Abstract
We studied the genetic variation, the relationship between wood fibers and the optimum cutting age of pulpwood stand using 29 halfsib families in primary seed orchard of Pinus massoniana. The results showed that:the properties of fibers has certain variations among and within the family. The variation of fiber length, fiber width, fiber length to width ratio, flexibility coefficient and wall thickness to lumen ratio of earlywood were all larger than those of latewood. The variance analysis showed that the average latewood fiber width, average latewood tracheid diameter, average latewood fiber length and the average fiber length of earlywood and latewood were significant different among families, family hereditary capacity was 0.38-0.51. Our research also showed that the mason pine age had significant correlations with fiber length, latewood lengthwidth ratio, fiber wall thickness, tracheid wall thickness to lumen ratio, flexibility coefficient and rigidity coefficient; the width of annual ring had significant correlations with fiber width, fiber length, fiber lengthwidth ratio, tracheid wall thickness to lumen ratio, tracheid wall thickness, rigidity coefficient and flexibility coefficient; the percent of latewood had significant correlations with fiber width, fiber length, fiber lengthwidth ratio, tracheid wall thickness, earlywood tracheid wall thickness to lumen ratio, earlywood rigidity coefficient and earlywood flexibility coefficient; thus, the annual ring width could be an indirect index for selection of fine paper pulp making family of mason pine. After the evaluation of growth, fiber content and the wood quality, family No.113 was chosen as the fine paper pulp making family.
Cite this article
Download Citations
TAN Jianhui,FENG Yuanheng,JIA Jie,YANG Zhangqi.
Study on the genetic variation of wood fiber morphology in a halfsib mason pine family and the selection of fine paper pulp making family[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2012, 36(06): 8-12 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.06.002
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]丁贵杰,周志春,王章荣.马尾松纸浆林培育与利用[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2006.
[2]周志春,傅玉狮,吴天林.马尾松生长和材性的地理遗传变异及最优种源区的划定[J].林业科学研究,1993,6(5):556-564.
[3]周志春,金国庆,周世水.马尾松自由授粉家系生长和材质的遗传分析及联合选择[J].林业科学研究,1994,7(3):323-328.
[4]荣文琛,吴天林,岳水林,等.马尾松造纸材种源选择[J].林业科学研究,1992,5(1):7-13.
[5]杨宗武,郑仁华,傅忠华,等.马尾松工业用材优良家系选择的研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(1):1-7.
[5]谭健晖,冯源恒.15和22年马尾松纸浆材优良家系选择比较研究[J].福建林学院学报,2011,31(4):41-45.
[7]杨章旗.马尾松材性与产脂性状遗传改良研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2012.
[8]邓继峰,张含国,张磊,等.杂种落叶松F2代自由授粉家系纸浆材遗传变异及多性状联合选择[J].林业科学,2011,47(5):31-39.
[9]杨章旗.马尾松种子园优良家系生长性状选择[J].福建林学院学报,2006,26(1): 45-48.
[10]徐峰,符韵林,梁宏温,等.马占相思木材解剖特性研究[J].广西农业生物科学,2005,24(2):140-144.
[11]薛崇昀,贺文明,聂怡,等.杨树无性系造纸材材性分析[J].中国造纸,2009,23(9):41-44.
[12]詹怀宇.纤维化学与物理[M].北京:科学出版社, 2005.
[13]孙晓梅,楚秀丽,张守攻,等.落叶松种间及其杂种管胞特征及微纤丝角的变异[J].林业科学研究,2011,24(4):415-422.