JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 245-253.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202310006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Constructing mechanisms and induction of empirical models for agroforestry compound management

DONG Bo()   

  1. College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037,China
  • Received:2023-10-08 Accepted:2024-10-13 Online:2025-05-30 Published:2025-05-27

Abstract:

【Objective】Agroforestry compound management is widely acknowledged as a promising strategy for guaranteeing the sustainability of future agricultural production. This research is dedicated to exploring and optimizing the agroforestry management system with Chinese characteristics. By elucidating its complex mechanisms and summarizing empirical models, the study aims to maintain the sustainable production of both forestry and agriculture in the future. 【Method】Based on an all-round review of agroforestry management practices, this paper focuses on constructing the agroforestry management mechanism to identify the roles of various factors. It also aims to summarize experience-based models suitable for different environmental conditions. Specifically, a detailed analysis of biophysical factors, socio-economic factors, farmers’ endowments, production enterprises, and safeguard measures has been carried out. 【Result】(1) The agroforestry management mechanism is significantly influenced by multiple factors. These encompass biophysical conditions such as soil quality, climate, and topography; socio-economic factors like market demand, economic policies, and the rural labor force; farmers’ endowments in terms of land resources, farming skills, and financial capabilities; production enterprises with their production scale, technological innovation, and market-orientation; and safeguard measures including agricultural policies, forest protection regulations, and rural infrastructure construction. (2) According to the degree of utilization of ecosystem types, agroforestry management systems can be classified into four main categories: agroforestry systems, mainly centering on the combination of agricultural crops and forest trees; forest-pastoral systems, emphasizing the integration of forestry and livestock grazing; agroforestry-pastoral systems, integrating agriculture, forestry, and animal husbandry; and other special systems customized to specific local ecological and socio-economic conditions. (3) In Europe and the Americas, through the efforts of farms and research institutes, forest-farm-livestock composite management practice systems and scientific research systems have been established respectively. These systems enable the meticulous management of agricultural production, covering aspects such as precise resource allocation, scientific breeding, and the efficient utilization of agricultural land. In contrast, most regions in Asia still primarily rely on traditional agroforestry management systems, which are characterized by relatively simple production models and less advanced technologies. (4) China has a long-standing history of agroforestry management with diverse modes. These modes show obvious spatial differentiation due to differences in the natural environment, economic development level, and cultural traditions in different regions. However, there is still a gap between the technological application in China’s agroforestry management and the international advanced level, especially in areas such as modern agricultural machinery, information technology, and ecological management. 【Conclusion】In light of the above-mentioned findings, it is of great significance to promote the sustainable development of China’s agroforestry management system. This can be achieved by establishing an agroforestry management mechanism tailored to local conditions, actively enhancing farmers’ production concepts and technical capabilities through training and extension services, and constructing a comprehensive risk-defense mechanism and a sound policy-guarantee system. The risk-defense mechanism should cover aspects such as natural disaster prevention, market risk mitigation, and technological innovation risks, while the policy-guarantee system should include preferential policies for agroforestry development, financial support, and land-use policies.

Key words: agroforestry management, driving mechanisms, management models, precision agriculture, rural revitalization

CLC Number: