Variations of surface soil macrofauna in different aged Metasequoia glyptostroboides plantations

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202307026

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 91-98.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202307026

Previous Articles Next Articles

Variations of surface soil macrofauna in different aged Metasequoia glyptostroboides plantations

CAO Lili¹(), RUAN Honghua¹^,^*(), LI Yuanyuan², NI Juanping¹, WANG Guobing¹, CAO Guohua³, SHEN Caiqin³, XU Yaming³

1. Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. School of Food Science, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China
3. Dongtai State Forest Farm of Jiangsu Province, Yancheng 224243, China

Received:2023-07-20 Accepted:2024-07-30 Online:2025-03-30 Published:2025-03-28
Contact: RUAN Honghua E-mail:caolllychee@163.com;hhruan@njfu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Soil faunas are crucial components of forest ecosystem. This study investigated the distribution characteristics and seasonal variation of soil macrofauna in Metasequoia glyptostroboides plantations of different ages. We analyzed differences in the community structure, seasonal dynamics, and influencing mechanisms of surface soil macrofauna, providing a theoretical basis for future studies on soil fauna community structure in these plantations.【Method】We assessed soil macrofauna community dynamics across nine M. glyptostroboides plantations (seven, 11, 16, 21, 26, 31, 36, 41, and 46 years old) using a randomized block design with four replicate plots per age group, located in a coastal area of northern Jiangsu Province, China. Collections were made in summer (August) and autumn (October) using pitfall traps, and samples were sorted and identified under a stereomicroscope in the laboratory. Additionally, soil samples from the 0-15 cm layer were collected for physicochemical analysis.【Result】We collected a total of 14 289 surface soil macrofauna individuals from 16 orders and 23 families. The dominant groups were Armadillidae and Oniscidae. Significant differences were observed in the dominant and common groups of soil macrofauna among plantations of different ages. The 11-year-old plantation had the highest number of soil macrofauna, while the 36-year-old plantation had the lowest. In terms of seasonal variation, the total number of surface soil macrofauna was higher in August than in November, whereas species richness was greater in November than in August.【Conclusion】The study highlights that both stand development and seasonal variation significantly influence the community structure of surface soil macrofauna in M. glyptostroboides plantations. As the forest matures, the total number, species diversity and diversity index of surface soil macrofauna increase, reaching a high level in middle-aged forests.

Key words: surface soil macrofauna, biodiversity, community structure, stand development, seasonal variation

CLC Number:

S718

CAO Lili, RUAN Honghua, LI Yuanyuan, NI Juanping, WANG Guobing, CAO Guohua, SHEN Caiqin, XU Yaming. Variations of surface soil macrofauna in different aged Metasequoia glyptostroboides plantations[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(2): 91-98.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1

Table 2

The Two-way ANOVA of the effects of stand age and sampling date on the abundance of surface soil macrofauna of M. glyptostroboides planations"

项目item	变量variable	F	P	项目item	变量variable	F	P
	林龄age	13.101	< 0.001		林龄age	1.354	0.237
个体总数total number	时间date	0.112	0.739	奇马陆科Paradoxosomatidae	时间date	1.727	0.194
	林龄age×时间date	4.983	< 0.001		林龄age×时间date	1.354	0.237
	林龄age	3.727	< 0.01		林龄age	3.139	< 0.01
蟋蟀总科Grylloidea	时间date	19.570	< 0.001	土蝽科Cydnidae	时间date	3.381	0.071
	林龄age×时间date	3.738	< 0.01		林龄age×时间date	2.551	< 0.05
	林龄age	0.900	0.523		林龄age	1.000	0.447
蚱总科Eumastacoidea	时间date	0.200	0.656	奇蝽科Enicocephalidae	时间date	1.000	0.321
	林龄age×时间date	1.100	0.377		林龄age×时间date	1.000	0.447
	林龄age	1.471	0.189		林龄age	0.412	0.908
蚁亚科Formicinae	时间date	13.323	< 0.001	正蚓科Lumbricidae	时间date	4.800	< 0.05
	林龄age×时间date	0.768	0.631		林龄age×时间date	0.647	0.647
	林龄age	0.793	0.610		林龄age	1.504	0.177
切叶蚁亚科Myrmicinae	时间date	1.654	0.203	大蚕蛾科Saturniidae	时间date	0.262	0.610
	林龄age×时间date	0.891	0.530		林龄age×时间date	0.465	0.875
	林龄age	1.468	0.190		林龄age	1.187	0.323
步甲科Carabidae	时间date	0.605	0.439	尺蛾科Geometridae	时间date	0	1.000
	林龄age×时间date	1.767	0.104		林龄age×时间date	0.562	0.803
	林龄age	0.589	0.782		林龄age	1.623	0.134
象甲科Curculionidae	时间date	6.857	< 0.05	丝尾螋科Diplatyidae	时间date	0.304	0.479
	林龄age×时间date	0.589	0.782		林龄age×时间date	0.283	0.685
	林龄age	1.611	0.143		林龄age	1.000	0.447
隐翅甲科Staphylinidae	时间date	0.444	0.507	蚰蜒科Scutigeridae	时间date	1.000	0.321
	林龄age×时间date	0.194	0.990		林龄age×时间date	1.000	0.447
	林龄age	16.306	< 0.001		林龄age	1.304	0.262
卷甲虫科Armadillidae	时间date	5.144	< 0.05	虫齿科Psocidae	时间date	2.980	0.090
	林龄age×时间date	2.734	< 0.05		林龄age×时间date	1.304	0.262
	林龄age	15.375	< 0.001		林龄age	0.861	0.554
潮虫科Oniscidae	时间date	12.745	< 0.001	盲蛛目Opiliones	时间date	0.063	0.801
	林龄age×时间date	4.719	< 0.001		林龄age×时间date	1.500	0.179
	林龄age	2.295	< 0.05		林龄age	2.183	< 0.05
蜈蚣科Scolopendridae	时间date	1.920	0.171	后纺亚目Mesothele	时间date	0	1.000
	林龄age×时间date	1.380	0.226		林龄age×时间date	0.198	0.989
	林龄age	0.630	0.748		林龄age	0.861	0.554
地蜈蚣科Geophilidae	时间date	2.241	0.140	中纺亚目Opisthothele	时间date	0.063	0.801
	林龄age×时间date	0.980	0.461		林龄age×时间date	1.500	0.179
	林龄age	2.630	< 0.05		林龄age	1.153	0.344
隐带马陆科Cryptodesmidae	时间date	30.965	< 0.001	后纺亚目Mesogastropoda	时间date	0.009	0.921
	林龄age×时间date	2.630	< 0.05		林龄age×时间date	3.791	< 0.01

Table 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

References 36

[1]	CARRILLO Y, BALL B A, BRADFORD M A, et al. Soil fauna alter the effects of litter composition on nitrogen cycling in a mineral soil[J]. Soil Biol & Biochem, 2011, 43(7): 1440-1449. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.03.011.
[2]	GUIDI C, FREY B, BRUNNER I, et al. Soil fauna drives vertical redistribution of soil organic carbon in a long-term irrigated dry pine forest[J]. Glob Chang Biol, 2022, 28(9): 3145-3160. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16122.
[3]	AYUKE F O, BRUSSAARD L, VANLAUWE B, et al. Soil fertility management: impacts on soil macrofauna, soil aggregation and soil organic matter allocation[J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2011, 48(1): 53-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.02.001.
[4]	WARDLE D A, BARDGETT R D, KLIRONOMOS J N, et al. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota[J]. Science, 2004, 304(5677): 1629-1633. DOI: 10.1126/science.1094875.
[5]	HEDĚNEC P, JIMÉNEZ J J, MORADI J, et al. Global distribution of soil fauna functional groups and their estimated litter consumption across biomes[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 17362. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21563-z.
[6]	ELLERS J, BERG M P, DIAS A T C, et al. Diversity in form and function: vertical distribution of soil fauna mediates multidimensional trait variation[J]. J Anim Ecol, 2018, 87(4): 933-944. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12838.
[7]	朱永恒, 赵春雨, 王宗英, 等. 我国土壤动物群落生态学研究综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(12): 1477-1481.
	ZHU Y H, ZHAO C Y, WANG Z Y, et al. Research on soil animal community ecology in China[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2005, 24(12): 1477-1481.
[8]	王兴松, 李恩星, 杨诗瀚, 等. 根结线虫病对烟草植株根际土壤微生物群落及其功能的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2024, 40(6): 993-1003.
	WANG X S, LI E X, YANG S H, et al. Effects of root-knot nematode disease on microbial community and function in rhizosphere soil of tobacco plants[J]. Jiangsu J of Agri Sci, 2024, 40(6):993-1003. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.06.005.
[9]	DARBY B J, NEHER D A, HOUSMAN D C, et al. Few apparent short-term effects of elevated soil temperature and increased frequency of summer precipitation on the abundance and taxonomic diversity of desert soil micro-and meso-fauna[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43(7): 1474-1481. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.03.020.
[10]	刘雨诗, 蒋敏杰, 唐恺阳, 等. 基于大型土壤动物多样性视角的景观驳岸生态学特征研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2023, 41(1): 92-100.
	LIU S Y, JIANG M J, TANG K Y, et al. A study on the ecological characteristics of landscape revetment based on the perspective of soil macrofauna diversity[J]. J of Sichuan Agri Univ, 2023, 41(1):92-100. DOI: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.202209172.
[11]	GUO X H, ENDLER A, POLL C, et al. Independent effects of warming and altered precipitation pattern on nematode community structure in an arable field[J]. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2021, 316: 107467. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107467.
[12]	BIRD S B, COULSON R N, FISHER R F. Changes in soil and litter arthropod abundance following tree harvesting and site preparation in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 202(1/2/3): 195-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.023.
[13]	SCHEU S, ALBERS D, ALPHEI J, et al. The soil fauna community in pure and mixed stands of beech and spruce of different age: trophic structure and structuring forces[J]. Oikos, 2003, 101(2): 225-238. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12131.x.
[14]	XU G R, ZHANG Y X, ZHANG S, et al. Biodiversity associations of soil fauna and plants depend on plant life form and are accounted for by rare taxa along an elevational gradient[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2020, 140: 107640. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107640.
[15]	徐昭, 张瑞芝, 王佳楠, 等. Pk-αts高表达提高红松对松材线虫耐病性[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (5): 22-30.
	XU Z, ZHANG R Z, WANG J N, et al. High expression of the Pk-αts increased the tolerance of Pinus koraiensis against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39(5):22-30.
[16]	问宇翔, 冯坤乔, 童冉, 等. 水杉人工林细根和粗根碳氮磷计量特征对N添加的响应[J]. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35(3): 161-168.
	WEN Y X, FEN K R, TONG R, et al. Response of C, N, P stoichiometry of fine and coarse roots of metasequoia glyptostroboides plantation to nitrogen addition[J]. Forest Research, 2022, 35(3): 161-168. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2022.03.018.
[17]	程建伟, 刘新民, 郝百惠, 等. 氮沉降对内蒙古典型草原地表节肢动物的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(8):2237-2245.
	CHENG J W, LIU X M, HAO B H, et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition on ground-dwelling arthropods in a temperate grassland of Inner Mongolia[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2017, 36(8):2237-2245.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201708.031.
[18]	尹文英. 中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,1998.
	YIN W Y. Pictorial keys to soil animals of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1998: 1-6.
[19]	DROLC A, VRTOVSEK J. Nitrate and nitrite nitrogen determination in waste water using on-line UV spectrometric method[J]. Bioresour Technol, 201, 101(11):4228-4233.DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.015.
[20]	周泓杨, 张健, 张丹桔, 等. 不同郁闭度控制下马尾松(Pinus massoniana)人工林土壤动物群落特征[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(6): 1939-1955.
	ZHOU H Y, ZHANG J, ZHANG D J, et al. Community characteristics of soil fauna for different canopy density of a Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(6): 1939-1955. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201510232148.
[21]	MAHARNING A R, MILLS A A S, ADL S M. Soil community changes during secondary succession to naturalized grasslands[J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2009, 41(2): 137-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.11.003.
[22]	谭艳, 王邵军, 阮宏华, 等. 不同林龄杨树人工林土壤动物群落结构特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(3): 8-12.
	TAN Y, WANG S J, RUAN H H, et al. Community structure of soil fauna in different age poplar plantations[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2014, 38(3): 8-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.03.002.
[23]	何相玉, 周冠军, 张新洁, 等. 氮磷添加对水曲柳人工林叶片、细根和土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (1): 73-81.
	HE X Y, ZHOU G J, ZHANG X J, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on stoichiometry characteristics of leaf, fine root and soil of Fraxinus mandshurica plantation[J]. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39(1):73-81.
[24]	王辉, 陈旭, 吴鹏飞, 等. 白水河国家级自然保护区柳杉(Cryptomeria fortune)人工林大型土壤动物群落特征[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(7): 1486-1496.
	WANG H, CHEN X, WU P F, et al. Characteristics of soil macrofauna community in Cryptomeria fortune plantations in Baishuihe Nature Reserve[J]. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2021, 34(7): 1486-1496. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2021.7.018.
[25]	彭彩云. 华西雨屏区不同林龄杉木人工林土壤动物群落特征[D]. 四川农业大学, 2021.
	PENG C Y. Characteristics of soil fauna community in different forest age Chinese fir plantations in rainy zone of west China[D]. Sichuan Agri Univ, 2021. DOI: 10.27345/d. cnki. Gsnyu. 2019.000626.
[26]	刘杰, 陈建. 陷阱法调查转Bt棉对棉田地面蜘蛛群落的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2015, 42(1): 59-65.
	LIU J, CHEN J. Effects of transgenetic Bt cotton on ground-dwelling spider assemblages by pitfall traps[J]. J Plant Prot, 2015, 42(1): 59-65. DOI: 10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2015.01.009.
[27]	BERG M P, HEMERIK L. Secondary succession of terrestrial isopod, centipede, and millipede communities in grasslands under restoration[J]. Biol Fertil Soils, 2004, 40(3): 163-170. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-004-0765-z.
[28]	WU P F, WANG C T. Differences in spatiotemporal dynamics between soil macrofauna and mesofauna communities in forest ecosystems: the significance for soil fauna diversity monitoring[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 337: 266-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.031.
[29]	WU P F, LIU S R, LIU X L. Composition and spatio-temporal changes of soil macroinvertebrates in the biodiversity hotspot of northern Hengduanshan Mountains, China[J]. Plant Soil, 2012, 357(1): 321-338. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1166-y.
[30]	谭波, 吴福忠, 杨万勤, 等. 不同林龄马尾松人工林土壤节肢动物群落结构[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(4): 1118-1124.
	TAN B, WU F Z, YANG W Q, et al. Population structure of soil arthropod in different age Pinus massoniana plantations[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2013, 24(4): 1118-1124. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0267.
[31]	肖玖金, 王子豪, 王戈, 等. 三种人工林中小型土壤动物群落季节动态特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(10): 167-172.
	XIAO J J, WANG Z H, WANG G, et al. Characteristics of soil fauna communities in three typical plantations[J]. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 2018, 32(10): 167-172. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2018.318.
[32]	拓向辉, 艾宁, 周永维, 等. 陕北黄土高原典型草地土壤动物群落的基本特征: 以吴起金佛坪小流域为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(8):125-132.
	TUO X H, AI N, ZHOU Y W, et al. Basic characteristics of soil fauna in typical grasslands on the Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi[J]. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 2022, 36(8): 125-132. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2022.208.
[33]	李晓东, 史沉鱼, 覃国乐, 等. 濒危植物单性木兰林区土壤动物群落结构与季节动态[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2015, 34(4): 20-26.
	LI X D, SHI C Y, QIN G L, et al. Community composition and seasonal dynamics of soil fauna in endangered plant Kmeria septentrionalis forest[J]. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2015, 34(4): 20-26. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2015.04.001.
[34]	易兰, 由文辉. 浙江天童栲树林土壤动物群落结构及其季节变化[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2006(2): 112-120.
	YI L, YOU W H. Community structure and seasonal change of soil animals in Castanopsis fargesii forest at Tiantong, Zhejiang Province[J]. J East China Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2006(2): 112-120. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2006.02.018.
[35]	ZHANG N L, LIU W X, YANG H J, et al. Soil microbial responses to warming and increased precipitation and their implications for ecosystem C cycling[J]. Oecologia, 2013, 173(3): 1125-1142. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2685-9.
[36]	CHEN S A, GONG B L. Response and adaptation of agriculture to climate change:evidence from China[J]. J Dev Econ, 2021, 148: 102557. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102557.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

林龄/a stand age	平均胸径/cm mean DBH	平均树高/m mean tree height	林分郁闭度/% canopy closure
7	10.5±0.4	8.2±0.8	81.8
11	15.4±1.3	16.5±1.2	70.6
16	20.9±1.8	20.1±0.8	69.5
21	25.8±1.4	22.4±1.4	77.3
26	27.0±1.7	22.9±0.3	80.7
31	27.4±2.3	23.2±1.0	78.4
36	30.5±1.4	25.1±2.5	78.8
41	34.2±1.9	26.6±1.1	81.4
46	33.2±1.8	26.1±0.5	81.1

Variations of surface soil macrofauna in different aged Metasequoia glyptostroboides plantations

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 36

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

[1]	REN Shichao, ZHANG Yinlong, CAO Mingchang, LIU Wei, QIAO Shufan, ZHU Xiaojing, LUO Kangning. The bird diversity spatial and temporal distribution patterns and its hotspot areas identification in Chengdu City [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(5): 189-196.
[2]	WANG Zimeng, RUAN Honghua, WU Xiaoqiao, YANG Yan, XIE Youchao, SHEN Caiqin, DING Xuenong, CAO Guohua. Effects of nitrogen addition on soil springtail(Collembolan) community in a poplar plantation [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(4): 243-253.
[3]	LI Jialiang, WU Dayu, MAO Kangshan. Taxonomy and diversity of the genus Cupressus: current status and recommendations [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 36-45.
[4]	ZHANG Chenghui, ZU Guohao, WANG Haiyang, XUE Hao. A new record species of Exoristobia from China (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 214-218.
[5]	FAN Mingyang, HU Meng, YNAG Yuan, FANG Yanming. Community classification, structures and species diversity characteristics of Pinus massoniana and P. hwangshanensis in the eastern China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 47-58.
[6]	LU Xudong, DONG Yuran, LI Yao, MAO Lingfeng. Community assembly mechanism for different planting ages of Chinese fir artificial forests in subtropical China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 67-73.
[7]	YAN Zhengming, RUAN Honghua, LIAO Jiahui, SHI Ke, NI Juanping, CAO Guohua, SHEN Caiqin, DING Xuenong, ZHAO Xiaolong, ZHUANG Xin. Abundance and diversity of soil beetles on the forest floor in different aged poplar plantations [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 236-242.
[8]	LIU Xingjie, WU Qiqi, LI Yuanyuan, RUAN Honghua, DING Xuenong, CAO Guohua, SHEN Caiqin. Interactive effects of stand development and seasonality on soil arthropod community in poplar plantations [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 224-230.
[9]	YU Cigang, GUO Xiaoping, MA Yue, ZHANG Zhenhua, LIU Yan, DONG Shanshan, SUN Shuo. Analyses on bird community structure and diversity in Songyang County, Zhejiang Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 231-236.
[10]	LUO Li, HOU Yanan, YANG Jingyuan, YU Xinwen, GAO Lingwang, OUYANG Xuan, YANG Minglun, GAO Jiajun, GUO Anqi, LIU Yukun. Exploration of dynamic changes of sound diversity based on acoustic index in the Shennongjia National Park, China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 39-48.
[11]	YIN Shixuan, WU Yongbo, HUANG Xiaoyu. Bird diversity in Jintan ecological redline areas of Changzhou City [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 219-225.
[12]	GUO Lili, ZHANG Chenjie, WANG Fei, SHEN Jiajia, ZHANG Kaiyue, HE Lixia, GUO Qi, HOU Xiaogai. Analysis of bacterial community characteristics in the rhizosphere soil of wild tree peony [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 45-55.
[13]	LI Xiao, YANG Jiameng, CHEN Yuheng, MAO Lingfeng, GE Zhiwei. Evaluations of habitat quality of Jiangsu Yancheng Wetland National Nature Rare Bird Reserve based on land use changes [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(5): 169-176.
[14]	GUO Hongting, JI Xiaofang, WANG Cheng, ZOU Hanlu, WANG Liyan, JIANG Jiang. Spatial variability and influencing factors of plant diversity in the shrub layers of artificial forests in China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 144-152.
[15]	WANG Bixia, DU Xiaoqi, DENG Yan, CAI Xiaomei, SU Guangcan. Seasonal variations of the nutrients and phenols from olive leaves in main cultivation varieties at Liangshan, Sichuan Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 169-176.