Effects of canopy micro-environment on fruit yield and quality characteristics of Sapindus mukorossi

ZHANG Yunqi, LIU Chen, LIU Yang, YE Changqi, ZHANG Meng, JIA Liming, HAO Yanbin, SU Shuchai

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 189-198.

PDF(5018 KB)
PDF(5018 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 189-198. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202001031

Effects of canopy micro-environment on fruit yield and quality characteristics of Sapindus mukorossi

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】Fruit yield and quality characteristics are closely related to the canopy micro-environment, but the specific relationships have been unclear. Analyzing the relationship between micro-environmental factors and fruit characteristics can reveal the effect of the canopy micro-environmental factors on Sapindus mukorossi fruit characteristics, and provide a theoretical basis and technical information for optimization of canopy structure and the construction of favorable micro-environments. 【Method】In this study, in Jianning County of Fujian Province, 10-year-old S. mukorossi trees with a stable fruiting stage were chosen as test samples. The whole of the natural round-head canopy was divided into 144 small measuring areas. During the whole growing period from May to October in 2017, the canopy micro-environmental factors were measured monthly in these areas. The fruit yield and quality characteristics were determined immediately after harvest. Based on the measured values of micro-environmental factors and fruit yield in different parts of the canopy, 3D distribution maps were drawn. According to the distance from the trunk and the vertical stratification of the canopy, the small measuring areas were grouped into nine different canopy areas, and the significant differences in micro-environmental factors and fruit characteristics were analyzed. The correlations between micro-environmental factors and fruit characteristics in different vertical layers were also analyzed, and the regression models of fruit characteristics were established. Finally, the micro-environmental conditions for the high fruit yield and quality were assessed. 【Result】① Within the canopy from inside to outside and from bottom to top, the average temperature in the growing season increased by 0.3 and 1.5 ℃, respectively; the average photosynthetically active radiation of the growing season increased by 330.76 and 463.53 μmol/(m 2·s), respectively; the average relative humidity of growing season decreased by 1.1% and 3.0%, respectively. The ratio of fruit yield of the lower, middle and upper layers was 8:17:75, and that of the inner, middle and peripheral layers was 24:32:44. The differences in the micro-environment and fruit yield in the horizontal direction were obviously smaller than that in the vertical direction. Fruits were mainly distributed in the periphery and upper layer. ② There were significant differences in the fruit number, fresh fruit yield, dry fruit yield, the water content of the fruit, single dried fruit weight and oil yield in nine canopy areas, but there were no significant differences in the dried aril content ratio, the dried seed content ratio, the kernel content of the dried seed, and the oil content of the kernel. ③ Fruit yields, the kernel content of the dried seed, and the oil yield all had significant positive correlations with temperature and photosynthetically active radiation, but a significant negative correlation with relative humidity. Photosynthetically active radiation had the greatest impact on fruit yield and quality, followed by temperature and relative humidity. ④ From the single factor regression models, it was deduced that suitable micro-environmental conditions for high fruit yield and quality are: temperature between 28-30 ℃, relative humidity no more than 74%, and photosynthetically active radiation between 830-1 203 μmol/(m 2·s). ⑤Multivariate regression models were suitable for the S. mukorossi fruit and oil yield prediction with a natural round-head canopy. 【Conclusion】The synergistic effect of micro-environmental factors greatly influences fruit yield and quality characteristics of S. mukorossi. The fruit characteristics in the central and lower layers are strongly affected by the micro-environment, so the improvement of the micro-environment of the middle and lower layers through horticultural measures based on the canopy structures and fruit-bearing habits can improve fruit characteristics.

Key words

Sapindus mukorossi / micro-environmental factors / fruit characteristics / regression models

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Yunqi , LIU Chen , LIU Yang , et al . Effects of canopy micro-environment on fruit yield and quality characteristics of Sapindus mukorossi[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2020, 44(5): 189-198 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202001031

References

[1]
CHEN Y H, CHIANG T H, CHEN J H . Properties of soapnut (Sapindus mukorossi) oil biodiesel and its blends with diesel[J]. Biomass Bioenerg, 2013,52:15-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.025.
[2]
国家林业局. 全国林业生物质能源发展规划(2011-2020年)[Z].北京: 2013.
The State Forestry Administration of China. National forestry biomass energy development plan for 2011-2020[Z].Beijing: 2013.
[3]
张大鹏 . 叶幕微气候及其调控生物学研究中的基本概念和内涵[J]. 葡萄栽培与酿酒, 1993(2):1-4.
ZHANG D P . Basic concepts and connotations in the study of canopy microclimate and its regulatory biology[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine Wine, 1993(2):1-4. DOI: 10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.1993.02.001.
[4]
JOHNSON D S, RIDOUT M S. Effects on the quality of stored apple fruit[C]//SHEWFELT R L,BRÜCKNER B. Fruit and vegetable quality: an integrated view. Lancaster: Technomic Publishing, 2000: 67-84.
[5]
DOKOOZLIAN N K, KLIEWER W M . The light environment within grapevine canopies: I.Description and seasonal changes during fruit development[J]. Am J Enol Vitic, 1995,46(2):209-218.
[6]
MARTIN D, GROSE C, FEDRIZZI B , et al. Grape cluster microclimate influences the aroma composition of Sauvignon Blanc wine[J]. Food Chem, 2016,210:640-647. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.010.
[7]
MIKA A, BULER Z, TREDER W , et al. Relationship between fruit distribution within ‘Jonagold’ apple canopy,fruit quality and illumination[J]. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res, 2002,10:75-84.
[8]
ZHANG J J, SERRA S, S LEISSO R , et al. Effect of light microclimate on the quality of ‘d’Anjou’ pears in mature open-centre tree architecture[J]. Biosyst Eng, 2016,141:1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.11.002.
[9]
GULLO G, MOTISI A, ZAPPIA R , et al. Rootstock and fruit canopy position affect peach[Prunus persica (L.) Batsch](cv.Rich May) plant productivity and fruit sensorial and nutritional quality[J]. Food Chem, 2014,153:234-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.056.
[10]
WEN Y, SU S C, ZHANG H C . Effects of canopy microclimate on Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima Blume) nut yield and quality[J]. Forests, 2020,11(1):97. DOI: 10.3390/f11010097.
[11]
MA W C Y, WANG Y W N . Effects of canopy microclimate on fruit yield and quality of Camellia oleifera[J]. Sci Hortic, 2018,235:132-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.042.
[12]
LANDSBERG J J, GOWER S T . Canopy architecture and microclimate[M] //Applications of Physiological Ecology to Forest Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997: 51-88. DOI: 10.1016/b978-012435955-0/50003-0.
[13]
MINAS I S, TANOU G, MOLASSIOTIS A . Environmental and orchard bases of peach fruit quality[J]. Sci Hortic, 2018,235:307-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.028.
[14]
魏钦平, 王丽琴, 杨德勋 , 等. 相对光照度对富士苹果品质的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 1997,18(5):12-14.
WEI Q P, WANG L Q, YANG D X , et al. Effect of relative light intensity on fruit quality of “Fuji apple”[J]. Chin J Agrometeorology, 1997,18(5):12-14.
[15]
MURAKAMI K, MATSUDA R, FUJIWARA K . Light-induced systemic regulation of photosynjournal in primary and trifoliate leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris:effects of photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) versus spectrum[J]. Plant Biol, 2014,16(1):16-21. DOI: 10.1111/plb.12055.
[16]
GAO Y, GAO S L, JIA L M , et al. Canopy characteristics and light distribution in Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn.are influenced by crown architecture manipulation in the hilly terrain of southeast China[J]. Sci Hortic, 2018,240:11-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.05.034.
[17]
HARDWICK S R, TOUMI R, PFEIFER M , et al. The relationship between leaf area index and microclimate in tropical forest and oil palm plantation:forest disturbance drives changes in microclimate[J]. Agric For Meteorol, 2015,201:187-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.11.010.
Land use change is a major threat to biodiversity. One mechanism by which land use change influences biodiversity and ecological processes is through changes in the local climate. Here, the relationships between leaf area index and five climate variables - air temperature, relative humidity, vapour pressure deficit, specific humidity and soil temperature - are investigated across a range of land use types in Borneo, including primary tropical forest, logged forest and oil palm plantation. Strong correlations with the leaf area index are found for the mean daily maximum air and soil temperatures, the mean daily maximum vapour pressure deficit and the mean daily minimum relative humidity. Air beneath canopies with high leaf area index is cooler and has higher relative humidity during the day. Forest microclimate is also found to be less variable for sites with higher leaf area indices. Primary forest is found to be up to 2.5 degrees C cooler than logged forest and up to 6.5 degrees C cooler than oil palm plantations. Our results indicate that leaf area index is a useful parameter for predicting the effects of vegetation upon microclimate, which could be used to make small scale climate predictions based on remotely sensed data.
[18]
GARRATT J . Review:the atmospheric boundary layer[J]. Earth-Sci Rev, 1994,37(1/2):89-134. DOI: 10.1016/0012-8252(94)90026-4.
[19]
WILLIAMS-LINERA G, DOMÍNGUEZ-GASTELÚ V, GARCÍA-ZURITA M E . Microenvironment and floristics of different edges in a fragmented tropical rainforest[J]. Conserv Biol, 1998,12(5):1091-1102. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97262.x.
[20]
刘瑞文, 孙晓刚, 郭太君 , 等. 4种园林树木树冠微环境与增湿降温的关系[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2015,43(3):43-47,78.
LIU R W, SUN X G, GUO T J , et al. Relationship of four landscape trees canopy microenvironment with humidity increase and temperature reduction[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2015,43(3):43-47,78. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20150119.006.
[21]
BASILE B, SOLARI L I, DEJONG T M . Intra-canopy variability of fruit growth rate in peach trees grafted on rootstocks with different vigour-control capacity[J]. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol, 2007,82(2):243-256. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2007.11512226.
[22]
HE F L, WANG F, WEI Q P , et al. Relationships between the distribution of relative canopy light intensity and the peach yield and quality[J]. Agric Sci China, 2008,7(3):297-302. DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60069-3.
[23]
TRENTACOSTE E R, GÓMEZ-DEL-CAMPO M, RAPOPORT H F . Olive fruit growth,tissue development and composition as affected by irradiance received in different hedgerow positions and orientations[J]. Sci Hortic, 2016,198:284-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.040.
[24]
TRAD M, GAALICHE B, RENARD C M G C , et al. Inter-and intra-tree variability in quality of figs.Influence of altitude,leaf area and fruit position in the canopy[J]. Sci Hortic, 2013,162:49-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.07.032.
[25]
JONES H G. Plants and microclimate:a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology[M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[26]
KRAMER P J, BOYER J S. Water relations of plants and soils[M]. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995.
[27]
李晔男, 刘彬昕, 关欣 , 等. 高寒地区钙果引种栽培试验[J]. 森林工程, 2019,35(2):27-31.
LI Y N, LIU B X, GUAN X , et al. Introduction experiment of Cerasus humilis in alpine-cold area[J]. For Eng, 2019,35(2):27-31. DOI: 10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2019.02.004.
[28]
黄海静, 符国槐, 杨再强 , 等. 设施栽培对杨梅生长发育和品质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,36(6):47-52.
HUANG H J, FU G H, YANG Z Q , et al. Effect of protected cultivation to the development and quality of Myrica rubra[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat l Sci Ed), 2012,36(6):47-52. DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.06.010.
[29]
王建平, 王纪章, 周静 , 等. 光照对农林植物生长影响及人工补光技术研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,44(1):215-222.
WANG J P, WANG J Z, ZHOU J , et al. Recent progress of artificial lighting technique and effect of light on plant growth[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020,44(1):215-222. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806033.
[30]
CHERBIY-HOFFMANN S U, SEARLES P S, HALL A J , et al. Influence of light environment on yield determinants and components in large olive hedgerows following mechanical pruning in the subtropics of the Southern Hemisphere[J]. Sci Hortic, 2012,137:36-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.01.019.
[31]
TRENTACOSTE E R, CONNOR D J, GÓMEZ-DEL-CAMPO M . Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure,fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N-S and E-W oriented olive hedgerows[J]. Sci Hortic, 2015,193:240-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.013.
[32]
WEN Y, ZHANG Y Q, SU S C , et al. Effects of tree shape on the microclimate and fruit quality parameters of Camellia oleifera Abel[J]. Forests, 2019,10(7):563. DOI: 10.3390/f10070563.
[33]
GROSSMAN Y L, DEJONG T M . Training and pruning system effects on vegetative growth potential,light interception,and cropping efficiency in peach trees[J]. J Am Soc Hortic Sci, 1998,123(6):1058-1064. DOI: 10.21273/jashs.123.6.1058.
[34]
刘博, 罗桂杰, 金倩 , 等. 避雨栽培对宿晓红葡萄生长发育及果实品质的影响[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2018,45(3):7-10.
LIU B, LUO G J, JIN Q , et al. Effect of rain-shelter cultivation on growth and fruit quality of grape Suxiaohong[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol, 2018,45(3):7-10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.03.002.
[35]
王文元, 赖秀芳, 张恩慧 , 等. 15个观赏海棠果实品质分析[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2018,45(1):1-4.
WANG W Y, LAI X F, ZHANG E H , et al. Analysis of fruit quality of 15 ornamental crabapple varieties[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol, 2018,45(1):1-4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.01.001.
[36]
CASTILLO-RUIZ F J, SOLA-GUIRADO R R, CASTRO-GARCIA S , et al. Pruning systems to adapt traditional olive orchards to new integral harvesters[J]. Sci Hortic, 2017,220:122-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.03.043.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2020.
PDF(5018 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/