土壤活性有机碳组分的变化[J]．土壤学报，2013，50(2)：315-323．
	CAI X B，PENG Y L，YU B Z，et al．Changes in major fractions of active soil organic carbon in alpine steppes different in states[J]．Acta Pedol Sin，2013，50(2)：315-323．
10	张欢.华东沿海滩涂围垦区土壤有机碳动态及其模型预测[D]．南京：南京大学，2017．ZHANG H. Dynamics and predication of soil organic carbon in coastal reclaimed lands，eastern China [D]．Nanjing：Nanjing University，2017．
11	曹磊，宋金明，李学刚，等．中国滨海盐沼湿地碳收支与碳循环过程研究进展[J]．生态学报，2013，33(17) ：5141-5152．
	CAO L，SONG J M，LI X G，et al. Research progresses in carbon budget and carbon cycle of the coastal salt marshes in China[J]．Acta Ecol Sin，2013，33(17) ：5141-5152．DOI:10.5846/stxb201206030803.
12	普慧梅,王艮梅.不同经营模式下杨树人工林土壤溶解性有机碳的吸附行为[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(2):55-63.
	PU H M,WANG G M.Mechanism of dissolved organic carbon adsorption in soils underdifferent poplar plantation management patterns[J].J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed ),2019,43(2):55-63.DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803028.
13	王莹，阮宏华，黄亮亮，等．围湖造田不同土地利用方式土壤活性有机碳的变化[J]．生态学杂志，2010，29(4)：741-748．
	WANG Y，RUAN H H，HUANG L L，et al．Soil labile organic carbon of different land use types in a reclaimed land area of Taihu Lake[J]．Chin J Ecol，2010，29(4)：741-748．DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2010.0112.
14	田耀武,刘谊锋,王聪,等.伏牛山森林土壤有机碳密度与环境因子的关联性分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(1):83-90.
	TIAN Y W,LIU Y F,WANG C,et al.Correlation between forest soil organic carbon density and environmental factors in Funiu Mountain, Henan Province[J].J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed ),2019,43(1):83-90.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201709057.
15	HUO L L，CHEN Z K，ZOU Y C，et al．Effect of Zoige alpine wetland degradation on the density and fractions of soil organic carbon[J]．Ecol Eng，2013，51：287-295．DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.020.
16	曾从盛，钟春棋，仝川，等．土地利用变化对闽江河口湿地表层土壤有机碳含量及其活性的影响[J]．水土保持学报，2008，22(5)：125-129．
	ZENG C S，ZHONG C Q，TONG C，et al．Impacts of LUCC on soil organic carbon contents in wetland of Minjiang River estuary[J]．J Soil Water Conserv，2008，22(5)：125-129．DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2008.05.030.
17	JONES D，WILLETT V．Experimental evaluation of methods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil[J]．Soil Biol Biochem，2006，38(5)：991-999．DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.012.
18	FREY S D，KNORR M，PARRENT J L，et al．Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil micro⁃bial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests[J]．For Ecol Manag，2004，196(1)：159-171．DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.018.
19	BLAIR G J，LEFROY R，LISLE L．Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation，and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems[J]．Aust J Agric Res，1995，46(7)：1459．DOI:10.1071/ar9951459.
20	SIX J, CONANT R T, PAUL E A, et al. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C⁃saturation of soils[J]. Plant Soil, 2002, 241(2): 155-176. DOI:10.1023/A:1016125726789.
21	吴江琪，马维伟，李广，等．尕海湿地沼泽化草甸中不同积水区土壤活性有机碳含量[J]．湿地科学，2017，15(1)：137-143．
	WU J Q，MA W W，LI G，et al．Contents of active organic carbon in soils of different flooding areas in marshy meadow in Gahai wetlands[J]．Wetl Sci，2017，15(1)：137-143．DOI:10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2017.01.020.
22	MAIE N，WATANABE A，KIMURA M．Chemical characteristics and potential source of fulvic acids leached from the plow layer of paddy soil[J]．Geoderma，2004，120(3/4)：309-323．DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.02.007.
23	张文敏，吴明，邵学新，等．杭州湾南岸不同围垦年限农田土壤有机碳及其活性组分变化[J]．水土保持学报，2014，28(2)：226-231．
	ZHANG W M，WU M，SHAO X X，et al．Changes in soil organic carbon and its active fractions during different reclamation period on the south coast of Hangzhou Bay[J]．J Soil Water Conserv，2014，28(2)：226-231．DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2014.02.043.
24	万忠梅，郭岳，郭跃东．土地利用对湿地土壤活性有机碳的影响研究进展[J]．生态环境学报，2011，20(3)：567-570．
	WAN Z M，GUO Y，GUO Y D．Research progress on influence of land use on wetland soil active organic carbon[J]．Ecol Environ Sci，2011，20(3)：567-570．DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2011.03.020.
25	马士德，谢肖勃，朱素兰．辽东湾海域海水DOC，POC及间隙水中的DOC分布特征[J]．海洋科学，1995，19(6)：46-50．
	MA S D，XIE X B，ZHU S L．The distributive characteristics of poc in seawater and doc in seawater and interstitial water of Liaodong bay[J]．Mar Sci，1995，19(6)：46-50．DOI: 10.1007/BF02006258.
26	龚月月，朱新萍，李典鹏，等．不同土地利用方式下干旱区湿地土壤活性有机碳组分特征[J]．草业科学，2019，36(8)：1944-1952．
	GONG Y Y，ZHU X P，LI D P，et al．Effect of land use type on the active organic carbon of wetland soil in an arid area[J]．Pratacultural Sci，2019，36(8)：1944-1952．DOI:10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2019-0595.
27	崔东,闫俊杰,刘海军,等.伊犁河谷不同类型湿地土壤活性有机碳组分及其含量差异[J].生态学杂志, 2019,38(7):2087-2093. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201907.006.CUI D,
	YAN J J, LIU H J, et al. Soil labile organic carbon fractions and the differences of their concentrations in different types of wetlands in Yili valley[J]. Chin J of Ecol，2019, 38(7): 2087-2093.
28	张仕吉，项文化，孙伟军，等．湘中丘陵区不同土地利用方式对土壤有机碳和微生物量碳的影响[J]．水土保持学报，2013，27(2)：222-227．
	ZHANG S J，XIANG W H，SUN W J，et al．Effects of different land use types on soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon in the hilly area，central Hunan Province[J]．J Soil Water Conserv，2013，27(2)：222-227．DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2013.02.035.
29	李太魁，朱波，王小国，等．土地利用方式对土壤活性有机碳含量影响的初步研究[J]．土壤通报，2013，44(1)：46-51．
	LI T K，ZHU B，WANG X G，et al．Effects of land use on the contents of soil active organic carbon[J]．Chin J Soil Sci，2013，44(1)：46-51．DOI:10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2013.01.007.
30	张成娥,梁银丽,贺秀斌.地膜覆盖玉米对土壤微生物量的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(4):508-512.
	ZHANG C E, LIANG Y L, HE X B. Effects of plastic cover cultivation on soil microbial biomass[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2002, 22(4): 508-512.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.04.009.
	张成娥，梁银丽，贺秀斌．地膜覆盖玉米对土壤微生物量的影响[J]．生态学报，2002，22(4)：508-512．
	ZHANG C E，LIANG Y L，HE X B．Effects of plastic cover cultivation on soil microbial biomass[J]．Acta Ecol Sin，2002，22(4)：508-512．
31	THORBURN P J，MEIER E A，COLLINS K，et al．Changes in soil carbon sequestration，fractionation and soil fertility in response to sugarcane residue retention are site-specific[J]．Soil Tillage Res，2012，120：99-111．DOI:10.1016/j.still. 2011.11.009.
32	王国兵，赵小龙，王明慧，等．苏北沿海土地利用变化对土壤易氧化碳含量的影响[J]．应用生态学报，2013，24(4)：921-926.
	WANG G B，ZHAO X L，WANG M H，et al. Effects of land use change on soil readily oxidizable carbon in a coastal area of northern Jiangsu Province，East China[J]．Chin J Appl Ecol，2013，24(4)：921-926．DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332. 2013.0246.
