An landscape gene evaluation of traditional villages in Nanjing based on residents’ and tourists’ perception perspective

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202307017

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 255-264.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202307017

Previous Articles Next Articles

An landscape gene evaluation of traditional villages in Nanjing based on residents’ and tourists’ perception perspective

LI Xiaoying(), WANG Zhidong, TANG Yucheng

College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2023-07-17 Revised:2024-05-15 Online:2025-01-30 Published:2025-01-21

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aims to quantitatively analyze the commonalities and differences in the genetic evaluation of traditional village landscapes from the perspectives of residents and tourists and to propose specific strategies for optimizing the design of traditional village landscapes.【Method】The landscape gene theory and residents’ and tourists’ perception theory were introduced using Qiqiao Village in Nanjing City as the research object. The landscape gene theory was applied to qualitatively analyze the current status of traditional village landscape genes and construct a landscape gene map. Accordingly, a questionnaire was designed to investigate and analyze the landscape gene perception of residents and tourists. 【Result】(1) Residents’ perceptions of landscape gene features are ranked from high to low as environmental, cultural, architectural, and layout characteristics. (2) Tourists’ perceptions of landscape gene features are ranked from high to low as layout features, environmental, architectural, and cultural features. (3) Regarding the perceived differences between residents and tourists, local residents place greater importance on cultural inheritance and development. In contrast, foreign tourists focus more on the layout structure and architectural landscape expression of the villages. 【Conclusion】The landscape gene theory provides theoretical guidance for the authenticity protection of traditional villages. This study reveals the internal connection between traditional villages and the landscape perceptions of residents and tourists. The development of traditional villages must comprehensively consider the perceptions and demands of residents and tourists and dialectically view the connections and differences in landscape perception.

Key words: villages landscape, traditional villages, landscape genes, residents and tourists perception, authenticity protetion, Qiqiao Villages, Nanjing City

CLC Number:

TU982.29

LI Xiaoying, WANG Zhidong, TANG Yucheng. An landscape gene evaluation of traditional villages in Nanjing based on residents’ and tourists’ perception perspective[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(1): 255-264.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Table 2

Statistical table of perception of landscape gene characteristics 单位:%"

感知特征 perceptual feature	景观基因(感知项) landscape genes(code)	组别 group	非常赞同 strongly agree	比较赞同 quite agree	一般 generally agree	比较不赞同 relatively disagree	非常不赞同 strongly disagree
环境特征 environmental feature	自然环境(X1)	居民组	22.78	59.41	9.90	7.92	0
		游客组	32.75	47.06	8.40	1.68	1.68
	水系布局(X2)	居民组	24.75	44.55	11.89	11.89	3.96
		游客组	19.33	41.18	24.37	6.72	0
	绿地形态(X3)	居民组	17.82	44.55	30.69	4.95	1.98
		游客组	17.65	27.73	34.45	7.56	4.20
	地理环境(X4)	居民组	8.91	48.51	35.64	6.93	0
		游客组	75.89	42.02	35.29	8.40	0
布局特征 layout feature	街巷布局(X5)	居民组	18.81	39.60	27.72	9.90	3.96
		游客组	18.49	50.42	17.65	5.04	0
	建筑布局(X6)	居民组	16.83	15.54	21.78	12.87	2.97
		游客组	12.61	56.30	17.65	1.68	0.84
	道路铺装(X7)	居民组	12.87	29.70	31.68	22.77	2.97
		游客组	24.37	36.13	18.49	10.08	2.52
建筑特征 architectural feature	建筑风格(X8)	居民组	5.94	35.64	44.55	12.87	0.99
		游客组	34.45	30.25	16.81	9.24	0.84
	建筑细部(X9)	居民组	6.93	50.50	34.65	7.92	0
		游客组	8.40	40.37	29.41	13.45	0
	建筑结构(X10)	居民组	25.74	48.51	22.78	2.97	0
		游客组	8.40	36.97	35.29	10.08	0.84
文化特征 cultural feature	历史变迁(X11)	居民组	25.74	44.55	12.87	11.89	4.95
		游客组	10.92	36.13	33.61	4.20	6.72
	宗族文化(X12)	居民组	21.78	37.62	19.80	10.89	9.90
		游客组	3.37	15.97	33.61	29.41	9.24
	文学遗传(X13)	居民组	10.89	37.62	28.71	10.89	11.89
		游客组	3.37	15.97	25.21	37.82	11.76
	宗教信仰(X14)	居民组	13.86	45.54	23.76	15.84	3.96
		游客组	0.84	13.45	20.17	42.86	14.29
	民俗活动(X15)	居民组	23.76	33.66	26.73	11.89	3.96
		游客组	7.56	13.45	19.33	31.93	19.33
	传统技艺(X16)	居民组	30.69	37.62	16.83	8.91	5.94
		游客组	1.68	19.33	15.13	39.50	15.97
	饮食文化(X17)	居民组	46.53	38.61	8.91	1.98	3.96
		游客组	7.56	21.01	15.97	36.97	10.08

Table 2

Table 3

References 30

[1]	申秀英, 刘沛林, 邓运员, 等. 中国南方传统聚落景观区划及其利用价值[J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(3):485-494.
	SHEN X Y, LIU P L, DENG Y Y, et al. Landscape communities of traditional settlement in southern China and their values of conservation and utilization[J]. Geogr Res, 2006, 25(3):485-494.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2006.03.014.
[2]	ELTON M. Susan Blackmore,the meme machine[J]. Mines Mach, 2001, 11:437-442.DOI: 10.1023/A:1017539015001.
[3]	TAYLOR G. Environment,village and city:agenetic approach to urban geography;with some reference to possibilism[J]. Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 1942, 32(1):1-67.DOI: 10.1080/00045604209357229.
[4]	LACHLAN R F, FELDMAN M W. Evolution of cultural communication systems: the coevolution of cultural signals and genes encoding learning preferences[J]. J Evol Biol, 2003, 16(6):1084-1095.DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00624.x.
[5]	刘沛林. 古村落文化景观的基因表达与景观识别[J]. 衡阳师范学院学报(社会科学), 2003, 24(4):1-8.
	LIU P L. The gene expression and the sight identification of the ancient villages’ cultural landscape[J]. J Hengyang Norm Univ, 2003, 24(4):1-8.DOI: 10.13914/j.cnki.cn43-1453/z.2003.04.001.
[6]	杨立国, 林琳, 刘沛林, 等. 少数民族传统聚落景观基因的居民感知与认同特征:以通道芋头侗寨为例[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(6):60-66.
	YANG L G, LIN L, LIU P L, et al. On perception and identification of traditonal settlements’landscape genes in Chinese minority areas: a case study in Taro Dong Minority Village of Tongdao[J]. Hum Geogr, 2014, 29(6):60-66.DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2014.06.010.
[7]	申秀英, 刘沛林, 邓运员. 景观“基因图谱” 视角的聚落文化景观区系研究[J]. 人文地理, 2006, 21(4):109-112.
	SHEN X Y, LIU P L, DENG Y Y. Seeking the landscape’s genes atlas: one kind of new angle of view about settlement’s cultural landscape districts research[J]. Hum Geogr, 2006, 21(4):109-112.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2006.04.023.
[8]	刘沛林. “景观信息链” 理论及其在文化旅游地规划中的运用[J]. 经济地理, 2008, 28(6):1035-1039.
	LIU P L. “Landscape Information Chain” theory and its utilization in planning of cultural tour destinations[J]. Econ Geogr, 2008, 28(6):1035-1039.
[9]	刘沛林, 刘春腊, 邓运员, 等. 基于景观基因完整性理念的传统聚落保护与开发[J]. 经济地理, 2009, 29(10):1731-1736.
	LIU P L, LIU C L, DENG Y Y, et al. Study on ancient village’s protection and development which based on the concept of landscape-gene’s integrity[J]. Econ Geogr, 2009, 29(10):1731-1736.
[10]	蒋思珩, 樊亚明, 郑文俊. 国内景观基因理论及其应用研究进展[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2021, 36(1):84-91.
	JIANG S H, FAN Y M, ZHENG W J. Research progress on landscape’s gene theory and its utilization in China[J]. J Hum Settl West China, 2021, 36(1):84-91.DOI: 10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20210111.
[11]	GURSOY D, JUROWSKI C, UYSAL M. Resident attitudes[J]. Ann Tour Res, 2002, 29(1):79-105.DOI: 10.1016/s0160-7383(01)00028-7.
[12]	LAWSON R, WILLIAMS J, YOUNG T, et al. A comparison of residents’ attitudes towards tourism in 10 New Zealand destinations[J]. Tour Manag, 1998, 19(3):247-256.DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00018-1.
[13]	PARASKEVOPOULOU A T, NEKTARIOS P A, KOTSIRIS G. Post-fire attitudes and perceptions of people towards the landscape character and development in the rural Peloponnese: a case study of the traditional village of Leontari,Arcadia,Greece[J]. J Environ Manage, 2019, 241:567-574.DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.105.
[14]	LANKFORD S V. A comment concerning “Developing and testing a tourism impact scale”[J]. J Travel Res, 2001, 39(3):315-316.DOI: 10.1177/004728750103900310.
[15]	RASOOLIMANESH S M, DAHALAN N, JAAFAR M. Tourists’ perceived value and satisfaction in a community: based homestay in the Lenggong Valley World Heritage Site[J]. J Hosp Tour Manag, 2016, 26:72-81.DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.01.005.
[16]	PANDŽA BAJS I. Tourist perceived value,relationship to satisfaction,and behavioral intentions[J]. J Travel Res, 2015, 54(1):122-134.DOI: 10.1177/0047287513513158.
[17]	张玉萍, 李雪铭. 基于居民期望与感知的城市居住景观差异分析:以大连市南关岭街道为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2008, 23(9):60-64.
	ZHANG Y P, LI X M. Analysis on difference between expectation and perception of urban habitat landscape:based on Nanguanling Street in Dalian[J]. Mod Urban Res, 2008, 23(9):60-64.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2008.09.009.
[18]	周艳梅, 唐雪琼, 曾莉, 等. 乡村景观的审美分异:感知与认知路径的对比研究[J]. 中国园林, 2021, 37(11):92-97.
	ZHOU Y M, TANG X Q, ZENG L, et al. Landscape aesthetic heterogeneity in rural area:a comparative study between perception and cognition pathway[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2021, 37(11):92-97.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2021.11.0092.
[19]	黄硕, 郑宇, 成林莉, 等. 基于景观偏好的城市公园景观健康效益评价机制研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(5):221-228.
	HUANG S, ZHENG Y, CHENG L L, et al. The impact mechanism of urban park health benefit evaluation based on landscape preference[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2022, 46(5):221-228.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107020.
[20]	焦议. 基于居民游客感知的党家村古村落景观保护与开发研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
	JIAO Y. Protection and development of ancient village landscape of Dangjia Village based on the perce-ption of residents and tourists[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2019.
[21]	李娜, 张捷. 基于居民感知的旅游地民居建筑景观变化研究:以九寨沟藏寨建筑景观特色变化为例[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版), 2009, 32(3):132-137.
	LI N, ZHANG J. Researching the transformation of vernacular architectural landscape in tourism destination based on the residents’ perception: case study of the transformation of the characteristics of the tibetam architectural landscape in Jiuzhaigou[J]. J Nanjing Norm Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2009, 32(3):132-137.
[22]	陈幺, 赵振斌, 张铖, 等. 遗址保护区乡村居民景观价值感知与态度评价:以汉长安城遗址保护区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(10):1971-1980.
	CHEN Y, ZHAO Z B, ZHANG C, et al. Landscape value perception and attitude evaluation of community residents on historical protection area:a case study of Han Chang’an City Historical Site[J]. Geogr Res, 2015, 34(10):1971-1980.DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201510014.
[23]	易果平, 钟永德, 易米平. 乡村旅游地居民的社会文化感知研究:以官庄景区为例[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 4(4):51-54.
	YI G P, ZHONG Y D, YI M P. On residents’ socio-cultural perceptions of rural tourism:a case study of Guanzhuang scenic area[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol (Soc Sci), 2010, 4(4):51-54.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-9272.2010.04.049.
[24]	程乾, 付俊. 基于游客感知的古村落旅游资源评价研究[J]. 经济地理, 2010, 30(2):329-333.
	CHENG Q, FU J. Research on evaluation of ancient village tourism resources based on visitor perception[J]. Econ Geogr, 2010, 30(2):329-333.DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2010.02.025.
[25]	曹帅强, 李敏. 基于游客感知的传统聚落景观基因意象评价:以南岳古镇为例[J]. 云南地理环境研究, 2015, 27(1):22-30.
	CAO S Q, LI M. Traditional settlement landscape image guest rating based on perception: take the south town as a case[J]. Yunnan Geogr Environ Res, 2015, 27(1):22-30.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7852.2015.01.004.
[26]	高燕, 郑焱. 凤凰古城景观真实性感知比较研究:基于居民和旅游者视角[J]. 旅游学刊, 2010, 25(12):44-52.
	GAO Y, ZHENG Y. A comparative study on the authentic perception of landscapes in Fenghuang Ancient city: from the perspective of residents and tourists[J]. Tour Tribune, 2010, 25(12):44-52.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2010.12.007.
[27]	张琳, 杨珂, 刘滨谊, 等. 基于游客和居民不同视角的江南古镇景观地域特征感知研究:以同里古镇为例[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(1):10-16.
	ZHANG L, YANG K, LIU B Y, et al. A study on the regional characteristics perception of ancient towns in the south of the Yangtze River based on different perspectives of tourists and residents:a case study of Tongli ancient town[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2019, 35(1):10-16.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2019.01.003.
[28]	胡最, 刘沛林, 陈影. 传统聚落景观基因信息图谱单元研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2009, 25(5):79-83.
	HU Z, LIU P L, CHEN Y. A research on graphic methodology unit model of traditional settlement landscape[J]. Geogr Geo Inf Sci, 2009, 25(5):79-83.
[29]	王志东. 主客感知视角下传统村落景观基因评价及优化设计研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2023.
	WANG Z D. Landscape genes evaluation and optimal design of traditional village from the perspective of residents and tourists perception: a case study of Qiqiao Village in Nanjing[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forest University, 2023.
[30]	成慧. 儒家礼制下的家族婚姻观:以漆桥村孔氏家族为例[J]. 百色学院学报, 2018, 31(2):43-47.
	CHENG H. The view of family marriage under the Confucian ritual system: taking the Kongshi family in Qiqiao Village as an example[J]. J Baise Univ, 2018, 31(2):43-47.DOI: 10.16726/j.cnki.bsxb.2018.02.009.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

感知特征 perceptual feature	感知项 prceptual code	居民感知均值 residents mean value	游客感知均值 tourists mean value
环境特征 environmental feature	X1	3.97	4.17
	X2	3.80	3.80
	X3	3.71	3.51
	X4	3.59	3.50
	平均	3.77	3.75
布局特征 layout feature	X5	3.59	3.90
	X6	3.60	3.83
	X7	3.27	3.76
	平均	3.49	3.83
建筑特征 architectural feature	X8	3.33	2.04
	X9	3.56	3.48
	X10	3.97	3.46
	平均	3.62	2.99
文化特征 cultural feature	X11	3.74	3.44
	X12	3.50	2.72
	X13	3.19	2.55
	X14	3.47	2.39
	X15	3.61	2.54
	X16	3.78	2.47
	X17	4.22	2.77
	平均	3.64	2.70

An landscape gene evaluation of traditional villages in Nanjing based on residents’ and tourists’ perception perspective

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 30

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

变量 variable	景观基因 landscage gene	感知项代码 code	测项item
环境特征 environmental feature	自然环境	X1	整体自然环境舒适宜人
	水系布局	X2	水系环绕,池塘、河道等水系景观优美
	绿地形态	X3	绿地和植物种类丰富
	地理环境	X4	交通便利
布局特征 layout feature	街巷布局	X5	街巷空间布局合理、主次分明
	建筑布局	X6	建筑之间位置布局合理
	道路铺装	X7	道路布局合理
建筑特征 architectural feature	建筑风格	X8	建筑风格统一、形式美观
	建筑细节	X9	建筑的门、窗、屋面等外观装饰美观
	建筑结构	X10	建筑结构、材料具有地方特色
文化特征 cultural feature	历史变化	X11	村落驿道发展等历史变迁
	宗族文化	X12	孔氏文脉传承及儒家文化特色
	文学遗传	X13	相关历史传说和诗词歌赋
	宗教信仰	X14	土地庙、娘娘庙等相关宗教信仰
	民俗活动	X15	木偶戏、高腔戏等民俗活动
	传统技艺	X16	传统民俗技艺
	饮食文化	X17	特色饮食文化