Based on the investigation of willingness of farmer on Wongan county in Guizhou province, through the method of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), the satisfaction degree of every correlative behalf were discussed from different point in this paper. The key of the reformation of collective forest rights was pushing up to establish the system of management by family. Through the investigation in Wongan by participatory rural appraisal method, this paper analyzed the performance of reformation of collective forest rights, from the points of the farmer whether had the decision rights of management, the farmer’s attitude to the reformation, the inputs in the management of forest, and the demand of circulation of the forest land, etc. The results showed that through the reformation of collective forest rights, farmers got higher income and more labor hours were invested. Disputes of forest rights solved at the same time. However, farmers had some differences in the forest management and the forest land circulation, because of their differences in age, education and scale. In a short time, the increase of income was not so obviously, but to aspects liked largescale management, element marketing, circulation regulation and ecosystem compensation, more research work is needed.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]于杰. 关于我国森林资源产权制度改革的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2001. [2]温铁军. 农地制度安排与交易成本[J]. 读书,2004(9):105-111. [3]吴勇. 林权法律问题探究[J]. 中国林业,2003(10):41-42. [4]李延荣. 浅谈林权制度改革中的“林权”[J]. 法学杂志,2009(1):51-54. [5]张春霞. 乡村社会林业的发展与产权制度的改革——林业产权研究之五[J]. 林业经济问题,1995(2):9-14. [6]何俊,何丕坤. 参与式方法在集体林权制度改革中的应用思考[J]. 林业经济,2007(2):72-76. [7]张蕾,文彩云. 集体林权制度改革对农户生计的影响——基于江西、福建、辽宁和云南4省的实证研究[J]. 林业科学,2008,44(7):73-78. [8]朱冬亮,肖佳. 集体林权制度改革:制度实施与成效反思——以福建为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报:社会科学版,2007,24(3):81-91. [9]沈文星,吕祥熙. 集体林权流转制度的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(1):117-120. [10]刘璨. 改革开放30年中国集体林发展趋势分析[J]. 林业经济,2009(1):41-54.
PDF(651854 KB)
