Optimization of forestry production factors from the perspective of ecological performance growth

JIANG Zhan, CAI Zhijian, QIN Xi

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 159-164.

PDF(1403 KB)
PDF(1403 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 159-164. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201904016

Optimization of forestry production factors from the perspective of ecological performance growth

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】Increase the forest ecological performance through optimizing the forestry production factors, which include forest land, technology, labor and capital. 【Method】The mechanism of factor optimization on the growth of ecological performance of forests was analyzed using forest rotation as the intermediate variable between factor input and growth in ecological performance; a case was studied in Shaxian County, Fujian Province. 【Result】 ① The relationship between the ecological performance and factor input of forest land with operation is as follows: first, the optimization of production factors can improve ecological performance, e.g., state-owned forests have better ecological performance than other types of forests because of large forest lands, low capital costs, and advanced forest operation technologies. Second, there is a “threshold” effect between forest management scale and ecological performance. When the forest land area exceeds the “threshold”, it is possible to extend the forest rotation age and further improve the ecological performance. ② All forest production factor input modes should be optimized: state-owned forest farms need more forestland input, collective forest farms face forestland and capital shortage, the villagers’ group and household management are faced with the comprehensive shortage of technology, capital, and labor input.【Conclusion】The key to forest ecological growth is to extend forest rotation under the rule of maximizing forest revenue, and the factor input needs to be optimized as follows. First, adopting advanced production technology, i.e., land preparation and thinning according to the high standard forest management technical regulations, adopting good seeds and strong steckling, and investing in more fertilizers and other land saving technologies. Second, reducing capital costs and investing more capital. Third, more forest land input to cope with the increased demand for forest land management due to the extension of forest rotation period. Finally, the forest “threshold” scale is necessary for the extension of forest rotation period.

Key words

ecological performance / optimization of production factors / “threshold” scale / extension of forest rotation period / forest management mode

Cite this article

Download Citations
JIANG Zhan , CAI Zhijian , QIN Xi. Optimization of forestry production factors from the perspective of ecological performance growth[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2019, 43(6): 159-164 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201904016

References

[1]
赵建梅, 孔祥智, 孙东升, 等. 中国农户兼业经营条件下的生产效率分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2013(3):16-26.
ZHAO J M, KONG X Z, SUN D S, et al. A productivity analysis of China’s farmer’s households under the condition of concurrent business[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2013(3):16-26.
[2]
LIU C, WANG S, LIU H. An examination of the effects of recent tenure reforms in China’s collective forests on peasants’ forest activities and their income[J]. International Foresryt Review, 2017, 19(1):55-67. DOI: 10.1505/146554817820888672.
[3]
林毅夫. 制度、技术与中国农业发展[M]. 上海: 格致出版社, 2008:45-166.
[4]
蒋瞻, 蔡志坚, 陈书林, 等. “三权分置”对农户用材林林地转出行为的影响研究——基于计划行为理论[J]. 江淮论坛, 2018(4):12-18. DOI: 10.16064/j.cnki.cn34-1003/g0.2018.04.032.
JIANG Z, CAI Z J, CHEN S L, et al. Farming fousholds’ decision-making process of timber-forest land transfer-out: a case study in Fujian Province[J]. Jianghuai Tribune, 2018(4):12-18.
[5]
ZHANG D W, PETER H P. Forest economics[M]. Vancouver. Toronto: UBC Press, 2011:191-224.
[6]
YIN R S, ZULU L, QI J G, et al. Empirical linkages between devolved tenure systems and forest conditions: primary evidence[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2016, 73:277-285. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.033.
[7]
杨扬, 李桦, 薛彩霞. 林地产权安全对农户林业管护行为的影响研究——来自南方集体林区浙江、江西省林农的调查[J]. 农业技术经济, 2018(7) : 51-63.DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.jae.
YANG Y, LI H, XUE C X. Impact of forestland tenure security on farmers ‘forestry management in Zhejiang and Jiangxi Provinces[J]Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2018(7):51-63.
[8]
金三林, 朱贤强. 我国劳动力成本上升的成因及趋势[J]. 经济纵横, 2013(2):37-42. DOI: 10.16528/j.cnki.22-1054/f.2013.02.004.
JIN S L, ZHU X Q. The reasons and trend of China’s labor rise[J]. Economic Review, 2013(2):37-42.
[9]
XIE Y, WEN Y L, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Impact ofproperty rights reform on household forest management investment: an empirical study of southern China[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 201334:73-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.12.002.
[10]
王庶, 岳希明. 退耕还林、非农就业与农民增收[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(4):106-119.
WANG S, YUE X M. The grain-for-green project, non-farm employment, and the growth of farmer income[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2017, 52(4):106-119.
[11]
HARTMAN R. The harvesting decision whena standing forest has valuea[J]. Economic Inquiry, 1976, 14(1):52-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00377.x
[12]
阳含熙, 方奇, 陈钟镇, 等. 杉木生态特性研究-I福建建瓯高阳乡[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1958:16-41.
YANG H X, FANG Q, CHEN Z Z, et al. Study on ecological characteristics of Chinese fir-I case study in Gaoyang Town, Jianou County,Fujian Province[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Express, 1958:16-41.
[13]
CARDINALE B J, MATULICH K L, HOOPER D U, et al. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2011, 98:572-592.DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000364.
[14]
彭萱亦, 吴金卓, 栾兆平, 等. 中国典型森林生态系统生物多样性评价综述[J]. 森林工程, 2013, 29(6):4-10, 43. DOI: 10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2013.06.046.
PENG X Y, WU J Z, LUAN Z P, et al. Evaluation ofbiodiversity in typical forest ecosystems in China: a review[J]. Forest Engineering, 2013, 29(6):4-10, 43.
[15]
PERSHA L, AGRAWAL A, CHHATRE A. Social andecological synergy: local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation[J]. Science, 2011, 331(6024):1606-1608. DOI: 10.1126/science.1199343.
[16]
TIMILSINA N, ROSS M S, HEINEN J T. A community analysis of sal (Shorea robusta) forests in the Western Terai of Nepal[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 241(1/2/3):223-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.012.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2019
PDF(1403 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/