Abstract
Six tree species(Ormosia hosiei Hemsl. et Wils, Photinia×fraseri ‘Red Robin’, Schima superba, Zelkova schneideriana, Salix×jiangsuensis cv. ‘J172’， Prunus cerasifera ‘Hollywood’) were conducted to compare the difference of photosynthetic characteristic and drought resistance. Results showed that there were great differences of photosynthetic characteristics of these six tree species during 10 d drought stress period. Photosynthesis of Prunus cerasifera ‘Hollywood’ and Salix jiangsuensis cv. ‘J172’ were much more sensitive to drought stress, of which there were significant decline of photosynthesis after 10 d drought stress due to stomatal limitation. In Zelkova schneideriana, stomatal limitation appeared after 4 d drought stress, however, the photosynthesis level return to normal level in the 10th day. In contrast, there was no stomatal limitation in Ormosia hosiei Hemsl. et Wils, Photinia fraseri ‘Red Robin’ and Schima superba during drought stress period. According to the Ci and Ca ratio of six tree species of normal irrigation during the 10 d period, the drought resistant ability arranged in descending order was Ormosia hosiei Hemsl. et Wils, Schima superba, Zelkova schneideriana, Photinia fraseri ‘Red Robin’, Salix jiangsuensis cv. ‘J172’, Prunus cerasifera ‘Hollywood’.
Cite this article
Download Citations
RUI Wenyi, TIAN Yunlu, ZHANG Jilin, LI Shuqin.
Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristic of six tree species[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition）. 2012, 36(01): 68-72 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.01.014
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]季孔庶，孙志勇，方彦.林木抗旱性研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版，2006，30（6）：123-128.
[2]曹晶，姜卫兵，翁忙玲，等.夏秋季旱涝胁迫对红叶石楠光合特性的影响[J].园艺学报，2007，34(1)：163-172.
[3]Berry J A, Dowton W J S. Environment regulation of photosynthesis[G]//Covind J. Photosynthesis:Ⅱ.New York: Academic Press, 1982.
[4]Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis [J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1982, 33: 317-345.
[5]邓彭艳， 陈洪松，聂云鹏，等.桂西北喀斯特地区菜豆树和红背山麻杆旱、雨季光合特性比较[J].生态学杂志，2010，29(8)：1498-1504.
[6]张成军，郭佳秋，解恒才，等.干旱对北京东灵山4种木本植物生理特性的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版，2004，28（6）：23-26.
[7]张光灿，刘霞，贺康宁，等.金矮生苹果叶片气体交换参数对土壤水分的响应[J].植物生态学报，2004，28（1）：66-72.
[8]Saitoh K, Kikuirl M, Ishihara K. Relationship between leaf movement of trifoliolate compound leaf and environmental factors in the soybean canopy:V. Differences in leaf movement among cultivars [J]. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 1994, 63(2): 254-260.
[9]周智彬，李培军.我国旱生植物的形态解剖学研究[J].干旱区研究，2002，19（1）：35-40.
[10]罗世孝，张奠湘.中国红豆属植物的叶表皮形态学[J].热带亚热带植物学报，2004，12（4）：298-308.
[11]许皓，李彦，邹婷，等.梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron)生理与个体用水策略对降水改变的响应[J].生态学报，2007，27(12)：5019-5028.
PDF(1462738 KB)
