Evaluation of urban waterfront landscape quality based on semantic differential method:a case of Zhonghuamen section of Qinhuai River in Nanjing

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202009055

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 221-227.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202009055

Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation of urban waterfront landscape quality based on semantic differential method:a case of Zhonghuamen section of Qinhuai River in Nanjing

CAO Jiajie(), ZHANG Mengfan

Co-Innovation Center for the the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China,College of Landscape Architecture,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2020-09-10 Revised:2020-10-19 Online:2020-11-30 Published:2020-12-07

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Based on the psychological perception of users, the key factors affecting the quality of the urban waterfront landscape are evaluated by quantitative methods, so as to provide a reference direction for the optimization of the urban waterfront landscape quality. 【Method】This paper took Zhonghuamen section of the Qinhuai River in Nanjing as the research object, and uses Semantic Differential (SD) method to evaluate the quality of the waterfront landscape of Zhonghuamen section of the Qinhuai River from the psychological perspective of users. Evaluation factors were developed from three aspects of landscape, ecology and humanity. Questionnaires were conducted on users for each evaluation factor to collect data and SPSS software was used for a further analysis of the data. 【Result】The results show that the waterfront landscape in Zhonghuamen section of the Qinhuai River is highly evaluated by the users for its hydrophilicity, coastline form, landscape aesthetic degree, cleanliness of the environment and historical and cultural continuity, but less evaluated for its visual range, environmental visual interest, vegetation coverage rate and recreational activity diversity. Based on the evaluation results, it is concluded that the important factors affecting the waterfront landscape quality are public participation, plant diversity and river water quality. In combination with the landscape status of Zhonghuamen Section of the Qinhuai River, it is proposed to improve the integration of the waterfront landscape and regional culture, highlight the uniqueness of the Qinhuai River landscape and enhance the sense of belonging of visitors. Secondly, it is proposed to attach importance to public participation, strengthen the initiative and effectiveness of public participation, enrich the space function of Zhonghuamen section of the Qinhuai River and enhance the vitality of the waterfront landscape. Thirdly, it is proposed to strengthen the protection and treatment of the Qinhuai River water quality, improve the vegetation coverage, and make full use of aquatic plants to create the waterfront ecological landscape in order to give visitors ecological experience of getting close to nature. 【Conclusion】Through the evaluation of perceived objects, the introduction of SD method to analyze visitors’ psychological perception provides a reference path for the quality evaluation of the urban waterfront landscape, which is helpful to focus on the scientific analysis of urban waterfront landscape efficiency and promote the sustainable development of the urban waterfront landscape. This evaluation method can provide a reference for the optimization of the urban waterfront landscape in the future.

Key words: waterfront landscape, landscape quality, semantic differential (SD) method, landscape evaluation, the Qinhuai River

CLC Number:

TU984

CAO Jiajie, ZHANG Mengfan. Evaluation of urban waterfront landscape quality based on semantic differential method:a case of Zhonghuamen section of Qinhuai River in Nanjing[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(6): 221-227.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.2

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

References 17

[1]	邓慧. 城市滨水景观质量评估方法研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2008.
	DENG H. Evaluation method study on the quality of urban waterfront[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2008.
[2]	曹加杰, 王杰, 吴向崇, 等. 城市河道开放空间景观修复后评价研究——以南京内秦淮河东段为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,44(3):195-201.
	CAO J J, WANG J, WU X C, et al. Post evaluation of urban river open space landscape restoration:a case study of the eastern part of the Inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020,44(3):195-201.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201809023.
[3]	秦书茜. 长沙市湘江滨水区景观评价与优化研究[D]. 长沙:湖南师范大学, 2015.
	QIN S (Q/X).Study on the landscape evaluation and optimization of Xiangjiang Rriver waterfront in Changsha[D]. Changsha:Hunan Normal University, 2015.
[4]	王珊珊. 基于地域文化的哈尔滨群力新区滨水景观评价及优化[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2019.
	WANG S S. Evaluation and optimization of waterfront landscape in qunli new area of Harbin on regional culture[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2019.
[5]	朱润钰, 甄峰. 城市滨水景观评价研究初探:以南京市莫愁湖滨水区为例[J]. 四川环境, 2008,27(1):5-11.
	ZHU R Y, ZHEN F. The pondering on the evaluation of urban waterfronts landscape:take Mochouhu Lake,Nanjing for instance[J]. Sichuan Environ, 2008,27(1):5-11.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3644.2008.01.002.
[6]	姚玉敏, 朱晓东, 徐迎碧, 等. 城市滨水景观的视觉环境质量评价:以合肥市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(18):5836-5845.
	YAO Y M, ZHU X D, XU Y B, et al. Assessing the visual quality of urban waterfront landscapes:the case of Hefei,China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012,32(18):5836-5845.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201107301119.
[7]	赵烨, 王建国. 滨水区城市景观的评价与控制:以杭州西湖东岸城市景观规划为例[J].城市规划学刊, 2014(4):80-87.
	ZHAO Y, WANG J G. The evaluation and improvement of waterfront urban landscape:the case of the West Lake in Hangzhou[J].Urban Plan Forum, 2014(4):80-87.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2014.04.013.
[8]	达婷. 城市滨水区再开发的生态、社会功能及文脉三维连接性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(3):129-134.
	DA T. Analyses on three-dimensional connectivity of eco-social function-context of urban waterfront redevelopment[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2013,37(3):129-134. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.03.023.
[9]	章俊华. 规划设计学中的调查分析法16:SD法[J]. 中国园林, 2004,20(10):54-58.
	ZHANG J H. The diagnosis methods in planning and design (16):SD method[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2004,20(10):54-58.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2004.10.013.
[10]	王亚娟 . 基于SBE和SD法的北京市郊野公园视觉景观质量研究[D]. 北京:首都师范大学, 2013.
[11]	王建伟, 魏淑敏, 姚瑞, 等. 园林空间类型划分及景观感知特征量化研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012,27(2):221-225,229.
	WANG J W, WEI S M, YAO R, et al. Quantitative evaluation of landscape perception features and classification of garden space[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2012,27(2):221-225,229.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2012.02.44.
[12]	乔文黎. 城市滨水区景观的评价研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2008.
	QIAO W L. Research on the evaluation and landscape of urban waterfronts[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2008.
[13]	徐慧. 城市景观水系规划模式研究——以江苏省太仓市为例[J]. 水资源保护, 2007,23(5):25-27.
	XU H. Landscape planning of urban water system: a case study on Taicang City[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2007,23(5):25-27.
[14]	张佳娴. 城市线性滨水空间景观设计研究:以郴州中心城区为例[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015,43(29):165-167.
	ZHANG J X. Design and research of urban linear waterfront landscape:taking Chenzhou central city as an example[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2015,43(29):165-167.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2015.29.060.
[15]	王菁, 王雪松, 覃琳, 等. 基于SD法的重庆滨水空间活力评价研究[J]. 重庆建筑, 2019,18(1):28-31.
	WANG J, WANG X S, QIN L, et al. Research on evaluation of spatial vitality of waterfront spaces in Chongqing based on SD method[J]. Chongqing Archit, 2019,18(1):28-31.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9107.2019.01.28.
[16]	邓春艳. 城市滨水开放空间的场所性塑造研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2010.
	DENG C Y. Study on the sence of space of urban public open waterfront[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University, 2010.
[17]	白晓丹. 基于SD法的天河山风景区景观评价与优化研究[D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学, 2019.
	BAI X D. Research on the landscape visual evaluation of Tianhe Mountain scenic spot based on the SD method[D]. Handan: Hebei University of Engineering, 2019.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

分类 classification	代号 code	评价因子 evaluation factor	形容词对 adjectives
景观要素 landscape elements	A1	可达性	不便—便捷
	A2	视域宽广度	视域狭窄—视域宽广
	A3	岸线形态	渠化—蜿蜒
	A4	亲水性	亲水性低—亲水性高
	A5	景观美感度	单调—美观
	A6	景观和谐度	混乱—和谐
	A7	环境视觉趣味性	无趣—有趣
生态要素 ecological elements	B1	植被覆盖率	覆盖率低—覆盖率高
	B2	植物多样性	单一—丰富
	B3	河流水质	浑浊—清澈
	B4	环境整洁度	脏乱—整洁
社会人文要素 social and humanistic elements	C1	历史文化延续性	延续性低—延续性高
	C2	公众参与度	参与度低—参与度高
	C3	配套设施安全性	危险—安全
	C4	娱乐活动多样性	单一—多样

SD因子 SD factor	样本sample					均值 mean
SD因子 SD factor	1	2	3	4	5	均值 mean
可达性accessibility	1.05	0.40	0.85	0.70	1.15	0.83
视域宽广度breadth of vision	0.45	0.45	0.95	1.15	0.90	0.78
岸线形态shoreline form	0.70	0.60	0.85	1.20	1.10	0.89
亲水性hydrophilia	0.40	0.80	1.05	1.25	1.15	0.93
景观美感度landscape aesthetics	0.40	0.65	1.00	1.25	1.00	0.86
景观和谐度landscape harmony	0.70	0.25	1.10	1.40	0.75	0.84
环境视觉趣味性environmental visual interest	0.25	0.55	0.75	1.10	0.95	0.72
植被覆盖率vegetation coverage	1.05	0.35	0.70	0.75	1.05	0.78
植物多样性plant diversity	0.60	0.65	0.70	1.20	1.00	0.83
河流水质water quality	0.90	0.60	0.90	0.75	1.20	0.87
环境整洁度cleanliness of the environment	0.90	0.55	1.05	1.50	1.50	1.10
历史文化延续性historical and cultural continuity	0.95	0.70	1.40	1.50	1.10	1.13
公众参与度public participation	0.70	0.60	0.90	1.00	1.10	0.86
配套设施安全性safety of supporting facilities	1.20	0.20	1.00	1.40	1.25	1.01
娱乐活动多样性diversity of recreational activities	0.45	0.65	1.00	1.00	0.60	0.74

均值- 样本点 plot	平均值差值 mean difference	差值标准差 difference standard deviation	t	P	Cohen’s d
1	0.16	0.249	2.566	0.022^*	0.663
2	0.34	0.197	6.776	0.000^**	1.750
3	-0.07	0.129	-2.068	0.058	0.534
4	-0.27	0.206	-4.986	0.000^**	1.287
5	-0.18	0.155	-4.389	0.001^**	1.133

SD因子 SD factor	相关系数 correlation coefficient	P	SD因子 SD factor	相关系数 correlation coefficient	P
A1	0.595^**	0.000	B1	0.665^**	0.000
A2	0.838^**	0.000	B2	0.645^**	0.000
A3	0.738^**	0.000	B3	0.373^**	0.008
A4	0.605^**	0.000	B4	0.721^**	0.000
A5	0.765^**	0.000	C1	0.810^**	0.000
A6	0.775^**	0.000	C2	0.642^**	0.000
A7	0.683^**	0.000	C3	0.662^**	0.000
			C4	0.770^**	0.000

SD因子 SD factor	载荷系数load factor
SD因子 SD factor	因子1	因子2	因子3
C2	0.878	0.163	-0.052
A7	0.867	0.188	0.266
A5	0.740	0.317	0.303
C3	0.610	0.281	0.128
A6	0.607	0.497	0.055
C4	0.597	0.343	0.167
B2	0.377	0.887	0.139
A2	0.405	0.799	0.239
A3	0.299	0.776	0.256
A4	0.257	0.698	0.170
C1	0.461	0.468	0.372
B3	-0.118	0.306	0.821
A1	0.317	0.202	0.803
B1	0.124	0.318	0.675
B4	0.467	0.363	0.504

Evaluation of urban waterfront landscape quality based on semantic differential method:a case of Zhonghuamen section of Qinhuai River in Nanjing

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 17

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

[1]	DA Ting, LI Yan, G Mathias Kondolf. Research on social connectivity of urban waterfront park based on place attachment [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 227-235.
[2]	QU Ziya, ZHANG Qingping, ZHANG Rui, WANG Yujie, LI Lanxin. The optimization of urban blue-green spatial layout based on dual performances: a case study on Putuo District in Shanghai [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 235-243.
[3]	CAO Jiajie, ZHU Yinglu, CHEN Yu, FU Jianwei, FENG Xiao, YANG Peiying, WANG Hao. The landscape quality evaluation model and method of urban water-sensitive river course [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(6): 288-293.
[4]	WANG Xianguang, WANG Zhenrong, HE Xiaoyong, LIAN Faliang, HONG Zhen,WANG Junfeng, DU Youxin, TANG Li. The beauty degree of forest facies and its optimal color composition pattern in the southwest Zhejiang Province in autumn [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(01): 118-126.
[5]	LI Xiaowen,, JIA Liming*, LI Guangde, HAO Xiaofei. Landscape evaluation and management techniques on mixed scenic forest of Amygdalus davidiana and conifer in Beijing lower mountainous area [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2010, 34(04): 107-111.
[6]	YIN Hua，WANG Da-ming. Measures of Highway’s Own Landscape Evaluation [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2006, 30(S1): 63-66.
[7]	Li Shidong. LANDSCAPE QUALITY EVALUATION OF ZHANG nA JIE NATIONAL FOREST PARK [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 1993, 17(04): 43-47.