JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 288-293.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107041
Special Issue: 南京林业大学120周年校庆特刊
Previous Articles Next Articles
CAO Jiajie(), ZHU Yinglu, CHEN Yu, FU Jianwei, FENG Xiao, YANG Peiying, WANG Hao()
Received:
2021-07-28
Revised:
2022-01-05
Online:
2022-11-30
Published:
2022-09-13
Contact:
WANG Hao
E-mail:caojiajie@njfu.edu.cn;wh9816@126.com
CLC Number:
CAO Jiajie, ZHU Yinglu, CHEN Yu, FU Jianwei, FENG Xiao, YANG Peiying, WANG Hao. The landscape quality evaluation model and method of urban water-sensitive river course[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(6): 288-293.
Table 1
The water-sensitive river landscape evaluation index system and index standard"
目标层 target layer | 准则层 criterion layer | 指标层 index layer | 指标层涵义 meaning of index layer |
---|---|---|---|
水敏性河道 景观评价 (A) landscape evaluation of water- sensitive river | 生态(B1) ecology | 水质(C1) water quality | 水质评价是合理利用和保护水资源的一项基本工作,是水环境管理与决策的依据[ |
雨水利用(C2) utilization of rainwater | 在城市范围内, 有目的地采用各种措施对雨水资源的保护和利用, 主要包括收集、调蓄和净化后的直接利用[ | ||
生物栖息地多样性(C3) biological habitat diversity | 生物栖息地包括河岸栖息地、林地栖息地、生态岛屿栖息地、雨水处理型人工湿地等不同类型,营造丰富多样的生境,同时增加湿地空间价值[ | ||
植物物种多样性(C4) bio-diversity | 合理配置水敏性植物,包括湿生乔木、引鸟乔木和水生及消落带植物,植物物种多样性可以体现群落的稳定程度[ | ||
美学(B2) wsthetics | 水景层次丰富度(C5) hydrophilicity | 岸线优美、在满足防洪要求下,通过形式多样的驳岸与植物组合搭配,丰富水景的层次 | |
个性化景观(C6) sustainabl facilities | 绿化空间符合场地特征,通过合理的水敏性植物配置、水敏性设施,打造独特的美景 | ||
雨水艺术化处理(C7) ecological revetment | 通过可视化和艺术化的雨水处理,提升视觉的美观性,改善河道空间质量,提升生活品质[ | ||
环境协调性(C8) landscape form | 雨水管理的措施应该与周围建筑、空间环境相协调[ | ||
功能(B3) function | 公众参与(C9) continuity of historical context | 优秀的水敏性设计方案应该能让场地相关利益者参与进来[ | |
生态教育(C10) ecological education | 能够将生态思想、理念、原则方法融入到场所设计中,雨水可视化处理提升公众生态意识,普及生态环境知识 | ||
管理维护(C11) management and maintenance | 水敏性设计依赖于后期的维护管理,城市绿化机构或公园管理机构管理并维护公园的雨水和公共设施、自然植被与社会冲突[ | ||
防洪蓄水(C12) flood control and water storage | 防洪蓄水是水敏性设计最重要的功能,河道应达到50年一遇防洪标准,降雨时场地内部能够通过削减径流减轻排涝压力,并能通过雨水管理措施达到对雨水的可持续利用[ |
Table 2
A method determination of ideal values of the indicator layer"
指标 index | 得分 score | 属性 properties | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.0 | ||
水质(C1) | > Ⅲ类 | — | — | Ⅲ类 | 客观 |
雨水利用(C2) | 10 | 30 | 50 | 80 | 客观 |
生物栖息地多样性(C3) | 10 | 30 | 50 | 80 | 客观 |
植物物种多样性(C4) | 10 | 30 | 50 | 80 | 客观 |
水景层次丰富度(C5) | 差 | 一般 | 较好 | 好 | 主观 |
个性化景观(C6) | 差 | 一般 | 较好 | 好 | 主观 |
雨水艺术化处理(C7) | 差 | 一般 | 较好 | 好 | 主观 |
环境协调性(C8) | 差 | 一般 | 较好 | 好 | 主观 |
公众参与(C9) | 差 | 一般 | 较好 | 好 | 主观 |
生态教育(C10) | 差 | 一般 | 较好 | 好 | 主观 |
管理维护(C11) | 差 | 一般 | 较好 | 好 | 主观 |
防洪蓄水(C12) | 差 | 一般 | 较好 | 好 | 主观 |
Table 3
Index weight for river landscapes and the evaluation scores of Nanjing Crescent Lake landscape"
目标层 target layer | 准则层 criterion layer | 指标层 index layer | 标准值 standard | 距离指数 distance index | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
准则 criterion | 权重 weight | 指标 index | 权重 weight | 指标层 index layer | 准则层 criterion layer | 目标层 target layer | ||
A | 生态(B1) | 0.61 | 水质(C1) | 0.235 8 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.48 | 0.36 |
雨水利用(C2) | 0.071 3 | 1 | 0.6 | |||||
生物栖息地多样性(C3) | 0.158 3 | 1 | 0.4 | |||||
植物物种多样性(C4) | 0.143 4 | 1 | 0.5 | |||||
美学(B2) | 0.16 | 水景层次丰富度(C5) | 0.030 4 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.26 | ||
个性化景观(C6) | 0.021 1 | 1 | 0.3 | |||||
雨水艺术化处理(C7) | 0.094 1 | 1 | 0.4 | |||||
环境协调性(C8) | 0.014 1 | 1 | 0.2 | |||||
功能(B3) | 0.23 | 公众参与(C9) | 0.018 1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.19 | ||
生态教育(C10) | 0.040 2 | 1 | 0.3 | |||||
管理维护(C11) | 0.048 3 | 1 | 0.3 | |||||
防洪蓄水(C12) | 0.124 5 | 1 | 0.2 |
Table 4
Evaluation and test data of groups from different backgrounds"
指标 index | 平均值±标准差 mean±SD | t | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
专业学生 (n=60) professional | 居民 (n=112) resident | |||
C1 | 0.`70±0.08 | 0.69±0.12 | 0.436 | 0.663 |
C2 | 0.60±0.06 | 0.57±0.11 | 1.795 | 0.074 |
C3 | 0.42±0.13 | 0.32±0.11 | 5.148 | <0.001** |
C4 | 0.67±0.09 | 0.57±0.15 | 5.540 | <0.001** |
C5 | 0.74±0.08 | 0.70±0.09 | 2.880 | 0.004** |
C6 | 0.69±0.09 | 0.68±0.08 | 0.919 | 0.359 |
C7 | 0.74±0.05 | 0.64±0.07 | 10.771 | <0.001** |
C8 | 0.74±0.09 | 0.72±0.12 | 0.991 | 0.323 |
C9 | 0.82±0.04 | 0.83±0.05 | -1.563 | 0.120 |
C10 | 0.80±0.03 | 0.72±0.07 | 11.209 | <0.001** |
C11 | 0.74±0.07 | 0.70±0.07 | 3.972 | <0.001** |
C12 | 0.76±0.08 | 0.75±0.07 | 1.036 | 0.303 |
[1] | 顾晓昀, 徐宗学, 刘麟菲, 等. 北京北运河河流生态系统健康评价[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(6):2576-2587. |
GU X Y, XU Z X, LIU L F, et al. Health assessment of the stream ecosystem in the north canal river basin,Beijing,China[J]. Environ Sci, 2018, 39(6):2576-2587.DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.201706229. | |
[2] | 蔡凯臻, 王建国. 城市设计与城市水文管理的整合:澳大利亚水敏性城市设计[J]. 建筑与文化, 2008(7):96-99. |
CAI K Z, WANG J G. The integration of urban design with urban water management:water sensitive urban design in Australia[J]. Archit & Cult, 2008(7):96-99. | |
[3] | 马慧洁, 韩雪原. 水敏性城市设计的评价原则与应用研究:以美国波特兰地区为例[J]. 小城镇建设, 2017(4):58-65. |
MA H J, HAN X Y. Water sensitive urban design principles and application of research:a case study in Portland[J]. Dev Small Cities & Towns, 2017(4):58-65. | |
[4] | 刘恋. 汉丰湖湖岸水敏性生态系统功能评估研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2018. |
LIU L. Study on the functional assessment of water sensitive ecosystem on shore of Hanfeng Lake[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2018. | |
[5] | 杨青娟, 梅瑞狄斯·弗朗西丝·多比. 雨洪管理多功能景观文化生态系统服务的重要性-满意度研究[J]. 景观设计学, 2019, 7(1):52-67. |
YANG Q J, MEREDITH F D. Importance-satisfaction analysis of cultural ecosystem services of multifunctional landscapes designed for stormwater management[J]. Landsc Archit Front, 2019, 7(1):52-67. | |
[6] | 孔德政, 赵亚楠, 刘艺平, 等. 郑州市东风渠滨水景观分析与评价[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2015, 35(1):69-74. |
KONG D Z, ZHAO Y N, LIU Y P, et al. The analysis and evaluation of the waterfront landscape of Dongfeng canal in Zhengzhou[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2015, 35(1):69-74.DOI:10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.01.014. | |
[7] | 郭金玉, 张忠彬, 孙庆云. 层次分析法的研究与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(5):148-153. |
GUO J Y, ZHANG Z B, SUN Q Y. Study and applications of analytic hierarchy process[J]. China Saf Sci J, 2008, 18(5):148-153.DOI:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2008.05.018. | |
[8] | 刘佳驹, 王宇泓, 赵龙, 等. 基于景观评价的河道景观规划方法研究:以昆明市盘龙江为例[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 55(1):189-196. |
LIU J J, WANG Y H, ZHAO L, et al. Urban river landscape planning based on landscape evaluation:a case study of Panlong River in Kunming[J]. Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekin, 2019, 55(1):189-196. DOI:10.13209/j.0479-8023.2018.093. | |
[9] | 曹加杰, 王杰, 吴向崇, 等. 城市河道开放空间景观修复后评价研究:以南京内秦淮河东段为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(3):195-201. |
CAO J J, WANG J, WU X C, et al. Post-evaluation of urban river open space landscape restoration: a case study of the eastern part of the Inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed),2020, 44(3):195-201. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201809023. | |
[10] | 袁鹏, 徐连奎, 可宝玲, 等. 南京市月牙湖黑臭水体整治与生态修复[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2020, 10(5):696-701. |
YUAN P, XU L K, KE B L, et al. Treatment and ecological restoration of black and odorous water body in Yueya Lake in Nanjing City[J]. J Environ Eng Technol, 2020, 10(5):696-701.DOI:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200111. | |
[11] | 杨波. 水敏性城市河道湿地公园景观规划设计策略研究:以郑州寺河湿地公园景观规划为例[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2015. |
YANG B. Study on landscape planning and design strategy of water-sensitive urban river wetland park: a case study of Sihe Wetland park in Zhengzhou[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2015. | |
[12] | 王鹏, 亚吉露·劳森, 刘滨谊. 水敏性城市设计(WSUD)策略及其在景观项目中的应用[J]. 中国园林, 2010, 26(6):88-91. |
WANG P, GOLL L, LIU B Y. Water sensitive urban design and its applications in landscape projects[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2010, 26(6):88-91.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2010.06.033. | |
[13] | 刘迎宾, 周彦吕. 新加坡水敏性城市设计的发展历程和实施研究[C]// 规划60年:成就与挑战——2016中国城市规划年会论文集(06城市设计与详细规划).沈阳, 2016:622-633. |
[14] | 雷兴碧, 冯玉雪, 赵红雪, 等. 基于水质指数的宁夏沙湖综合水质状态研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2021(1):54-60. |
LEI X B, FENG Y X, ZHAO H X, et al. Assessing the water quality of Shahu Lake by the water quality index model[J]. China Rural Water Hydropower, 2021(1):54-60. | |
[15] | 何培根, 张成. 基于水敏性城市设计的雨洪管理实践及启示:以墨尔本为例[C]// 规划60年:成就与挑战——2016中国城市规划年会论文集(02城市工程规划).沈阳, 2016:464-473. |
[16] | 张冬杰, 王雪宏, 佟守正, 等. 松花江下游富锦段沿江恢复湿地植物多样性[J]. 湿地科学, 2016, 14(6):883-887. |
ZHANG D J, WANG X H, TONG S Z, et al. Plant diversity in the restored riparian wetlands along the downstream of Songhua River[J]. Wetl Sci, 2016, 14(6):883-887.DOI:10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2016.06.017. | |
[17] | 钱进, 王超, 王沛芳, 等. 基于层次分析法的河湖滨岸缓冲带宽度适宜性评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2008, 24(6):76-79. |
QIAN J, WANG C, WANG P F, et al. Evaluation of width suitability of riparian buffer strip based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Water Resour Prot, 2008, 24(6):76-79.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6933.2008.06.019. |
[1] | QU Ziya, ZHANG Qingping, ZHANG Rui, WANG Yujie, LI Lanxin. The optimization of urban blue-green spatial layout based on dual performances: a case study on Putuo District in Shanghai [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 235-243. |
[2] | WANG Zhen, GAO Yajun, YAN Fanfeng, WANG Xiaowei, LI Huaqing, JIANG Lei. Construction of a comprehensive assessment system for road greening tree species in coastal cities [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(2): 187-196. |
[3] | CAO Jiajie, ZHANG Mengfan. Evaluation of urban waterfront landscape quality based on semantic differential method:a case of Zhonghuamen section of Qinhuai River in Nanjing [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(6): 221-227. |
[4] | CAO Jiajie, WANG Jie, WU Xiangchong, DING Changhui, WANG Weixi, WANG Hao. Post⁃evaluation of urban river open space landscape restoration:a case study of the eastern part of the Inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 195-201. |
[5] | ZHANG Caihong, XUE Wei, XIN Ying, GAO Yujuan. Suitability evaluation of rest and recuperation sites in Guizhou Yushe National Forest Park by analytic hierarchy process(AHP) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(2): 215-219. |
[6] | WANG Xianguang, WANG Zhenrong, HE Xiaoyong, LIAN Faliang, HONG Zhen,WANG Junfeng, DU Youxin, TANG Li. The beauty degree of forest facies and its optimal color composition pattern in the southwest Zhejiang Province in autumn [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(01): 118-126. |
[7] | HUANG Zhengjin, WEI Yunli, ZHANG Chunhong, LYU Lianfei, LI Weilin, WU Wenlong. Comprehensive evaluation of five blackberry hybrid strains by analytic hierarchy process(AHP) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(01): 135-140. |
[8] | SHI Youhai, ZHU Xiaohang. Resources of flowering trees & shrubs and quantitative evaluation of ornamental characters in urban parks of Haikou [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2014, 38(增刊): 118-124. |
[9] | WANG Jinxiu,QI Shi,ZHANG Yaoqi,WANG Hui,LI Linying,WANG Di,YU Xiaoyan,LIU Jin. Comprehensive evaluation of riparian buffer strips on the upper reaches of the Qin river, Shanxi province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2012, 36(01): 152-155. |
[10] | LI Xiaowen,, JIA Liming*, LI Guangde, HAO Xiaofei. Landscape evaluation and management techniques on mixed scenic forest of Amygdalus davidiana and conifer in Beijing lower mountainous area [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2010, 34(04): 107-111. |
[11] | YIN Hua,WANG Da-ming. Measures of Highway’s Own Landscape Evaluation [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2006, 30(S1): 63-66. |
[12] | Liu Ying’an Hong Yan(Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing 210037) (Xuanzhou Prefectural Forestry Bureall)Ye Jinshan. CHINESE FIR MANMADE FOREST SITE QUALITY QUANTITATIVEEVALUATION AND YIELD PREDICTION OF THE MOUNTAINAREA IN THE SOUTHEAST OF ANHUI PROVINCE [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 1998, 22(03): 51-55. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||