Spatial characteristics analysis of rural landscape values based on residents’ perceptions

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202110034

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 207-216.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202110034

Previous Articles Next Articles

Spatial characteristics analysis of rural landscape values based on residents’ perceptions

TAN Shizhu(), HUANG Yingying, ZHENG Yejing, SHEN Yamei, WU Xiaohua, TAO Yizhou, XU Bin, YAN Shaojun()

College of Landscape Architecture and Architecture, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China

Received:2021-10-17 Revised:2022-05-12 Online:2023-05-30 Published:2023-05-25
Contact: YAN Shaojun E-mail:1312894631@qq.com;shaojunyan@zafu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objectives】 This research aims to analyze rural landscape issues from the perspective of residents,and to provide a reference for rural landscape suitability evaluations and management decisions. 【Method】 Using Baizhang Town in Hangzhou as an example, we used a combination of semi-closed structure questionnaires, semi-structured interviews and participatory mapping to survey 468 residents on rural landscape value perceptions. SPSS correlation analysis was then used to explore correlations between demographic characteristic variables and rural landscape values, whilst PPGIS was used to identify eight rural landscape value spatial patterns and to subsequently construct sensitivity and compatibility models to further reveal spatial characteristics of the landscape. 【Result】 (1) The five demographic characteristic variables of age, income, education, occupation and residence time were correlated with several rural landscape values, whereas the gender was not correlated with rural landscape values. (2) The eight rural landscape values were spatially distributed in a patchy pattern, mainly surrounding residential villages, attractions with high cultural values, and activity concentration areas to spread outward. (3) Areas with high sensitivity values were correlated with village settlements and production areas, linked to the distribution of landscape resources, production and living needs, and environmental psychological factors. (4) The compatibility analysis identified four landscape attitude type areas, influenced by the spatial distribution of rural landscape values and the attitudes of residents. 【Conclusion】 The spatial layout of the perceived landscape values of residents was inseparable from the residents’ daily life and production activities, whilst having a certain regularity. Within the region, the mixed turnover of positive and negative landscape values also indicated the complexity of the spatial compound of multiple values on the competition for willingness to use. PPGIS can provide an effective method for revealing the spatial characteristics of the perceived values of rural landscapes from the residents’ perspective, alongside potential problems.

Key words: rural landscape, residents’ perception, rural landscape value, Baizhang Town, Hangzhou

CLC Number:

TU985
X37

TAN Shizhu, HUANG Yingying, ZHENG Yejing, SHEN Yamei, WU Xiaohua, TAO Yizhou, XU Bin, YAN Shaojun. Spatial characteristics analysis of rural landscape values based on residents’ perceptions[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 207-216.

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Fig. 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 4

Fig. 4

References 35

[1]	叶洁楠, 王浩, 杲恬恬. 乡村振兴背景下文化传承型乡村景观的存续与发展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(2):19-25.
	YE J N, WANG H, GAO T T. Maintenance and development of cultural heritage in rural landscape construction under the background of rural revitalization[J]. J Northwest A&F Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2021, 21(2):19-25.DOI:10.13968/j.cnki.1009-9107.2021.02.03.
[2]	吴志才, 张凌媛, 郑钟强, 等. 旅游场域中古城旅游社区的空间生产研究:基于列斐伏尔的空间生产理论视角[J]. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(12):86-97.
	WU Z C, ZHANG L Y, ZHENG Z Q, et al. The production of space within the field of tourism: a case study of the tourism community of Chaozhou ancient city[J]. Tour Tribune, 2019, 34(12):86-97.DOI:10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2019.12.011.
[3]	ZUBE E H. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values[J]. Landsc Ecol, 1987, 1(1):37-45.DOI:10.1007/BF02275264.
[4]	VAN RIPER C J, KYLE G T, SUTTON S G, et al. Mapping outdoor recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park,Australia[J]. Appl Geogr, 2012, 35(1/2):164-173.DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.008.
[5]	YUNG L, FREIMUND W, BELSKY J. The politics of place:understanding meaning,common ground,and political difference on the Rocky Mountain Front[J]. For Sci, 2003, 49:855-866.DOI:10.1093/forestscience/49.6.855.
[6]	BROWN G. Mapping landscape values and development preferences:a method for tourism and residential development planning[J]. Int J Tour Res, 2006, 8(2):101-113.DOI:10.1002/jtr.562.
[7]	BROWN G, REED P. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning[J]. For Sci, 2000, 46(2):240-247.DOI:10.1093/forestscience/46.2.240.
[8]	戴代新, 谢民. 公众参与地理信息系统在风景园林规划中的应用[J]. 风景园林, 2016(7):98-104.
	DAI D X, XIE M. The application of public participation geographic information systems in landscape architecture[J]. Landsc Archit, 2016(7):98-104.DOI:10.14085/j.fjyl.2016.07.0098.07.
[9]	ZHU X, PFUELLER S, WHITELAW P, et al. Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River region of Victoria, Australia[J]. Environ Manage, 2010, 45(5):896-911. DOI:10.1007/s00267-010-9462-x.
[10]	刘阳, 赵振斌. 居民主体视角下民族旅游社区多群体冲突的空间特征及形成机制:以西江千户苗寨为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(7):2086-2101.
	LIU Y, ZHAO Z B. The spatial characteristics and formation mechanism of multi-group conflicts in ethnic tourism community from the perspective of residents: a case study of Xijiang Qianhu Miao Village[J]. Geogr Res, 2021, 40(7):2086-2101.DOI:10.11821/dlyj020200735.
[11]	BROWN G, RAYMOND C M. Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2014, 122:196-208.DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007.
[12]	郭晓彤, 韩锋. 欧洲乡村景观价值解读与评估方法对中国的启示[J]. 中国园林, 2021, 37(1):110-115.
	GUO X T, HAN F. Case study on reading and assessment methods of rural landscape in Europe[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2021, 37(1):110-115.DOI:10.19775/j.cla.2021.01.0110.
[13]	张琳, 马椿栋. 基于人居环境三元理论的乡村景观游憩价值研究[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(9):25-29.
	ZHANG L, MA C D. On the value of rural landscape recreation based on the trilism theory of human settlements[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2019, 35(9):25-29.DOI:10.19775/j.cla.2019.09.0025.
[14]	李小永, 张铖, 赵振斌, 等. 社区旅游开发项目的景观价值相容性研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(11):196-201.
	LI X Y, ZHANG C, ZHAO Z B, et al. Landscape value compatibility of community tourism development projects[J]. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 2020, 34(11):196-201.DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.319.
[15]	陈诚, 赵振斌, 黄燕. 西部乡村旅游社区社会景观敏感度分析:以甘南郎木寺镇为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(5):899-912.
	CHEN C, ZHAO Z B, HUANG Y. Social landscape sensitivity analysis of western tourism community:a case study of Langmusi Town in Gannan[J]. Geogr Res, 2017, 36(5):899-912.DOI:10.11821/dlyj201705008.
[16]	BIEDENWEG K, WILLIAMS K, CERVENY L, et al. Is recreation a landscape value?:exploring underlying values in landscape values mapping[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2019, 185:24-27.DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.12.005.
[17]	陈幺, 赵振斌, 张铖, 等. 遗址保护区乡村居民景观价值感知与态度评价:以汉长安城遗址保护区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(10):1971-1980.
	CHEN Y, ZHAO Z B, ZHANG C, et al. Landscape value perception and attitude evaluation of community residents on historical protection area:a case study of Han Chang’an City Historical Site[J]. Geogr Res, 2015, 34(10):1971-1980.DOI:10.11821/dlyj201510014.
[18]	李小永, 赵振斌, 李佳乐, 等. 居民视角下民族社区旅游化的空间演变过程及特征:以肇兴侗寨为例[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(5):1051-1064.
	LI X Y, ZHAO Z B, LI J L, et al. Spatial evolution and characteristics of tourismization in ethnic community from the perspective of residents:a case of the Zhaoxing Dong Village[J]. Resour Sci, 2021, 43(5):1051-1064.DOI:10.18402/resci.2021.05.17.
[19]	麦琪·罗. 《欧洲风景公约》:关于“文化景观”的一场思想革命[J]. 韩锋,徐青,译.中国园林, 2007, 23(11):10-15.
	MAGGIE R. The European landscape convention: a revolution in thinking about ‘Cultural Landscapes’[J]. HAN F,XU Q,translate.Chin Landsc Archit, 2007, 23(11):10-15.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2007.11.004.
[20]	黄江松, 鹿春江, 徐唯燊. 基于马斯洛需求理论构建宜居城市指标体系及对北京的宜居评价[J]. 城市发展研究, 2018, 25(5):89-93.
	HUANG J S, LU C J, XU W S. Building livable city index system based on the Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory and evaluating the livable level of Beijing[J]. Urban Dev Stud, 2018, 25(5):89-93.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2018.05.013.
[21]	刘滨谊, 陈鹏. 乡村人居环境风貌评价与优化[J]. 中国城市林业, 2020, 18(6):1-8.
	LIU B Y, CHEN P. Evaluation and optimization of rural landscape features based on the science of human settlements[J]. J Chin Urban For, 2020, 18(6):1-8.DOI:10.12169/zgcsly.2020.10.10.0001.
[22]	胡畔, 谢晖, 王兴平. 乡村基本公共服务设施均等化内涵与方法:以南京市江宁区江宁街道为例[J]. 城市规划, 2010, 34(7):28-33.
	HU P, XIE H, WANG X P. Connotation and method of public facilities equalization in rural areas:with Jiangning street of Jiangning District in Nanjing as an example[J]. City Plan Rev, 2010, 34(7):28-33.
[23]	孔祥智, 卢洋啸. 建设生态宜居美丽乡村的五大模式及对策建议:来自5省20村调研的启示[J]. 经济纵横, 2019(1):19-28.
	KONG X Z, LU Y X. Five models for constructing ecologically livable beautiful countryside and countermeasures: inspiration from surveys in 5 provinces and 20 villages[J]. Econ Rev J, 2019(1):19-28.DOI:10.16528/j.cnki.22-1054/f.201901019.
[24]	GROBELNA A, MARCISZEWSKA B. Measurement of service quality in the hotel sector:the case of northern Poland[J]. J Hosp Market Manag, 2013, 22(3):313-332.DOI:10.1080/19368623.2013.753816.
[25]	钟美玲, 唐勇, 王尧树, 等. 都江堰“熊猫谷”景观游憩价值感知评价研究[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(1):119-124.
	ZHONG M L, TANG Y, WANG Y S, et al. Assessing the landscapes’ recreational value of the “Pandas Valley”,Dujiangyan Sichuan,P.R. China[J]. Ecol Econ, 2019, 35(1):119-124.
[26]	俞孔坚. 景观敏感度与阀值评价研究[J]. 地理研究, 1991, 10(2):38-51.
	YU K J. Assessment of landscape sensitivity and impact resistability:with a case study of Wangxiangyan Canyon in south Mt.Taihang[J]. Geogr Res, 1991, 10(2):38-51.
[27]	BROWN G, WEBER D, DE BIE K. Assessing the value of public lands using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and social landscape metrics[J]. Appl Geogr, 2014, 53:77-89.DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.006.
[28]	BROWN G, REED P. Values compatibility analysis:using public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) for decision support in national forest management[J]. Appl Spatial Anal Policy, 2012, 5(4):317-332.DOI:10.1007/s12061-011-9072-x.
[29]	王兆峰, 向秋霜. 景观感知和地方依恋对居民文化补偿认知的影响与分异[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(5):220-229.
	WANG Z F, XIANG Q S. The effect and differentiation of landscape perception and place attachment on the residents’ cognition towards cultural compensation[J]. Econ Geogr, 2020, 40(5):220-229.DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.05.024.
[30]	NUNKOO R, GURSOY D. Residents’ support for tourism[J]. Ann Tour Res, 2012, 39(1):243-268.DOI:10.1016/j.annals.2011.05.006.
[31]	JACKSON M S, INBAKARAN R J. Evaluating residents’ attitudes and intentions to act towards tourism development in regional Victoria,Australia[J]. Int J Tour Res, 2006, 8(5):355-366.DOI:10.1002/jtr.584.
[32]	BROWN G, BRABYN L. The extrapolation of social landscape values to a national level in New Zealand using landscape character classification[J]. Appl Geogr, 2012, 35(1/2):84-94.DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.002.
[33]	任凯, 阳建强. 基于空间生产-生态辩证关系的乡村景观建构:基于晋西北传统村镇的观察[J]. 现代城市研究, 2019, 34(9):26-33.
	REN K, YANG J Q. Construction of rural landscape based on spatial production: ecological dialectic relationship:a case study of traditional towns in northwest of Shanxi Province[J]. Mod Urban Res, 2019, 34(9):26-33.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2019.09.004.
[34]	孙全胜. 论马克思“空间正义”的理论形态[J]. 内蒙古社会科学, 2021, 42(3):39-47.
	SUN Q S. On the theoretical form of Marx’s Space Justice[J]. Inn Mong Soc Sci, 2021, 42(3):39-47.DOI:10.14137/j.cnki.issn1003-5281.2021.03.006.
[35]	TZANAVARIS S. Graphical representation of the movements of motives of consciousness in Leontyev’s activity theory[J]. Integr Psychol Behav Sci, 2021:1-15.DOI:10.1007/s12124-021-09629-5.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

乡村景观价值类型 rural landscape value type	价值内涵 value connotation
农业生产价值 value of agricultural production	提供劳动生产、农事劳动、农作物保障的地方
生活保障价值 value of life protection	保障居民正常生活的地方
生态环境价值 eco-environmental value	生态环境良好、自然资源丰富的地方
情感联系价值 emotional connection value	具有归属感、儿时记忆、认同感、精神信仰等特殊期情感的地方
历史文化价值 historical and cultural value	具有历史遗迹,体现传统文化、地方风俗的地方
休闲娱乐价值 recreational value	能够使人放松身体、心情愉悦的地方
观赏美学价值 ornamental aesthetic value	风景优美的地方
经济产业价值 economic industry value	为人提供收入或者就业机会的地方

基本情况 basic facts	类别 type	比例/% proportion	基本情况 basic facts	类别 type	比例/% proportion
性别 gender	男	48.8	年龄/a age	<18	5.5
	女	51.2		18~29	15.9
受教育程度 education level	小学及以下	30.4		30~44	18.0
	初中	26.3		45~59	25.1
	高中或中专	20.8		≥60	35.5
	大专或本科	16.6	月收入水平/元 monthly income level	<1 000	30.4
	硕士及以上	5.5		1 000~3 000	16.7
	缺失	0.3		3 001~5 000	11.7
职业 career	农民	40.1		5 001~7 000	17.6
	工人	19.7		7 001~10 000	14.5
	商人	9.7		>10 000	9.1
	学生	9.0	居住时间/a length of residence	<10	4.2
	离退休人员	2.8		10~30	22.1
	其他	18.7		31~50	30.1
				≥50	43.6

乡村景观价值类型 rural landscape value types	居民感知内容 resident perception content	数量 quantity	景观价值因子均值 mean value of landscape value factor	相容系数 compatibility factor
农业生产价值(APV) value of agricultural production	农田、菜地、有水方便灌溉、种田务农、出租农田、种树、承包等	347	3.12	0.12
生活保障价值(LPV) value of life protection	医院、村委、政府、公交车、水泥路、学校、文化礼堂、养老等	433	2.90	-0.10
生态环境价值(EEV) eco-environmental value	空气好、水库、树多、有水、地势高的地方生态好、政府的工作等	708	4.17	1.17
情感联系价值(ECV) emotional connection value	小时候玩的地方、上小学、家、民俗活动,即在这里长大、读书、参加民俗节庆活动等	501	2.86	-0.14
历史文化价值(HCV) historical and cultural value	历史悠久,民间传说、新四军事迹等	493	3.34	0.34
休闲娱乐价值(RV) recreational value	散步、聊天、玩手机、打牌、跳广场舞等	498	3.05	0.05
观赏美学价值(OAV) ornamental aesthetic value	映山红(观花)、看星空、古树、寺、环境好等	508	3.31	0.31
经济产业价值(EIV) economic industry value	工厂、店铺、农家乐、民宿、竹产业和乡镇工厂发展势微、传统经济不景气等	432	2.58	-0.42

变量 variables	农业生产价值 APV	历史文化价值 HCV	生活保障价值 LPV	情感联系价值 ECV	休闲娱乐价值 RV	生态环境价值 EEV	观赏美学价值 OAV	经济产业价值 EIV
性别 gender	-0.004	0.018	0.031	-0.017	0.045	0.041	0.012	0.004
年龄 age	0.176^**	0.201^**	0.192^**	0.228^**	0.065	0.007	0.056	0.090
月收入水平 monthly income level	-0.116^*	-0.068	-0.118^*	0.057	-0.138^*	0.044	0.091	0.152^**
受教育程度 education level	-0.065	0.149^*	-0.332^**	0.020	-0.299^**	-0.005	0.141^*	-0.293^**
职业 career	-0.352^**	-0.030	-0.107	-0.070	0.019	-0.072	0.102	-0.065
居住时间 length of residence	0.075	0.310^**	0.086	0.424^**	0.047	-0.002	0.053	0.109

Spatial characteristics analysis of rural landscape values based on residents’ perceptions

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 35

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer