Suitability evaluation of functional layout of National Urban Wetland Park in Jiangsu Province

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903006

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 152-158.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903006

Previous Articles Next Articles

Suitability evaluation of functional layout of National Urban Wetland Park in Jiangsu Province

XU Xinzhou(), LU Zhichao, QIU Bing, WANG Hao^*()

College of Landscape Architecture, Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2019-03-03 Revised:2019-05-31 Online:2019-11-30 Published:2019-11-30
Contact: WANG Hao E-mail:1073563212@qq.com;wh9816@126.com

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 In view of the phenomenon of ecological protection function, neglect of functional layout and insufficiency of function in the National Urban Wetland Park, it is helpful to improve the theoretical system of Urban Wetland Park and solve the practical problems of urban wetland park construction.【Method】Five national urban wetland parks in southern Jiangsu (Changguangxi, Shajiabang, Gucheng Lake, Kunshan and Lushuiwan) were selected with the help of landscape architecture and sociological investigation methods, through questionnaires, interviews, and mathematical statistics, and both relevant indicators and evaluation index systems were established to assess the suitability of the functional layout of urban wetland parks. 【Result】 The selected professional evaluation indicators included the integrity and suitability of the overall functional layout and the integrity of the regional functional layout, whereas the selected user satisfaction indicators included ecological environment, popular science exhibition, tourism activities, and management service satisfaction. Comprehensive evaluation indicated that the functional layout of Shajiabang Urban Wetland Park was suitable, whereas that of Gucheng Lake Urban Wetland Park was not suitable, and that of the other three parks was generally suitable. 【Conclusion】 The main problems with the functional layout of Jiangsu National Urban Wetland Park were the lack of ecological protection areas and ecological buffer zones and the unreasonable relationship between ecological protection functions and tourist activities. Therefore, the future planning and construction of urban wetland parks should consider both the social and economic benefits of parks, as well as the ecological benefits of wetland ecological environment optimization. In addition, from the perspective of tourists’ needs and experiences, future planning and construction should also aim to improve relevant supporting service facilities. At the same time, combined with the planning and design of the park, the planning and design of the urban wetland park should be integrated and integrated.

Key words: Jiangsu urban wetland park, functional layout, suitability analysis

CLC Number:

TU984

XU Xinzhou, LU Zhichao, QIU Bing, WANG Hao. Suitability evaluation of functional layout of National Urban Wetland Park in Jiangsu Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(6): 152-158.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig.1

Table 1

Guideposts of functional layout evaluation in National Urban Wetland Park"

评价指标evaluation index			赋值方法mulator method
一级 primary level	二级secondary level	三级tertiary level	赋值方法mulator method
专业评价 professional evaluation	整体功能布局完整性(A) integrity of overall functional layout		总分为5分。功能布局包含以上3部分的,得5分;每缺少一项减1分;3项均缺少的,得0分根据《城市湿地公园规划设计导则(试行)》中对功能布局的要求,国家城市湿地公园功能布局应至少包含以下3部分:生态保育区、生态缓冲区、综合服务与管理区
	整体功能布局适宜性(B) suitability of overall function layout		总分为5分。整体功能布局符合理想布局形式的,得5分;整体功能布局符合并列型、环绕型或指状型布局形式的,得3分;整体功能布局不符合以上任意一种布局形式的,得0分根据城市湿地规划设计原则与点、线、面的布局形态总结出整体功能布局理想布局形式为并列型、环绕型和指状型布局3种类型
	分区布局完整性(C) suitability of zoning layout	生态保育区布局适宜性	总分为5分。生态保护区布局远离城市且周围有缓冲区的,得5分;生态保护区布局远离城市但外围无缓冲区的或外围有缓冲区但与城市相邻的,得3分;生态保护区与城市相邻且无缓冲区的,得1分;未设置生态保护区或生态保护区面积小于公园面积的10%的,得0分
		生态缓冲区布局适宜性	总分为5分。生态保护区和其他功能分区之间有生态缓冲区的,得5分;生态保护区与资源展示区之间无生态缓冲区的,得3分;生态保护区与游览活动区或管理服务区之间无生态缓冲区的,得1分;未设置生态缓冲区的,得0分
		综合服务与管理区布局适宜性	总分为5分。两类功能区布局在公园外围、远离生态保护区的,得5分;两类功能分区相隔较远,无法体现管理服务功能的,得3分;两类功能区布局在生态保护区外围、对生态保护区造成干扰的,得1分;未设置游览活动区或管理服务区的,得0分。
用户满意度 user satisfaction evaluation	生态环境 ecological environment(D)	动植物资源保护	将调查问卷选项设置为:非常满意、满意、一般、不满意、非常不满意5个选项结合问卷调查的统计结果,找出比例最大的选项,并将其按十分制进行换算,所得结果即为量化分值
	生态环境 ecological environment(D)	水资源保护
	科普展示 science popularization(E)	科普宣教活动形式、数量
	科普展示 science popularization(E)	科普宣教设施分布
	游览活动 sightseeing activities(F)	游览活动形式、数量
	游览活动 sightseeing activities(F)	游览设施分布
	管理服务满意度 service satisfaction(G)	服务设施形式、数量
	管理服务满意度 service satisfaction(G)	服务设施分布

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

References 23

[1]	GRAYSON J E, CHAPMAN M G, UNDERWOOD A J. The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlands[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1999, 43(4):227-236. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2046(98)00108-x. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00108-X
[2]	李洪波, 韦妮妮. 城市湿地生态系统服务的空间流转过程研究: 以泉州湾河口湿地为例[J]. 湿地科学, 2015, 13(1):98-102. DOI: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2015.01.014.
	LI H B, WEI N N. Spatial transfer process of urban wetland ecosystem services: a case of estuarine wetlands Quanzhou Bay[J]. Wetland Science, 2015, 13(1):98-102.
[3]	LOOKINGBILL T R, ELMORE A J, ENGELHARDT K A M, et al. Influence of wetland networks on bat activity in mixed-use landscapes[J]. Biological Conservation, 2010, 143(4):974-983. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.011. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.011
[4]	曹牧, 薛建辉. 崇明东滩湿地生态系统服务功能与价值评估研究述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5):163-169. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.026.
	CAO M, XUE J H. Review of service function and value research on Chongming Dongtan wetland ecosystem[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 40(5):163-169.
[5]	刘源, 张凯云, 王浩. 城市公园绿地整体性发展分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(6):101-106.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.06.020.
	LIU Y, ZHANG K Y, WANG H. Research on overall development of the urban public park[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2013, 37(6):101-106.
[6]	ÅSTEBØL S O, HVITVED-JACOBSEN T, SIMONSEN Ø. Sustainable stormwater management at Fornebu: from an airport to an industrial and residential area of the city of Oslo, Norway[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2004, 334/335:239-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.042. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.042
[7]	费文君, 丁佳颖, 曹颖. 从“泄洪沟”到“海绵园”的滨水绿地适用性设计[J]. 中国园林, 2018, 34(2):106-111. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2018.02.025.
	FEI W J, DING J Y, CAO Y. Applicability design in waterfront green space from “flood discharge ditch” to “sponge garden”[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2018, 34(2):106-111.
[8]	徐跃. 草海、洪河湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估及对比分析[D]. 北京:首都师范大学, 2014.
	XU Y. Service evaluation and comparative analysis of Caohai,Honghe wetland ecosystem[D]. Beijing:Capital Normal University, 2014.
[9]	CAO X C, ZHEN L, YANG L, et al. Stakeholder perceptions of changing ecosystem services consumption in the Jinghe watershed: a household survey and PRA[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2011, 2(4):345-352. DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2011.04.008.
[10]	李伟, 崔丽娟, 赵欣胜, 等. 中国滨海湿地及其生态系统服务功能研究概述[J]. 林业调查规划, 2014, 39(4):24-30.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2014.04.006.
	LI W, CUI L J, ZHAO X S, et al. An overview of Chinese coastal wetland and their ecosystem services[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2014, 39(4):24-30
[11]	江波, 欧阳志云, 苗鸿, 等. 海河流域湿地生态系统服务功能价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(8):2236-2244.
	JIANG B, OUYANG Z Y, MIAO H, et al. Ecosystem services valuation of the Haihe River basin wetlands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(8):2236-2244.
[12]	CHEN B, YU W W, LIU W H, et al. An assessment on restoration of typical marine ecosystems in China:achievements and lessons[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2012, 57:53-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.11.007.
[13]	赵欣胜, 崔丽娟, 李伟, 等. 吉林省湿地调蓄洪水功能分析及其价值评估[J]. 水资源保护, 2016, 32(4):27-33.
	ZHAO X S, CUI L J, LI W, et al. Flood storage function analysis and value assessment of wetlands in Jilin Province[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2016, 32(4):27-33.
[14]	陆智超. 江苏省国家城市湿地公园功能布局适宜性调查研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2018.
[15]	邓志平, 俞青青, 朱炜, 等. 生态恢复在城市湿地公园植物景观营造中的应用: 以西溪国家湿地公园为例[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2009, 24(6):162-165, 176.
	DENG Z P, YU Q Q, ZHU W, et al. Application of the ecological restoration theory in the construction of planting landscape design of urban wetland park: a case in Xixi National Wetland Park[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2009, 24(6):162-165, 176.
[16]	潘健, 于丹丹, 何振芳, 等. 东平湖湿地景观演变对人类活动的响应机制[J]. 水资源保护, 2017, 33(4):88-94.DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2017.04.014.
	PAN J, YU D D, HE Z F, et al. Impacts of human activities on change of wetland landscape in Dongping Lake area[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2017, 33(4):88-94.
[17]	国家林业局《湿地公约》履约办公室. 湿地公约履约指南[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001.
[18]	张振明, 刘俊国. 生态系统服务价值研究进展[J]. 环境科学学报, 2011, 31(9):1835-1842. DOI: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2011.09.010.
	ZHANG Z M, LIU J G. Progress in the valuation of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2011, 31(9):1835-1842.
[19]	徐惠强. 江苏湿地[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2012.
[20]	胡伟, 龙庆华, 钱茂, 刘广兵. 基于层次分析法的企业污水治理评价指标体系权重确定[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2014, 36(2):88-91,95.
	HU W, LONG Q H, QIAN M, LIU G B. Determination of evaluation index system weight for enterprises wastewater treatment based on AHP[J]. Environment Pollution & Control, 2014, 36(2):88-91,95.
[21]	李彦螓, 李锦馨, 马生花, 等. 基于AHP法的花博园景观评价分析——以银川市花博园为例[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2019(4):1-6.
	LI Y Z, LI J X, MA S H, et al. Evaluation and analysis of the flower expo garden landscape based on AHP method:a case study of Yinchuan Flower Expo Garden[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2019(4):1-6.
[22]	费文君, 史莹, 徐爽. 常州青枫公园防灾避险适宜性分析研究[J]. 绿色科技, 2017(11):1-4.
	FEI W J, SHI Y, XU S. Analysis and study on the suitability of emergency and disaster-preventionin Changzhou Green Maple Park[J]. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2017(11):1-4.
[23]	方国华, 袁婷, 林榕杰. 长江江苏段饮用水水源地生态风险评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2018, 34(6):12-16. DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2018.06.02.
	FANG G H, YUAN T, LIN R J. Ecological risk assessment of drinking water source in Jiangsu section of Yangtze River[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2018, 34(6):12-16.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

一级primary level		二级secondary level		三级tertiary level
指标index	权重weight	指标index	权重weight	指标index	权重weight
专业评价 professional evaluation	0.74	整体功能布局完整性(A)	0.39	-	-
		整体功能布局适宜性(B)	0.46	-	-
		分区功能布局完整性(C)	0.15	生态保护区功能布局适宜性(C1)	0.48
				生态缓冲区功能布局适宜性(C2)	0.30
				综合服务与管理区功能布局适宜性(C3)	0.06
用户满意度评价 user satisfaction evaluation	0.26	生态环境满意度(D)	0.51	动、植物保护情况(D1)	0.67
		生态环境满意度(D)	0.51	水资源保护情况(D2)	0.33
		科普展示满意度(E)	0.18	科普宣教活动(形式、数量)(E1)	0.67
		科普展示满意度(E)	0.18	科普宣教设施分布(E2)	0.33
		游览活动满意度(F)	0.19	游览活动(形式、数量)(F1)	0.70
		游览活动满意度(F)	0.19	游览设施(种类、数量)(F2)	0.30
		管理服务满意度(G)	0.12	服务设施分布(G1)	0.65
		管理服务满意度(G)	0.12	服务设施(种类、数量)(G2)	0.35

类型 type	项目 item		得分 score
类型 type	项目 item		长广溪 Changguangxi		沙家浜 Shajiabang		固城湖 Guchenghu		昆山 Kunshan		绿水湾 Lüshuiwan
专业评价 professional evaluation	I.评价得分		4.06		5.00		2.56		2.97		4.11
	整体功能布局完整性(A)		5.00		5.00		3.00		4.00		3.00
	整体功能布局适宜性(B)		3.00		5.00		3.00		3.00		3.00
	分区功能布局适宜性(C)		4.88		5.00		0.06		0.22		1.66
	生态保育区布局适宜性(C1)		5.00		5.00		0		0		0
	生态缓冲区布局适宜性(C2)		5.00		5.00		0		0		0
	综合服务与管理区布局适宜性(C3)		3.00		5.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
用户满意度评价 user satisfaction evaluation	II.评价得分		3.31		2.84		2.47		3.23		1.75
	生态环境满意度(D)		3.20		2.42		2.28		3.06		2.30
	动植物资源保护(D1)		3.38		2.40		2.30		3.06		2.30
	水资源保护(D2)		2.84		2.46		2.28		3.06		2.30
	科普展示满意度(E)		3.42		3.21		1.00		3.72		1.00
	科普宣教活动形式、数量(E1)		3.60		3.21		1.00		3.83		1.00
	科普宣教设施分布(E2)		1.25		3.21		2.37		3.49		1.00
	游览活动满意度(F)		3.42		3.67		1.25		3.04		1.25
	游览活动形式、数量(F1)		3.43		3.67		3.05		3.04		1.25
	游览设施分布(F2)		3.41		3.67		3.05		3.04		1.25
	管理服务满意度(G)		3.39		2.79		1.33		3.49		1.33
	服务设施形式、数量(G1)		3.38		2.83		1.33		3.49		1.33
	服务设施分布(G2)		3.42		2.71		2.50		3.49		1.33
功能布局适宜性评价suitability evaluation of functional		3.87		4.43		2.54		3.04		3.50
评价结果evaluation result		一般适宜		适宜		不适宜		一般适宜		一般适宜

Suitability evaluation of functional layout of National Urban Wetland Park in Jiangsu Province

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 23

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer