Risk analysis ofZeuzera coffeae Nietner in Jiangsu Province

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901032

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 207-210.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901032

Risk analysis ofZeuzera coffeae Nietner in Jiangsu Province

JU Yunwei¹(), ZHU Chenxi¹, YAN Xiaoru¹^,², ZHANG Yu¹, WU Yali¹, ZHAO Yuling¹, WANG Kechun³, LI Yongrong⁴

1. Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. Suzhou High-tech Zone (Huqiu District) Forestry Station, Suzhou 215010,China
3. Jiangsu Shuimu Agricultural Landscape Co., Ltd., Jurong 212400, China
4. Nanjing Green Earth Thin Shell Pecan Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210014,China

Received:2019-01-23 Revised:2019-08-31 Online:2019-11-30 Published:2019-11-30

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】The risk analysis of Carya illinoinensis Koch harmed by Zeuzera coffeae Nietner was conducted to determine the degree of hazard, which provided a reference for the prevention and control of Z. coffeae in the production of C. illinoinensis.【Method】From 2016 to 2017, four sample lands (50 m × 50 m) of C. illinoinensis Koch planting bases in Luhe of Nanjing and Jurong of Zhenjiang of Jiangsu Province, were investigated for the damage caused by Z. coffeae Nietner to the C. illinoinensis Koch forest. Seven sample plots were selected from each sample land by the diagonal method, and ten sample plots from each sample were selected by interlaced sampling. The calculation method of the damaged rate ofC. illinoinensis Koch is the total number of damaged C. illinoinensis Koch divided by the total number of plants investigated. According to the evaluation criteria of forestry pest risk analysis, the risk degree of Z. coffeae was quantitatively analyzed for the first time, and the risk analysis was carried out by a comprehensive analysis method.【Result】The damaged rate of C. illinoinensis Koch was 41.43% for 3-year-old victims; the rate of 4-year-old victims was 32.86%; the rate of 5-year-old victims was 22.14%; the rate of 6-year-old victims was 17.86%. Based on the rules of pest risk analysis, we categorized the risk level of Z. coffeae Nietner using five indexes: the distribution, potential degree of damage, economical value of infected host plants, possibility of transmission and spreading, and difficulty of risk management in Jiangsu. The values of the five indexes were calculated as 2.00, 3.00, 1.80, 3.00 and 1.67, respectively. The overall risk value of Z. coffeae Nietner was 2.22. 【Conclusion】Through the analysis of the spread, harm, and risk of Z. coffeae Nietner, it is considered to be a highly dangerous pest for C. illinoinensis Koch. During production, the monitoring of Z. coffeae Nietner should be strengthened, and timely detection and prevention should be carried out to control the density of this insect population; this will reduce the negative impact on the economic and ecological benefits of C. illinoinensis.

Key words: Carya illinoinensis Koch, Zeuzera coffeae Nietner, risk analysis, Jiangsu

CLC Number:

S763.42

JU Yunwei, ZHU Chenxi, YAN Xiaoru, ZHANG Yu, WU Yali, ZHAO Yuling, WANG Kechun, LI Yongrong. Risk analysis ofZeuzera coffeae Nietner in Jiangsu Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(6): 207-210.

Figures/Tables 1

References 21

[1]	刘联仁. 咖啡豹蠹蛾生物学特性的初步观察[J]. 四川果树, 1995(3):12-13.
	LIU L R. Preliminary observation on the biological characteristics of Zeuzera coffeae Nietner [J]. Sichuan Fruits, 1995(3):12-13.
[2]	冯荣扬, 郭良珍, 梁恩义, 等. 咖啡豹蠹蛾生物学特性及其防治[J]. 植物保护, 2000, 26(4):12-14.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2000.04.005.
	FENG R Y, GUO L Z, LIANG E Y, et al. Bionomics and control of Zeuzera coffeae Nietner [J]. Plant Protection, 2000, 26(4):12-14.
[3]	薛婷婷, 刘嘉, 沈永宝, 等. 温度对薄壳山核桃种子萌发的影响及其机制初探[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(11):42-50.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.11.008.
	XUE T T, LIU J, SHEN Y B, et al. Study on the seed germination characteristic of Carya illinoensis [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(11):42-50.
[4]	韩杰, 张明, 林苏宝, 等. 不同修剪措施对薄壳山核桃幼树光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(6):13-18.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703024.
	HAN J, ZHANG M, LIN S B, et al. Effects of different pruning measures on the photosynthetic characteristics of pecan seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 41(6):13-18.
[5]	刘壮壮, 曹凡, 张瑞, 等. 5个薄壳山核桃品种花粉形态电镜扫描观察[J]. 经济林研究, 2016, 34(2):137-142. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2016.02.025.
	LIU Z Z, CAO F, ZHANG R, et al. Observation of pollen morphologies in five cultivars of Carya illinoensis by SEM [J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2016, 34(2):137-142.
[6]	郭新峰. 宁国市山核桃蛀干性害虫的发生规律及防治技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(7):202-203. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2010.07.139.
	GUO X F. Occurrence and control techniques of stem borers onCarya cathayensis Sarg. in Ningguo City [J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010(7):202-203.
[7]	朱广奇, 龚巧枝. 山核桃园咖啡木蠹蛾的发生与防治[J]. 安徽林业, 2005(4):43.
	ZHU G Q, GONG Q Z. Occurrence and control of Zeuzera coffeae Nietner in pecan garden [J]. Anhui Forestry Journal, 2005(4):43.
[8]	蔡彤. 汪清林业局森林昆虫多样性及其对林木危害评估的初步研究[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2016.
	CAI T. Preliminary studies of forest insect diversity and damage assessment of forest insect pests in Wangqing Forestry Bureau[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2016.
[9]	彭方仁, 李永荣, 郝明灼, 等. 我国薄壳山核桃生产现状与产业化发展策略[J]. 林业科技开发, 2012, 26(4):1-4.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2012.04.001.
	PENG F R, LI Y R, HAO M Z, et al. Production status and industrialization development strategy of Carya illinoensis Koch in China [J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2012, 26(4):1-4.
[10]	蒋志新. 江苏薄壳山核桃发展态势分析与策略[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2011, 38(4):51-53.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2011.04.015.
	JIANG Z X. Development situation analysis and strategy of Jiangsu Carya illinoensis Koch [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2011, 38(4):51-53.
[11]	吴文龙, 闾连飞. 薄壳山核桃的引种栽培[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2003(1):11-13.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2003.01.004.
	WU W L, LYU L F. Cultivation of Carya illinoensis(Wangenn.)K.Koch as an exotic species [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2003, 30(1):11-13.
[12]	王曼, 李贤忠, 宁德鲁, 等. 薄壳山核桃研究概况及发展趋势[J]. 林业调查规划, 2009, 34(6):93-95.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2009.06.024.
	WANG M, LI X Z, NING D L, et al. The research summary and developmental trend of Carya illinoensis [J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2009, 34(6):93-95.
[13]	陈克, 范晓虹, 李尉民. 有害生物的定性与定量风险分析[J]. 植物检疫, 2002, 16(5):257-261.DOI: 10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2002.05.001.
	CHEN K, FAN X H, LI W M. Qualitative and quantitative pest risk analysis[J]. Plant Quarantine, 2002, 16(5):257-261.
[14]	严晓茹, 熊大斌, 周际丰, 等. 南方板栗林黑星天牛的风险分析[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2017, 36(5):22-25.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2017.05.006.
	YAN X R, XIONG D B, ZHOU J F, et al. Risk analysis of Anoplophora leechi (Gahan) in southern chestnut forests [J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2017, 36(5):22-25, 46.
[15]	李杰, 李峰, 王建海. 界首市美国白蛾风险分析[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2017, 43(3):24-28.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0152.2017.03.005.
	LI J, LI F, WANG J H. Risk analysis on Hyphantria cunea in Jieshou City [J]. Anhui Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 43(3):24-28.
[16]	刘丽, 陈楠, 郑奋, 等. 海南主要林业有害生物风险评估信息系统的开发[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(2):282-289. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2018.02.6.
	LIU L, CHEN N, ZHENG F, et al. Development of risk assessment information system of main forest pest in Hainan[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2018, 40(2):282-289.
[17]	孙小霞, 蔡继增, 李小燕, 等. 林业有害生物云杉大小蠹风险分析[J]. 甘肃科技, 2014, 30(8):143-145.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0952.2014.08.052.
	SUN X X, CAI J Z, LI X Y, et al. Risk analysis of forest pests Dendroctonus micans(Kugelann) [J]. Gansu Science and Technology, 2014, 30(8):143-145.
[18]	李娟, 赵宇翔, 陈小平, 等. 林业有害生物风险分析指标体系及赋分标准的探讨[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2013, 32(3):10-15.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2013.03.003.
	LI J, ZHAO Y X, CHEN X P, et al. Discussion on the forest pest risk analysis index system and standard of natural endowments[J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2013, 32(3):10-15.
[19]	巨云为, 曹霞, 叶健, 等. 美国薄壳山核桃虫害研究综述[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2014, 33(1):29-34.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2014.01.009.
	JU Y W, CAO X, YE J, et al. Research advances on pests attacking Carya illinoensis [J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2014, 33(1):29-34, 43.
[20]	周祖琳. 咖啡豹蠹蛾危害葡萄[J]. 植物保护, 1993, 19(6):45-46.
	ZHOU Z L. Zeuzera coffeae Nietner harms grapes [J]. Plant Protection, 1993, 19(6):45-46.
[21]	胡淼. 越桔两种蛀干害虫的发生与防治[J]. 昆虫知识, 2001, 38(3):221-222.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0452-8255.2001.03.018.
	HU M. Occurence and control of two stem borers on blueberry[J]. Entomological Knowledge, 2001, 38(3):221-222.

Related Articles 15

[1]	YANG Rui, WU Chaoming, ZHU Li, HU Haibo. Study on soil erosion characteristics of economic forest slope field in southern Jiangsu hilly area [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 70-76.
[2]	YI Xiangui, DONG Peng, XIE Chunping, PENG Zhiqi, YANG Guodong, DONG Jingjing, ZHONG Yuqian, ZHAI Feifei, WANG Xianrong. An analysis on species composition of a permanent plot on the Longchi Mountain, Yixing City, Jiangsu Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(6): 159-168.
[3]	MA Yingyi, LIU Zhifeng. Assessment of landscape ecological risk and its dynamic response with urbanization development of Jiangsu Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(5): 185-194.
[4]	WANG Lichao, CHEN Fengmao, QIU Cailou, TANG Jingen, DING Xuenong, REN Jixing. Identification and risk analyses of Euwallacea interjectus [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(5): 201-208.
[5]	HUI Hao, GUAN Qingwei, WANG Yaru, LIN Xinyu, CHEN Bin, WANG Gang, HU Yue, HU Jingdong. Effects of different forest management modes on soil nitrogen content and enzyme activity [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(4): 151-158.
[6]	PENG Zhiqi, DONG Peng, ZHU Hong, ZHU Shuxia, DONG Jingjing, ZHONG Yuqian, ZHAI Feifei, ZHENG Aichun, WANG Xianrong, YI Xiangui. Analyses of Cerasus serrulata population structure and point patterns in Yuntai Mountain, Jiangsu [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(4): 167-176.
[7]	XIA Wenwen, LI Xiang, WANG Yuqi, XU Chi, LIU Maosong. Distribution of soil factors across the habitat gradient of Spartina alterniflora and Suaeda salsa communities [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(3): 37-44.
[8]	LIN Sixi, YE Jianren. Invasion risk analysis of Phytophthora ramorum in China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(6): 161-168.
[9]	CHEN Dasheng. Development of succulent plant based on characteristics town planning [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(6): 201-206.
[10]	CAI Han, ZHU Quan, LUO Yunjian, MA Kun. Evolution characteristics and driving mechanisms of cultivated landscape eco-security patterns in rapid urbanization areas [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(5): 181-188.
[11]	YAN Yu, CUI Zhihua. Implementation of a small-town master plan based on land use change in the north of Jiangsu [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(4): 191-198.
[12]	XU Xinzhou, LU Zhichao, QIU Bing, WANG Hao. Suitability evaluation of functional layout of National Urban Wetland Park in Jiangsu Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(6): 152-158.
[13]	ZHOU Jie, HUANG Jing,XING Wei, WANG Baosong, HE Xudong, JIAO Zhongyi. Cloning and functional characterization of SlSIP from shrub Salix [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 62(01): 39-44.
[14]	ZHANG Xiaochen,ZHAO Yang,XIONG Zhongren,YI Xiangui,CHEN Xin. Population age structure and spatial point pattern of Cyclobalanopsis glauca in Baohua Mountain, Jiangsu Province, China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 61(06): 77-83.
[15]	ZHANG Jinguang,ZHAO Bing. Location and layout optimization of urban parks based on accessibility [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 61(06): 151-158.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

指标层P_ij judgment content	评判标准 judgment standard	P赋分值 P assignment
区域内分布情况(P₁)	5%≤有害生物分布面积占其寄主 (包括潜在寄主)面积的百分率<20%	2.00
有害生物被截获的可能性(P₂₁)	寄主植物、产品调运的可能性和携带有害生物的可能性均大	3.00
运输过程中有害生物存活率(P₂₂)	存活率≥40%	3.00
有害生物的适生性(P₂₃)	繁殖能力和抗逆性都强	3.00
自然扩散能力(P₂₄)	随介体携带扩散能力或自身扩散能力强	3.00
分析区域内适生范围(P₂₅)	能够适生的地区≥50%	3.00
潜在经济危害性(P₃₁)	1%≤如传入可造成树木死亡率或产量损失<5%	1.00
非经济方面的潜在危害性(P₃₂)	潜在的环境、生态、社会影响大	3.00
官方重视程度(P₃₃)	曾被列入我国林业危险性有害生物名单	1.00
受害寄主的种类(P₄₁)	10种以上	3.00
受害寄主的分布面积或产量(P₄₂)	分布面积中等或产量中等	2.00
受害寄主的特殊经济价值(P₄₃)	经济价值高、社会影响大	3.00
检疫识别的难度(P₅₁)	现场识别可靠性一般,由经过专门培训的技术人员才能识别	2.00
除害处理的难度(P₅₂)	50%≤常规方法的除害效率≤100%	1.00
根除的难度(P₅₃)	介于效果差、成本高、难度大和效果好、成本低、简便易行之间	2.00

Risk analysis ofZeuzera coffeae Nietner in Jiangsu Province

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 1

References 21

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer