JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 213-223.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202210017
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Changai1(), LIU Ling1, QIU Bing2,*(
), NI Cunming3, NING Lili1, LI Yaliang1, WANG Hui1, LIU Xingyu1, YANG Suhui1
Received:
2022-10-17
Revised:
2022-12-19
Online:
2023-09-30
Published:
2023-10-10
CLC Number:
LI Changai, LIU Ling, QIU Bing, NI Cunming, NING Lili, LI Yaliang, WANG Hui, LIU Xingyu, YANG Suhui. Spatial-temporal change and driving factors of land use/cover in Anhui Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 213-223.
Table 1
Area of land use/cover types and corresponding proportions in Anhui Province"
地类 land use type | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积/ km2 area | 比例/% ratio | 面积/ km2 area | 比例/% ratio | 面积/ km2 area | 比例/% ratio | 面积/ km2 area | 比例/% ratio | 面积/ km2 area | 比例/% ratio | 面积/ km2 area | 比例/% ratio | |
耕地CulL | 81 271.8 | 58.0 | 80 688.2 | 57.6 | 80 324.8 | 57.3 | 78 918.5 | 56.3 | 77 682.6 | 55.4 | 77 445.3 | 55.3 |
林地FL | 32 281.9 | 23.0 | 32 285.9 | 23.0 | 32 293.8 | 23.0 | 32 206.0 | 23.0 | 32 102.5 | 22.9 | 32 117.2 | 22.9 |
草地GL | 8 372.1 | 6.0 | 8 360.5 | 6.0 | 8 354.9 | 6.0 | 8 324.8 | 5.9 | 8 282.6 | 5.9 | 8 293.7 | 5.9 |
水域WA | 71 84.9 | 5.1 | 7 195.5 | 5.1 | 7 236.3 | 5.2 | 7 286.6 | 5.2 | 7 453.6 | 5.3 | 7 345.8 | 5.2 |
建设用地ConL | 11 034.6 | 7.9 | 11 617.6 | 8.3 | 11 937.8 | 8.5 | 13 414.2 | 9.6 | 14 623.2 | 10.4 | 14 930.6 | 10.7 |
未利用地UL | 5.9 | 0 | 5.9 | 0 | 5.9 | 0 | 5.3 | 0 | 8.7 | 0 | 22.1 | 0 |
Table 2
Land use/cover transfer matrix in Anhui Province"
地类 land use type | 时间段 time interval | 草地 grassland | 耕地 cultivated land | 建设用地 construction land | 林地 forest | 水域 water area | 未利用地 unutilized land |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
草地GL | 1995—2000 | 8 330.6 | 9.5(23.23) | 3.5(8.56) | 26.1(63.81) | 1.8(4.40) | 0.0(0.00) |
2000—2005 | 8 320.1 | 7.0(17.33) | 3.2(7.92) | 29.5(73.02) | 0.7(1.73) | 0.0(0.00) | |
2005—2010 | 8 235.8 | 27.6(23.17) | 33.7(28.30) | 54.4(45.68) | 3.4(2.85) | 0.0(0.00) | |
2010—2015 | 8 209.0 | 24.2(20.92) | 29.8(25.76) | 48.8(42.18) | 11.6(10.03) | 1.3(1.12) | |
2015—2020 | 8 059.2 | 68.9(30.86) | 45.2(20.24) | 100.5(45.00) | 7.0(3.13) | 1.7(0.76) | |
1995—2020 | 8 066.6 | 79.2(25.93) | 82.2(26.92) | 131.8(43.16) | 10.7(3.50) | 1.5(0.49) | |
耕地CulL | 1995—2000 | 6.8(0.98) | 80 576.2 | 600.2(86.33) | 65.6(9.44) | 22.6(3.25) | 0.0(0.00) |
2000—2005 | 7.7(1.52) | 80 181.4 | 323.8(63.93) | 76.5(15.10) | 98.5(19.45) | 0.0(0.00) | |
2005—2010 | 33.5(1.80) | 78 459.2 | 1 576.2(84.49) | 121.3(6.5) | 134.5(7.21) | 0.1(0.01) | |
2010—2015 | 28.4(1.62) | 77 170.4 | 1 349.9(77.23) | 108.9(6.23) | 260.0(14.87) | 0.8(0.05) | |
2015—2020 | 67.4(2.23) | 74 665.0 | 2 303.3(76.33) | 318.0(10.54) | 320.6(10.62) | 8.2(0.27) | |
1995—2020 | 89.1(1.58) | 75 634.4 | 4 716.5(83.66) | 364.4(6.46) | 457.0(8.11) | 10.5(0.19) | |
建设用地 ConL | 1995—2000 | 0.3(0.92) | 30.5(93.85) | 11 002.0 | 1.2(3.69) | 0.5(1.54) | 0.0(0.00) |
2000—2005 | 0.3(1.47) | 17.6(86.27) | 11 597.3 | 1.3(6.37) | 1.2(5.88) | 0.0(0.00) | |
2005—2010 | 1.5(0.62) | 226.7(96.91) | 11 703.8 | 3.0(1.29) | 2.7(1.17) | 0.0(0.00) | |
2010—2015 | 4.9(1.66) | 268.8(91.18) | 13 118.7 | 11.3(3.83) | 9.8(3.32) | 0.0(0.00) | |
2015—2020 | 35.0(1.60) | 2 006.5(91.83) | 12 438.3 | 93.3(4.27) | 46.9(2.15) | 3.2(0.15) | |
1995—2020 | 5.5(0.48) | 1 120.4(96.88) | 9 878.1 | 9.2(0.80) | 20.5(1.77) | 0.9(0.08) | |
林地 FL | 1995—2000 | 21.4(23.41) | 58.9(64.44) | 9.0(9.85) | 32 189.8 | 2.1(0.30) | 0.0(0.00) |
2000—2005 | 25.4(24.83) | 65.3(63.83) | 9.4(9.19) | 32 182.3 | 2.2(2.15) | 0.0(0.00) | |
2005—2010 | 51.4(18.84) | 126.9(46.50) | 89.1(32.64) | 32 020.9 | 5.0(1.84) | 0.5(0.17) | |
2010—2015 | 38.6(14.02) | 114.8(41.70) | 97.4(35.27) | 31 929.9 | 22.9(8.32) | 1.6(0.58) | |
2015—2020 | 112.7(21.22) | 304.7(57.38) | 97.1(18.29) | 31 571.1 | 13.5(2.54) | 3.0(0.56) | |
1995—2020 | 121.9(17.77) | 342.2(49.88) | 201.7(29.40) | 31 595.5 | 16.0(2.33) | 4.2(0.61) | |
水域 WA | 1995—2000 | 1.2(6.98) | 12.4(72.09) | 1.5(8.72) | 2.1(12.21) | 7 167.8 | 0.0(0.00) |
2000—2005 | 0.9(1.46) | 53.1(86.06) | 4.1(6.65) | 3.6(5.83) | 7 133.7 | 0.0(0.00) | |
2005—2010 | 2.5(2.61) | 78.0(81.50) | 11.3(11.81) | 3.9(4.08) | 7 140.6 | 0.0(0.00) | |
2010—2015 | 1.6(1.17) | 104.3(76.35) | 27.2(19.91) | 3.5(2.56) | 7 149.4 | 0.0(0.00) | |
2015—2020 | 18.2(3.67) | 399.2(80.40) | 45.7(9.20) | 32.3(6.51) | 6 957.1 | 1.1(0.22) | |
1995—2020 | 10.2(2.96) | 267.5(77.72) | 51.2(14.88) | 14.9(4.33) | 6 840.8 | 0.4(0.12) | |
未利用地 UL | 1995—2000 | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 5.8 |
2000—2005 | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 5.8 | |
2005—2010 | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.9(75.00) | 0.3(25.00) | 4.7 | |
2010—2015 | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.2(66.67) | 0.1(33.33) | 0.0(0.00) | 5.0 | |
2015—2020 | 1.2(24.49) | 0.8(16.33) | 0.3(6.12) | 1.4(28.57) | 0.0(0.00) | 4.9 | |
1995—2020 | 0.1(7.69) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.0(0.00) | 0.9(69.23) | 0.3(23.08) | 4.5 |
Table 3
Comprehensive indexes of land use degrees of each city in Anhui Province"
城市 city | L | 变化率/% rate of change over 25 years | 城市 city | L | 变化率/% rate of change over 25 years | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1995 | 2020 | 1995 | 2020 | ||||
宿州市 Suzhou | 309.6 | 312.2 | 0.87 | 合肥市 Hefei | 294.7 | 301.1 | 2.18 |
淮北市 Huaibei | 308.7 | 313.7 | 1.60 | 马鞍山市 Ma’anshan | 283.9 | 288.4 | 1.56 |
亳州市 Bozhou | 315.4 | 318.0 | 0.85 | 芜湖市 Wuhu | 280.8 | 285.2 | 1.60 |
蚌埠市 Bengbu | 303.8 | 305.9 | 0.71 | 宣城市 Xuancheng | 236.9 | 238.8 | 0.81 |
阜阳市 Fuyang | 315.5 | 317.9 | 0.77 | 安庆市 Anqing | 251.8 | 253.7 | 0.77 |
滁州市 Chuzhou | 284.3 | 287.3 | 1.06 | 铜陵市 Tongling | 261.3 | 271.4 | 3.83 |
淮南市 Huainan | 302.0 | 306.5 | 1.50 | 池州市 Chizhou | 230.0 | 232.1 | 0.92 |
六安市 Lu’an | 262.8 | 264.6 | 0.66 | 黄山市 Huangshan | 215.2 | 216.1 | 0.42 |
Table 4
Dynamic degree of land use/cover change in Anhui Province"
地类 land use type | 1995—2000 | 2000—2005 | 2005—2010 | 2010—2015 | 2015—2020 | 1995—2020 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 area | 动态度 dynamic degree | 面积 area | 动态度 dynamic degree | 面积 area | 动态度 dynamic degree | 面积 area | 动态度 dynamic degree | 面积 area | 动态度 dynamic degree | 面积 area | 动态度 dynamic degree | |
耕地CulL | -583.7 | -0.14 | -363.4 | -0.09 | -1 406.3 | -0.35 | -1 235.9 | -0.31 | -237.3 | -0.06 | -3 826.6 | -0.94 |
林地FL | 4.0 | 0.00 | 7.9 | 0.00 | -87.9 | -0.05 | -103.5 | -0.06 | 14.7 | 0.01 | -164.7 | -0.10 |
草地GL | -11.6 | -0.03 | -5.6 | -0.01 | -30.1 | -0.07 | -42.2 | -0.10 | 11.1 | 0.03 | -78.5 | -0.19 |
水域WA | 10.5 | 0.03 | 40.8 | 0.11 | 50.3 | 0.14 | 167.0 | 0.46 | -107.8 | -0.29 | 160.9 | 0.45 |
建设用地ConL | 583.0 | 1.06 | 320.1 | 0.55 | 1 476.4 | 2.47 | 1 209.0 | 1.80 | 307.3 | 0.42 | 3 895.9 | 7.06 |
未利用地UL | -0.0 | -0.09 | 0.0 | 0.09 | -0.6 | -2.03 | 3.4 | 12.74 | 13.4 | 30.72 | 16.2 | 54.63 |
综合LUCC | 1 192.8 | 0.09 | 737.9 | 0.05 | 3 051.6 | 0.22 | 2 761.0 | 0.20 | 691.6 | 0.05 | 8 142.7 | 0.12 |
Table 5
Correlation coefficient matrix"
驱动因子 driving factor | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1.000 | ||||||||||||
X2 | 0.990** | 1.000 | |||||||||||
X3 | 0.992** | 0.997** | 1.000 | ||||||||||
X4 | 0.998** | 0.994** | 0.994** | 1.000 | |||||||||
X5 | 0.990** | 0.966** | 0.969** | 0.985** | 1.000 | ||||||||
X6 | 0.968** | 0.988** | 0.983** | 0.979** | 0.931** | 1.000 | |||||||
X7 | 0.997** | 0.986** | 0.989** | 0.996** | 0.993** | 0.960** | 1.000 | ||||||
X8 | -0.095 | -0.138 | -0.170 | -0.091 | -0.057 | -0.106 | -0.115 | 1.000 | |||||
X9 | -0.945** | -0.967** | -0.958** | -0.960** | -0.907** | -0.991** | -0.936** | 0.024 | 1.000 | ||||
X10 | 0.957** | 0.947** | 0.951** | 0.955** | 0.950** | 0.919** | 0.958** | -0.152 | -0.895** | 1.000 | |||
X11 | 0.942** | 0.963** | 0.957** | 0.955** | 0.900** | 0.986** | 0.932** | -0.057 | -0.988** | 0.899** | 1.000 | ||
X12 | 0.978** | 0.972** | 0.968** | 0.982** | 0.976** | 0.962** | 0.979** | -0.019 | -0.955** | 0.934** | 0.938** | 1.000 | |
X13 | 0.313 | 0.309 | 0.298 | 0.317 | 0.345* | 0.293 | 0.339* | -0.080 | -0.275 | 0.226 | 0.262 | 0.359* | 1.000 |
Table 6
Eigenvalues and contribution rates of principal components"
主成分 PCs | 特征值 eigenvectors | 贡献率/% contribution rate | 累积贡献率/% cumulative contribution rate |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 10.754 | 82.725 | 82.725 |
2 | 1.030 | 7.920 | 90.645 |
3 | 0.899 | 6.913 | 97.558 |
4 | 0.209 | 1.606 | 99.164 |
5 | 0.057 | 0.440 | 99.604 |
6 | 0.027 | 0.207 | 99.811 |
7 | 0.013 | 0.103 | 99.914 |
8 | 0.005 | 0.039 | 99.953 |
9 | 0.002 | 0.019 | 99.972 |
10 | 0.002 | 0.015 | 99.987 |
11 | 0.001 | 0.011 | 99.998 |
12 | 0 | 0.001 | 99.999 |
13 | 0 | 0.001 | 100 |
[1] | 徐光来, 杨先成, 徐晓华, 等. 气候变暖背景下安徽省月NDVI动态变化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(2):397-406. |
XU G L, YANG X C, XU X H, et al. Dynamic changes of monthly NDVI in Anhui Province under background of climate warming[J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(2):397-406.DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202102014. | |
[2] |
ALKAMA R, CESCATTI A. Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover[J]. Science, 2016, 351(6273):600-604.DOI: 10.1126/science.aac8083.
pmid: 26912702 |
[3] | 潘雯, 刘云慧, 武泽浩, 等. 不同发展情景下青海省土地利用布局及生物多样性变化模拟[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(4):103-116. |
PAN W, LIU Y H, WU Z H, et al. Simulation of changes in land use distribution and biodiversity under different development scenarios in Qinghai Province[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2022, 30(4):103-116.DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021425. | |
[4] | CARDINALE B J, DUFFY J E, GONZALEZ A, et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity[J]. Nature, 2012, 486(7401):59-67.DOI: 10.1038/nature11148. |
[5] | 周旺明, 王金达, 刘景双, 等. 三江平原不同土地利用方式对区域气候的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(5):155-158. |
ZHOU W M, WANG J D, LIU J S, et al. Influence of different land-use to regional climate in Sanjiang Plain[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2005, 19(5):155-158.DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2005.05.039. | |
[6] | BOYSEN L R, BROVKIN V, ARORA V K, et al. Global and regional effects of land-use change on climate in 21st century simulations with interactive carbon cycle[J]. Earth Syst Dynam, 2014, 5(2):309-319.DOI: 10.5194/esd-5-309-2014. |
[7] | ARNETH A, SITCH S, PONGRATZ J, et al. Historical carbon dioxide emissions caused by land-use changes are possibly larger than assumed[J]. Nat Geosci, 2017, 10(2):79-84.DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2882. |
[8] | HE J J, ZHANG P Y. Evaluation of carbon emissions associated with land use and cover change in Zhengzhou City of China[J]. Reg Sustain, 2022, 3(1):1-11.DOI: 10.1016/j.regsus.2022.03.002. |
[9] | VERBURG P H, CROSSMAN N, ELLIS E C, et al. Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system:a global land project perspective[J]. Anthropocene, 2015, 12:29-41.DOI: 10.1016/j.ancene.2015.09.004. |
[10] | 林坚, 周琳, 张叶笑, 等. 土地利用规划学30年发展综述[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(9):24-33. |
LIN J, ZHOU L, ZHANG Y X, et al. Review on the development of land use planning science in recent three decades[J]. China Land Sci, 2017, 31(9):24-33.DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20171027.145754. | |
[11] | 邹大伟, 李孝玲, 康瑞存, 等. 基于Google Earth Engine的土地覆盖分类方法研究[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2021, 44(S1):100-102,105,109. |
ZOU D W, LI X L, KANG R C, et al. Research on land cover classification method based on google earth engine[J]. Geomat Spatial Inf Technol, 2021, 44(S1):100-102,105,109. | |
[12] | 张德军, 颜玮, 陈志军, 等. 基于GF-1数据复杂地区地物类型提取探究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(11):172-185. |
ZHANG D J, YAN W, CHEN Z J, et al. GF-1 data-based extraction of land cover of complex areas[J]. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 43(11):172-185.DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2021.11.020. | |
[13] |
王臣立, 徐丹, 林文鹏. 红河哈尼梯田世界文化景观遗产的遥感监测与土地覆盖变化[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(2):233-241.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.02.002 |
WANG C L, XU D, LIN W P. Remote sensing monitoring and land cover change of the world cultural landscape heritage in Honghe Hani Terrace,China[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2021, 30(2):233-241.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.02.002. | |
[14] |
马海云, 张林林, 魏学琼, 等. 2000—2015年西南地区土地利用与植被覆盖的时空变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2):618-628.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202102.017 |
MA H Y, ZHANG L L, WEI X Q, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of land use and vegetation cover in southwest China from 2000 to 2015[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2021, 32(2):618-628.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202102.017. | |
[15] | 王奕璇, 张志斌, 王仁慈. 基于地理国情监测的兰州新区土地利用时空演变分析[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2021, 56(1):149-159. |
WANG Y X, ZHANG Z B, WANG R C. Analysis on the spatio-temporal evolution of land use in Lanzhou New District based on the national geographical monitoring data[J]. J Gansu Agric Univ, 2021, 56(1):149-159.DOI: 10.13432/j.cnki.jgsau.2021.01.020. | |
[16] | 梁明, 聂拼, 陆胤昊, 等. 淮南市土地利用程度变化过程的时空演化特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(22):99-106. |
LIANG M, NIE P, LU Y H, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of land use intensity change process of Huainan[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2019, 35(22):99-106.DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.22.011. | |
[17] |
艾敏, 景慧, 田禹东, 等. 近20年哈尔滨市呼兰区土地利用覆盖变化及驱动分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022(7):124-128.
doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0215 |
AI M, JING H, TIAN Y D, et al. Analysis of land use and coverage change and driving force in Hulan District of Harbin City in recent 20 Years[J]. Bull Surv Mapp, 2022(7):124-128.DOI: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0215. | |
[18] | 李玉, 牛路, 赵泉华. 抚顺矿区1989—2019年土地利用/覆盖变化分析[J]. 测绘科学, 2021, 46(8):96-104,140. |
LI Y, NIU L, ZHAO Q H. Analysis of land use/cover change in Fushun mining area from 1989 to 2019[J]. Sci Surv Mapp, 2021, 46(8):96-104,140.DOI: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2021.08.014. | |
[19] | DU X Z, ZHAO X A, LIANG S L, et al. Quantitatively assessing and attributing land use and land cover changes on China’s loess plateau[J]. Remote Sens, 2020, 12(3):353.DOI: 10.3390/rs12030353. |
[20] | 国务院关于《淮河生态经济带发展规划》的批复国函〔2018〕126号. [2018-10-18]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-10/18/content_5332105.htm. |
[21] | 中共中央国务院印发《长江三角洲区域一体化发展规划纲要》. [2019-12-01]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-12/01/content_5457442.htm. |
[22] | 季军民, 刘庆广, 王爱. 合肥市土地利用变化及其生态系统响应研究[J]. 生态科学, 2018, 37(3):91-95. |
JI J M, LIU Q G, WANG A. Study on land use change and its ecosystem response in Hefei[J]. Ecol Sci, 2018, 37(3):91-95.DOI: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2018.03.012. | |
[23] | GUAN J, YU P. Does coal mining have effects on land use changes in a coal resource-based city?evidence from Huaibei City on the north China plain[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(21):11616.DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111616. |
[24] | WANG X T, HAN J Z, LIN J. Response of land use and net primary productivity to coal mining:a case study of Huainan City and its mining areas[J]. Land, 2022, 11(7):973.DOI: 10.3390/land11070973. |
[25] | 彭建, 吴见, 徐飞雄, 等. 基于价值评估的黄山市生境质量时空演变特征分析[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(2):665-679. |
PENG J, WU J, XU F X, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of habitat quality in typical tourism cities based on value evaluation:a case study of Huangshan[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(2):665-679.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201904020639. | |
[26] | 吴见, 侯功兰, 刘民士, 等. 安徽省土地利用十年动态变化遥感监测[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(2):147-150. |
WU J, HOU G L, LIU M S, et al. Land use dynamic monitoring for ten years by remote sensing of Anhui Province[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2014, 38(2):147-150.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.02.028. | |
[27] | 吴楠, 陈红枫, 冯朝阳, 等. 基于土地覆被变化的安徽省生境质量时空演变特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(5):1119-1127. |
WU N, CHEN H F, FENG C Y, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of habitat quality based on land cover change in Anhui Province[J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(5):1119-1127.DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202005007. | |
[28] | 黄安东, 赵明松, 郜敏, 等. 1980—2020年安徽省土地利用时空演化特征[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(11):4627-4635. |
HUANG A D, ZHAO M S, GAO M, et al. Characteristics of spatio-temporal evolution of land use in Anhui Province from 1980 to 2020[J]. Sci Technol Eng, 2022, 22(11):4627-4635.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.11.046. | |
[29] | 赵冰雪, 王雷, 程东亚. 安徽省气象数据空间插值方法比较与分布特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(3):141-145. |
ZHAO B X, WANG L, CHENG D Y. Comparison of spatial interpolation method for meteorological data and distribution characteristic in Anhui Province[J]. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2017, 24(3):141-145.DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2017.03.026. | |
[30] | 阮新民, 陈曦, 岳伟, 等. 气候变化对安徽省两熟制粮食作物物候期及周年气候资源分配与利用的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2021, 29(2):355-365. |
RUAN X M, CHEN X, YUE W, et al. Effects of climate change on phenophases and annual climate resources distribution and utilization of major food crops under a double-cropping system in Anhui Province[J]. Chin J Eco Agric, 2021, 29(2):355-365.DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200459. | |
[31] | 柴立夫, 田莉, 奥勇, 等. 人类活动干扰对青藏高原植被覆盖变化的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(6):382-388. |
CHAI L F, TIAN L, AO Y, et al. Influence of human disturbance on the change of vegetation cover in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2021, 28(6):382-388.DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20210527.001. | |
[32] |
胡悦琴, 马燕飞, 张伟科. 中国陆地区土地利用/覆被时空格局变化及驱动力分析[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(4):26-35.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190600085 |
HU Y Q, MA Y F, ZHANG W K. Land use/cover in China’s land areas:spatio-temporal pattern change and driving forces analysis[J]. J Agric, 2020, 10(4):26-35. | |
[33] | 邢颖, 高礼安, 张杭杭. 基于主成分分析的都匀市土地利用动态变化及驱动力分析[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2018, 36(12):67-72. |
XING Y, GAO L A, ZHANG H H. Dynamic change and driving force analysis of land use in Duyun City based on principal component analysis[J]. China Resour Compr Util, 2018, 36(12):67-72.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9500.2018.12.021. | |
[34] | 乔伟峰, 盛业华, 方斌, 等. 基于转移矩阵的高度城市化区域土地利用演变信息挖掘:以江苏省苏州市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(8):1497-1507. |
QIAO W F, SHENG Y H, FANG B, et al. Land use change information mining in highly urbanized area based on transfer matrix:a case study of Suzhou,Jiangsu Province[J]. Geogr Res, 2013, 32(8):1497-1507. | |
[35] | 庄大方, 刘纪远. 中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 1997, 12(2):105-111. |
ZHUANG D F, LIU J Y. Study on the model of regional differentiation of land use degree in China[J]. J Nat Resour, 1997, 12(2):105-111. | |
[36] |
于明雪, 孙建国, 杨维涛, 等. 基于贝叶斯层次时空模型的甘肃省土地利用程度演变分析[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(5):918-925.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.05.017 |
YU M X, SUN J G, YANG W T, et al. Evolution of land use degree in Gansu Province based on Bayesian hierarchical spatio-temporal model[J]. Sci Geogr Sin, 2022, 42(5):918-925.DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.05.017. | |
[37] | 钟凯文, 孙彩歌, 解靓. 基于GIS的广州市土地利用遥感动态监测与变化分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2009, 11(1):111-116. |
ZHONG K W, SUN C G, XIE L. The dynamic monitoring of land use change in Guangzhou based on RS and GIS[J]. J Geo Inf Sci, 2009, 11(1):111-116. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1560-8999.2009.01.017. | |
[38] | 陈亚军, 付保红, 邱玥. 基于RS-GIS的昆明市土地利用变化及驱动力分析[J]. 云南地理环境研究, 2018, 30(6):65-71. |
CHEN Y J, FU B H, QIU Y. Analysis of land use change and driving forces in Kunming based on RS-GIS[J]. Yunnan Geogr Environ Res, 2018, 30(6):65-71.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7852.2018.06.009. | |
[39] | 赵慧, 汪云甲. 影响ETM影像土地利用/覆盖分类精度因素的研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2012, 27(4):600-608. |
ZHAO H, WANG Y J. Research on the factors affecting the classification accuracy of ETM remote sensing image land cover/use[J]. Remote Sens Technol Appl, 2012, 27(4):600-608. |
[1] | ZHANG Xiaorui, HE Yu, DONG Jieyun. Landscape pattern study based on evaluating the development potential of villages [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 155-164. |
[2] | ZHAO Zhiqiang, XU Xiaolong, YUAN Qing, WU Yan. Landscape pattern evolution and driving factors of Songhua River wetland in Harbin [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 219-226. |
[3] | SHEN Hao, JIANG Jiang, ZHOU Chen, PAN Qingquan. Research on factors driving carbon storage in broad-leaved forests of different origins from Shicheng, Jiangxi Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 185-190. |
[4] | QIAN Chunhua, ZHAO Yichen, LI Mingyang, LI Tao. Dynamic analyses of forest ecological functions based on fixed plot data of continuous forest resources inventories from 1979 to 2012 in Guangzhou [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(2): 205-212. |
[5] | LI Jiangrong, GUO Qiqiang, ZHENG Weilie. Analyses of transpiration water consumption of Abies georgei var. smithii and its driving factors in southeastern Tibet [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(6): 151-158. |
[6] | YU Songping, LIU Zebin, GUO Jianbin, WANG Yanhui, YU Pengtao, WANG Lei. Stand transpiration characteristics of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation and their influencing factors in Liupan Mountain [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(1): 131-140. |
[7] | LU Hongwang, HU Wenmin, SHE Jiyun, ZENG Wen, SONG Yabin. Study on the influence of Ecological Poplar Withdrawal on the landscape pattern of Dongting Lake wetland [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 171-178. |
[8] | HU Hong, XU Yanli, JU Hongbo, SUN Zhichao. Monitoring and analysis of county-level vegetation cover change in Changting, Fujian based on remote sensing images [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(03): 92-98. |
[9] | LU Yanan, YAO Shunbo. Spatial-temporal dynamic characteristics for land use of the southern collective forest region based on the function of economy and policy [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 42(05): 163-171. |
[10] | DAI Tingting, XU Ming, XU Yannan. Spatio-temporal distribution charasteristics and driving factors of rural settlements: a case study in Yixian, Anhui Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 42(05): 155-162. |
[11] | HAN Huiqing,ZHANG Jiaoyan,MA Geng,ZHANG Xinding,BAI Yumei. Advances on impact of climate change on ecosystem services [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 42(02): 184-190. |
[12] | REN Qiong,TONG Guangchen, ZHANG Jinchi. Dynamics of Poyang Lake watershed landscape pattern [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(03): 94-100. |
[13] | HE Liheng, JIA Zirui, WANG Zhijie . Land-use/cover spatial-temporal change characteristic in Yan'an region [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(06): 173-176. |
[14] | WANG Dong, XU Jingjing, ZHOU Liangguang, WU Jian. Changes of ecosystem service value in Anhui Province and prediction of its changing trend [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(04): 88-94. |
[15] | WU Jian, ZHANG Yan, HOU Langong. Landscape ecological quality change of Anhui Province in 2000-2010 [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(02): 84-90. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||