Protection and utilization of landscape resources in mountainous scenic areas based on ecological security patterns

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202102002

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 178-186.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202102002

Previous Articles Next Articles

Protection and utilization of landscape resources in mountainous scenic areas based on ecological security patterns

TANG Xiaolan¹^,²(), WANG Yimei¹, ZHOU Kongfei¹

1. College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. Academy of Chinese Ecological Progress and Forestry Development Studies, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2021-02-01 Revised:2022-09-10 Online:2023-03-30 Published:2023-03-28

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 From the perspective of ecological security patterns, the study aimed at guiding the protection and utilization of landscape resources in mountainous scenic areas. 【Method】 Taking the Tianmu Mountain Scenic Area in Zhejiang Province as an example, based on the identification of ecological security patterns, ArcGIS geospatial analysis tools and the minimum cumulative resistance model (MCR), and ecological source and natural background conditions of the scenic area, this study constructed a research framework for the protection and utilization of landscape resources in mountainous scenic areas: “ Ecological Source Diagnosis-Security Pattern Identification-Ideal Source Extraction-Protection and Utilization Strategy”.【Result】 The comprehensive ecological security pattern of the scenic areas was constructed through the analysis and identification of the safety patterns of rainwater security, biological protection, cultural heritage protection and geological disasters in the study area. Furthermore, 37 ideal scenic points were finally extracted on the basis of the existing scenery resources in the scenic area, including 32 natural scenic points and five cultural scenic points, combined with the analysis, extraction, and superposition of the natural geographical features of the ideal scenery sources.【Conclusion】 This study proposes a strategy for the protection and utilization of landscape resources in mountainous scenic areas based on the ecological security pattern, the results provide a reference for ecological protection and scenic areas construction related to the mountainous environments.

Key words: mountainous scenic area, landscape resource, ecological security pattern, ArcGIS, Tianmu Mountain Scenic Area in Zhejiang Province

CLC Number:

TU986

TANG Xiaolan, WANG Yimei, ZHOU Kongfei. Protection and utilization of landscape resources in mountainous scenic areas based on ecological security patterns[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(2): 178-186.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 2

Fig.6

Table 3

Fig.7

References 21

[1]	周维权. 中国名山风景区[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1996.
	ZHOU W Q. China famous mountain scenic spots[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1996.
[2]	俞孔坚, 王思思, 李迪华, 等. 北京市生态安全格局及城市增长预景[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3):1189-1204.
	YU K J, WANG S S, LI D H, et al. The function of ecological security patterns as an urban growth framework in Beijing[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29(3):1189-1204.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.03.015.
[3]	胡善风, 朱红兵. 山岳型遗产地旅游可持续发展研究:以黄山风景区为例[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 27(1):1-6.
	HU S F, ZHU H B. Research on sustainable development of mountain heritage site tourism: a case study of Huangshan Mountain[J]. J Hefei Univ Technol (Soc Sci), 2013, 27(1):1-6.
[4]	李仁杰, 路紫, 李继峰. 山岳型风景区观光线路景观感知敏感度计算方法:以武安国家地质公园奇峡谷景区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(2):244-256.
	LI R J, LU Z, LI J F. The calculation method of landscape perception sensitivity on sightseeing route in ecotourism destinations:a case study of Qixiagu Scenic Region in Wu’an National Geopark[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2011, 66(2):244-256.
[5]	马珂伟. 陕南地区山岳型自然风景区游客服务中心生态适应性研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2018.
	MA K W. Study on the ecological adaptability of the tourist service center of the mountain natural scenic area in the southern part of Shaanxi Province[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2018.
[6]	王国玉, 白伟岚. 风景名胜区生态敏感性评价研究与实践进展[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(2):87-91.
	WANG G Y, BAI W L. Research and practice progress in ecological sensitivity evaluation of scenic spot[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2019, 35(2):87-91.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2019.02.017.
[7]	张蜜, 陈存友, 胡希军. 苍南县玉苍山风景区生态敏感性评价[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(4):92-100,150.
	ZHANG M, CHEN C Y, HU X J. GIS-based evaluation of ecological sensitivity of Yucang Mountain scenic spot in Cangnan County[J]. For Resour Manag, 2019(4):92-100, 150.DOI:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.04.014.
[8]	李佳. 生态敏感性评价技术在山岳型风景名胜区规划中的应用研究:以河南林州市林虑山为例[J]. 中国名城, 2020(3):69-73.
	LI J. The application of ecological sensitivity evaluation technology in the planning of mountain scenic spots:taking Linlü Mountain in Linzhou City,Henan Province as an example[J]. China Anc City, 2020(3):69-73.DOI:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2020.03.011.
[9]	CARO T. Focal species[J]. Conserv Biol, 2000, 14(6):1569-1570.DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.01462-3.x.
[10]	OPDAM P, VERBOOM J, POUWELS R. Landscape cohesion:an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity[J]. Landsc Ecol, 2003, 18(2):113-126.DOI:10.1023/A:1024429715253.
[11]	BROOKS T, KENNEDY E. Conservation biology:biodiversity barometers[J]. Nature, 2004, 431(7012):1046-1047.DOI:10.1038/4311046a.
[12]	LAMBECK R. Lambeck R J. Focal species:a multi species umbrella for nature conservation[J]. Conserv Biol, 1997, 11(4):849-856.
[13]	王翊丞, 盛旭峰. 梦游天姥生态福地[J]. 浙江林业, 2021(3):36-37.
	WANG Y C, SHENG X F. Sleepwalking in Tianmu, ecological blessed land[J]. Zhejiang Forestry, 2021(3):36-37.
[14]	涂丽梅, 阳莉君. 浅谈野生穿山甲的保护现状与研究[J]. 吉林畜牧兽医, 2019, 40(5):74-75.
	TU L M, YANG L J. Protection status and research of wild pangolin[J]. Jilin Animal Husb Vet Med, 2019, 40(5):74-75.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2078.2019.05.040.
[15]	吴诗宝, 刘廼发, 马广智, 等. 大雾岭保护区穿山甲冬季生境选择[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(6):1079-1086.
	WU S B, LIU N F, MA G Z, et al. Studies on habitat selection by Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) in winter in Dawuling Natural Reserve[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2003, 23(6):1079-1086.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2003.06.007.
[16]	俞孔坚. 北京市浅山区土地利用战略研究[R]. 北京:北京大学, 2010-02-05.
	YU K J. Research on land use strategy in shallow mountain district of Beijing[R]. Beijing: Peking University, 2010-02-05.
[17]	马坤, 唐晓岚, 王奕文, 等. 小尺度丘陵山地风景区游览路线的规划与优化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(1):163-170.
	MA K, TANG X L, WANG Y W, et al. Planning and optimization of small-scale mountain landscape sightseeing routes[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(1):163-170.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811022.
[18]	王云才, 郭娜, 彭震伟. 基于湖泊整体保护的区域生态网络格局构建研究:以沈阳卧龙湖生态区保护规划为例[J]. 中国园林, 2013, 29(7):107-112.
	WANG Y C, GUO N, PENG Z W. The study on the construction of the regional pattern for ecological security based on the integrated protection of the lake: a case study of Wolong Lake in Shenyang[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2013, 29(7):107-112.
[19]	戴冰武, 曾丽婷, 韩西丽. 基于生态安全格局的风景区游览线路最低成本路径选线:以湖南省平江县福桶山景区为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2015, 30(1):97-103.
	DAI B W, ZENG L T, HAN X L. Lowest cost path selection of scenic tour route based on ecological security pattern: a case study of Pingjiang Baishui Lake Futong Hill Scenic Spot,Hunan[J]. Mod Urban Res, 2015, 30(1):97-103.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2015.01.018.
[20]	方莹, 王静, 黄隆杨, 等. 基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态保护修复关键区域诊断与识别:以烟台市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1):190-203.
	FANG Y, WANG J, HUANG L Y, et al. Determining and identifying key areas of ecosystem preservation and restoration for territorial spatial planning based on ecological security patterns:a case study of Yantai City[J]. J Nat Resour, 2020, 35(1):190-203.DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200116.
[21]	肖华斌, 安淇, 盛硕, 等. 基于生态风险空间识别的城市山体生态修复与分类保护策略研究:以济南市西部新城为例[J]. 中国园林, 2020, 36(7):43-47.
	XIAO H B, AN Q, SHENG S, et al. Research on urban mountain ecological restoration and classified protection strategies based on spatial identification of ecological risk:taking the west new district of Jinan City as an example[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2020, 36(7):43-47.DOI:10.19775/j.cla.2020.07.0043.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

项目 item	生物栖息地适宜性 suitability of biological habitat			项目 item	物种迁徙的阻力因子 resistance factor ranking
项目 item	权重 weight	评价因子 factor	分级 grade	项目 item	权重 weight	评价因子 factor	分级 grade
土地覆被类型 land cover type		水域	1	土地覆盖类型 land cover type	0.50	建设用地	9
	0.40	草地	2			旱地	7
		林地	3			裸地	5
坡度/(°) slope		0~15	1			水域	4
	0.25	≥15~30	2			草地	2
		≥30~60	3			林地	1
高程/m altitude	0.20	0~300	1	坡度/(°) slope	0.30	0~15	3
		≥300~500	2			≥15~30	2
		≥500	3			≥30~60	1
坡向 aspect	0.15	北坡	1	高程/m altitude	0.20	0~300	3
		东坡、东北坡、西北坡、西坡	2			≥300~500	2
		东南坡、南坡、西南坡	3			≥500	1

项目 item	权重 weight	评价因子 factor	分级 grade
土地覆盖类型 land cover type		林地	5
		草地	4
	0.40	建设用地	3
		旱地、裸地	2
		水域	1
坡度/(°) slope		0~15	5
		≥15~25	4
	0.60	≥25~35	3
		≥35~45	2
		≥45	1

自然因素natural factor	特征描述characteristic
高程altitude	山脊空间具有较强的中心性和标志性,视通性最高,视域开阔,视阈空间呈发散状
坡度slope	结合国际地理学会划分的坡度等级,进一步选择坡度等级在0°~15°之间的平坡地、缓坡地和中坡地为最佳坡度
坡向aspect	以正北方向为0°,按顺时针方向0~360°计算,考虑到日照时长和通风条件,以 157.5°~202.5°,即南南西—南南东方向为最佳坡向
生态安全格局 ecological security pattern	为避免受到地质灾害的影响以及对雨洪安全区、生物栖息地、景观资源的潜在破坏,保护天姥山风景区的景观生态安全,风景点需避开低安全水平格局

Protection and utilization of landscape resources in mountainous scenic areas based on ecological security patterns

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 21

Related Articles 8

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

[1]	ZHANG Yiting, XIA Nianhe, LIN Shuyan, DING Yulong. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of Chimonobambusa in China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(2): 107-114.
[2]	TANG Xiaolan, CHEN Yalin, CHEN Qing, SONG Tianrui. Construction of natural landscape system in Jiangsu Province based on spatial distribution characteristics and ecological space identification [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(5): 156-164.
[3]	LUAN Chunfeng, GUO Xinran. Research on land use conflict identification from the perspective of ecological security pattern [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 156-164.
[4]	GUO Tianwei, LU Chunfeng, WANG Junxiao, LIU Ruicheng, ZHOU Shenglu. Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern based on the coupling of ecological-production-living spaces: taking Yangzhou City as an example [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(5): 133-142.
[5]	WU Zhen, WANG Wei, WANG Hao. Comprehensive evaluation of landscape resources in hydrographic net region of southern Jiangsu Province based on GIS [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(04): 202-208.
[6]	HAN Yangyang, WANG Yan, XIANG Yang, YE Jianren. Prediction of potential distribution of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in China based on Maxent ecological niche model [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(01): 6-10.
[7]	Wang Xiaojun. A PRELIMINARY APPROACH TO LANDSCAPE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN CHINA [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 1992, 16(03): 70-76.
[8]	Lu Zhaosu, Yu Guobao & Zhang Zhiqiang(Nanjing Institute of Forestry)Wu Jinglei, Zhao Renshou, Zhu Naiwen & Ren Baoshan. THE DYNAMICS OF THE SCENIC FOREST OF THE ZIJIN MOUNTAIN AND THE MANAGEMENT CONCERNED [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 1985, 9(03): 1-12.