33	肖烨，黄志刚，武海涛，等．三江平原不同湿地类型土壤活性有机碳组分及含量差异[J]．生态学报，2015，35(23)：7625-7633．
	XIAO Y，HUANG Z G，WU H T，et al．Compositions and contents of active organic carbon in different wetland soils in Sanjiang Plain，Northeast China[J]．Acta Ecol Sin，2015，35(23)：7625-7633．
34	周晨霓，马和平．西藏色季拉山典型植被类型土壤活性有机碳分布特征[J]．土壤学报，2013，50(6)：1246-1251．
	ZHOU C N，MA H P．Distribution of labile organic carbon in soil as affected by vegetation typical of sygera mountains，Tibet，China[J]．Acta Pedol Sin，2013，50(6)：1246-1251．
35	JANDL R，SOLLINS P．Water⁃extractable soil carbon in relation to the belowground carbon cycle[J]．Biol Fertil Soils，1997，25(2)：196-201．DOI:10.1007/s003740050303.
36	XU X，ZHOU Y，RUAN H H，et al．Temperature sensitivity increases with soil organic carbon recalcitrance along an elevational gradient in the Wuyi Mountains，China[J]．Soil Biol Biochem，2010，42(10)：1811-1815．DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.06.021.
37	张仕吉，项文化，孙伟军，等．湘中丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤水溶性有机碳含量[J]．生态学杂志，2014，33(8)：2065-2071．
	ZHANG S J，XIANG W H，SUN W J，et al．Soil Dissolved organic carbon concentration under different land⁃use patterns in a hilly area of central Hunan Province，China[J]．Chin J Ecol，2014，33(8)：2065-2071．DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2014.0187.
38	张金波，宋长春．土地利用方式对土壤碳库影响的敏感性评价指标[J]．生态环境，2003，12(4)：500-504．
	ZHANG J B，SONG C C．The sensitive evaluation indicators of effects of land⁃use change on soil carbon pool[J]．Ecol Environmnet，2003，12(4)：500-504．DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2003.04.031.
39	唐国勇，黄道友，童成立，等．红壤丘陵景观单元土壤有机碳和微生物生物量碳含量特征[J]．应用生态学报，2006，17(3)：429-433．
	TANG G Y，HUANG D Y，TONG C L，et al．Characteristics of soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon in hilly red soil region[J]．Chin J Appl Ecol，2006，17(3)：3429-3433．DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2006.0088.
40	王晓君，王宪帅，黄从德，等．岷江上游森林/干旱河谷交错带不同土地利用类型土壤有机碳和活性有机碳特征[J]．水土保持学报，2011，25(2)：167-172．
	WANG X J，WANG X S，HUANG C D，et al．Characteristics of soil organic carbon and labile organic carbon under different land use types at forest⁃drought valley ecotone in the upper reaches of Minjiang River[J]．J Soil Water Conserv，2011，25(2)：167-172．DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2011.02.038.
41	WANG Y，RUAN H H，HUANG L L，et al．Soil labile organic carbon with different land uses in reclaimed land area from Taihu Lake[J]．Soil Sci，2010，175(12)：624-630．DOI:10.1097/ss.0b013e3181fe2ee4.
42	刘学东．荒漠草原不同群落类型土壤活性有机碳组分特征研究[D]．银川：宁夏大学，2017.
	LIU X D．Characteristics of soil labile organic carbon fractions in different communities of desert steppe[D]．Yinchuan：Ningxia University，2017.
43	周学峰．围垦后不同土地利用方式对长江口滩地土壤有机碳的影响[D]．上海：华东师范大学，2010．
	ZHOU X F．Effects of land⁃use changes on soil organic carbon of reclaimed alluvial soils in the Yangtze Estuary[D]．Shanghai：East China Normal University，2010．
44	张徐，张明，吴鹏豹，等．典型滩涂围垦区土壤化学性质的短期变化特征[J]．土壤通报，2016，47(2)：346-352．
	ZHANG X，ZHANG M，WU P B，et al．Short⁃term variation of soil chemical properties after tidal flat reclamation in a typical coastal area[J]．Chin J Soil Sci，2016，47(2)：346-352．DOI:10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2016.02.14.
45	LUTZE J L，GIFFORD R M．Nitrogen accumulation and distribution in Danthoniarichardsonii swards in response to CO₂ and nitrogen supply over four years of growth[J]．Glob Chang Biol，2000，6(1)：1-12．DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00276.x.
46	SOUSSANA J F，LEMAIRE G．Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop⁃livestock systems[J]．Agric Ecosyst Environ，2014，190：9-17．DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.012.
47	满洲，胡婵娟，冯德显，等．黄土丘陵区白杨纯林群落结构调整对土壤碳的影响[J]．生态学杂志，2018，37(12)：3533-3540．
	MAN Z，HU C J，FENG D X，et al．Effect of community structure adjustment of pure Populustomentosa planataion on soil carbon in the semi⁃arid Loess Plateau of China[J]．Chin J Ecol，2018，37(12)：3533-3540．DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201812.017.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

序号 No.	地理位置 geographical location	土地利用类型 land use type	植被特征 vegetation
1	32°76′57.83′′N, 120°96′96.86′′E	光滩	无植被
2	32°52′45.04′′N, 120°51′22.94′′E	林地	杨树人工林，林龄为8年，平均树高约18.08 m, 平均胸径为16.36 cm, 林分密度为350株/hm²
3	32°50′31.97′′N,120°53′34.51′′E	旱地	8年左右耕作史，种植作物以玉米为主
4	32°50′34.09′′N,120°53′50.95′′E	水田	8年左右耕作史，种植水稻

土地利用类型 land use type	土层深度/cm soil depth	pH	电导率/(dS·m^-1) EC	有机碳含量/(g·kg^-1) SOC content	全氮含量/(g·kg^-1) TN content	全磷含量/(g·kg^-1) TP content
光滩 bared land	0~20	8.65±0.03 Ba	3.50±0.88 Aa	0.94±0.11 Da	0.27±0.05 Ba	0.96±0.01 ABa
	≥20~40	8.61±0.03 Cab	3.07±0.50 Aa	0.94±0.04 Da	0.31±0.12 Aa	0.87±0.01 ABab
	≥40~60	8.57±0.04 Cab	3.12±0.69 Aa	0.88±0.04 Ba	0.26±0.02 Aa	0.87±0.02 ABab
	≥60~80	8.58±0.01 Cb	2.94±0.43 Aa	0.87±0.03 Aa	0.30±0.02 Ba	0.84±0.01 Ab
	≥80~100	8.57±0.06 Cb	2.88±0.43 Aa	0.93±0.03 Aa	0.31±0.04 ABa	0.90±0.02 Bab
林地 forest land	0~20	8.77±0.06 ABb	0.12±0.02 Ba	5.80±0.20 Aa	0.62±0.08 Aa	0.51±0.03 Cb
	≥20~40	8.90±0.13 Bab	0.10±0.02 Ba	3.15±0.09 Ab	0.37±0.06 Ab	0.63±0.04 Cab
	≥40~60	9.02±0.10 Ba	0.10±0.03 Ba	0.81±0.07 Bc	0.37±0.07 Ab	0.75±0.01 Bab
	≥60~80	9.08±0.16 Ba	0.11±0.02 Ba	0.83±0.03 Ac	0.35±0.04 Bb	0.84±0.08 Aa
	≥80~100	9.11±0.17 Ba	0.11±0.01 Ba	0.87±0.03 Ac	0.36±0.02 BCb	0.60±0.07 Aab
旱地 upland	0~20	8.90±0.19 Ac	0.30±0.17 Ba	3.91±0.13 Ba	0.71±0.18 Aa	0.90±0.04 Ba
	≥20~40	9.20±0.18 Ab	0.22±0.06 Ba	1.22±0.10 Cb	0.34±0.08 Ab	0.75±0.01 Ba
	≥40~60	9.40±0.08 Aab	0.24±0.07 Ba	0.93±0.05 Bc	0.35±0.07 Ab	0.84±0.05 ABa
	≥60~80	9.46±0.12 Aab	0.28±0.16 Ba	1.02±0.13 Ab	0.32±0.06 Ab	0.81±0.04 Aa
	≥80~100	9.57±0.09 Aa	0.27±0.13 Ba	0.78±0.04 Ac	0.38±0.03 Cb	0.78±0.02 ABa
水田 paddy field	0~20	8.09±0.08 Cd	0.51±0.06 Ba	4.38±0.14 Ba	0.76±0.04 Aa	1.05±0.01 Aa
	≥20~40	8.33±0.05 Dc	0.32±0.08 Bab	1.92±0.13 Bb	0.32±0.03 Ab	0.93±0.01 Aa
	≥40~60	8.41±0.05 Dbc	0.31±0.09 Bab	1.12±0.09 Acd	0.36±0.06 Ab	0.93±0.01 Aa
	≥60~80	8.50±0.12 Cab	0.33±0.11 Bab	1.24±0.02 Ac	0.37±0.07 Ab	1.02±0.02 Aa
	≥80~100	8.65±0.09 Ca	0.25±0.14 Bb	1.03±0.13 Ad	0.33±0.08 Ab	1.02±0.04 Aa

指标 index	DOC	MBC	EOC	SOC	pH	EC	TN	TP
DOC	1	0.031	-0.005	0.039	0.031	0.360^**	0.011	0.109
MBC		1	0.811^**	0.703^**	-0.347^**	-0.091	0.608^**	-0.183
EOC			1	0.818^**	-0.405^**	-0.205	0.826^**	-0.118

[1]	ZHAO Shuang, WANG Shaojun, YANG Bo, ZUO Qianqian, CAO Qianbin, WANG Ping, ZHANG Lulu, ZHANG Kunfeng, FAN Yuxiang. Responses of soil respiration to tropical forest secondary succession in Xishuangbanna [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(2): 12-18.
[2]	FAN Zhixin, WANG Genmei, ZHANG Huanchao, CHEN Jie. Effects of organic fertilizer addition on dissolved organic carbon in coastal saline soils [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(1): 15-24.
[3]	GUO Chuanyang, LIN Kaimin, ZHENG Mingming, REN Zhengbiao, LI Mao, ZHENG Hong, YOU Yunfei, CHEN Zhiyun. Short-term effects of thinning on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in a Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(5): 125-131.
[4]	FAN Hongwang, BUI Van Thang, TAO Xiao, GUAN Zhiwei, XU Kefu. Effects of spatial difference between urban and rural areas on soil active organic carbon in Quercus acutissima forests [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(4): 151-158.
[5]	LU Mingxing, XU Chuanhong, ZHU Yongli, LI Pingping. Hormetic effect of Cd on soil alkaline phosphatase:driving mechanism of land use change [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(2): 173-180.
[6]	PU Huimei, WANG Genmei. Mechanism of dissolved organic carbon adsorption in soils under different poplar plantation management patterns [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(02): 55-63.
[7]	LIU Lan,TANG Xiaolan,XIONG Xing,DU Juan,WANG Junwei. Ecological sensitivity analysis of rural natural landscape in the south of Jiangsu Province based on GIS [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 42(04): 159-164.
[8]	YANG Baoling, ZHANG Wenwen^{1, 3}, FAN Huan, WANG Shaojun, RUAN Honghua, SHEN Caiqin, CAO Guohua. Community structure of soil fauna under different land use types in the coastal area of Northern Jiangsu Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(06): 120-126.
[9]	SONG Lei, LIN Youwei, JIN Guangze. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in a mixed broadleaf Korean pine forest [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(05): 7-12.
[10]	LI Lanhai, LIU Xiang, ZHU Yongli. Effects of reclamation on soil soluble organic nitrogen contents in wetlands of the Ili River Valley [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(03): 1-6.
[11]	XU Yiqian, XUE Jianhui, WU Yongbo, BU Xiaoli. Effects of rice husk biochar application on nitrogen and phosphorus leaching and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content in yellow brown soil [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(03): 22-28.
[12]	ZHANG Wenwen, XIAO Hanran, YANG Baoling, DONG Kejia, RUAN Honghua, ZHENG Abao,SHEN Caiqin, CAO Guohua. Effects of soil fauna on seasonal variations of soil N mineralization under different land use type [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(06): 20-26.
[13]	HE Dongmei, WANG Lei, FENG Yuqing, RUAN Honghua. Effects of land use type on soil dissolved organic carbon in a land reclamation area from lake [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(06): 15-19.
[14]	WANG Shu,MA Lan,GAO Jiarong,YANG Fan,ZHANG Dong,LIANG Xianghan. Effect of land use type on variability of soil organic matter content with soil depth in the loess region of western Shanxi Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(05): 81-86.
[15]	WANG Dong, XU Jingjing, ZHOU Liangguang, WU Jian. Changes of ecosystem service value in Anhui Province and prediction of its changing trend [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(04): 88-94.

Content and vertical distribution of soil labile organic carbons in different land use types in the tidal flat area

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 47

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer