The difference of conductivity and pH value between healthy and pine wilt diseased woods of Pinus kesiya var.langbianensis

CHEN Yuhui, ZHAO Ning, NING Xialing, LIU Jiankui

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05) : 59-62.

PDF(581207 KB)
PDF(581207 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05) : 59-62. DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2010.05.013

The difference of conductivity and pH value between healthy and pine wilt diseased woods of Pinus kesiya var.langbianensis

  • CHEN Yuhui1, ZHAO Ning1, NING Xialing2, LIU Jiankui1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

In order to find a simple,fast and accurate method for detecting woods from the Simao pine(Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis) infected by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, the conductivity and pH value of the woods from the healthy and the diseased Simao pine were compared by physical methods in this paper. The results showed that the conductivities of the diseased and dead woods were significantly lower than that of the healthy plant. The conductivities of woods from 19 healthy plants were all higher than 45 μS/cm, those from 20 dead plants were all lower than 35 μS/cm. It was easy to distinguish the dead plants from the healthy plants by the wood conductivity. The average pH values of the diseased and dead woods were higher than that of the healthy woods. The pH values of the healthy woods were significantly different from that of the dead woods. The range of the pH value from the diseased and dead woods were much lager than that from the healthy woods. Therefore, the healthy woods could not be distinguished from the diseased wood by detecting pH value. The conductivity of stems from the 1.5yearold of Simao pine inoculated with B.xylophilus was gradually reduced as the development of disease symptom. The average conductivity of dead plant was reduced 71.8 %, comparing with the control. The pH value changed little as the development of disease symptom of inoculated plant, which was similar as the changes of pH value from infected and healthy wood in nature.

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHEN Yuhui, ZHAO Ning, NING Xialing, LIU Jiankui. The difference of conductivity and pH value between healthy and pine wilt diseased woods of Pinus kesiya var.langbianensis[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2010, 34(05): 59-62 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2010.05.013

References

[1]杨宝君,潘宏阳,汤坚,等. 松材线虫病[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2003. [2]赵立荣,廖金铃,钟国强. 松材线虫和拟松材线虫的PCR快速检测[J]. 华南农业大学学报,2005,26(2):59-61. [3]陈凤毛,叶建仁,汤坚,等. 应用PCR-RFLP技术鉴别松材线虫与拟松材线虫[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2006,30(4):5-9. [4]王玉嬿,舒朝然,李海燕,等. 松材线虫病木快速检疫技术的研究[J]. 林业科学,2000,36(5):59-62. [5]王玉嬿,李海燕,舒朝然,等. 几种松树松材线虫病木和健木pH值差异的研究[J]. 植物病理学报,2001,31(4):342-348. [6]王明旭,张志飞,罗宽,等. 松材线虫快速检测技术方法的比较研究[J]. 湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2004,30(3):239-242. [7]周平阳,李祖钦,刘宏屏,等. 云南省松材线虫病的发现与快速根除[J]. 植物检疫,2008,22(4):236-239. [8]徐福元,席客,徐刚,等. 不同龄级马尾松对松材线虫病抗性的探讨[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,1994,18(3):27-33. [9]王磊,章光新. 湿地缓冲带对氮磷营养元素的去除研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2006,25(增刊):649-652. [10]骆建霞,史燕山,张旭,等. 电导法对8种地被植物抗寒性的测定[J]. 天津农学院学报,2005,12(3):10-13. [11]顾可梁. 尿电导率测定及应用现状[J]. 检验医学,2008,23(4):442-443. [12]Gazineky E, Boege F. Urine screening with the UFseries analysis: the use of urine conductivity as a sannogate marker of urine osmolality and renal diuresis[J]. Sysmex J Imtern, 2002, 12(2): 76-78. [13]马黎明,胥勇,周平阳,等. 思茅松松材线虫病症状初步研究[J]. 中国森林病虫,2007,26(6):17-18,34. [14]Fukuda K, Hogetsu T, Suzuki K. Cavitation and cytological change in xylem of pine seedlings inoculated with virulent and avirulent isolates of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and B.mucronatus[J]. J Jan For Soc, 1992a, 74(4): 289-299.
PDF(581207 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/