An analysis of the disturbance mechanism of tourist destinations at the edge of world geological parks based on the MSOR theoretical model

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202311042

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 227-234.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202311042

Previous Articles Next Articles

An analysis of the disturbance mechanism of tourist destinations at the edge of world geological parks based on the MSOR theoretical model

WANG Haoyi¹^,²(), ZHANG Jianguo³^,⁴^,^*(), LYU Yuanwan³

1. School of Urban Construction, Jingzhou University, Jingzhou 434000, China
2. Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China
3. School of Economics and Management, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China
4. Institute of Sustainable Development, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China

Received:2023-11-29 Accepted:2024-12-16 Online:2025-05-30 Published:2025-05-27
Contact: ZHANG Jianguo E-mail:U22091120691@cityu.mo;zhangjianguo2004@163.com

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】This study was conducted to explore the impact mechanisms of different tourism motivations on the tourism experience, satisfaction, and loyalty of tourists in the edge tourist destinations of Yandang Mountain Global Geopark, providing theoretical support and practical insights for understanding the disturbance mechanisms of edge tourist destinations. 【Method】Amos and Mplus software were employed to administer a survey questionnaire targeting the consumption behavior characteristics of tourists in the non-core scenic area of the Yandang Mountain Global Geopark, specifically the South Yandang Mountain. 【Result】(1) The primary tourist group in peripheral tourist destinations consists of local residents, predominantly core families. (2) Noelty motivation exhibited no direct or indirect effects on loyalty. (3) Relationship strengthening’s influence on loyalty was fully mediated, demonstrating positive effects on tourism experience and loyalty through mediating effects. (4) Isolation motivation and escape motivation exhibited both direct and indirect positive effects on loyalty, with complex and multiple chain-mediated impacts. These findings reveal the impact mechanisms of different tourism motivations on tourist experiences, satisfaction, and loyalty in edge tourism destinations. Local tourists were identified as playing a crucial role in the protection and sustainable development of edge tourism destinations. 【Conclusion】The study suggests that scenic spots should avoid large-scale construction, leverage customer characteristics to mitigate disturbance risks, and cautiously supplement tourist demand to prevent disturbances from expanding.

Key words: nature reserves, marginal tourist destination, structural equation model, MSOR theory, the Yandang Mountain Global Geopark

CLC Number:

WANG Haoyi, ZHANG Jianguo, LYU Yuanwan. An analysis of the disturbance mechanism of tourist destinations at the edge of world geological parks based on the MSOR theoretical model[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 227-234.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 2

Table 6

Mediating effect test of MSOR model in the South Yandang Mountain"

中介效应 mediating effect	效应路径 effect path	标准化系数 Est	标准误 SE	Est/SE	显著性 sig.	95%置信区间 95% confidence interval
新奇动机(M)→ 忠诚度(R) effects from M to R	总效应	0.104	0.132	0.789	不显著	[-0.167,0.357]
	间接效应	0.059	0.096	0.621	不显著	[-0.127,0.227]
	1:新奇动机(M) →满意度(O)→ 忠诚度(R)	-0.056	0.086	-0.659	不显著	[-0.223,0.079]
	2:新奇动机(M)→旅游体验(S)→ 满意度(O)→忠诚度(R)	0.116	0.091	1.266	不显著	[-0.072,0.298]
	直接效应:新奇动机(M)→忠诚度(R)	0.045	0.097	0.461	不显著	[-0.116,0.241]
隔离动机(M)→ 忠诚度(R) effects from M to R	总效应	0	0.256	0.001	不显著	[-0.421,0.371]
	间接效应	0.079	0.187	0.421	不显著	[-0.188,0.392]
	1:隔离动机(M) →满意度(O)→ 忠诚度(R)	0.232	0.222	1.047	显著	[0.012,0.678]
	2:新奇动机(M)→旅游体验(S)→ 满意度(O)→忠诚度(R)	-0.154	0.178	-0.865	不显著	[-0.555,0.039]
	直接效应:隔离动机(M)→忠诚度(R)	-0.078	0.170	-0.461	不显著	[-0.385,0.166]
关系强化(M) → 忠诚度(R) Effects from M to R	总效应	0.533	0.200	2.670	显著	[0.203,0.911]
	间接效应	0.482	0.135	3.562	显著	[0.257,0.771]
	1:关系强化(M) →满意度(O)→ 忠诚度(R)	0.062	0.166	0.374	不显著	[-0.259,0.317]
	2:关系强化(M)→旅游体验(S)→ 满意度(O)→忠诚度(R)	0.420	0.180	2.325	显著	[0.177,0.839]
	直接效应:关系强化(M)→忠诚度(R)	0.052	0.163	0.319	不显著	[-0.265,0.332]
逃离动机(M)→ 忠诚度(R) effects from M to R	总效应	0.232	0.209	1.106	不显著	[-0.078,0.656]
	间接效应	0.062	0.164	0.375	不显著	[-0.191,0.290]
	1:逃离动机(M) →满意度(O)→ 忠诚度(R)	-0.173	0.194	-0.892	不显著	[-0.528,0.032]
	2:逃离动机(M)→旅游体验(S)→ 满意度(O)→忠诚度(R)	0.234	0.157	1.496	显著	[0.047,0.587]
	直接效应:逃离动机(M)→忠诚度(R)	0.170	0.141	1.208	不显著	[-0.022,0.473]

Table 6

References 37

[1]	黄薇薇, 沈非. 边缘型旅游地研究综述及展望[J]. 人文地理, 2015, 30(4):24-31.
	HUANG W W, SHEN F. A review and prospects of studies on peripheral tourism areas[J]. Human Geography, 2015, 30(4):24-31.DOI:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.04.005.
[2]	赵逊, 赵汀. 中国地质公园地质背景浅析和世界地质公园建设[J]. 地质通报, 2003, 22(8):620-630.
	ZHAO X, ZHAO T. Geological background of national geoparks of China and construction of world geoparks[J]. Regional Geology of China, 2003, 22(8):620-630.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2003.08.011.
[3]	XIANG Y Y, MENG J J, YOU N S, et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of anthropogenic disturbances on landscape pattern of tourist destinations:a case study in the Li River basin,China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1):19285.DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-55532-w.
[4]	BOORI M S, VOŽENÍLEK V, CHOUDHARY K. Land use/cover disturbance due to tourism in Jeseníky Mountain,Czech Republic:a remote sensing and GIS based approach[J]. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2015, 18(1):17-26.DOI:10.1016/j.ejrs.2014.12.002.
[5]	REN B F, PARK K, SHRESTHA A, et al. Impact of human disturbances on the spatial heterogeneity of landscape fragmentation in Qilian Mountain National Park,China[J]. Land, 2022, 11(11):2087.DOI:10.3390/land11112087.
[6]	MEHRABIAN A, RUSSELL J A. An approach to environmental psychology[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press,1974.
[7]	何云梦, 徐菲菲, 剌利青, 等. 基于S-O-R理论的文旅消费驱动机制研究[J]. 旅游科学, 2023, 37(1):116-132.
	HE Y M, XU F F, LA L Q, et al. A research on the driving mechanism of cultural and tourism consumption:a S-O-R model perspective[J]. Tourism Science, 2023, 37(1):116-132.DOI:10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.2023.01.002.
[8]	SHAKOORI A, HOSSEINI M. An examination of the effects of motivation on visitors’ loyalty:case study of the Golestan Palace,Tehran[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2019,32:100554.DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100554.
[9]	AGYEIWAAH E, OTOO F E, SUNTIKUL W, et al. Understanding culinary tourist motivation,experience,satisfaction,and loyalty using a structural approach[J]. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2019, 36(3):295-313.DOI:10.1080/10548408.2018.1541775.
[10]	MORAL-CUADRA S, MARTÍN J C, ROMÁN C, et al. Influence of gastronomic motivations,satisfaction and experiences on loyalty towards a destination[J]. British Food Journal, 2023, 125(10):3766-3783.DOI:10.1108/bfj-02-2023-0121.
[11]	刘雷, 史小强. 新冠肺炎疫情背景下体育旅游消费行为影响机制:基于S-O-R框架的MOA-TAM整合模型的实证分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(8):52-70.
	LIU L, SHI X Q. Research on the impact mechanism of sports tourism consumption behavior under the background of the normalization of COVID-19 prevention and control:empirical analysis of MOA-TAM integration model based on S-O-R framework[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(8):52-70.DOI:10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2021.08.010.
[12]	粟路军, 何学欢, 胡东滨, 等. 服务质量对旅游者抵制负面信息意愿的影响机制研究:基于Stimulus-Organism-Response(S-O-R)分析框架[J]. 旅游科学, 2017, 31(6):30-51.
	SU L J, HE X H, HU D B, et al. A study on the impact mechanism of service quality on tourists resistance to negative information:based on the framework of stimulus-organism-response(S-O-R)[J]. Tourism Science, 2017, 31(6):30-51.DOI:10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.2017.06.003.
[13]	BELK R W. Situational variables and consumer behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1975, 2(3):157.DOI:10.1086/208627.
[14]	达婷, 李琰, Mathias Kondolf.G. 基于场所依恋的城市滨水公园社会连接研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(6):227-235.
	DA T, LI Y, MATHIAS G. Research on social connectivity of urban waterfront park based on place attachment[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2023, 47(6):227-235.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202212019.
[15]	林雨辰, 赵伟. 基于时空景观的泉州蓄滞洪区城市更新研究[J]. 室内设计与装修, 2024(2):130-131.
	LIN Y C, ZHAO W. Research on urban renewal of flood storage area in Quanzhou based on spatiotemporal landscape[J]. Interior Design Construction, 2024(2):130-131.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7374.2024.02.028.
[16]	PEARCE P L. Tourist behaviour: themes and conceptual schemes[M]. Clevedon: Channel View Publications, 2005.
[17]	PEARCE P L. Tourist behaviour and the contemporary world[M]. Bristol: Channel View Publications, 2011.
[18]	PEARCE P L, LEE U I. Developing the travel career approach to tourist motivation[J]. Journal of Travel Research, 2005, 43(3):226-237.DOI:10.1177/0047287504272020.
[19]	周玲强, 李罕梁. 游客动机与旅游目的地发展:旅行生涯模式(TCP)理论的拓展和应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2015, 45(1):131-144.
	ZHOU L Q, LI H L. Tourists’ motivations and tourism destination development:an application of revised travel career pattern (TCP) theory[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2015, 45(1):131-144.DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2014.08.281.
[20]	陈楠, 乔光辉. 大众旅游者与生态旅游者旅游动机比较研究:以云台山世界地质公园为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(8):1005-1010.
	CHEN N, QIAO G H. A comparative study on the tourism motivation of ecological tourists:a case of the geopark at the Mount Yuntai Scenic Spot[J]. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(8):1005-1010.
[21]	AMARO S, CHAVES N B, HENRIQUES C, et al. Motivation-based segmentation of visitors to a UNESCO global geopark[J]. Geoheritage, 2023, 15(2):79.DOI:10.1007/s12371-023-00848-3.
[22]	林心影, 赖鹏程, 陈健翎, 等. 雁荡山风景名胜区旅游形象感知研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2021(2):164-170.
	LIN X Y, LAI P C, CHEN J L, et al. Research on tourism image perception of Yandang Mountain[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2021(2):164-170.DOI:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.02.022.
[23]	余向洋, 朱国兴, 邱慧. 游客体验及其研究方法述评[J]. 旅游学刊, 2006, 21(10):91-96.
	YU X Y, ZHU G X, QIU H. Review on tourist experience and its research methods[J]. Tourism Tri-bune, 2006, 21(10):91-96.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2006.10.020.
[24]	MANFREDO M J, DRIVER B L, BROWN P J. A test of concepts inherent in experience based setting management for outdoor recreation areas[J]. Journal of Leisure Research, 1983, 15(3):263-283.DOI:10.1080/00222216.1983.11969562.
[25]	DEMIRGÜNEP B K. Relative importance of perceived value,satisfaction and perceived risk on willingness to pay more[J]. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2015,5:211-220.
[26]	LÓPEZ-MOSQUERA N, SÁNCHEZ M. Cognitive and affective determinants of satisfaction,willingness to pay,and loyalty in suburban parks[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2014, 13(2):375-384.DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2013.08.007.
[27]	TANFORD S. Antecedents and outcomes of hospitality loyalty[J]. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 2016, 57(2):122-137.DOI:10.1177/1938965516640121.
[28]	张欣然. 社区居民对都市近郊乡村旅游影响的感知与态度的实证研究:以成都花香果居景区为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(12):243-248.
	ZHANG X R. The perception and attitude of community residents towards the influence of suburban rural tourism[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2016, 37(12):243-248.DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20161238.
[29]	赵昕, 关宏志, 夏晓敬. 基于活动的游客出游模式选择行为研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2013, 39(6):920-924.
	ZHAO X, GUAN H Z, XIA X J. Activity-based model for tourist’s travel pattern choice behavior[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2013, 39(6):920-924.
[30]	SECKELMANN A. Domestic tourism:a chance for regional deve-lopment in Turkey?[J]. Tourism Management, 2002, 23(1):85-92.DOI:10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00066-8.
[31]	GAO C L, CHENG L. Tourism-driven rural spatial restructuring in the metropolitan fringe:an empirical observation[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020,95:104609.DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104609.
[32]	张建国, 胡洁思. 森林运动小镇游客游憩动机与满意度关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(4):201-209.
	ZHANG J G, HU J S. Research on the relationship between the recreation motivation and satisfaction of tourists in forest sports towns[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2021, 45(4):201-209.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007024
[33]	URBACH N, AHLEMANN F. Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares[J]. The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 2022,11:2.
[34]	樊友猛, 谢彦君. 具身欲求与身体失范:旅游不文明现象的一种理论解释[J]. 旅游学刊, 2016, 31(8):4-6.
	FAN Y M, XIE Y J. Physical desire and physical anomie:a theoretical explanation of uncivilized tourism[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2016, 31(8):4-6.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2016.08.002.
[35]	廖维俊, 何有世. 非惯常环境旅游者不文明行为是如何形成的?基于相对剥夺理论视角的扎根研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(6):194-201.
	LIAO W J, HE Y S. How does the uncivilized behavior of tourists form in unusual environment?[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(6):194-201.DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2018.194
[36]	邱宏亮, 范钧, 赵磊. 旅游者环境责任行为研究述评与展望[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(11):122-138.
	QIU H L, FAN J, ZHAO L. Development of the academic study of tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior:a literature review[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(11):122-138.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2018.12.018.
[37]	汪熠杰, 吕宛青, 倪向丽. 考虑羊群效应的旅游不文明行为形成与演化:基于演化博弈分析[J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(4):37-50.
	WANG Y J, LV W Q, NI X L. Formation and evolution of tourist uncivilized behavior under herd instinct[J]. Journal of Huaqiao University (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 2022(4):37-50.DOI:10.16067/j.cnki.35-1049/c.2022.04.009.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

基本属性 basic attributes	类别 category	频数 frequency	占比% percentage	基本属性 basic attributes	类别 category	频数 frequency	占比% percentage
性别 gender	男	179	58.12	经济状况 economic condition	没有收入	43	13.96
	女	129	41.88		低于所在地平均水平	33	10.71
年龄 age	18岁以下	15	4.87		处于所在地平均水平	170	55.20
	19~25岁	62	20.13		高于所在地平均水平	60	19.48
	26~35岁	32	10.39		远高于所在地平均水平	2	0.65
	36~45岁	76	24.67	常住地 habitual residence	温州本地	236	76.62
	46~60岁	83	26.95		省内其他地方	40	12.99
	61岁以上	40	12.99		长三角地区其他地方	7	2.27
婚姻状况 marital status	已婚	208	67.53		周边其他省份	9	2.92
	未婚(离异、丧偶)	100	32.47		国内其他地方	16	5.20
家庭结构 family structure	单人家庭	25	8.12		港澳台地区	0	0
	核心家庭	193	62.66		国外	0	0
	直系亲属家庭	67	21.75	职业 occupation	公务员	20	6.49
	联合家庭	23	7.47		企事业单位管理人员	35	11.37
受教育背景 educational background	初中及以下	53	17.21		企事业单位专业技术人员	22	7.14
	高中/中专	98	31.82		企事业单位一般员工	64	20.78
	专科、高职	62	20.13		私营业主或自主创业	46	14.94
	本科	93	30.19		学生	54	17.53
	研究生及以上	2	0.65		其他职业	67	21.75
就业状况 employment status	在岗(含创业、兼职)	179	58.12
	失业、待业或退休	78	25.32
	在校学生	51	16.56

项目 item	序号 serial No.			题项 question item	克朗巴哈系数 Cronbach’s α		旋转后因子载荷系数 factor load coefficient after rotation		累计方差贡献率/% cumulative variance contribution rate
忠诚度(R) tourist loyalty	Q37			我还会再来			0.816
	Q39			我会向别人宣传这里			0.761
	Q38			我会鼓励亲戚朋友来这里	0.94		0.771		23.702
	Q41			日后门票等涨价,我仍愿意再来			0.737
	Q40			我愿意消费更多钱			0.749
旅游体验(S) travel experience		Q25	我与同行者增加了情感交流			0.93		0.650		38.611
		Q27	我到这里体验了新奇活动					0.709
		Q28	我在这里体验了不同美食					0.706
		Q22	我来这里后增长了见识					0.562
新奇动机(M) novelty motivation		Q11	我希望体验新鲜事物			0.85		0.812		50.846
		Q10	我希望开阔眼界,增长见识					0.778
隔离动机(M) isolation motivation		Q13	我希望远离自己不喜欢的人					0.845
		Q14	我希望减少来自他人的干扰			0.86		0.809		60.649
		Q15	我希望摆脱周围社会的压力					0.598
满意度(O) satisfaction		Q33	本次旅游的消费值得			0.93		0.527		70.376
		Q32	这里的卫生环境符合我的心理预期					0.483
		Q34	这里的主题活动符合我的心理预期					0.484
		Q36	这里的服务设施符合我的心理预期					0.385
关系强化(M) relationship strengthening		Q19	我希望与兴趣相似的人相处					0.719
		Q18	我希望自我感觉能够好一些			0.87		0.622		77.444
		Q20	我希望认识新朋友					0.551
逃离动机(M) escaping motivation		Q17	我希望离开常住的环境			0.70		0.901		83.263
		Q16	我希望改变日常生活节奏					0.478

拟合指数类型 fitting index type	参数 parameters	理想值 ideal value	初始模型值 initial model value	修正模型值 revise the model value
绝对拟合指数 absolute fitting index	GFI	>0.90	0.868	0.898
	AGFI	>0.90	0.827	0.864
	RMSEA	<0.05	0.069	0.056
相对拟合指数 relative fitting index	NFI	>0.90	0.926	0.942
	RFI	>0.90	0.911	0.929
	IFI	>0.90	0.955	0.971
	TLI	>0.90	0.945	0.964
	CFI	>0.90	0.954	0.971
简约拟合指数 parsimony fit index	PGFI	>0.50	0.661	0.674
	PNFI	>0.50	0.768	0.771
	χ²/df	<3.00	2.469	1.958

项目 item	序号 serial No.	标准化因子载荷 SDFL	组合信度 SMC	组合效度 CR	平均提取方差 AVE
忠诚度(R) tourist loyalty	Q37	0.904	0.817
	Q39	0.900	0.810
	Q38	0.932	0.869	0.940	0.760
	Q41	0.788	0.621
	Q40	0.827	0.684
旅游体验(S) travel experience	Q25	0.874	0.764	0.930	0.769
	Q27	0.888	0.789
	Q28	0.870	0.757
	Q22	0.875	0.766
新奇动机(M) novelty motivation	Q11	0.873	0.762	0.852	0.742
	Q10	0.850	0.723
隔离动机(M) isolation motivation	Q13	0.694	0.482
	Q14	0.798	0.637	0.825	0.612
	Q15	0.847	0.717
满意度(O) satisfaction	Q32	0.836	0.699	0.930	0.769
	Q33	0.868	0.753
	Q34	0.913	0.834
	Q36	0.888	0.789
关系强化(M) relationship enhancement	Q20	0.779	0.607
	Q19	0.865	0.748	0.880	0.710
	Q18	0.880	0.774
逃离动机(M) escaping motivation	Q17	0.624	0.389	0.714	0.561
	Q16	0.856	0.733

假设关系 assuming relationship	影响路径 impact path	路径系数 path factor	P	检验结果 inspection results
H1a	新奇动机(M)→旅游体验(S)	0.179	0.03	弱正向显著影响
H1b	隔离动机(M)→旅游体验(S)	-0.238	0.08	中等偏弱负向影响
H1c	关系强化(M)→旅游体验(S)	0.649	<0.001	中等偏强正向显著影响
H1d	逃离动机(M)→旅游体验(S)	0.362	<0.001	中等偏强正向显著影响
H2a	新奇动机(M)→满意度(O)	-0.072	0.35	弱负向影响
H2b	隔离动机(M)→满意度(O)	0.299	0.02	弱正向显著影响
H2c	关系强化(M)→满意度(O)	0.080	0.52	弱正向影响
H2d	逃离动机(M)→满意度(O)	-0.222	0.05	中等偏弱负向显著影响
H3a	新奇动机(M)→忠诚度(R)	0.045	0.51	弱正向影响
H3b	隔离动机(M)→忠诚度(R)	-0.078	0.43	弱负向影响
H3c	关系强化(M)→忠诚度(R)	0.052	0.60	弱正向影响
H3d	逃离动机(M)→忠诚度(R)	0.170	0.04	弱正向显著影响
H4	旅游体验(S)→满意度(O)	0.831	<0.001	强正向显著影响
H5	满意度(O)→忠诚度(R)	0.778	<0.001	强正向显著影响

An analysis of the disturbance mechanism of tourist destinations at the edge of world geological parks based on the MSOR theoretical model

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 37

Related Articles 5

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

[1]	WANG Yaoyi, WANG Hongxiang, WANG Yongqiang, ZENG Wenhao, YE Shaoming. Affecting factors analysis of functional diversity at different forest strata in an old growth forest community in Yachang Natural Reserve [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(5): 28-38.
[2]	SA Rula, WANG Zirui, HUA Yongchun, HU Richa, LIU Lei, GAO Minglong, YU Xiaoyu. Evaluating forest ecosystem restoration ability of natural forest in northern Greater Khingan Mountains by a structural equation model [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 196-204.
[3]	GAO Yu, LI Jing, LIU Yang, WU Yahan, GONG Jiaxing, XIN Qirui. Application of structural equation model in growth of Larix gmelinii stand [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(1): 38-46.
[4]	GUO Hongting, JI Xiaofang, WANG Cheng, ZOU Hanlu, WANG Liyan, JIANG Jiang. Spatial variability and influencing factors of plant diversity in the shrub layers of artificial forests in China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 144-152.
[5]	CHEN Yong, ZHU Xingyue, ZHANG ZhiguangNanjing Forestry University,Nangjing 210037,China). The Review of the Sustainable Development for Nature Reserves [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2003, 27(02): 79-83.