Open space morphology and research framework with multi-perspectives

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.01.015

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (01): 83-89.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.01.015

Previous Articles Next Articles

Open space morphology and research framework with multi-perspectives

HAN Lingyun, XU Zhen, WANG Lianggui^*

College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Online:2014-01-15 Published:2014-01-15

Abstract

Abstract: Research on different aspects of urban open spaces is a point to understand their transformations. The author reviewed the literatures on urban morphology, landscape ecology, policy evaluation, perception and aesthetics, history and sociology to equate theories and methodologies related to open space. Combining with mapping physical form and typological changes, investigation of the factors influencing morphology, deduction of what these morphological changes bring, these five sub-topics would construct a multi-dimension framework for open space study. With historical-GIS as database platform and analysis tools, this framework was adopt by the authors to study open space in Nanjing,which showed the potential of supporting interdisciplinary research and public participation as a open platform.

CLC Number:

TU984

HAN Lingyun, XU Zhen, WANG Lianggui. Open space morphology and research framework with multi-perspectives[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2014, 38(01): 83-89.

References

[1] 尹海伟. 城市开敞空间:格局·可达性·宜人性[M].南京:东南大学出版社, 2008.
[2] 侯仁之. 北京城的生命印记[M]. 上海:三联书店, 2009.
[3] 姚亦锋. 南京城市地理变迁及现代景观[M]. 南京:南京大学出版社, 2006.
[4] Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1977.
[5] Eckbo G. Urban Landscape Design [M]. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book,1964.
[6] Clark P. The European City and Open Space [M]. London:Ashgate Publishing Co, 2006.
[7] Lynch K. City Sense and City Design[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press,1995.
[8] Francis M. Urban Open Space: Designing For User Needs [M].Washington D C:Island Press,2003.
[9] Carmona M. Contemporary public space, part two: classification [J]. Journal of Urban Design,2010, 15(2): 157-173.
[10] Conzen M R G. Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town-plan Analysis [M]. London:George Philip, 1960.
[11] Whitehand J W R. Fringe belts and socioeconomic change in China [J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2011, 38(1):41-60.
[12] Whitehand J W R. Development cycles and urban landscapes [J]. Geography, 1994, 79(1):3-16.
[13] Conzen M P. How cities internalized their former urban fringes: a cross-cultural comparison [J]. Urban Morphology, 2009,13(1): 29-54.
[14] Konstantinos Tzoulas. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 81(3): 167-178.
[15] Hannes Palang, Theo Spek Marie Stenseke. Digging in the past: new conceptual models in landscape history and their relevance in peri-urban landscapes [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011(100): 344 346.
[16] Cantwell M D, Forman R T T. Landscape graphs [J]. Landscape Ecology, 1993, 8(4): 239-255.
[17] Levin N. Landscape continuity analysis: a new approach to conservation planning in Israel [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007,(79)1: 53-64.
[18] Vogt P. Mapping functional connectivity [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2009, 9(1):64-71.
[19] Hough M. City Form and Natural Process[M]. London: Routledge,2004.
[20] Alcoforado M J. Application of climatic guidelines to urban planning: the example of Lisbon(Portugal)[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009, 90(1-2): 56-65.
[21] Harvey D. Social Justice and the City [M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.
[22] Tang B S, Wong S W. A longitudinal study of open space zoning and development in Hongkong [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 87(4): 258-268.
[23] Koomen E. Open-space preservation in the Netherlands [J]. Land Use Policy, 2008, 25(3):361-377.
[24] Yang Jun. The failure and success of greenbelt program in Beijing [J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2007, 6(4): 287-296.
[25] Lucie Laurian. Evaluating the outcomes of plans: theory, practice, and methodology[J]. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, 2010, 37(4): 740-757.
[26] Machemer P L. Policy analysis of transferable development rights programming using geographic information systems modeling [J]. Landscape Journal, 2006(25): 228-244.
[27] Jennifer Wolch. Park and park funding in Los Angeles: an equity-mapping analysis[J]. Urban Geography, 2006, 26(1): 4-35.
[28] Olga Barbosa. Who benefits from access to green space. a case study from Sheffield, UK [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 83(2-3):187-195.
[29] Kyushik Oh. Assessing the spatial distribution of urban parks using GIS [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 82(1): 25-32.
[30] Liisa Tyrvainen. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 79(1): 5-19.
[31] Jackson J B. Discovering the Vernacular Landscape[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.
[32] Cranz G, Michael Boland. Defining the sustainable park: a fifth model for urban parks [J]. Landscape Journal, 2004, 23(2):102-120.
[33] Sakai A. The hybridization of ideas on public parks: introduction of western thought and practice into nineteenth-century Japan [J]. Planning Perspectives, 2011, 26(3): 347-371.
[34] Kolodney Z, Rachel Kallus. From colonial to national landscape: producing Haifa’s cityscape [J]. Planning Persp, 2008,23(3):3323-348.
[35] Bosselman P. Representation of Places[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.
[36] Jacob A B. Great Streets[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1993.
[37] Foltete J C. Urban layout, landscape features and pedestrian usage[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 81(3): 225-234.
[38] Yang J, Zhao L S, McBride J. Can you see green assessing the visibility of urban forests in cities [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 91(2): 97-104.
[39] Lee S W. Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 85(1): 60-70.

Related Articles 15

[1]	XU Zhen, LI Mingke, CHEN Yan, ZHOU Zhenqi. Assessing the cycling catchment of large parks with online maps: a case study of Nanjing City [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 219-226.
[2]	ZHANG Guilian, YI Yang, ZHANG Lang. Spatial and temporal evolution and distribution pattern of China’s relocation land converted to ecological land [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 263-271.
[3]	ZHANG Jinguang, SONG Anqi, XIA Tianyu, ZHAO Bing. Evaluating the urban park green space exposure from the perspective of the community life circle [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 191-198.
[4]	CAO Jiajie, ZHU Yinglu, CHEN Yu, FU Jianwei, FENG Xiao, YANG Peiying, WANG Hao. The landscape quality evaluation model and method of urban water-sensitive river course [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(6): 288-293.
[5]	HUANG Shuo, ZHNEG Yu, CHENG Linli, JI Chunyue, WANG Shan, DONG Jianwen. The impact mechanism of urban park health benefit evaluation based on landscape preference [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(5): 221-228.
[6]	SONG Shuang, SHI Mengxi, HU Shanshan, WANG Shaohan, XU Dawei. Evolutions and driving mechanisms of urban blue-green spaces in northeast China: a case study with the urban central district of Harbin City [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 221-229.
[7]	ZHANG Jingjing, HU Guang, LIANG Mufeng. Applications of plant color configurations in urban parks based on the LIM analysis—a case of Quyuanfenghe Park of West Lake in Hangzhou [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 230-238.
[8]	WU Wenting, ZHOU Tingting, REN Yi, MEI Yi, LI Zhixing. Research on the application status of plants in rain gardens in Hangzhou [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 239-246.
[9]	SHI Ke, ZU Guoliang, HU Haihui. Evaluation on aesthetic quality of plant color landscape in urban parks of Harbin based on public aesthetic [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(1): 233-240.
[10]	CAO Jiajie, ZHANG Mengfan. Evaluation of urban waterfront landscape quality based on semantic differential method:a case of Zhonghuamen section of Qinhuai River in Nanjing [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(6): 221-227.
[11]	XIONG Xing, TANG Xiaolan, LIU Lan, WANG Junwei. Traditional rural landscape security pattern construction based on “Source-Sink” theory [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(6): 143-151.
[12]	XU Xinzhou, LU Zhichao, QIU Bing, WANG Hao. Suitability evaluation of functional layout of National Urban Wetland Park in Jiangsu Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(6): 152-158.
[13]	TANG Peng,WANG Hao. Analysis on the suitability of green sponge space in modern city based on MCR model [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(03): 116-122.
[14]	ZHANG Zhi-hui，CHEN Jian. Building of Virtual City Based on Web3D Technique [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2006, 30(S1): 135-138.
[15]	LIU Yuan, ZHANG Kaiyun, WANG Hao. Research on overall development of the urban public park [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2013, 37(06): 101-106.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

Open space morphology and research framework with multi-perspectives

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer