The burning behaviors of woodplastic composites (WPC) and fireretardant WPC were investigated by testing the ignition time, heat release rate, mass loss, and smoke generation with cone calorimeter in this research.Test results showed that the ignition time of WPC was 27 s, which was longer than that of the plantation wood and similar to that of MDF with a density of 086 g/cm3. The peek value of heat release rate (HRR) of WPC was 404 kW/m2, and the total heat released (THR) after combustion for 1 200 s was 180 MJ/m2, and the average effective heat of combustion (HOC) of WPC was 28 MJ/kg which was higher than that of the planted wood. The average mass loss rate (MLR) of WPC was about 7 g/(s·m2), which was lower than that of poplar and masson pine. The total amount of the smoke emitted in the combustion process of WPC was higher than that of the plantation wood. The peek HRR and the MLR of were lower than PP because the wood is dehydrated and given off none combustion composition, for example, water, CO2, CO et al, and take effect as fire retardant. The HRR and THR of WPC treated with fire retardant(nonhalogen and halogen containing fire retardants) has decreased, and the SP has increased, especially the halogen containing fire retardant. Therefore, the halogen containing fire retardant does not fit WPC.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]克列阿索夫.木塑复合材料[M].王伟宏，宋永明，高华，等译. 北京：科学出版社，2010.
[2]Schartela B, Brauna U, Schwarzb U, et al. Fire retardancy of polypropylene/flax blends[J]. Polymer, 2003,44(20):6241-6250.
[3]Sain M, Park S H, Suhara F, et al. Flame retardant and mechanical properties of natural fibrePP composites containing magnesium hydroxide[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability，2004,83(2):363-367.
[4]Li Bin, He Jinmei. Investigation of mechanical property, flame retardancy and thermal degradation of LLDPEwoodfibre composites[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability，2004,83(2):241-246.
[5]Michel L B， Sophie D, Magali F， et al. Intumescent polypropylene/flax blends: a preliminary study[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2005，88(1)：80-84.
[6]宋永明，王清文，龚丽,等. 可膨胀石墨和聚磷酸铵对木粉/聚丙烯复合材料阻燃及力学性能的影响[C]//中国林学会木材工业分会论文集：33.广州：广东省林业科学研究院，2009.
[7]吴玉章，杨忠. 锥形量热仪法研究超细Al(OH)3处理中密度纤维板的燃烧性能[J]. 东北林业大学学报，2010，38（2）：47-49.
[8]吴玉章，原田寿郎. 磷酸铵盐处理人工林木材燃烧性能[J]. 林业科学，2005，41（2）：112-116.
[9]李坚，王清文，李淑君,等. 用CONE法研究木材阻燃剂FRW的阻燃性能[J]. 林业科学，2002，38（5）：108-114.
[10]贾修伟. 纳米阻燃材料[M]. 北京：化学工业出版社，2005.
[11]吴玉章，原田寿郎. 人工林木材燃烧性能的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(2): 131-136.
[12]吴民生，杨立，吴谷青. 含溴阻燃聚丙烯纤维阻燃性能的热分析研究[J]. 江苏化工，1992(4)：47-49.
[13]李坚. 新型木材[M]. 哈尔滨：东北林业大学出版社，1993.
[14]吴玉章. 硼化物处理人工林木材的燃烧性能[J]. 木材工业，2006，20（4）：32-34.
[15]李坚，王清文，李淑君,等. 用CONE法研究木材阻燃剂FRW的抑烟性能[J]. 林业科学，2002，38（6）：103-109.
PDF(1458317 KB)
