Salt tolerance of four half-sib families of Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge from coastal areas

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202003044

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 157-166.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202003044

Previous Articles Next Articles

Salt tolerance of four half-sib families of Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge from coastal areas

MIAO Lifei(), YU Xiaojing, ZHANG Qiuyue, FENG Chaonian^*()

College of Biology and the Environment,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2020-03-14 Revised:2020-05-13 Online:2020-10-30 Published:2020-10-30
Contact: FENG Chaonian E-mail:1296928897@qq.com;fcn@njfu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】This research investigated the differences of salt tolerance among four half-sib families of Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge in order to provide a reference for the selection and promotion of salt tolerant varieties in coastal areas.【Method】The seedlings of 4 half-sib families collected from coastal areas were used as test materials[No. YC, QD20, QD14 and LYG], which were treated with different concentrations of NaCl (0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%) through indoor soil culture and pot culture experiments. The growth and physiology indicators were measured to analyze the salt tolerance ability among four half-sib families of Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge such as the survival rate, biomass, root/shoot ratio, cell membrane permeability, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics. The salt tolerance of four families was comprehensively evaluated by a factor analysis and membership function method.【Result】With the increase of salt stress concentration, the survival rate of seedlings of four Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge families decreased gradually, of which YC was the highest. The root/shoot ratio increased first and then decreased. YC and QD14 reached the maximum value at 0.6% salt concentration, while QD20 and LYG reached the maximum value at 0.2% and 0.4% salt concentration respectively. Compared with the control, the seedling height, ground diameter and the total biomass of each family were significantly inhibited at 0.2% and YC decreased the least by 37.00%, 18.69% and 24.98%, respectively. The seedling height increment and the total biomass of LYG decreased the most by 95.42% and 50.71%, respectively. With the increase of stress concentration, the change trends of net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and chlorophyll content of four Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge families were the same and they all decreased, among which there indexes of YC decreased the least and those of LYG decreased the most. The membrane permeability of four families increased gradually and it decreased significantly at the level of 0.6%, among which the increases of LYG and QD14 were larger, reaching 231.11% and 238.97% respectively but the increase of YC and QD20 was smaller, reaching 67.77% and 98.42% respectively. The changes of intercellular carbon dioxide concentration of leaves of four families were different with the increase of salt treatment level. LYG and QD20 showed a trend from a decline to a rise and YC presented the downward trend all the time, while QD14 was opposite to YC. Through the factor analysis and membership function analysis, the salt tolerance of the four families was in order of Yancheng > Qingdao14 > Qingdao20 > Lianyungang.【Conclusion】There were significant differences in salt tolerance among four half-sib families of Pyrus betulaefolia. The comprehensive salt tolerance of Yancheng family was the strongest followed by Qingdao 14 and Qingdao 20 and the Lianyungang family was the weakest.

Key words: Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge, half-sib families, salt tolerance, subordination function method

CLC Number:

MIAO Lifei, YU Xiaojing, ZHANG Qiuyue, FENG Chaonian. Salt tolerance of four half-sib families of Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge from coastal areas[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(5): 157-166.

Figures/Tables 11

Table 1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

References 32

[1]	MUNNS R, TESTER M . Mechanisms of salinity tolerance[J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2008,59(1):651-681. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911.
[2]	赵宣, 韩霁昌, 王欢元 , 等. 盐渍土改良技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(8):113-116.
	ZHAO X, HAN J C, WANG H Y , et al. Research progress of saline soil improvement technology[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2016,32(8):113-116.
[3]	张建国, 马爱生, 徐新文 , 等. 土壤盐结皮研究进展与展望[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2013,59(4):146-149.
	ZHANG J G, MA A S, XU X W , et al. Progress and prospects in soil salt crusts[J]. Shaanxi J Agric Sci, 2013,59(4):146-149. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0488-5368.2013.04.048.
[4]	唐于银, 乔海龙 . 我国盐渍土资源及其综合利用研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2008,14(8):19-22.
	TANG Y Y, QIAO H L . Saline soil and the comprehensive utilization of resources progress in China[J]. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2008,14(8):19-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2008.08.008.
[5]	杨劲松 . 中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望[J]. 土壤学报, 2008,45(5):837-845.
	YANG J S . Development and prospect of the research on salt-affected soils in China[J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2008,45(5):837-845. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2008.05.010.
[6]	宗宇 . 中国北方野生杜梨的遗传多样性和谱系地理研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2014.
	ZONG Y . Studies on genetic diversity and phylogeography of wild Pyrus betulaefolia in Northern China[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2014.
[7]	荆蓉, 邓莉琦, 彭祚登 . 外源激素对杜梨扦插繁殖效果的影响[J]. 林业科技, 2019,44(4):22-25.
	JING R, DENG L Q, PENG Z D . Effects of exogenous hormones on the cutting propagation of Pyrus betulifolia[J]. For Sci Technol, 2019,44(4):22-25. DOI: 10.19750/j.cnki.1001-9499.2019.04.006.
[8]	王爱斌, 许建锋, 闫帅 , 等. 不同处理方法对解除杜梨种子休眠的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2016,33(S1):209-212.
	WANG A B, XU J F, YAN S , et al. Effects of different treatment on the seed dormancy breaking of Pyrus betulaefolia[J]. J Fruit Sci, 2016,33(S1):209-212. DOI: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.2016.S.30.
[9]	宗宇, 孙萍, 牛庆丰 , 等. 中国北方野生杜梨分布现状及其形态多样性评价[J]. 果树学报, 2013,30(6):918-923,1106.
	ZONG Y, SUN P, NIU Q F , et al. Distribution situation and assessment of morphological diversity of wild Pyrus betulaefolia in Northern China[J]. J Fruit Sci, 2013,30(6):918-923,1106. DOI: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.2013.06.011.
[10]	韩金龙, 李慧, 蔺经 , 等. 核黄素对盐胁迫下杜梨叶片抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2015,31(4):893-898.
	HAN J L, LI H, LIN J , et al. The regulatory role of riboflavin in antioxidant system of Pyrus betulaefolia in response to salt tolerance[J]. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2015,31(4):893-898. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.029.
[11]	张晓晓 . 杜梨盐胁迫下的生理响应及耐盐性资源筛选[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2015.
	ZHANG X X . Studies on the physiological response of Pyrus betulaefolia bge.under salt stress and screening out of salt-tolerance resources[D]. Baoding:Hebei Agricultural University, 2015.
[12]	高崇 . 接种AM真菌对盐胁迫下杜梨实生苗生长及耐盐性的影响研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2013.
	GAO C . Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and salt tolerance of Pyrus betulaefolia seedlings[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University, 2013.
[13]	WANG J B, NIU D T, WANG Y , et al. Chloride diffusion of shotcrete lining structure subjected to nitric acid,salt-frost degradation,and bending stress in marine environment[J]. Cem Concr Compos, 2019,104:103396. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103396.
[14]	BEN YAHMED J, NOVILLO P, GARCIA-LOR A , et al. Salt tolerance traits revealed in mandarins (Citrus reticulata Blanco) are mainly related to root-to-shoot Cl-translocation limitation and leaf detoxification processes[J]. Sci Hortic, 2015,191:90-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.005.
[15]	ROSSI L, FRANCINI A, MINNOCCI A , et al. Salt stress modifies apoplastic barriers in olive (Olea europaea L.):a comparison between a salt-tolerant and a salt-sensitive cultivar[J]. Sci Hortic, 2015,192:38-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.023.
[16]	杨传宝, 孙超, 李善文 , 等. 白杨派无性系苗期耐盐性综合评价及筛选[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017,39(10):24-32.
	YANG C B, SUN C, LI S W , et al. Comprehensive evaluation and screening of salt tolerance for Leuce clones at nursery stage[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2017,39(10):24-32. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170323.
[17]	燕丽萍, 吴德军, 王因花 , 等. 4种白蜡的耐盐性响应特征与综合评价[J]. 西北植物学报, 2019,39(7):1270-1278.
	YAN L P, WU D J, WANG Y H , et al. Salt tolerance response and comprehensive evaluation for four kinds of Fraxinus[J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occidentalia Sin, 2019,39(7):1270-1278. DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2019.07.1270.
[18]	徐敏, 刘君 , 阿衣古力·阿布都瓦依提.植物生理实验教学中叶绿素提取方法比较[J]. 实验科学与技术, 2018,16(4):129-133.
	XU M, LIU J, AND A . Comparative methods on chlorophyll extraction in plant physiology experiment teaching[J]. Exp Sci Technol, 2018,16(4):129-133. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4550.2018.04.032.
[19]	李合生 . 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
	LI H S. Principles and techniques of plant physiological biochemical experiment[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[20]	程方, 赵小军, 倪云 , 等. 5个南方型杨树无性系苗木耐盐性盆栽试验[J]. 林业科学研究, 2019,32(3):105-112.
	CHENG F, ZHAO X J, NI Y , et al. Study on salt tolerance of five southern poplar clones in pot culture[J]. For Res, 2019,32(3):105-112. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2019.03.014.
[21]	韦莉莉, 张小全, 侯振宏 , 等. 杉木苗木光合作用及其产物分配对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005,29(3):394-402.
	WEI L L, ZHANG X Q, HOU Z H , et al. Effects of water stress on photosynjournal and carbon allocation in Cunninghamia lanceolata seedlings[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2005,29(3):394-402. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0052.
[22]	马剑, 刘贤德, 金铭 , 等. NaCl胁迫对文冠果幼苗生长性状的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018,38(1):11-15.
	MA J, LIU X D, JIN M , et al. Effects of NaCl stress on growth properties of Xanthoceras sorbifolia[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2018,38(1):11-15. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2018.01.003.
[23]	胡爱双, 肖丹丹, 孙宇 , 等. NaCl胁迫对金银花幼苗生长及光合生理特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019,47(11):170-173.
	HU A S, XIAO D D, SUN Y , et al. Effects of NaCl stress on seedling growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Lonicera japonica[J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2019,47(11):170-173. DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2019.11.038.
[24]	刘行, 张彦广 . 盐胁迫对金露梅的生长及其叶绿素含量的影响[J]. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,38(1):90-95.
	LIU H, ZHANG Y G . Effects of salt stress on the growth and chlorophyll content of Potentilla fruticosa L[J]. J Ningxia Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017,38(1):90-95. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2328.2017.01.018.
[25]	许帼英, 李柱, 安沙舟 , 等. 木地肤幼苗细胞膜透性和酶系统对盐胁迫的适应性研究[J]. 草业科学, 2008,25(12):51-55.
	XU G Y, LI Z, AN S Z , et al. Effects of salt stress on membrane permeability and enzymes system of Kochia prostrata seedling[J]. Pratacultural Sci, 2008,25(12):51-55.
[26]	WU Q S, ZOU Y N . Adaptive responses of birch-leaved pear (Pyrus betulaefolia) seedlings to salinity stress[J]. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj-Napoca, 2009,37(1):133-138. DOI: 10.15835/nbha3713109.
[27]	苏兰茜, 白亭玉, 鱼欢 , 等. 盐胁迫对2种菠萝蜜属植物幼苗生长及光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(12):2140-2150. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.011
	SU L Q, BAI T Y, YU H , et al. Effects of salt stress on seedlings growth,photosynjournal and chlorophyll fluorescence of two species of Artocarpus[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2019,52(12):2140-2150. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.011. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.011
[28]	朱进, 别之龙 . 盐胁迫对3种黄瓜砧木幼苗光合特性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2007,34(6):1418-1424.
	ZHU J, BIE Z L . Effects of NaCl stress on photosynthetic characteristics of three cucumber rootstock seedlings[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2007,34(6):1418-1424. DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2007.06.012.
[29]	季琳琳, 吴中能, 刘俊龙 , 等. NaCl胁迫对两种柳树幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2014,45(1):77-82.
	JI L L, WU Z N, LIU J L , et al. Effect of physiological characteristics of two willows seedling under salt stress[J]. J Northeast Agric Univ, 2014,45(1):77-82. DOI: 10.19720/j.cnki.issn.1005-9369.2014.01.013.
[30]	杨佳鑫, 李庆卫, 郭子燕 , 等. 3个梅花品种幼苗耐盐性综合评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,47(8):65-74.
	YANG J X, LI Q W, GUO Z Y , et al. Comprehensive evaluation on salt tolerance of three Prunus mume varieties[J]. J Northwest A F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019,47(8):65-74. DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2019.08.009.
[31]	闫文华, 吴德军, 燕丽萍 , 等. 盐胁迫下白蜡无性系苗期的耐盐性综合评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019,41(11):44-53.
	YAN W H, WU D J, YAN L P , et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance of clones of Fraxinusin spp.seedling stage under salt stress[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2019,41(11):44-53. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180438.
[32]	石元豹, 汪贵斌, 黄广远 , 等. 3个臭椿半同胞家系耐盐性比较研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2016,34(2):153-160.
	SHI Y B, WANG G B, HUANG G Y , et al. Salt tolerance of 3 half-sib families of Ailanthus altissima[J]. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2016,34(2):153-160. DOI: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2016.02.005.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

地区 area	家系 family	经度(E)/ (°) longitude	纬度(N)/ (°) latitude	海拔/m elevation	土壤电导率/ (μS·cm^-1) soil electric conductivity
青岛	QD14	120.004 906	35.769 905	47	90.33
青岛	QD20	120.004 952	35.769 994	50	99.00
连云港	LYG	118.955 925	35.011 831	151	50.00
盐城	YC	120.102 586	33.754 961	2	533.33

家系 family	盐处理/% treatment	地上干质量/g dry weight of shoot	根系干质量/g dry weight of root	总干质量/g total dry weight	根冠比/% radio of root to shoot
LYG	CK	7.01±0.63 a	4.29±0.59 a	11.3±0.23 a	0.62±0.14 b
	0.2	2.51±0.60 b	3.06±0.78 b	5.57±1.20 b	1.25±0.31 a
	0.4	2.16±0.19 bc	2.62±0.20 b	4.78±0.17 b	1.22±0.19 a
	0.6	1.57±0.24 c	1.64±0.16 c	3.22±0.20 c	1.06±1.06 b
	0.8	1.68±0.34 bc	0.95±0.12 c	2.63±0.46 c	0.57±0.05 c
家系 family	盐处理/% treatment	地上干质量/g dry weight of shoot	根系干质量/g dry weight of root	总干质量/g total dry weight	根冠比/% radio of root to shoot
YC	CK	6.68±0.03 a	3.93±0.18 a	10.61±0.21 a	0.59±0.03 b
	0.2	4.18±0.06 b	3.83±0.96 a	7.96±0.97 b	0.93±0.23 a
	0.4	4.29±0.60 b	3.3±0.15 ab	7.59±0.75 b	0.78±0.07 ab
	0.6	2.50±0.34 c	2.49±0.52 b	4.99±0.82 c	0.99±0.11 a
	0.8	2.39±0.39 c	1.32±0.39 c	3.71±0.77 c	0.54±0.09 b
QD14	CK	4.73±0.64 a	2.38±0.38 a	7.11±1.01 a	0.50±0.02 a
	0.2	2.97±0.35 b	1.70±0.30 ab	4.67±0.48 b	0.58±0.12 a
	0.4	2.04±0.51 c	1.43±0.51 b	3.47±0.89 bc	0.71±0.24 a
	0.6	1.36±0.20 c	0.99±0.41 bc	2.35±0.44 c	0.74±0.32 a
	0.8	1.46±0.10 c	0.63±0.24 c	2.09±0.22 c	0.43±0.18 a
QD20	CK	5.95±0.74 a	3.56±0.75 a	9.50±1.49 a	0.59±0.05 b
	0.2	3.94±0.24 b	3.13±0.60 a	7.07±0.43 b	0.80±0.20 b
	0.4	2.58±0.33 c	2.85±0.56 a	5.44±0.86 b	1.10±0.13 a
	0.6	1.82±0.26 cd	1.55±0.43 b	3.37±0.66 c	0.85±0.17 ab
	0.8	1.35±0.54 d	0.90±0.21 b	2.25±0.75 c	0.70±0.13 b

家系 family	R₁	R₂	R₃	R₄	R₅	R₆	R₇	R₈	R₉	R₁₀	R₁₁
LYG	0.040	0.194	0.283	0.482	0.525	0.701	3.187	0.172	0.161	1.008	0.220
YC	0.279	0.439	0.498	0.696	0.900	0.913	1.474	0.547	0.424	0.870	0.501
QD14	0.185	0.395	0.414	0.499	0.600	0.736	1.857	0.501	0.385	0.940	0.572
QD20	0.166	0.009	0.408	0.593	0.700	0.669	3.690	0.220	0.344	1.219	0.401

指标 index	R₁	R₂	R₃	R₄	R₅	R₆	R₇	R₈	R₉	R₁₀	R₁₁
R₁	1
R₂	0.533	1
R₃	0.998^**	0.478	1
R₄	0.825	0.222	0.833	1
R₅	0.894	0.350	0.897	0.988^*	1
R₆	0.756	0.786	0.720	0.745	0.808	1
R₇	-0.691	-0.980^*	-0.643	-0.372	-0.500	-0.838	1
R₈	0.842	0.880	0.810	0.475	0.603	0.784	-0.954^*	1
R₉	0.961^*	0.461	0.966^*	0.672	0.754	0.571	-0.627	0.826	1
R₁₀	-0.380	-0.970^*	-0.319	-0.173	-0.282	-0.784	0.913	-0.750	-0.261	1
R₁₁	0.826	0.584	0.820	0.368	0.487	0.448	-0.706	0.877	0.929	-0.370	1

因子 factor	R₁	R₂	R₃	R₄	R₅	R₆	R₇	R₈	R₉	R₁₀	R₁₁	贡献率P contribution rate
1	0.282	0.950	0.220	0.073	0.181	0.719	-0.874	0.691	0.170	-0.994	0.306	0.358
2	0.675	0.091	0.686	0.974	0.932	0.682	-0.221	0.290	0.488	-0.091	0.147	0.329
3	0.681	0.298	0.694	0.216	0.314	0.136	-0.432	0.662	0.856	-0.056	0.941	0.313

Salt tolerance of four half-sib families of Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge from coastal areas

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 32

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

家系 family	X₁	X₂	X₃	U(1)	U(2)	U(3)	D
LYG	0.140	-0.598	-1.369	0.703	0.170	0.000	0.307
YC	0.809	1.260	0.080	1.000	1.000	0.605	0.876
QD14	0.494	-0.977	1.025	0.860	0.000	1.000	0.621
QD20	-1.443	0.315	0.263	0.000	0.577	0.682	0.403
权重 index weight				0.358	0.329	0.313

[1]	JIAO Zhongyi, TIAN Xueyao, ZHENG Jiwei, WANG Baosong, HE Kaiyue, HE Xudong. Rapid identification and marker development of SNP loci for salt tolerance in shrub willow [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 107-113.
[2]	JIA Qingbin, LIU Geng, ZHAO Jiali, LI Kuiyou, SUN Wensheng. Variation analyses of growth traits in half-sib families of Korean pine and superior families selection [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 109-116.
[3]	CHEN Jia, GOU Jingyi, ZHAO Qi, HAN Qingqing, LI Huiping, YAO Dan, ZHANG Jinlin. Induced growth and salt tolerance of alfalfa by rhizobium strains from the rhizosphere of Haloxylon ammodendron [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(6): 99-110.
[4]	ZHANG Qun, JI Xiaoyu, HE Zihang, WANG Zhibo, TIAN Zengzhi, WANG Chao. Cloning and salt tolerance analysis of BpGRAS1 gene in Betula platyphylla [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(5): 38-46.
[5]	JIANG Lei, LI Huanyong, ZHANG Qin, ZHANG Huilong, QIAO Yanhui, ZHANG Huaxin, YANG Xiuyan. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi on the growth and physiological metabolism of Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge seedlings under saline-alkaline stress [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(6): 152-160.
[6]	PENG Yang, LU Yuetang, ZHAO Yang, XIAO Feng. A half-sib progeny test and juvenile selection of Trachycarpus fortunei [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(5): 78-84.
[7]	ZHOU Jie, HUANG Jing,XING Wei, WANG Baosong, HE Xudong, JIAO Zhongyi. Cloning and functional characterization of SlSIP from shrub Salix [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(01): 39-44.
[8]	CHEN Ying, LUO Yongya, QIU Nafei, WANG Ruiqi, SHENG Lili, CAO Fuliang. Effects of NaCl treatment on the growth, salt tolerance and flavonoids accumulation in Ginkgo biloba suspension cells [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(06): 45-50.
[9]	ZHANG Zihan, WANG Jiayuan, YU Fangyuan. Effects of NaCl stress on germination characteristics of Melia azedarach L. seeds from two provenances [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2014, 38(05): 107-112.
[10]	LI Yuanyuan，YANG Guang，WEI Rui，SUN Yanshuang，GUO Yuhua, ZHANG Ruiping，LIU Guifeng*. TabZIP transferred Betula platyphylla generation and salt tolerance analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2013, 37(05): 6-12.
[11]	WANG Chen,，YU Mukui*，WANG Zongxing ，ZHANG Cui，WU Tonggui，CHENG Xiangrong， TAO Jing. Difference of response to salt stress of nine clones of Catalpa bungei [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2011, 35(02): 20-24.
[12]	JIANG Zeping, XIAO Xiaojun,, HE Kaiyue*. Effects of NaCl stress on physiological characteristic and cell ultrastructure in leaves of two Broussonetia papyrifera varieties [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2010, 34(03): 77-82.