The responses of soil arthropod composition to wetland restoration in West

zhuojiaying, BeijingWANG Tianle, LI Wei, DING Jie, YU Daoyuan, LIU Maosong*

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (02) : 51-55.

PDF(1166048 KB)
PDF(1166048 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (02) : 51-55. DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.02.011

The responses of soil arthropod composition to wetland restoration in West

  • zhuojiaying, BeijingWANG Tianle1, LI Wei2, DING Jie1, YU Daoyuan1, LIU Maosong1*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

By the methods of handsorting, Tullgrens, the soil arthropod composition structure in the wetland restored for a year in Westzhuojiaying of Beijing was investigated, also compared with the wasteland and surrounding apricot forest. A total of 3 226 soil animals in 39 groups belonging to 4 classes, 19 orders, 36 families were collected. Compared with the wasteland, the number of individuals and groups, and the diversity of the soil arthropods in restored wetland were significantly (p<005) increased, while with the surrounding apricot forest not significantly different. The community structure of soil arthropod had no significant difference (p>005) among the areas of Amorpha fruticosa, Salix saposhnikovii, Morus mongolica, and Hippophae rhamnoides, also no significant difference (p>005) among the different soil layers.The results showed that wetland restoration truly achieved some effects, but it was still in the early stages of recovery due to short restoration time.

Cite this article

Download Citations
zhuojiaying, BeijingWANG Tianle, LI Wei, DING Jie, YU Daoyuan, LIU Maosong*. The responses of soil arthropod composition to wetland restoration in West[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2011, 35(02): 51-55 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.02.011

References

[1]Gibbs J P. Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation[J].Conservation Biology, 2000, 14(1):314-317.
[2]William J Mitsch, Wang Naiming. Largescale coastal wetland restoration on the Laurentian Great Lakes: Determining the potential for water quality improvement[J].Ecological Engineering, 2000, 15(3): 267-282.
[3]崔丽娟, Stephane Asselin. 湿地恢复手册:原则·技术与案例分析[M].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2006.
[4]陈卫,胡东,付必谦,等.北京湿地生物多样性研究[M].北京:科学出版社, 2007.
[5]韩立亮,王勇,王广力,等.洞庭湖湿地与农田土壤动物多样性研究[J].生物多样性,2007,15(2):199-206.
[6]武海涛,吕宪国,姜明,等.三江平原典型湿地土壤动物群落结构及季节变化[J].湿地科学,2008,6(4):459-465.
[7]武海涛,吕宪国,杨青,等.三江平原湿地岛状林土壤动物群落结构特征及影响因素[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(2):50-58.
[8]武海涛,于少鹏,吕宪国,等.三江平原乌拉苔草-毛苔草湿地土壤动物多样性及其枯落物分解功能[J].湿地科学,2008,6(2):285-292.
[9]徐国良,周国逸,莫江明,等.鹤山丘陵退化生态系统植被恢复的土壤动物群落结构[J].生态学报,2005,25(7):1670-1677.
[10]殷秀琴,顾卫,董炜华,等.公路边坡人工恢复植被后土壤动物群落变化及多样性[J].生态学报,2008,28(9):4295-4305.
[11]吕世海,卢欣石,高吉喜.呼伦贝尔草地风蚀沙化土壤动物对环境退化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(9):2055-2060.
[12]尹文英,宋大祥,赵立军,等.中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.
[13]尹文英,宋大祥,赵立军,等.中国亚热带土壤动物[M].北京:科学出版社,1992.
[14]郑乐怡,归鸿.昆虫分类[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,1999.
[15]廖崇惠,李健雄.再论DG指数的性质与应用[J].生物多样性,2009,17(2):127-134.
[16]柯欣,梁文举,宇万太,等.下辽河平原不同土地利用方式下土壤微节肢动物群落结构研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):600-604.
[17]吴玉红,蔡青年,林超文,等.四川紫色土丘陵区不同土地利用方式下中型土壤动物群落结构[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(2):277-282.
[18]董博,张仁涉,荆世杰,等.寿光市不同棚龄温室土壤动物群落结构[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(8):1769-1774.
[19]刘满强,胡锋,李辉信,等.退化红壤不同人工林恢复下土壤节肢动物群落特征[J].生态学报,2002,22(1):54-61.
PDF(1166048 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/