Driving factors on carbon sequestration for natural Betula platyphylla forests in the Greater Khingan Mountains based on random forest and structural equation.

JI Mengxuan, MEI Xuesong, DONG Lingbo

Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 2025

PDF(1284 KB)
PDF(1284 KB)
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 2025

Driving factors on carbon sequestration for natural Betula platyphylla forests in the Greater Khingan Mountains based on random forest and structural equation.

  • JI Mengxuan, MEI Xuesong, DONG Lingbo
Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】This study aims to quantify the impact of biotic and abiotic factors on the carbon sequestration capacity of natural Betula platyphylla forests in the Greater Khingan Mountains, and to identify and extract the key controllable factors that constrain their carbon sequestration function and lay the foundation for the sustainable functioning of natural Betula platyphylla forests ' carbon sequestration in the region. 【Method】The research was based on data from 175 fixed plots of the 7th and 8th National Forest Inventory in the the Greater Khingan Mountains. It combined Random Forests and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to quantify the direct and indirect effects of biotic factors (forest Stand characteristics, biodiversity) and abiotic factors (terrain, climate, soil) on carbon sequestration.【Result】(1)The results showed that the average annual carbon sequestration of natural Betula platyphylla forests in the region was 1.48±0.84 t·hm-2·a-1.(2) Random Forests results indicated that stand characteristics were the most dominant factor influencing carbon sequestration (Contribution: 60.09%), with their contribution approximately threefold that of soil indicators, fivefold that of climatic indicators, sixfold that of site condition indicators, and tenfold that of tree species diversity indicators.(3)SEM results indicated that carbon sequestration increased with canopy density (total path coefficient β = 0.030), while it decreased with stand average age (β = -0.643), diameter at breast height (DBH) (β = -0.498), stand average tree height (β = -0.298) , slope (β = -0.113), soil organic matter content (β = -0.039), basal area at the stand level (β =-0.007). 【Conclusion】Therefore, stand average age, stand average DBH, and stand average tree height were key manageable driving factors influencing forest carbon sequestration. In future management activities, appropriate thinning can be implemented to maintain a multi-layered and diverse forest structure, which can enhance the forest's carbon sequestration capacity.

Key words

Carbon sequestration / natural Betula platyphylla forests / Random forest algorithm / Structural equation Modelling / Driving factor

Cite this article

Download Citations
JI Mengxuan, MEI Xuesong, DONG Lingbo. Driving factors on carbon sequestration for natural Betula platyphylla forests in the Greater Khingan Mountains based on random forest and structural equation.[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2025

References

[1] Dixon R K, Brown S, et al.Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems[J]. Science, 1994, 263: 185-190. DOI: 10.1126/science.263.5144.185.
[2] Magnussen S, Köhl M, Olschofsky K.Error propagation in stock-difference and gain-loss estimates of a forest biomass carbon balance[J]. European journal of forest research, 2014, 133(6): 1137-55. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-014-0828-0.
[3] Li Y, Bao W, Bongers F, et al.Drivers of tree carbon storage in subtropical forests[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 654:684-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.024.
[4] Sullivan M J P, Joey T, Lewis L S, et al. Diversity and carbon storage across the tropical forest biome[J]. Scientific reports, 2017, 7(1-4): 39102. DOI: 10.1038/srep39102
[5] Paloma R, Lorena G, Alain P, et al.Diversity increases carbon storage and tree productivity in Spanish forests[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014, 23(3-4): 311-22.
[6] 兰秀, 杜虎, 宋同清, 等. 广西主要森林植被碳储量及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(06): 2043-53.
Lan X, Du H, Song T Q,et al. Vegetation carbon storage in the main forest types in Guangxi and the related influencing factors[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(6):2043-2053. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201803210557.
[7] Shi Y, Xu L, Zhou Y, et al.Quantifying driving factors of vegetation carbon stocks of Moso bamboo forests using machine learning algorithm combined with structural equation model[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 429: 406-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.035.
[8] Wang Z, Wang G, Li Y, et al.Determinants of carbon sequestration in thinned forests[J]. The Science of the total environment, 2024, 951: 175540. DOI: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2024.175540.
[9] 兰洁, 雷相东, 何潇, 等. 吉林省天然阔叶混交林生态系统多功能性及驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(13): 5128-41.
Lan J, Lei X D, He X, Gao W Q, Li Y T.Multi-functionality of natural mixed broad-leaved forests and driving forces in Jilin Province[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(13):5128-5141.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202101290310.
[10] 李虹谕, 杨会侠, 丁国权, 等. 中国森林碳储量分析[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2022,(12): 29-32.
Li H Y, Yang H X, Ding G Q, et al. Analysis of forest carbon stocks in China[J].Forest Science and Technology,2022,(12):29-32. DOI: 10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2022.05.23.0001.
[11] 李伟克, 舒立福, 王明玉, 等. 黑龙江大兴安岭林区雷击火与人为火发生规律及变化趋势[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(04): 136-46.
Li W K, Shu L F, Wang M Y, et al.Occurrence Pattern and Changing Trend of Lightning Induced Fires and Human-caused Fires inDaxing'anling Forest Region of Heilongjiang Province[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2024,60(04):136-46. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230259.
[12] 张煜星, 闫宏伟, 等. GB/T 38590-2020森林资源连续清查技术规程[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.
Zhang Y X, Yan H W, et al.GB/T 38590-2020 Technical regulations for continuous forest inventory[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2020.
[13] Patton S C C, Leavitt S M, Gibbs D, et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth[J]. Nature, 2020, 585(7826): 545-50. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x.
[14] 汪亚琴. 长江流域中上游天然林资源保护工程对森林碳汇的影响研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2023.
Wang Y Q.Influence of Natural Forest Resources in the Middle and Upper reaches of Yangtze River Bas[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2023.
[15] 董利虎. 黑龙江省主要树种相容性生物量模型研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学,2012.
Dong L H.Study on the Compatible Models of Tree Biomass for Main Species in Heilongjiang Province[D]. Harbin: Northest Forestry University, 2012.
[16] Breiman L.Random Forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32. DOI:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
[17] 高若楠, 谢阳生, 雷相东, 等. 基于随机森林模型的天然林立地生产力预测研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(04): 39-46.
Gao R N, Xie Y S, Lei X D, et al.Study on prediction of natural forest productivity based onrandom forest model[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology,2019,39(04):39-46. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.04.008.
[18] Liaw A, Wiener M.Classification and regression by randomForest[J]. R news, 2002, 2(3): 18-22.
[19] 马梦晨. 基于随机森林方法的中小企业信用风险评估研究[J]. 特区经济, 2023, (01): 141-4.
Ma M C.Research on Credit Risk Assessment of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Based on Random Forest Method[J]. Special Zone Economy,2023,(01):141-4.
[20] 曹小玉, 李际平, 赵文菲, 等. 基于结构方程模型分析林分空间结构对草本物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(24): 9164-73.
Cao X Y, Li J P, Zhao W F, et al.Effects of stand spatial structure on herbaceous species diversity in forests based on structural equation modeling[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(24):9164-73. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202001280179.
[21] Xu L, Shi Y, Fang H, et al. Vegetation carbon stocks driven by canopy density and forest age in subtropical forest ecosystems[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 631-632: 619-26. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.080.
[22] 董灵波, 田栋元, 陈莹, 等. 基于结构方程模型的兴安落叶松天然林更新影响因素[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(08): 2763-72.
Dong L B, Tian D Y, Chen Y, et al.Clarifying the factors affecting Larix gmelinii forest regeneration based on structural equa-tion model[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2021,32(08):2763-72. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.010.
[23] 何潇. 吉林省天然针阔混交林林分生物量影响因素与模型研究[D], 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2022.
He X.Influencing Factors and Models of Stand Biomass for Natural Conifer-Broad-Leaved Mixed Forest in Jilin[D], Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2022.
[24] 何潇, 李海奎, 曹磊, 等. 退化森林生态系统中林分碳储量的驱动因素——以内蒙古大兴安岭为例[J]. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(02): 69-76.
He X, Li H K, Cao L, et al.Driving Factors of Stand Carbon Storage in Degraded Forest Ecosystems: A Case Study of the Greater Khingan Mountains in Inner Mongolia[J].Forest Research,2020,33(02):69-76. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.02.009.
[25] 王维芳, 崔梦琦, 邢凯然. 包含哑变量的大兴安岭天然白桦林碳密度模型[J]. 森林工程, 2024, 40(05): 74-81.
Wang W F, Cui M Q, Xing K R.Carbon Density Model of Natural Birch Forest in theDaxing' an Mountains Based on Dummy Variables[J]. Forest Engineering,2024,40(05):74-81. DOI:10.7525/j.issn.1006-8023.2024.05.008.
[26] Deogkyu K, Philip C G. Factors influencing productivity of pine-dominated stands in South Korea[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2023, 330: 117250-. DOI:10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2023.117250.
[27] 伏鸿峰, 闫伟, 陈晶晶. 内蒙古大兴安岭林区森林碳储量及其动态变化研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(09): 166-70.
Fu H F, Yan W, Chen J J.Study on Forest Carbon Storage and Its Dynamic Changes in the Greater Khingan Mountains Forest Region of Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2023,27(09):166-70. DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2013.09.019.
[28] Vangi E, Dalmonech D, Cioccolo E, et al.Stand age diversity (and more than climate change) affects forests' resilience and stability, although unevenly[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2024, 366: 121822. DOI:10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2024.121822
[29] 梅雪松, 董灵波, 陈冠谋. 基于结构方程模型的兴安落叶松天然林碳汇量驱动因素[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(09): 1-10.
Mei X S, Dong L B, Chen G M.Driving factors of carbon sink in natural Larix gmelinii forests based onstructural equation models[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2024,46(09):1-10. DOI:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230284.
[30] Croft H, Chen J M, Noland T L.Stand age effects on Boreal forest physiology using a long time-series of satellite data[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 328: 202-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.023
[31] 张岚棋, 杨华, 张晓红. 天然云冷杉林树木生长与树木大小、竞争和树种多样性的关系[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(05): 64-72.
Zhang L Q, Yang H, Zhang X H.Relationship between tree growth and tree size, competition as well as species diversity in spruce-fir natural forests. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2024,46(05):64-72. DOI:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220409
[32] Ali A.Forest stand structure and functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 98: 665-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecommunications, 2020, 11(1): 4241-. DOI10.1038/s41467-020-17966-z
[33] Brienen R J W, Caldwell L, Duchesne L, et al. Forest carbon sink neutralized by pervasive growth-lifespan trade-offs[J]. Nature communications, 2020, 11(1): 4241-. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-17966-z
[34] 窦啸文, 吴登瑜, 张笑菁, 等. 天目山常绿阔叶林胸高断面积生长量影响因子研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2023, 40(05): 1063-72.
Dou X W, Wu D Y, Zhang X Q, et al.Study on the factors affecting breast-height basal area increment of evergreenbroad-leaved forest in Mount Tianmu[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(05): 1063-72. Doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220651
[35] 沈浩, 姜姜, 周晨, 等. 江西石城不同起源阔叶林碳储量驱动因子分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(04): 185-90.
Shen H, Jiang J, Zhou C, et al.Research on factors driving carbom storage in broad-leaved forests of different origins from Shicheng, Jiangxi Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition),2023,47(04):185-90. DOI: 10.12302/J.ISSN.1000-2006.202110023.
[36] Zuoqiang Y, Arshad A, Anvar S, et al. Few large trees, rather than plant diversity and composition, drive the above-ground biomass stock and dynamics of temperate forests in northeast China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 481: 118698-. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118698
[36] Jucker T, Bouriaud O, Coomes D A.Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed‐species forests[J]. Functional Ecology, 2015, 29(8): 1078-86. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12428.
[37] Gough C M, Curtis P S, Hardiman B S, et al. Disturbance, complexity,succession of net ecosystem production in North America's temperate deciduous forests[J]. Ecosphere, 2016, 7(6): n/a-n/a. DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1375
[38] Durán S M, Sánchez‐Azofeifa G A, Rios R S, et al. The relative importance of climate, stand variables and liana abundance for carbon storage in tropical forests[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2015, 24(7/8): 939-49. DOI:10.1111/geb.12304.
[39] Sylvanus M, Ruan V, Assogbadjo A E, et al.Tree species diversity promotes aboveground carbon storage through functional diversity and functional dominance[J]. Ecology and evolution, 2016, 6(20): 7546-57. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2525.
[40] Scharlemann J P, Tanner E V, Hiederer R, et al.Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool[J]. Carbon Management, 2014, 5(1): 81-91. DOI: 10.4155/cmt.13.77
[41] Paoli G D, Curran L M, Slik J W F. Soil nutrients affect spatial patterns of aboveground biomass and emergent tree density in southwestern Borneo[J]. Oecologia, 2008, 155(2): 287-99.
[42] Zhang Y, Huang K, Zhang T, et al.Soil nutrient availability regulated global carbon use efficiency[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2018, 173: 47-52. DOI:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2018.12.001.
PDF(1284 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/