Evaluation of the development process and its policy adjustment respose state-owned forest region in Great Khingan Mountains, Heilongjiang

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202302004

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 257-267.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202302004

Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation of the development process and its policy adjustment respose state-owned forest region in Great Khingan Mountains, Heilongjiang

CHEN Keyi¹(), HE Youjun¹, ZHANG Liwen², CAI Qi³^,^*()

1. Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2. Daxing’anling Forestry Group Company, Daxing’anling 165000, China
3. Research Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

Received:2023-02-05 Revised:2023-03-09 Online:2024-05-30 Published:2024-06-14

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 A scientific evaluation of the development process and prediction of the development trend of state-owned forest areas would be of great significance. It could provide guidance for the continuous in-depth reform of state-owned forests, promoting the coordinated development of the regional economy, and maintaining ecological security, defense security, and timber reserve security at the national level.【Method】 Taking the state-owned forest region of the Great Khingan Mountains in Heilongjiang Province as the study area, an evaluation index of the transformation and development process was constructed based on the five system layers of resource conservation, industrial development, enterprise management, the welfare of local people, and support security. The entropy weight TOPSIS method was used to quantitatively evaluate the transformation and development process from 2000 to 2020, and the gray GM (1,1) model and policy adjustment method were applied to fit the development trend from 2021 to 2025.【Result】 First, the funds raised by enterprises, professional and technical personnel, attraction of investment, average annual wage of on-the-job employees, proportion of the output value of the tertiary industry, and forest land area were important indicators affecting the development of the research area. Second, the bottom line goal of “protecting ecology and people’s livelihood” was achieved. Third, the development trend of each system level was not coordinated, and there was a clear developmental lag in the progress of industrial development, enterprise management, and support systems. Fourth, the development of the research area was heavily dependent on policy dividends, while the endogenous power and vitality need to be improved. Fifth, the study area faces much uncertainty, and the development trend during the “14th Five-Year Plan” period did not have an optimistic outlook. 【Conclusion】 On the basis of consolidating the natural environment and the well-being of local people, optimizing the industrial structure, improving the management efficiency of forest industry enterprises, and consolidating support and ensuring capability are the key strategic priorities for advancing the development of the research area.

Key words: state-owned forest egion, development process, entropy weight TOPSIS method, GM(1,1) model, Great Khingan Mountains

CLC Number:

F224

CHEN Keyi, HE Youjun, ZHANG Liwen, CAI Qi. Evaluation of the development process and its policy adjustment respose state-owned forest region in Great Khingan Mountains, Heilongjiang[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 257-267.

Figures/Tables 9

Table 1

Table 2

Comprehensive evaluation index system of the development process of state-owned forest areas in the Greater Khingan Mountains of Heilongjiang Province"

系统层 system level	控制层 control level	指标层 index level	指标性质 index property	子系统权重 subsystem weight	综合权重 comprehensive weight	熵值 entropy
资源保育 resource conservation	森林资源	森林覆盖率	正向	0.144	0.034	0.013
		森林蓄积量	正向	0.138	0.032	0.011
		林地面积	正向	0.170	0.040	0.019
	自然保护地资源	自然保护区面积	正向	0.155	0.037	0.016
		自然公园面积	正向	0.126	0.030	0.018
		国家级自然保护地面积占施业区面积比例	正向	0.102	0.024	0.013
	苗木资源	苗木产量	正向	0.080	0.019	0.007
	苗木资源	育苗面积	正向	0.084	0.020	0.010
产业发展 industrial development	产业实力	林业产业总产值	正向	0.185	0.030	0.011
	产业实力	林业产业增加值	正向	0.176	0.028	0.011
	产业结构	第一产业产值占林业产业总产值比例	负向	0.164	0.026	0.009
		第二产业产值占林业产业总产值比例	负向	0.084	0.014	0.009
		第三产业产值占林业产业总产值比例	正向	0.246	0.040	0.015
		接续替代产业产值占林业总产值比例	正向	0.146	0.023	0.013
企业管理 business management	经营效率	流动资产利润率	正向	0.125	0.033	0.012
		劳动生产率	正向	0.107	0.028	0.014
		企业就业指数	正向	0.077	0.020	0.013
	创新驱动	专业技术人员占在岗职工比例	正向	0.180	0.048	0.021
	创新驱动	林业科技交流与推广服务人员	正向	0.033	0.009	0.005
	交流合作	从业人员流动率	正向	0.077	0.021	0.008
		境外采伐木材	正向	0.053	0.014	0.008
		境外加工板材	正向	0.180	0.048	0.015
		招商引资	正向	0.169	0.045	0.011
民生福祉 well-being of people	工资收入	在岗职工年均工资	正向	0.381	0.042	0.016
	工资收入	离退休人员年均生活费	正向	0.353	0.039	0.016
	基本保险	年末参加基本医疗保险人数比例	正向	0.162	0.018	0.013
	基本保险	年末参加基本养老保险人数比例	正向	0.104	0.012	0.009
支撑保障 support and guarantee	灾害防控	森林火灾受害率	负向	0.023	0.005	0.005
	灾害防控	林业有害生物防治率	正向	0.136	0.031	0.013
	管护人力	森林管护职工占从业人员比例	正向	0.054	0.012	0.005
	管护人力	专业扑火队	正向	0.094	0.021	0.010
	资金投入	林业固定资产投资	正向	0.146	0.033	0.007
	资金投入	企业自筹资金	正向	0.359	0.082	0.017
	基础设施	在册林业公路	正向	0.086	0.020	0.012
		在册桥梁	正向	0.078	0.018	0.013
		在册涵洞	正向	0.025	0.006	0.005

Table 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 3

References 39

[1]	柯水发, 王宝锦, 朱烈夫, 等. 我国国有林区产业转型困境解析与路径选择[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(5): 44-50.
	KE S F, WANG B J, ZHU L F, et al. Industrial transformation in state-owned forest region: dilemmas and paths[J]. World For Res, 2018, 31(5): 44-50. DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2018.0072.y.
[2]	刘琳, 刘美爽, 徐永飞, 等. 我国重点国有林区林地面积变化及趋势分析: 基于黑龙江森工林区的实证研究[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(8): 88-94.
	LIU L, LIU M S, XU Y F, et al. Changes and tendency analysis of forest land area in the key stated-owned forest region: a case study based on the data of forest industry region of Heilongjiang Province[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2015, 51(8): 88-94. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150812.
[3]	郑树峰, 王丽萍, 臧淑英. 大兴安岭天保工程区生态系统服务变化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(7): 1295-1302.
	ZHENG S F, WANG L P, ZANG S Y. Study on the changes of ecosystem services in Daxinganling natural forest protection project area[J]. Sci Geogr Sin, 2021, 41(7): 1295-1302. DOI: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.10.28.
[4]	王玉芳, 徐永乐. 生态功能区建设下国有林区产业转型效果评价——以大兴安岭林区为例[J]. 林业经济, 2014, 36(5): 26-31.
	WANG Y F, XU Y L. Evaluation on the effect of industrial transformation in state-owned forest areas under the construction of ecological functional areas: taking the Greater Khingan Mountains forest area as an example[J]. For Econ, 2014, 36 (5): 26-31. DOI: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2014.05.006.
[5]	周妹. 黑龙江省国有林区经济转型的内生增长研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2017.
	ZHOU M. Study on endogenous growth of economic transformation in state-owned forest areas of Heilongjiang Province[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2017.
[6]	翟绪军, 王慧婷, 林红. 天保工程对国有林区林业产业结构变迁的影响研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2020, 40(6): 609-617.
	ZHAI X J, WANG H T, LIN H. Study on the impact of natural forest protection project on the change of forestry industrial structure in state-owned forest areas[J]. Probl For Econ, 2020, 40(6): 609-617. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.20200303.
[7]	朱洪革, 马田宇, 孟辰雨, 等. 重点国有林区社会职能移交对职工主观福祉的影响[J]. 林业经济问题, 2021, 41(3): 232-238.
	ZHU H G, MA T Y, MENG C Y, et al. Transfer of social functions in key state-owned forest areas and its impact on the employees’ subjective well-being[J]. Probl For Econ, 2021, 41(3): 232-238. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.20200183.
[8]	李朝霞. 基于生态功能区建设的国有林区社会转型研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2014.
	LI C X. Research on social transformation of state-owned forest areas based on the construction of ecological function zones[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2014.
[9]	郭岩. 生态文明视域下黑龙江林区森林文化建设研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2017.
	GUO Y. Study on forest culture construction in Heilongjiang forest region from the perspective of ecological civilization[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2017.
[10]	高旭, 刘艳. 全面停伐背景下内蒙古国有林区经营管理体制改革问题[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 46(2): 108-113.
	GAO X, LIU Y. Study on the reform of management system of Inner Mongolia’s state-owned forest region under the background of full-scale shutdown deforestation[J]. J Inn Mong Univ Natl (Soc Sci), 2020, 46(2): 108-113. DOI: 10.14045/j.cnki.nmsx.2020.02.016.
[11]	朱震锋, 曹玉昆, 王非, 等. 基于效率评价的国有林区经济转型发展动力分析[J]. 林业经济问题, 2016, 36(4): 295-301.
	ZHU Z F, CAO Y K, WANG F, et al. Dynamic analysis of economic transformation and development in state-owned forest areas based on efficiency evaluation[J]. Issues For Econ, 2016, 36(4): 295-301. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2016.04.002.
[12]	朱晓柯, 万志芳. 林业生态、产业和民生系统耦合协调的动态演进: 以黑龙江省国有林区为例[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2019, 34(2): 55-63.
	ZHU X K, WAN Z F. Dynamic evolution of coulpling coordination of forestry ecology,industry and people’s livelihood: a case of study in Heilongjiang state-owned forest area[J]. Stat Inf Forum, 2019, 34(2): 55-63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3116.2019.02.008.
[13]	曹娟娟, 王玉芳. 我国重点国有林区转型能力评价与预测[J]. 世界林业研究, 2020, 33(6): 110-114.
	CAO J J, WANG Y F. Transformation capability evaluation and prediction of key state-owned forest areas in China[J]. World For Res, 2020, 33(6): 110-114. DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2020.0111.y.
[14]	李朝洪, 孙丹, 王志伟. 大小兴安岭国有林区产业转型绩效的驱动与障碍因素诊断[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(5): 133-138.
	LI C H, SUN D, WANG Z W. Driving and obstacle factors for industrial transition performance of state-owned forest areas in Daxing’an and Xiaoxing’an Mountains[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2020, 48(5): 133-138. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2020.05.026.
[15]	李朝洪, 韦唯, 刘舒欣. 国有林区天然林资源保护工程绩效评价:以黑龙江省重点国有林区为例[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(4): 153-162.
	LI C H, WEI W, LIU S X. Performance eva-luation of natural forest resources protection project in state-owned forest areas: a case study of key state-owned forest areas in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2021, 57(4): 153-162. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210416.
[16]	卫兴华. 把发展生产力与发展社会主义生产关系和上层建筑统一起来[J]. 求实, 2016(8): 37-42.
	WEI X H. Unify the development of productive forces with the development of socialist relations of production and superstructure[J]. Truth Seek, 2016(8): 37-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8487.2016.08.005.
[17]	COHEN S, EIMICKE W B. Management fundamentals[M]. Columbia: Columbia University Press, 2019: 12-31. DOI: 10.7312/cohe19448.
[18]	张巍, 胡鞍钢, 叶子鹏. 发展社会主义文化生产力: 新中国70年总结与展望[J]. 财经问题研究, 2021(1): 3-13.
	ZHANG W, HU A G, YE Z P. Developing socialist cultural productivity: summary and prospect of 70 years of new China[J]. Res Financial Econ Issues, 2021(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2021.01.001.
[19]	陈凤娣, 廖萍萍. 共享经济发展的特征、问题与对策:基于生产关系变迁视角[J]. 亚太经济, 2022(4): 125-133.
	CHEN F D, LIAO P P. Characteristics, problems and countermeasures of sharing economy development: based on the perspective of changes in production relations[J]. Asia Pac Econ Rev, 2022(4):125-133. DOI: 10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2022.05.003.
[20]	张滨, 吕洁华. 要素投入驱动、产业结构升级与林业经济增长的空间效应解析:以黑龙江省重点国有林区为例[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(6): 142-151.
	ZHANG B, LÜ J H. Spatial effects analysis for factor inputs driving, industrial structure upgrading and forestry economic growth: a case study of Heilongjiang key state-owned forest region[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2020, 56(6): 142-151. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200614.
[21]	王瑶, 黄贤环. 企业高质量发展的指标体系构建与实现路径[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(12): 182-184.
	WANG Y, HUANG X H. Construction and realization path of index system for high-qua-lity development of enterprises[J]. Stat Decis, 2021, 37(12): 182-184. DOI: 10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2021.12.041.
[22]	干勇, 尹伟伦, 王海舟, 等. 支撑高质量发展的标准体系战略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2021, 23(3): 1-7.
	GAN Y, YIN W L, WANG H Z, et al. Standards system for supporting high-quality development[J]. Strateg Study CAE, 2021, 23(3): 1-7. DOI: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2021.03.001.
[23]	兰月竹, 吕杰. 辽宁林业现代化评价指标体系构建与评价:以辽宁省抚顺市清原满族自治县为例[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 15(2): 153-157.
	LAN Y Z, LÜ J. Liaoning forestry modernization evaluation index system: construction and evaluation: taking Qingyuan County, Fushun City, Liaoning Province for example[J]. J Shenyang Agric Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2013, 15(2): 153-157. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9713.2013.02.007.
[24]	刘峥晖, 谢彦明, 支玲. 云南省林业现代化评价指标体系的构建与实证分析[J]. 林业经济问题, 2016, 36(2): 103-108.
	LIU Z H, XIE Y M, ZHI L. The construction of forestry modernization evaluation system of Yunnan Province and empirical analysis[J]. Probl For Econ, 2016, 36(2): 103-108. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2016.02.002.
[25]	徐玮, 孔祥慧, 包庆丰. 中国林业现代化水平的地区差异及动态演进研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2018, 38(4): 86-90, 111.
	XU W, KONG X H, BAO Q F. Study on regional differences and dynamic evolution of forestry modernization level in China[J]. Probl For Econ, 2018, 38(4): 86-90, 111. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2018.04.014.
[26]	陈科屹, 何友均, 谢和生, 等. 黑龙江省大兴安岭重点国有林区复合系统耦合协调发展评价与预测[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2022, 38(5):578-586.
	CHEN K Y, HE Y J, XIE H S, et al. Evaluation and prediction of coupling coordinated development of compound system of key state-owned forest region in Daxing’anling,Heilongjiang Province[J]. J Ecol Rural Environ, 2022, 38(5):578-586. DOI: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0475.
[27]	马艳梅, 吴玉鸣, 吴柏钧. 长三角地区城镇化可持续发展综合评价:基于熵值法和象限图法[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(6): 47-53.
	MA Y M, WU Y M, WU B J. Comprehensive evaluation of sustainable urban development of Yangtze River Delta based on entropy method and quadrant method[J]. Econ Geogr, 2015, 35(6): 47-53. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.06.007.
[28]	毛锦凰. 乡村振兴评价指标体系构建方法的改进及其实证研究[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 49(3): 47-58.
	MAO J H. Improvement and empirical study on the construction method of evaluation index system for rural revitalization[J]. J Lanzhou Univ (Soc Sci), 2021, 49(3): 47-58. DOI: 10.13885/j.issn.1000-2804.2021.03.005.
[29]	余永琦, 王长松, 彭柳林, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的农业绿色发展水平评价与障碍因素分析:以江西省为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(2): 187-196.
	YU Y Q, WANG C S, PENG L L, et al. Evaluation of agricultural green development level and ananlysis of its obstacle factors based on entropy weight topsis model: a case study of Jiangxi Province[J]. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan, 2022, 43(2): 187-196. DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20220219.
[30]	鲁春阳, 文枫, 杨庆媛, 等. 基于改进TOPSIS法的城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断:以重庆市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(3): 535-541.
	LU C Y, WEN F, YANG Q Y, et al. An evaluation of urban land use performance based on the improved TOPSIS method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators: a case study of Chongqing[J]. Resour Sci, 2011, 33(3):535-541.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2009.01.002.
[31]	李朝洪, 赵晓红. 黑龙江省森工国有林区生态建设与经济转型协调发展研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(2): 144-152.
	LI C H, ZHAO X H. Study on the coordinated development of ecological construction and economic transformation in state-owned forest region of forest industry in Heilongjiang Province[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(2): 144-152.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201804022.
[32]	余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 基于农户满意度的耕地保护经济补偿政策绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(7): 1092-1103.
	YU L L, CAI Y Y. Performance evaluation and obstacle factor diagnosis of economic compensation policy for cultivated land protection based on farmers’ satisfaction[J]. J Nat Resour, 2015, 30(7): 1092-1103. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.07.003.
[33]	王玉芳, 周妹, 曹博, 等. 黑龙江省国有林区经济转型对经济内生增长的影响研究[J]. 林业经济, 2018, 40(5): 103-112.
	WANG Y F, ZHOU M, CAO B, et al. Research on the impact of economic transformation of state-owned forest areas in Heilongjiang Province on endogenous economic growth[J]. Forestry Economy, 2018, 40 (5): 103-112. DOI: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2018.05.019.
[34]	DEMEROUTI E, BAKKER A B. The job demands-resources model: challenges for future research[J]. SA J Ind Psychol, 2011, 37(2): 1-9. DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v37i2.974.
[35]	KRASNICKA T, GLÓD W, WRONKA-POSPIECH M. Management innovation, pro-innovation organizational culture and enterprise performance: testing the mediation effect[J]. Rev Manag Sci, 2018, 12(3): 737-769. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-017-0229-0.
[36]	王非, 朱震锋, 曹玉昆. 基于结构转换视角的中国重点国有林区经济转型发展路径分析[J]. 世界林业研究, 2016, 29(2): 60-64.
	WANG F, ZHU Z F, CAO Y K. Analysis of economic restructuring path in key state-owned forest region from the perspective of structural transition[J]. World For Res, 2016, 29(2): 60-64. DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2016.02.008.
[37]	李铁英, 白冰. 黑龙江省大兴安岭国有林区全面停伐背景下的困境与发展路径[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017(3): 17-19, 68.
	LI T Y, BAI B. Study on the dilemma and development path of the state-owned forest region in Daxing’anling of Heilongjiang Province underthe background of overall cutting ban[J]. For Resour Manag, 2017(3): 17-19, 68.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.03.004.
[38]	周也, 万志芳. 黑龙江省国有林区林业产业链产业共生关系研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2020, 40(2): 216-224.
	ZHOU Y, WAN Z F. Study on the symbiotic relationship of forestry industry in state-owned forest regions of Heilongjiang based on industrial chain[J]. Probl For Econ, 2020, 40(2): 216-224. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2020.02.013.
[39]	高运胜, 刘慧慧, 王云飞. 新冠疫情与产业链重构冲击下我国对外贸易高质量创新发展的对策分析[J]. 国际贸易, 2022(9): 30-40.
	GAO Y S, LIU H H, WANG Y F. The countermeasure analysis of high-quality innovative development of China’s foreign trade under the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and industrial chain reconstruction[J]. Intertrade, 2022(9): 30-40.DOI: 10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2021.06.020.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

层次 level	评价指数范围 evaluation index range	解释 explanation
E1	0 ≤E_j < 0.2	止步不前
E2	0.2 ≤E_j < 0.4	有所起色
E3	0.4 ≤E_j < 0.6	初见成效
E4	0.6 ≤E_j < 0.8	成效明显
E5	0.8 ≤E_j < 1	良性发展

年份 year	拟合值 fitted value	实际值 actual value	残差 residual	相对误差/% relative error	年份 year	拟合值 fitted value	实际值 actual value	残差 residual	相对误差/% relative error
2000	0.248	0.248	-0.000	0.000	2011	0.421	0.528	0.107	20.177
2001	0.227	0.238	0.011	4.547	2012	0.442	0.607	0.165	27.215
2002	0.246	0.260	0.014	5.429	2013	0.462	0.660	0.198	29.953
2003	0.265	0.236	-0.029	12.181	2014	0.483	0.559	0.076	13.597
2004	0.284	0.241	-0.043	17.746	2015	0.504	0.520	0.016	3.106
2005	0.303	0.289	-0.014	4.827	2016	0.525	0.513	-0.012	2.315
2006	0.322	0.253	-0.069	27.388	2017	0.546	0.514	-0.032	6.242
2007	0.342	0.248	-0.094	37.821	2018	0.567	0.527	-0.040	7.679
2008	0.361	0.302	-0.059	19.690	2019	0.589	0.548	-0.041	7.487
2009	0.381	0.316	-0.065	20.664	2020	0.611	0.480	-0.131	27.245
2010	0.401	0.443	0.042	9.414

Evaluation of the development process and its policy adjustment respose state-owned forest region in Great Khingan Mountains, Heilongjiang

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 39

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer