JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 70-78.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202106007
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Mingzhen1(), LIU Jing1, ZOU Xianhua2, ZHENG Hong3, FAN Fujing3, LIN Kaimin1,2, MA Xiangqing1,2, LI Ming1,2,*(
)
Received:
2021-06-03
Revised:
2022-05-10
Online:
2023-03-30
Published:
2023-03-28
CLC Number:
ZHAO Mingzhen, LIU Jing, ZOU Xianhua, ZHENG Hong, FAN Fujing, LIN Kaimin, MA Xiangqing, LI Ming. Effects of thinning and fertilization on the growth and timber assortment structure of middle-aged Chinese fir forest[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(2): 70-78.
Table 1
Physical properties of soil in the experimental site"
理化性质 physical and chemical property | 土层/cm soil layer | ||
---|---|---|---|
0~10 | ≥10~20 | ≥20~40 | |
最大持水量/mm max holding water | 52.61±1.92 | 52.19±2.34 | 105.50±4.59 |
毛管持水量/mm hairy tube holding water | 45.66±3.12 | 43.21±3.21 | 88.78±6.21 |
最小持水量/mm min retentive capacity | 31.93±3.37 | 28.93±3.35 | 61.19±4.64 |
非毛管孔隙度/% non-capillary porosity | 6.85±3.60 | 8.45±4.70 | 8.29±2.79 |
毛管孔隙度/% capillary porosity | 45.57±3.12 | 43.08±3.21 | 44.39±3.11 |
总孔隙度/% total porosity | 52.41±1.92 | 51.53±2.34 | 52.69±2.29 |
土壤密度/(g·cm-3) soil density | 2.66±0.15 | 2.68±0.10 | 2.87±0.14 |
N含量/(g·kg-1) N content | 1.57±0.34 | 1.42±0.32 | 1.02±0.21 |
P含量/(g·kg-1) P content | 0.26±0.04 | 0.25±0.05 | 0.26±0.05 |
Table 2
Regression fitting results of tree height and DBH"
回归模型类型 regression model type | 模型方程 model equation | R2 |
---|---|---|
二次函数 quadratic function | H= -0.010 8 D2 + 1.022 1 D + 1.093 5 | 0.720 5 |
一次线性函数 linear function | H = 0.620 8 D + 4.635 2 | 0.713 1 |
指数函数 exponential function | H = 7.397 5 | 0.699 4 |
幂函数 power function | H= 1.969 2 D0.720 5 | 0.731 6 |
Table 3
Proportions of timber type in different diameter classes"
材种 timber type | 各径级占比/% diameter class ratio | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<6 cm | 6 cm | 8 cm | 10 cm | 12 cm | 14 cm | 16 cm | 18 cm | 20 cm | 22 cm | 24 cm | ≥26 cm | |
薪材 fuelwood | 100 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
小条木 small wood | 0 | 70 | 100 | 60 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
小径材small diameter timber | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
中径材medium diameter timber | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 65 | 0 |
大径材 large diameter timber | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 100 |
Table 4
Various thinning and fertilization treatments,nutrient status and eco-stoichiometry of each sample plot"
样地号 sample No. | 保留密度/ (株·hm-2) retention density | 施肥量/(g·株-1) fertilizer amount | 养分含量/(g·kg-1) nutrient content | 化学计量比 eco-stoichiometry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | 有机碳 SOC | 全氮 TN | 全磷 TP | C:N | C:P | N:P | ||
1 | 1 200 | 0 | 250 | 16.12±3.55 | 1.24±0.33 | 0.23±0.08 | 13.30±1.62 | 75.74±23.18 | 5.58±1.18 |
2 | 1 500 | 200 | 0 | 13.06±2.51 | 0.93±0.08 | 0.24±0.03 | 14.36±4.08 | 57.43±19.70 | 3.94±0.29 |
3 | 1 200 | 200 | 500 | 17.05±2.53 | 1.37±0.19 | 0.25±0.02 | 12.44±0.17 | 69.35±13.82 | 5.56±1.04 |
4 | 2 250 | 0 | 0 | 22.08±2.92 | 1.73±0.23 | 0.30±0.02 | 12.82±1.14 | 73.59±5.90 | 5.77±0.56 |
5 | 1 500 | 0 | 500 | 18.39±7.28 | 1.30±0.57 | 0.28±0.02 | 14.70±1.64 | 66.23±24.35 | 4.71±1.97 |
6 | 1 200 | 100 | 0 | 15.25±3.11 | 1.13±0.36 | 0.32±0.01 | 14.18±2.22 | 47.12±10.24 | 3.50±1.14 |
7 | 2 250 | 100 | 500 | 15.64±3.86 | 1.13±0.36 | 0.25±0.01 | 14.36±1.53 | 61.58±13.14 | 4.42±1.26 |
8 | 1 500 | 100 | 250 | 16.37±2.89 | 1.19±0.30 | 0.24±0.02 | 14.30±2.96 | 67.20±9.71 | 4.93±1.30 |
9 | 2 250 | 200 | 250 | 25.47±1.32 | 1.78±0.30 | 0.21±0.07 | 14.74±2.86 | 129.37±33.58 | 9.51±3.80 |
Table 5
Growth of average DBH, average tree height, single mean volume and accumulation"
样地号 sample No. | 年份 year | D/ cm | H/ m | V单株/ m3 | V总/ (m3·hm-2) | 样地号 sample No. | 年份 year | D/ cm | H/ m | V单株/ m3 | V总/ (m3·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 18.47 | 16.10 | 0.221 8 | 242.16 | 5 | 2020 | 20.53 | 17.37 | 0.292 4 | 443.35 | |
2018 | 19.74 | 16.89 | 0.263 9 | 287.39 | 总增量 | 3.25 | 2.03 | 0.106 1 | 161.55 | ||
1 | 2019 | 21.02 | 17.67 | 0.311 1 | 339.60 | 2017 | 18.31 | 16.00 | 0.216 8 | 251.26 | |
2020 | 21.88 | 18.19 | 0.345 5 | 377.39 | 2018 | 19.44 | 16.70 | 0.253 5 | 294.28 | ||
总增量 | 3.41 | 2.09 | 0.123 7 | 135.23 | 6 | 2019 | 20.72 | 17.49 | 0.299 7 | 348.51 | |
2017 | 18.36 | 16.03 | 0.218 4 | 331.81 | 2020 | 21.93 | 18.22 | 0.347 6 | 405.15 | ||
2018 | 19.41 | 16.68 | 0.252 4 | 384.10 | 总增量 | 3.62 | 2.22 | 0.130 8 | 153.90 | ||
2 | 2019 | 20.43 | 17.31 | 0.288 7 | 439.61 | 2017 | 15.11 | 13.93 | 0.131 2 | 301.59 | |
2020 | 21.42 | 17.91 | 0.326 8 | 499.12 | 2018 | 16.14 | 14.61 | 0.156 0 | 359.71 | ||
总增量 | 3.06 | 1.88 | 0.108 4 | 167.32 | 7 | 2019 | 17.06 | 15.2 | 0.180 1 | 416.20 | |
2017 | 18.31 | 16.00 | 0.216 8 | 262.47 | 2020 | 17.69 | 15.61 | 0.198 2 | 454.87 | ||
2018 | 19.49 | 16.73 | 0.255 2 | 309.77 | 总增量 | 2.58 | 1.68 | 0.067 0 | 153.28 | ||
3 | 2019 | 20.72 | 17.49 | 0.299 7 | 364.14 | 2017 | 14.82 | 13.74 | 0.124 7 | 189.22 | |
2020 | 22.11 | 18.33 | 0.355 1 | 432.01 | 2018 | 16.09 | 14.58 | 0.154 6 | 238.42 | ||
总增量 | 3.80 | 2.33 | 0.138 3 | 169.54 | 8 | 2019 | 17.33 | 15.37 | 0.187 7 | 289.60 | |
2017 | 15.98 | 14.51 | 0.151 9 | 360.81 | 2020 | 18.22 | 15.94 | 0.214 0 | 330.24 | ||
2018 | 16.92 | 15.11 | 0.176 3 | 416.92 | 总增量 | 3.40 | 2.20 | 0.089 3 | 141.03 | ||
4 | 2019 | 17.72 | 15.63 | 0.199 2 | 472.27 | 2017 | 13.22 | 12.65 | 0.092 5 | 203.61 | |
2020 | 18.30 | 15.99 | 0.216 5 | 514.21 | 2018 | 14.48 | 13.51 | 0.117 3 | 258.43 | ||
总增量 | 2.32 | 1.48 | 0.064 6 | 153.39 | 9 | 2019 | 15.65 | 14.29 | 0.143 8 | 317.00 | |
2017 | 17.28 | 15.34 | 0.186 3 | 281.80 | 2020 | 16.33 | 14.73 | 0.160 7 | 354.41 | ||
5 | 2018 | 18.52 | 16.13 | 0.223 4 | 338.03 | 总增量 | 3.11 | 2.08 | 0.068 2 | 150.80 | |
2019 | 19.81 | 16.93 | 0.266 4 | 403.49 |
Table 6
Effects of three factors on the increment of each growth index"
变量 variable | 处理 treatment | D增量/cm | H增量/m | V单株增量/m3 | V总增量/ (m3·hm-2) | 出材量增量/(m3·hm-2) output increment | 出材率增量/% yield increment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中径材 medium- diameter timber | 大径材 large- diameter timber | 中径材 medium- diameter timber | 大径材 large- diameter timber | ||||||
保留密度/ (株·hm-2) retention density | 1 200 | 3.61±0.16 b | 2.21±0.10 a | 0.130 9±0.006 0 c | 152.89±14.02 a | 71.22±6.42 a | 104.47±15.52 b | 1.23±3.86 a | 25.01±3.25 b |
1 500 | 3.24±0.14 ab | 2.04±0.13 a | 0.101 3±0.008 5 b | 156.63±11.28 a | 138.19±43.03 a | 49.26±43.00 ab | 23.26±9.67 a | 10.05±8.06 a | |
2 250 | 2.67±0.33 a | 1.75±0.25 a | 0.066 6±0.001 5 a | 152.49±1.19 a | 134.86±22.73 a | 24.41±16.71 a | 24.92±6.87 a | 5.06±3.16 a | |
N肥量/ (g·株-1) N fertilizer amount | 0 | 2.99±0.48 a | 1.87±0.27 a | 0.098 1±0.024 8 a | 150.06±11.00 a | 121.69±47.41 a | 54.44±22.71 a | 13.8±7.14 a | 12.17±6.12 a |
100 | 3.20±0.45 a | 2.03±0.25 a | 0.095 7±0.026 4 a | 149.40±5.93 a | 127.39±35.94 a | 45.29±41.94 a | 22.56±4.67 a | 11.06±4.36 a | |
200 | 3.33±0.34 a | 2.10±0.18 a | 0.105 0±0.028 7 a | 162.55±8.36 b | 95.18±33.59 a | 78.41±53.55 a | 10.59±2.95 a | 16.88±5.71 a | |
P肥量 (g·株-1) P fertilizer amount | 0 | 3.00±0.54 a | 1.87±0.30 a | 0.101 2±0.027 5 a | 158.20±6.45 b | 87.8±11.87 a | 85.23±29.15 a | 3.21±4.26 a | 18.39±7.18 a |
250 | 3.31±0.14 a | 2.12±0.06 a | 0.093 7±0.022 9 a | 142.35±6.43 a | 120.58±32.80 a | 31.87±38.26 a | 26.87±8.71 a | 7.88±9.13 a | |
500 | 3.21±0.50 a | 2.01±0.27 a | 0.103 8±0.029 2 a | 161.46±6.64 b | 135.88±53.24 a | 61.04±44.57 a | 16.87±3.65 a | 13.84±9.51 a |
[1] | 徐雪蕾, 孙玉军, 周华, 等. 间伐强度对杉木人工林林下植被和土壤性质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(3):1-12. |
XU X L, SUN Y J, ZHOU H, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on understory growth and soil properties in Chinese fir plantation[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2019, 55(3):1-12. | |
[2] | WU C P, JIANG B, YUAN W G, et al. On the management of large-diameter trees in China’s forests[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(1):111.DOI:10.3390/f11010111. |
[3] | 国家林业局. 第八次全国森林资源清查结果[EB/OL]. [2016-01-15][2021-06-03]. http://www.forestry.gov.cn/. |
[4] | 欧启信. 杉木速生丰产林营林技术与管理要点分析[J]. 林业科技情报, 2019, 51(4):39-40,51. |
OU Q X. Analysis on the technology and management of fast-growing and high-yield forests in Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. For Sci Technol Inf, 2019, 51(4):39-40,51. | |
[5] | CRECENTE-CAMPO F, POMMERENING A, RODRÍGUEZ-SOALLEIRO R. Impacts of thinning on structure,growth and risk of crown fire in a Pinus sylvestris L.plantation in northern Spain[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 257(9):1945-1954.DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.009. |
[6] | 任衍敏, 陈敏健, 李惠通, 等. 配方施肥对杉木近熟林大径材材种结构的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2021, 41(1):18-25. |
REN Y M, CHEN M J, LI H T, et al. Effects of formula fertilization on species structure of large diameter wood in near mature forest of Chinese fir[J]. J For Environ, 2021, 41(1):18-25.DOI:10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2021.01.003. | |
[7] | 邓伦秀. 杉木人工林林分密度效应及材种结构规律研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2010. |
DENG L X. Studies on stand density effect and timber grade structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2010. | |
[8] | 相聪伟. 杉木人工林生长及材种结构规律研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2013. |
XIANG C W. Study on regulation of stand growth and timber assotrment structure in Cunninshamia lanceolata plantation[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2013. | |
[9] | 贾炜玮, 罗天泽, 李凤日. 基于抚育间伐效应的红松人工林枝条密度模型[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(2):10-21. |
JIA W W, LUO T Z, LI F R. Branch density model for Pinus koraiensis plantation based on thinning effects[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2021, 43(2):10-21. | |
[10] | 曹云, 杨劼, 宋炳煜, 等. 人工抚育措施对油松林生长及结构特征的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(3):397-402. |
CAO Y, YANG J, SONG B Y, et al. Effects of artificial tending on Pinus tabulaeformis forest growth and its structural characteristics[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2005, 16(3):397-402. | |
[11] | 肖兴翠, 索怀俊, 李成勇, 等. 不同间伐强度对香椿中龄林生长和干形的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(3):10-17. |
XIAO X C, SUO H J, LI C Y, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on growth and stem form of middle-aged Toona sinensis plantation[J]. J Central South Univ For & Technol, 2021, 41(3):10-17.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2021.03.002. | |
[12] | 郑鸣鸣, 任正标, 王友良, 等. 间伐强度对杉木中龄林生长和结构的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2020, 40(4):369-376. |
ZHENG M M, REN Z B, WANG Y L, et al. Effect of thinning intensity on the growth and structure of a middle-aged Chinese fir forest[J]. J For Environ, 2020, 40(4):369-376.DOI:10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2020.04.005. | |
[13] | 张鹏, 王新杰, 韩金, 等. 间伐对杉木人工林生长的短期影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(2):6-10,14. |
ZHANG P, WANG X J, HAN J, et al. Short-term effect of thinning on the growth of Chinese fir plantation[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2016, 44(2):6-10,14.DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20160105.036. | |
[14] | 王春胜, 赵志刚, 曾冀, 等. 广西凭祥西南桦中幼林林木生长过程与造林密度的关系[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(2):257-262. |
WANG C S, ZHAO Z G, ZENG J, et al. Relationship between planting density and tree growth process of Betula alnoides mid-young plantations in Pingxiang,Guangxi[J]. For Res, 2013, 26(2):257-262.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2013.02.020. | |
[15] | 王毓靖, 颜忠鹏, 李志辉. 不同间伐强度对桉树人工林林分生长的影响[J]. 桉树科技, 2019, 36(3):36-41. |
WANG Y J, YAN Z P, LI Z H. Effects of different thinning intensities on stand growth of Eucalyptus plantation[J]. Eucalypt Sci & Technol, 2019, 36(3):36-41.DOI:10.13987/j.cnki.askj.2019.03.006. | |
[16] | 童方平, 吴际友, 龙应忠, 余格非. 间伐对火炬松木材性质的影响[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2004, 24(2):23-27. |
TONG F P, WU J Y, LONG Y Z, et al. Effects of thinning on wood properties of loblloly pine[J]. J Central South For Univ, 2004, 24(2):23-27. | |
[17] | 徐有明, 林汉, 魏柏松, 等. 间伐强度对湿地松人工林木材质量的影响效应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2002, 30(2):38-42. |
XU Y M, LIN H, WEI B S, et al. Effects of thinning intensities on wood properties of exotic slash pine plantation[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2002, 30(2):38-42.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2002.02.010. | |
[18] | 陈家法, 魏志恒, 吴际友, 等. 湿地松中龄林施肥经济效应与最优施肥量研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(10):28-34. |
CHEN J F, WEI Z H, WU J Y, et al. Study on the economic effect of fertilization and the optimal amount of fertilization in the middle age Pinus elliottii plantation[J]. J Central South Univ For & Technol, 2020, 40(10):28-34.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.10.003. | |
[19] | 舒文波, 杨章旗, 兰富. 施肥对马尾松中龄林生长量和产脂的影响[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2009, 29(2):160-165. |
SHU W B, YANG Z Q, LAN F. Effects of fertilization on the growth and resin yield of middle-aged forest of Pinus massoniana[J]. J Fujian Coll For, 2009, 29(2):160-165.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.2009.02.013. | |
[20] | 彭桂永. 杉木中龄林间伐后不同保留密度和施肥试验研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2016, 22(12):94-95,117. |
PENG G Y. Experimental study on different retention density and fertilization of middle-aged Chinese fir forest after thinning[J]. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2016, 22(12):94-95,117.DOI:10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2016.12.044. | |
[21] | 王春胜, 唐诚, 赵志刚, 等. 桂西地区西南桦中龄林生长对间伐和施肥的响应[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(5):28-32. |
WANG C S, TANG C, ZHAO Z G, et al. Growth response of mid-aged Betula alnoides plantations to thinning and fertilization in western Guangxi[J]. J Central South Univ For & Technol, 2018, 38(5):28-32.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2018.05.005. | |
[22] | 郭光智, 段爱国, 张建国, 等. 南亚热带杉木人工林材种结构长期立地与密度效应[J]. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(1):35-43. |
GUO G Z, DUAN A G, ZHANG J G, et al. Long-term effects of site and density on timber assortment structure of Chinese fir plantations in south subtropical area,China[J]. For Res, 2020, 33(1):35-43.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.01.005. | |
[23] | 吴立潮, 胡曰利, 吴晓芙, 等. 杉木中龄林施肥效应与效益研究[J]. 中南林学院学报, 1997, 17(3):1-7. |
WU L C, HU Y L, WU X F, et al. Effect of fertilization on growth of middle-aged China-fir[J]. J Central South For Univ, 1997, 17(3):1-7. | |
[24] | 惠刚盈, 胡艳波, 罗云伍, 等. 杉木中大径材成材机理的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2000, 13(2):177-181. |
HUI G Y, HU Y B, LUO Y W, et al. Study on the mechanism of producing high quality wood of Chinese fir[J]. For Res, 2000, 13(2):177-181.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2000.02.011. | |
[25] | ACHAT D L, BAKKER M R, AUGUSTO L, et al. Phosphorus status of soils from contrasting forested ecosystems in southwestern Siberia:effects of microbiological and physicochemical properties[J]. Biogeosciences, 2013, 10(2):733-752.DOI:10.5194/bg-10-733-2013. |
[26] | 冯慧芳, 刘落鱼, 薛立. 氮磷添加及林分密度对大叶相思林土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(11):1010-1020. |
FENG H F, LIU L Y, XUE L. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus additions and stand density on soil chemical property in Acacia auriculiformis stands[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(11):1010-1020. | |
[27] | 董威, 刘泰瑞, 覃志杰, 等. 不同林分密度油松天然林土壤理化性质及微生物量碳氮特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(1):65-72. |
DONG W, LIU T R, QIN Z J, et al. Research on the characteristics of soil physicochemical properties and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in natural Pinus tabulaeformis forests with different stand densities[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2019, 28(1):65-72.DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2019.01.008. | |
[28] | 杨佳萍, 寥蓉, 杨万勤, 等. 高山峡谷区暗针叶林凋落物产量及动态[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(4):745-752. |
YANG J P, LIAO R, YANG W Q, et al. Litter production and its dynamic pattern in a dark coniferous forest in the alpine gorge region[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2017, 23(4):745-752.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.03020. | |
[29] | 郭传阳, 林开敏, 郑鸣鸣, 等. 间伐对杉木人工林土壤微生物生物量碳氮的短期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(5):125-131. |
GUO C Y, LIN K M, ZHENG M M, et al. Short-term effects of thinning on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in a Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(5):125-131.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201906007. |
[1] | LIU Juntao, JIA Liming, YAN Xiaoli, ZHANG Weihua, CAI Wanting, ZHONG Jing, WANG Lixian, CAO Qiuli, ZHAO Pengli, CHEN Yiyong, YU Jiaxin, CHEN Na, WENG Xuehuang. Effect of variations in fertilization formula on the photosynthetic characteristics and growth of young Sapindus saponaria [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(6): 23-33. |
[2] | LIU Xiaofang, YUE Xiliang, FANG Shengzuo, LI Qing, SUN Xin. Effects of various ratios of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on the growth and contents of leaf bioactive substances in Cyclocarya paliurus [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(4): 57-66. |
[3] | FENG Wei, SHAN Changdan, ZHANG Hui, LIU Jiaman, LIU Guoang, YAO Zengyu. Effects of fertilization regime and rate on growth and needle nutrient level of Pinus armandii seedling [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 191-198. |
[4] | LI Chengji, GUAN Fengying, ZHOU Xiao, ZHANG Xuan, ZHENG Yaxiong. Effects of fertilization application on quantity and quality recovery of restoring strip-harvested moso (Phyllostachys edulis) bamboo forests [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 79-85. |
[5] | LU Qifan, LIN Shangping, LIU Shenghui, ZHENG Xiang, BI Yufang, XIAO Zizhang, JIANG Jiang, WANG Anke, DU Xuhua. Meta-analysis of the effect of fertilization on the yield of Phyllostachys edulis forest [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 88-96. |
[6] | GAO Xieyu, DONG Lihu, HAO Yuanshuo. Effects of thinning on Larix olgensis plantation stem form based on TLS [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 85-94. |
[7] | WANG Zhangrong, JI Kongshu, XU Li’an, ZOU Bingzhang, LIN Nengqing, LIN Jingquan. New management model of construction techniques, realistic genetic gain and low cost multi-generation improvement in seedling seed orchard of Pinus massoniana [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 9-16. |
[8] | LIANG Wenchao, BU Xing, LUO Siqian, XIE Yinfeng, HU Jialing, ZHANG Wangxiang. Effects of fertilization on the leaf growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Chaenomeles speciosa ‘Changshouguan’ after processing of warming in the post floral stage [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 114-120. |
[9] | YE Keke, LI Qingmei, ZHU Yan, YAN Jingjing, ZHANG Zihan, FENG Sai, YANG Xiaohui. Responses of growth and afforestation performance of Pinus tabuliformis container and bareroot seedlings to fall fertilization [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(1): 136-144. |
[10] | LIANG Wenchao, BU Xing, LUO Siqian, XIE Yinfeng, ZHANG Wangxiang, HU Jialin. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium compound fertilization on the physiological characteristics of Chaenomeles speciosa ‘Changshouguan’ after processing of warming in the post floral stage [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(5): 81-88. |
[11] | WANG Youliang, LIN Kaimin, SONG Chongsheng, CUI Chaowei, PENG Lihong, ZHENG Hong, ZHENG Mingming, REN Zhengbiao, QIU Mingjing. Short-term effects of thinning on carbon storage in Chinese fir plantation ecosystems [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(3): 65-73. |
[12] | JI Yanhong, TANG Wenhua, DOU Quanqin, XIE Yinfeng. Effects of fertilizer application on seedling growth and nutrient accumulation in Carya illinoinensis container seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(6): 47-56. |
[13] | NI Ming, GAO Zhenzhou, WU Wen, ZHANG Yuhui, YU Fangyuan. Effects of different nitrogen fertilization methods on growth and non-structure carbohydrate accumulation of Quercus nuttallii seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(4): 107-113. |
[14] | WANG Fugen, WEI Xingbiao, ZHAO Guochun, JIA Liming. Responses of morphology and vertical distribution of fine roots in Sapindus mukorossi to formula fertilization [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(4): 58-66. |
[15] | LAI Guozhen, WANG Yannan, HUANG Baoxiang, ZHOU Guang, MO Xiaoyong, LIU Liting. A grid thinning model based on forest spatial structure optimization [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(3): 199-205. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||