JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 175-182.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203002
Previous Articles Next Articles
CHENG Fang1,2(), SUN Tingyu1(), YE Jianren1,*()
Received:
2022-03-01
Revised:
2023-07-04
Online:
2023-11-30
Published:
2023-11-23
CLC Number:
CHENG Fang, SUN Tingyu, YE Jianren. Induction of embryogenic callus from immature zygotic embryos of Pinus elliottii resistant to brown spot needle blight (pathogen: Lecanosticta acicola)[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 175-182.
Table 1
The initiation rate of Pinus elliottii tissue with different collection time, family trees and cone refrigeration time"
处理 treatment | 不同类型愈伤组织诱导率/% callus initiation rate | 出愈率/% initiation rate | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ、Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ | Ⅵ | |||
采集时间(月-日) collection time n=50 | 06-15 | 0 | 31.7 | 2.8 | 38.9 | 26.6 | 34.5 |
06-22 | 0 | 33.5 | 3.2 | 50.9 | 12.4 | 36.7 | |
06-28 | 0 | 58.4 | 6.8 | 32.5 | 2.3 | 65.2 | |
07-04 | 0 | 64.3 | 11.3 | 22.6 | 1.8 | 75.6 | |
07-13 | 0 | 76.8 | 12.1 | 9.8 | 1.3 | 88.9 | |
07-28 | 0 | 12.3 | 2.2 | 34.6 | 51.9 | 14.5 | |
08-03 | 0 | 13.6 | 0 | 32.5 | 53.9 | 13.6 | |
家系号 family trees code n=35 | 9 | 0 | 68.5 | 12.1 | 14.1 | 5.3 | 80.6 |
8 | 0 | 59.9 | 7.9 | 28.6 | 3.6 | 67.8 | |
34 | 0 | 65.6 | 15.6 | 15.9 | 2.9 | 81.2 | |
2 | 0 | 66.8 | 12.8 | 18.6 | 1.8 | 79.6 | |
23 | 0 | 72.4 | 13.4 | 14.2 | 0 | 85.8 | |
39 | 0 | 68.9 | 7.8 | 19.5 | 17.2 | 76.7 | |
11 | 0 | 70.5 | 10.0 | 14.6 | 4.9 | 80.5 | |
25 | 0 | 70.7 | 11.7 | 12.5 | 4.9 | 82.4 | |
球果冷藏时间/d cone refrigeration time n=32 | 0 | 0 | 58.9 | 19.6 | 12.8 | 8.7 | 78.5 |
5 | 0 | 55.8 | 24.8 | 13.6 | 5.8 | 80.6 | |
15 | 0 | 51.3 | 24.5 | 10.3 | 13.9 | 75.8 | |
30 | 0 | 53.8 | 16.6 | 16.9 | 12.7 | 70.4 | |
60 | 0 | 52.5 | 16.2 | 20.5 | 10.8 | 68.7 |
Table 2
The initiation rate of Pinus elliottii tissue with different additives"
处理 treatment | 不同类型愈伤组织诱导率/% callus initiation rate | 出愈率/% initiation rate | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ | Ⅵ | ||||||||||
糖种类及质量浓度/(g·L-1) sugar type and concentration n=35 | S1 | 0 | 0 | 65.4 | 5.1 | 22.5 | 7.0 | 70.5 | |||||||
S2 | 0 | 0 | 70.2 | 8.4 | 19.8 | 1.2 | 78.6 | ||||||||
S3 | 0 | 0 | 55.4 | 8.2 | 25.8 | 10.6 | 63.6 | ||||||||
S4 | 0 | 0 | 48.6 | 11.1 | 30.5 | 9.8 | 59.7 | ||||||||
S5 | 0 | 0 | 48.4 | 7.6 | 25.5 | 18.5 | 56.0 | ||||||||
S6 | 0 | 0 | 47.8 | 9.5 | 22.7 | 10.0 | 57.3 | ||||||||
肌醇质量浓度/(mg·L-1) inositol concentration n=35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.5 | 12.3 | 40.2 | 14.0 | 45.8 | |||||||
100 | 0 | 0 | 32.7 | 14.0 | 44.6 | 8.7 | 46.7 | ||||||||
300 | 0 | 0 | 35.6 | 8.3 | 45.8 | 10.3 | 43.9 | ||||||||
500 | 0 | 0 | 38.9 | 9.7 | 45.7 | 5.7 | 48.6 | ||||||||
1 000 | 2.9 | 0 | 25.5 | 7.0 | 35.8 | 8.8 | 35.4 | ||||||||
2 000 | 0 | 0 | 30.5 | 11.8 | 38.7 | 19.0 | 42.3 | ||||||||
抗坏血酸质量浓度/(mg·L-1) ascorbic acid concentration n=35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58.5 | 18.4 | 18.6 | 4.5 | 76.9 | |||||||
1 | 0 | 0 | 55.5 | 15.1 | 18.2 | 11.2 | 70.6 | ||||||||
2 | 0 | 0 | 52.0 | 20.5 | 17.5 | 10.0 | 72.5 | ||||||||
3 | 0 | 0 | 56.0 | 22.1 | 16.0 | 5.9 | 78.1 | ||||||||
α-酮戊二酸和丙酮酸 质量浓度/(mg·L-1) alpha-ketoglutaric acid and pyruvate concentration n=40 | A | 0 | 0 | 45.5 | 25.3 | 20.6 | 8.6 | 70.8 | |||||||
B | 0 | 0 | 48.8 | 27.5 | 16.3 | 7.4 | 76.3 | ||||||||
C | 0 | 0 | 53.3 | 22.6 | 14.8 | 9.3 | 75.9 | ||||||||
D | 0 | 0 | 66.0 | 19.8 | 8.5 | 5.7 | 85.8 |
Table 3
The initiation rate of Pinus elliottii with different hormone proportion"
处理号 treatment code | 激素质量浓度/(mg·L-1) hormone concentration | 不同类型愈伤组织诱导率/% callus initiation rate | 出愈率/% initiation rate | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,4-D | 6-BA | KT | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ | Ⅵ | ||
Ⅰ-26 | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0 | 2.9 | 52.3 | 23.7 | 15.4 | 5.7 | 78.9 |
Ⅰ-36 | 2 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 55.4 | 30.3 | 10.1 | 4.2 | 85.7 |
Ⅰ-40 | 4 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 51.6 | 32.2 | 12.6 | 3.6 | 83.8 |
Ⅰ-127 | 10 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 49.3 | 31.2 | 13.0 | 6.5 | 80.5 |
Ⅰ-128 | 10 | 3.0 | 0 | 1.8 | 0 | 56.9 | 31.7 | 7.5 | 2.1 | 90.4 |
Ⅰ-129 | 10 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 45.3 | 30.4 | 15.9 | 8.4 | 75.7 |
Ⅰ-130 | 10 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 48.6 | 29.8 | 16.0 | 5.6 | 78.4 |
Ⅰ-14 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 15.5 | 4.1 | 47.9 | 32.5 | 19.6 |
Ⅰ-16 | 2 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 23.6 | 9.0 | 43.1 | 24.3 | 32.6 |
Ⅰ-17 | 2 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 24.3 | 5.1 | 46.8 | 23.8 | 29.4 |
Ⅰ-18 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.2 | 8.3 | 40.4 | 32.1 | 27.5 |
Ⅰ-20 | 2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 18.5 | 7.7 | 48.1 | 25.7 | 26.2 |
Ⅰ-38 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 15.7 | 4.7 | 47.1 | 32.5 | 20.4 |
Ⅰ-39 | 4 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 14.2 | 11.1 | 35.8 | 38.9 | 25.3 |
[1] | 李传道, 韩政敏, 叶建仁, 等. 松针褐斑病在湿地松幼林中的发展[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1987, 11(1): 1-7. |
LI C D, HAN Z M, YE J R, et al. Development of brown-spot needle blight in slash pine plantations[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1987, 11(1):1-7. DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.1987.01.001. | |
[2] | 何月秋. 湿地松抗病家系组培繁殖技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2003. |
HE Y Q. Studies on technology about tissue culture propagation of resistance families of slash pine (Pinus elliottii)[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2003. | |
[3] | 王章荣. 我国林木良种繁育基地建设发展形势及可持续发展策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(5): 1-8. |
WANG Z R. The current scenario and sustainable developmental strategies for genetically improved tree seed production bases in China[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202005016. | |
[4] | 叶建仁, 韩政敏, 李传道, 等. 湿地松、火炬松种源抗褐斑病试验和抗病优树选择[J]. 南京林学院学报, 1986, 10(2):27-36. |
YE J R, HAN Z M, LI C D, et al. Resistance to brown spot disease of geographic seed sources of slash pine and loblolly pine and selection of resistant phenotypes of slash pine individual trees[J]. J Nanjing Inst For, 1986, 10(2):27-36.DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.1986.02.004. | |
[5] | 叶建仁, 韩正敏, 李传道, 等. 湿地松抗褐斑病无性系种子园营建技术研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1991, 15(2):23-29. |
YE J R, HAN Z M, LI C D, et al. Establishment technique of resistance clones seed orchard of slash pine to brown spot disease[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1991, 15(2):23-29.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.1991.02.05. | |
[6] | 朱丽华, 张艺, 吴小芹. 湿地松的组织培养及植株再生[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(6):47-51. |
ZHU L H, ZHANG Y, WU X Q. Tissue culture and plant regeneration of Pinus elliottii[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2004, 28(6):47-51.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2004.06.012. | |
[7] | 吴丽君. 湿地松、火炬松离体培养植株再生技术的研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2008. |
WU L J. In vitro culture and plantlet regeneration of slash pine and loblolly pine[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2008. | |
[8] | PULLMAN G S, GUPTA P K, TIMMIS R, et al. Improved Norway spruce somatic embryo development through the use of abscisic acid combined with activated carbon[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2005, 24(5):271-279.DOI: 10.1007/s00299-005-0933-0. |
[9] | SUN T Y, WANG Y L, ZHU L H, et al. Plant regeneration by somatic embryogenesis in Pinus thunbergii resistant to the pine wood nematode[J]. Can J For Res, 2019, 49(12):1604-1612.DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2018-0522. |
[10] | MOHAN JAIN S, DONG N, NEWTON R J. Somatic embryogenesis in slash pine (Pinus elliottii) from immature embryos cultured in vitro[J]. Plant Sci, 1989, 65(2):233-241.DOI: 10.1016/0168-9452(89)90070-8. |
[11] | YANG F, XIA X R, KE X, et al. Somatic embryogenesis in slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.):improving initiation of embryogenic tissues and maturation of somatic embryos[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC), 2020, 143(1):159-171. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-020-01905-3. |
[12] | 唐巍, 欧阳藩, 郭仲琛. 湿地松体细胞胚胎发生和植株再生[J]. 植物资源与环境, 1997, 6(2):8-11. |
TANG W, OUYANG F, GUO Z C. Plantlet regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in slash pine[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 1997, 6(2):8-11.DOI:CNKI:SUN:ZWZY.0.1997-02-001. | |
[13] | 程子珊, 易敏, 宋才玲, 等. 湿地松体细胞胚胎发生胚性愈伤组织诱导条件优化[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2021, 43(5):1054-1064. |
CHENG Z S, YI M, SONG C L, et al. Optimization of embryogenic callus induction conditions for somatic embryogenesis of Pinus elliottii[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2021, 43(5):1054-1064.DOI: 10.13836/j.jjau.2021114. | |
[14] | 胡继文, 郭文冰, 邓乐平, 等. 湿地松及其杂种的体细胞胚胎发生与植株再生[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019, 40(1):107-115. |
HU J W, GUO W B, DENG L P, et al. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in Pinus elliottii and its hybrids[J]. J South China Agric Univ, 2019, 40(1):107-115.DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201804001. | |
[15] | 张彩云, 朱丽华, 谈家金, 等. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松体细胞胚胎发生与植株再生[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(6):17-22. |
ZHANG C Y, ZHU L H, TAN J J, et al. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration of disease-resistant slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) to brown spot needle blight[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2016, 44(6):17-22.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20160510.011. | |
[16] | PULLMAN G S, JOHNSON S, PETER G, et al. Improving loblolly pine somatic embryo maturation:comparison of somatic and zygotic embryo morphology,germination,and gene expression[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2003, 21(8):747-758.DOI: 10.1007/s00299-003-0586-9. |
[17] | COKE. Basal nutrient medium for in vitro cultures of loblolly pines:United States,5534433[P]. 1996-07-06. |
[18] | 吴静, 朱丽华, 许建秀, 等. 抗松材线虫病赤松胚性愈伤组织的诱导及增殖[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(1):17-21. |
WU J, ZHU L H, XU J X, et al. Induction and proliferation of embryogenic callus in nematode-resistant Pinus densiflora[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 39(1):17-21.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.001. | |
[19] | MARUYAMA T E, HOSOI Y. Progress in somatic embryogenesis of Japanese pines[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2019, 10:31.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00031. |
[20] | IZUNO A, MARUYAMA T E, UENO S, et al. Genotype and transcriptome effects on somatic embryogenesis in Cryptomeria japonica[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(12):e0244634.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244634. |
[21] | 孙婷玉, 叶建仁, 吴小芹, 等. 抗松材线虫病黑松胚性愈伤组织诱导[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2015, 43(9):96-99. |
SUN T Y, YE J R, WU X Q, et al. Induction of embryonic callus from Pinus thunbergii for resistance to pine wilt disease[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2015, 43(9):96-99.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2015.09.019 | |
[22] | 郑志亮, 陈力耕. 柑桔胚状体发生的诱导及其调控研究进展[J]. 福建果树, 1993(3):13-17. |
ZHENG Z L, CHEN L G. Research progress on induction and regulation of Citrus embryogenesis[J]. Fujian Fruits, 1993(3):13-17.DOI:CNKI:SUN:FJGS.0.1993-03-003. | |
[23] | LI F Q, YAO J B, HU L F, et al. Multiple methods synergistically promote the synchronization of somatic embryogenesis through suspension culture in the new hybrid between Pinus elliottii and Pinus caribaea[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13:857972.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.857972. |
[24] | 黄健秋, 卫志明, 许智宏. 马尾松成熟合子胚的体细胞胚胎发生和植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 1995, 37(4):289-294. |
HUANG J Q, WEI Z M, XU Z H. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from callus of mature zygotic embryos of Masson pine[J]. Acta Bot Sin, 1995, 37(4):289-294.DOI:10.1007/BF02007173 | |
[25] | 黄健秋, 卫志明, 许智宏. 云南松成熟胚的体细胞胚胎的发生研究[J]. 实验生物学报, 1995, 28(4):371-379. |
HUANG J Q, WEI Z M, XU Z H. Somatic embryogenesis from callus of mature Yunnan pine embryos[J]. Acta Biol Exp Sin, 1995, 28(4):371-379. |
[1] | GUO Ying, YANG Ganggui, WU Yuhan, HE Jie, HE Yujie, LIAO Haoran, XUE Liangjiao. Recent advances in molecular regulatory mechanisms of DNA methylation in plant tissue culture [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 1-8. |
[2] | JIA Ting, SONG Wuyun, GUAN Xinxian, WEI Zhiwen, CHEN Han, YI Min, XIONG Qihui, ZHANG Lu. Responses of needle functional traits of Pinus elliottii to phosphorus addition [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(6): 65-71. |
[3] | DING Xianyin, TAO Xueyu, DIAO Shu, LUAN Qifu, JIANG Jingmin. Estimation of wood basic density in a Pinus elliottii stand using Pilodyn and Resistograph measurements [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 142-148. |
[4] | YI Min, ZHANG Lu, LEI Lei, CHENG Zishan, SUN Shiwu, LAI Meng. Analysis of SSR information in transcriptome and development of EST-SSR molecular markers in Pinus elliottii Engelm. [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(2): 75-83. |
[5] | CHEN Tingting,YE Jianren,WU Xiaoqin,SHEN Liyuan,ZHU Lihua. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration of disease-resistant Pinus massoniana Lamb. [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(03): 1-8. |
[6] | CHENG Tielong, MENG Yan,CHEN Jinhui,SHI Jisen. Effects of methyl jasmonic acid on somatic embryogenesis of Liriodendron hybrid [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(06): 41-46. |
[7] | DONG Jing, SHI Jisen, XU Jin. Callus induction and plant regeneration from zygotic embryos of Cryptomeria fortunei [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(06): 181-186. |
[8] | LU Lu, LU Ye, SHENG Yu, ZHENG Chen, SHI Jisen, CHEN Jinhui. Effects of different activated carbon on somatic embryogenesis of Liriodendron hybrids [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(02): 59-64. |
[9] | JI Kongshu, WANG Panpan, WANG Jinling,RUAN Qianqian, PAN Ting,ZHU Peihuang, GUO Tianwei, LIU Jing. Review on in vitro culture of tree species in Pinaceae [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(01): 142-148. |
[10] | HU Yuling, YAO Xiaohua, REN Huadong, WANG Kailiang, LONG Wei. Study on somatic embryogenesis regeneration system in Camellia oleifera [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2014, 38(06): 160-164. |
[11] | ZHANG Yanjuan, CHENG Tielong, ZHOU Yanwei, WU Shuang, WANG Pengkai, SHI Jisen, CHEN Jinhui. Effect of PSK on growth and development of Liriodendron hybrids suspension cultured cells [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2014, 38(01): 171-174. |
[12] | LIU Weidong, CHEN Jinhui, ZHOU Yanwei, ZHAO Yaqi, SHI Jisen. Cryopreservation of embryogenic callus of Pinus elliottii × Pinus caribaea using control freezing [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2013, 37(06): 1-5. |
[13] | ZHEN Yan, CHEN Jinhui, SHI Jisen. Research progress on the reacquisition of embryogenic potentiality in plant somatic embryogenesis [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2013, 37(06): 147-152. |
[14] | AN Huicui,YE Jianren,WU Xiaoqin,HOU Liang,ZHU Lihua. Resistance test of tissue cultured plantlets of Pinus elliottii against Lecanostica acicola [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2012, 36(03): 9-12. |
[15] | CHENG Fang, AN Huicui, LIU Ge, YE Jianren. Observation of growth traits on tissue culture plantlets of slash Pinus elliottii [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2012, 36(02): 69-72. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||