Landscape pattern study based on evaluating the development potential of villages

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202208046

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 155-164.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202208046

Special Issue: 自然保护地体系下景观设计理论与实践研究

Previous Articles Next Articles

Landscape pattern study based on evaluating the development potential of villages

ZHANG Xiaorui¹^,²(), HE Yu¹, DONG Jieyun¹

1. School of Architecture and Art,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230601,China
2. Laboratory of Digital Human Habitat Studies,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230601,China

Received:2022-08-18 Revised:2022-12-28 Online:2024-05-30 Published:2024-06-14

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 As per the new era and the comprehensive development of territorial spatial planning and the proposed rural revitalization strategy, the evaluation of village development potential is basic to rural planning and construction. The evaluation is also the core link to village planning under territorial spatial planning and a key guide to the classification of villages. 【Method】 Taking “background explanation-potential evaluation-village classification-classification pattern-development strategy” as the research path, seven criterion layers and 19 indicator layers were constructed according to the structural framework of target layer-criterion layer-indicator layer. The weights of indicators were determined by AHP and the entropy weight method. Based on this, villages in Lingbi County in Anhui Province were classified. Next, the landscape pattern of classified villages was analyzed based on Fragstats. 【Result】 Lingbi County in Anhui Province was divided into four types of villages: agglomeration enhancement, suburban integration, characteristic protection and relocation and withdrawal. Agglomeration enhancement villages had the largest landscape area, the most complex landscape shape, and the highest landscape agglomeration degree. The patch integration degree of suburban-integrated villages was the highest with the best landscape connectivity. The landscape complexity of the villages of relocation and withdrawal was the highest. Corresponding development strategies were proposed for different village types. 【Conclusion】 Corresponding development strategies are put forward for different village types: agglomeration and upgrading villages have a certain scale, an important breakthrough for rural modernization. During construction, the village layout should be optimized, the internal structure of the village should be properly adjusted, the construction of the village infrastructure should be improved, and the village’s appearance should be improved. The relationship between protection and development should be fully considered, and the integrity, authenticity, and continuity of village characteristics should be emphasized. In the construction of suburban-integrated villages, we should make use of their location advantages, focus on improving the village’s internal facilities, optimize the spatial layout, and discourage continuous expansion. At the same time, the overall style of the village should be different from the urban landscape—industrial development should be combined with the characteristics of the villages, village resources should be integrated, and the docking and integration of urban and rural industries should be strengthened. As per different industries, block division is conducted to realize the centralized development of industry and the intensive development of land. The natural resources in the villages should be protected, and rational land use and local resources should be combined to build characteristic tourism projects to develop village tourism. The relocation and withdrawal villages should merge, through spatial integration, with neighboring villages with high development potential to form the scale effect of village merger. The merger will enhance development potential and comprehensive competitiveness. The intention to relocate villagers and the restoration of rural ecology should be important considerations. The study provides method reference and a decision basis for the evaluation and classification of county-level rural potential.

Key words: rural revitalization strategy, territorial spatial planning, evaluation of the development potential of villages, landscape pattern, Lingbi County, Anhui Province

CLC Number:

TU982.29

ZHANG Xiaorui, HE Yu, DONG Jieyun. Landscape pattern study based on evaluating the development potential of villages[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 155-164.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 1

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 2

References 25

[25]	LI L, FENG C C, WANG L W. Village planning approach in ecological sensitive area:Xiashan Water Source Preservation Area,Weifang[J]. Planners, 2015, 31(4):117-122.
[26]	杨春德, 翟荣新, 朱晓伟, 等. 田柳镇三村村庄布局优化实践[J]. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(12):55-58.
	YANG C D, ZHAI R X, ZHU X W, et al. Application of spatial optimization for the layout of villages:a case study of three villages in Tianliu Town[J]. China Land Sci, 2011, 25(12):55-58.DOI: 10.13708/j.cnki.cn11-2640.2011.12.010.
[27]	姚龙, 刘玉亭. 基于聚类分析的城郊地区乡村发展类型:以广州市从化区为例[J]. 热带地理, 2015, 35(3):427-436.
	YAO L, LIU Y T. Rural development types in peri-urban areas based on cluster analysis:a case study of Conghua,Guangzhou[J]. Trop Geogr, 2015, 35(3):427-436.DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002747.
[28]	朱泽, 杨颢, 胡月明, 等. 基于多源数据的村庄发展潜力评价及村庄分类[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(6):1142-1151.
	ZHU Z, YANG H, HU Y M, et al. Evaluation of village development potential and village classification by multi-source data[J]. J Agric Resour Environ, 2021, 38(6):1142-1151.DOI: 10.13254/j.jare.2021.0496.
[29]	江国逊, 陈旭东, 石亚飞. 空心化村庄废弃地整理潜力研究:以江苏省邳州市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2013, 34(5):107-110.
	JIANG G X, CHEN X D, SHI Y F. Potential of wasteland consolidation in hollowing villages:a case study on Pizhou City in Jiangsu Province[J]. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan, 2013, 34(5):107-110.DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20130517.
[30]	欧维新, 邹怡, 刘敬杰, 等. 基于乡村振兴潜力和土地利用效率的村庄分类研究[J]. 上海城市规划, 2021, 6(6):15-21.
	OU W X, ZOU Y, LIU J J, et al. Integrating rural revitalization potential and land-use efficiency for classification of villages[J]. Shanghai Urban Plan Rev, 2021, 6(6):15-21.DOI: 10.11982/j.supr.20210603.
[1]	沈婕, 王瑾, 马远航. 西北山区县域乡村空间发展引导的探索和实践:以岷县县域村庄布局规划为例[J]. 建筑与文化, 2016(5):37-40.
	SHEN J, WANG J, MA Y H. The exploration and practice led by rural spatial development in mountainous regions in northwestern china:with case of layout planning for villages in Min County region[J]. Archit Cult, 2016(5):37-40.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4909.2016.05.006.
[2]	何杰, 金晓斌, 梁鑫源, 等. 城乡融合背景下淮海经济区乡村发展潜力:以苏北地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8):1940-1957.
	HE J, JIN X B, LIANG X Y, et al. Research of rural system development potential in Huaihai Economic Zone:a case study of northern Jiangsu Province under the background of urban-rural integration[J]. J Nat Resour, 2020, 35(8):1940-1957.DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200814.
[3]	李卫锋, 王仰麟, 彭建, 等. 深圳市景观格局演变及其驱动因素分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(8):1403-1410.
	LI W F, WANG Y L, PENG J, et al. Landscape spatial changes in Shenzhen and their driving factors[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004, 15(8):1403-1410.
[4]	柳迪子, 杜守帅, 王晨旭. 旅游型乡村景观格局变化及生态系统服务价值响应:以江苏省无锡市太湖国家旅游度假区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(5):264-275,286.
	LIU D Z, DU S S, WANG C X. Landscape pattern change and its response to ecosystem services value in a rural tourism area:a case study at Taihu National Tourism Resort in Wuxi City of Jiangsu Province[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2021, 41(5):264-275,286.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.035.
[5]	FORMAN R T T, GODRON M. Landscape ecology[M]. New York: Wiley, 1986.
[6]	GLADWIN C H, LONG B F, BABB E M, et al. Rural entrepreneurship:one key to rural revitalization[J]. Am J Agric Econ, 1989, 71(5):1305-1314.DOI: 10.2307/1243127.
[7]	JOHNSON T G. Entrepreneurship and development finance:keys to rural revitalization:discussion[J]. Am J Agric Econ, 1989, 71(5):1324-1326.DOI: 10.2307/1243129.
[8]	GREENE M J. Agriculture diversification initiatives: state government roles in rural revitalization[J]. Rural Economic Alternatives, 1988, 21(3):55-57.
[9]	ROBERTS B K. Landscapes of settlement:prehistory to the present[M]. New York: Routledge, 1996.
[10]	LOWE P, WARD N. Englands rural futures:asocio-geographical approach to scenarios analysis[J]. Regional Studies, 2009(10):1319-1332.
[11]	MEITZEN A, MEITZEN A. Siedelung und agrarwesen der westgermanen und Ostgermanen,der Kelten,Römer,Finnen und Slawen[M]. Berlin: Hertz, 1895.DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.27211.
[12]	MARSDEN T, MUNTON J, LOWE P, et al. Constructuring the countryside: an approach to rural development[M]. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Ltd., 1993.
[13]	STATISTICS O F N. Key statistics for the rural and urban classification 2004[EB/OL]. (2005-03-31) [2023-08-10].DOI:http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk.
[14]	SCARPA R, GILBRIDE T J, CAMPBELL D, et al. Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation[J]. Eur Rev Agric Econ, 2009, 36(2):151-174.DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbp012.
[15]	SEGARD M. Pastoralism,rural economy and landscape evolution in the western Alps[J]. J Roman Archaeol, 2009, 22:170-182.DOI: 10.1017/s104775940002064x.
[16]	ARORA-JONSSON S, LARSSON O. Lives in limbo:migrant integration and rural governance in Sweden[J]. J Rural Stud, 2021, 82:19-28.DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.010.
[17]	黎智辉, 张一凡, 袁娟. 圩区村庄布局规划新思考[J]. 规划师, 2013, 29(8):56-60.
	LI Z H, ZHANG Y F, YUAN J. Village planning and layout in polder area[J]. Planners, 2013, 29(8):56-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2013.08.010.
[18]	张卓然, 唐晓岚. 环太湖地区历史村落的环境适应性及特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(5): 17-24.
	ZHANG Z R, TANG X L. A study on environmental adaptability and characteristics of historical villages around the Taihu Lake area[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(5): 17-24.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201905027.
[19]	彭震伟, 王云才, 高璟. 生态敏感地区的村庄发展策略与规划研究[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2013(3):7-14.
	PENG Z W, WANG Y C, GAO J. Village planning and development study in environmentally sensitive area[J]. Urban Plan Forum, 2013(3):7-14.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2013.03.002.
[20]	张俊杰, 蔡克光, 蔡云楠. 全域风景化视角下都市村庄空间布局探讨:以广州村庄规划为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2016, 23(5):56-62.
	ZHANG J J, CAI K G, CAI Y N. Urban village space layout based on the perspective of the global landscape:taking village planning in Guangzhou as an example[J]. Urban Dev Stud, 2016, 23(5):56-62.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2016.05.010.
[21]	王昱之, 赵大伟. 基于灰色关联度的镇域村庄布局影响因素分析:以甘肃省达板镇为例[J]. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 53(2):123-128.
	WANG Y Z, ZHAO D W. An analysis on factors affecting village layout in town based on grey correlation degree: a case study on Daban Town in Gansu Province[J]. J Northwest Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2017, 53(2):123-128.DOI: 10.16783/j.cnki.nwnuz.2017.02.022.
[22]	夏国锋, 邬家峰, 王啸, 等. 村庄类型与农民公共精神的差异性呈现:胜利村、南坝村和十里村的比较[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 13(3):121-125.
	XIA G F, WU J F, WANG X, et al. Research on differences of farmers’ public spirit in different type of villages:a comparison of three villages[J]. J Northwest A&F Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2013, 13(3):121-125.DOI: 10.13968/j.cnki.1009-9107.2013.03.026.
[23]	孟欢欢, 李同昇, 于正松, 等. 安徽省乡村发展类型及乡村性空间分异研究[J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(4):144-148,185.
[31]	ESTOQUE R C, MURAYAMA Y, LASCO R D, et al. Changes in the landscape pattern of the La Mesa Watershed: the last ecological frontier of Metro Manila,Philippines[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2018, 430:280-290. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.08.023.
[32]	孟超, 王计平, 支晓蓉, 等. 乡镇尺度森林景观格局特征与影响因素定量分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(3):212-220.
	MENG C, WANG J P, ZHI X R, et al. Quantitative analysis of forest landscape pattern and its influencing factors in township scale[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach, 2019, 50(3):212-220.DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2019.03.023.
[33]	王佐霖, 黄钰辉, 杨龙, 等. 深圳森林生态系统类型自然保护区近20年土地利用与景观格局变化[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2019, 35(2):1-6.
	WANG Z L, HUANG Y H, YANG L, et al. Dynamics of land use and landscape pattern of forest ecosystem nature reserve in Shenzhen in recent 20 years[J]. For Environ Sci, 2019, 35(2):1-6.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2019.02.001.
[34]	马骅, 王义飞, 宁宇, 等. 若尔盖县高原湿地景观格局动态分析研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(1):109-115.
	MA H, WANG Y F, NING Y, et al. Dynamic analysis of landscape pattern of the plateau wetland of Zoige County[J]. For Resour Manag, 2019(1):109-115.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.01.017.
[35]	邬建国. 景观生态学:格局、过程、尺度与等级[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007.
	WU J G. Landscape ecology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007.
[23]	MENG H H, LI T S, YU Z S, et al. Rurality and acorrelation analysis of the cuunty economy in Anhui Province[J]. Econ Geogr, 2013, 33(4):144-148,185.DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2013.04.007.
[24]	张伟峰, 张立. 基于神经网络方法的乡村类型研究:西宁的案例[J]. 城市建筑, 2020, 17(1):45-49,53.
	ZHANG W F, ZHANG L. Research on rural type based on neural network method:a case of Xining[J]. Urban Archit, 2020, 17(1):45-49,53.DOI: 10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2020.01.007.
[25]	李琳, 冯长春, 王利伟. 生态敏感区村庄布局规划方法:以潍坊峡山水源保护地为例[J]. 规划师, 2015, 31(4):117-122.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

目标层 target layer	准则层 criterion layer	指标层 index level
村庄发展潜力 village development potential	村庄自然环境B1	高程C1
		坡度C2
		自然灾害C3
	村庄资源禀赋B2	耕地面积C4
	村庄资源禀赋B2	水域面积C5
	村庄居民点现状B3	人口规模C6
		村庄建设用地面积C7
		建设用地斑块密度C8
	村庄区位交通B4	通公路自然村数量C9
		与中心城区距离C10
		村庄道路网密度C11
	村庄经济发展B5	经济作物种植面积C12
	村庄经济发展B5	村庄可支配收入C13
	村庄社会保障B6	医疗保障C14
		养老保障C15
		最低生活保障C16
	村庄设施条件B7	公共服务设施C17
		道路交通设施C18
		宽带网络设施C19

乡镇 village/town	最小值 min	最大值 max	平均值 mean	标准差 SD	乡镇 villages/town	最小值 min	最大值 max	平均值 mean	标准差 SD
朝阳镇Chaoyang Town	0.167 3	0.398 4	0.236 6	0.059 0	向阳镇Xiangyang Town	0.143 6	0.343 3	0.249 5	0.064 8
大庙镇Damiao Town	0.150 2	0.413 3	0.222 4	0.061 4	杨疃镇Yangtong Town	0.128 2	0.396 0	0.279 1	0.075 1
冯庙镇Fengmiao Town	0.087 7	0.372 0	0.248 0	0.062 1	游集镇Youji Town	0.118 1	0.260 0	0.191 0	0.046 6
高楼镇Gaolou Town	0.136 3	0.341 7	0.208 7	0.072 0	渔沟镇Yugou Town	0.110 2	0.435 2	0.231 9	0.081 7
黄湾镇Huangwan Town	0.148 4	0.332 4	0.233 7	0.062 0	虞姬镇Yuji Town	0.213 5	0.407 1	0.322 2	0.049 0
浍沟镇Huigou Town	0.110 1	0.267 0	0.181 4	0.047 3	朱集乡Zhuji Township	0.116 4	0.346 7	0.199 4	0.068 8
灵城镇Lingcheng Town	0.319 3	0.618 1	0.478 8	0.108 1	大路乡Dalu Township	0.068 7	0.254 8	0.167 5	0.055 5
娄庄镇Louzhuang Town	0.154 1	0.162 6	0.252 8	0.067 1	尹集镇Yinji Town	0.134 8	0.359 5	0.243 8	0.053 2
韦集镇Weiji Town	0.163 5	0.362 0	0.255 4	0.053 3	禅堂镇Chantang Town	0.109 1	0.390 5	0.214 8	0.085 6
下楼镇Xialou Town	0.104 9	0.306 2	0.195 0	0.064 1	全部乡镇平均mean			0.236 7	0.085 7

村庄类型 village type	数量/个 number	乡镇分布统计 township distribution statistics
集聚提升类 cluster lifting	170	禅堂镇11个、朝阳镇12个、大路乡8个、大庙镇11个、冯庙镇10个、高楼镇14个、黄湾镇10个、浍沟镇10个、娄庄镇14个、韦集镇6个、下楼镇11个、向阳镇4个、杨疃镇9个、尹集镇7个、游集镇11个、渔沟镇11个、虞姬镇3个、朱集乡8个
城郊融合类 suburban fusion	85	禅堂镇3个、朝阳镇2个、大路乡3个、大庙镇3个、冯庙镇7个、高楼镇3个、黄湾镇4个、浍沟镇2个、灵城镇8个、娄庄镇12个、韦集镇6个、下楼镇1个、向阳镇8个、杨疃镇7个、尹集镇6个、游集镇2个、渔沟镇1个、虞姬镇5个、朱集乡4个
特色保护类characteristic conservation	24	朝阳镇2个、高楼镇1个、灵城镇1个、娄庄镇3个、韦集镇2个、下楼镇1个、游集镇1个、渔沟镇6个、虞姬镇3个、尹集镇3个、禅堂镇1个
搬迁撤并类relocation and withdrawal	13	大路乡2个、冯庙镇1个、浍沟镇3个、下楼镇4个、尹集镇1个、游集镇1个、朱集乡1个

类型 type	CA/hm²	LPI/%	LSI	PLADJ/%	COHESION/%	SHDI	SHEI
集聚提升类cluster lifting	108 547.74	7.991 6	99.178 7	82.816 2	98.669 1	0.822 5	0.374 3
城郊融合类suburban fusion	72 398.25	21.901 0	82.080 5	82.597 6	98.861 9	0.830 1	0.377 8
特色保护类characteristic conservation	16 738.56	10.296 6	41.775 2	82.548 2	96.989 8	0.848 0	0.407 8
搬迁撤并类relocation and withdrawal	5 013.09	8.522 3	25.957 7	80.275 0	95.205 5	0.965 1	0.464 1
灵璧县Lingbi County	202 705.65	17.938 2	128.448 9	83.145 3	99.285 6	0.832 1	0.378 7

Landscape pattern study based on evaluating the development potential of villages

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 25

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

[1]	LI Sirong, SU Tongxiang. Protection policy impacts on landscape pattern changes and ecosystem service value responses in Fuxian Lake basin [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 145-154.
[2]	ZHAO Zhiqiang, XU Xiaolong, YUAN Qing, WU Yan. Landscape pattern evolution and driving factors of Songhua River wetland in Harbin [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 219-226.
[3]	ZENG Zheli, SHE Jiyun, TANG Zichao, LUO Chuying. Dynamic change of wetland landscape in Changsha based on JRC global surface water data [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 9-18.
[4]	XU Hao, JIN Ting, LIU Wei. Study on the scale and landscape pattern evolution characteristics of blue-green space in Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou metropolitan area, China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(1): 219-226.
[5]	MA Yingyi, LIU Zhifeng. Assessment of landscape ecological risk and its dynamic response with urbanization development of Jiangsu Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(5): 185-194.
[6]	ZHOU Wen, CAO Fuliang, ZHANG Rui, WANG Guibin. Multi⁃scale analysis of the effects of green space pattern on the urban surface thermal environment [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 133-141.
[7]	LU Hongwang, HU Wenmin, SHE Jiyun, ZENG Wen, SONG Yabin. Study on the influence of Ecological Poplar Withdrawal on the landscape pattern of Dongting Lake wetland [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 171-178.
[8]	JIA Yanyan, TANG Xiaolan, TANG Fanglin, YANG Yang. Spatial⁃temporal evolution of landscape pattern in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin from 1995 to 2015 [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 185-194.
[9]	LIU Zhili, YUE Depeng, YANG Hui, ZHANG Qibin, YU Qiang, XU Xiaodong. Evolvement and prediction of landscape pattern in Yixing City based on urbanization process [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(6): 105-112.
[10]	XU Haishun, DU Hongyu, CAI Chaolin. Spatial characteristics of landscape pattern based on ecological restoration in the riparian zone of Huangpu River, Shanghai City [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(04): 125-131.
[11]	DAI Tingting, XU Ming, XU Yannan. Spatio-temporal distribution charasteristics and driving factors of rural settlements: a case study in Yixian, Anhui Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 42(05): 155-162.
[12]	LYU Guoping, LIAO Chengrui, XU Yannan, ZHANG Ting, LI Haidong. Dynamic simulation of future ecosystem service value in Puding County, Guizhou Province based on CA-Markov model [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(05): 49-56.
[13]	CHEN Yanfei, TANG Chendong, MA Qiang, XUE Jianhui. Landscape pattern change of Chongming Dongtan Nature Reserve of Shanghai from 2011 to 2015 [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(01): 1-8.
[14]	REN Qiong,TONG Guangchen, ZHANG Jinchi. Dynamics of Poyang Lake watershed landscape pattern [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(03): 94-100.
[15]	YANG Qiang, WANG Tao. Spatial-temporal variation of land use/cover and the analysis of its effect on ecological vulnerability in Yulin City of Shaanxi Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(02): 79-83.