Variations in seed morphological characteristics and nutritional content of Castanopsis carlesii from different provenances

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202206024

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 27-34.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202206024

Special Issue: “攥紧中国种子”视域下的中国林草种业研究专题Ⅰ

Previous Articles Next Articles

Variations in seed morphological characteristics and nutritional content of Castanopsis carlesii from different provenances

SUN Rongxi¹(), PAN Xinhao¹, ZHONG Xiaoru¹, LI Guisheng²

1. Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045,China
2. Wuyuan Ecological Forest Farm, Wuyuan 333200,China

Received:2022-06-17 Revised:2022-07-26 Online:2023-03-30 Published:2023-03-28

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To provide scientific references for germplasm conservation and development and utilization of Castanopsis carlesii, the geographical variations of seed morphological characteristics and nutrient content of C. carlesii from different provenances were analyzed. 【Method】 Seeds of C. carlesii were collected from 357 individuals growing in natural distribution areas of thirteen provenances. Six morphological characteristics (seed length, seed width, length width ratio, volume, surface area and 1 000-seed weight) and nutrients (soluble sugar and starch) of seeds were measured, and then variance, correlation and cluster analyses were conducted.【Result】 Seeds’ morphological characteristics were significantly different between and within provenances (P < 0.01); the mean values of seed length, width, length width ratio, volume, surface area and 1 000-seed weight ranged from 0.93-1.02 cm, 0.82-0.93 cm, 1.07-1.21, 0.32-0.46 cm³, 1.83-2.32 cm² and 397.15-599.67 g, respectively. The nest analysis of variances showed that the maxima of seed length, width, volume, surface area, and 1 000-seed weight were observed in seeds from Jiangxi Dingnan (JXDN), and significantly differed from those from other provenances. The 1 000-seed weight of Anhui Qimen (AHQM) was 66.23% that of JXDN, and the seed length, width, volume and surface area were comparatively smaller. The percentages of starch and soluble sugar were 31.80% and 21.76%, respectively. The nutrient contents of C. carlesii were significantly different between provenances (P < 0.01); the coefficients of variation were 14.06% and 30.62%. The average coefficient of phenotypic differentiation was 28.15%, and genetic variation within provenances was the main source of the genetic variation of morphology characteristics. The correlation analysis showed that starch and 1 000-seed weight had the most positive correlations with seed width (P < 0.05), while sugar had an extremely significant correlation with seed length and length-width ratios (P < 0.01). Seed length showed a significant negative correlation with longitude (P < 0.05). The length-width ratio showed an extremely significant negative correlation to longitude (P < 0.01), and had significant negative correlation with precipitation during the coldest quarter (P < 0.05). The starch showed a significant correlation to annual mean temperature. The cluster analysis showed that the thirteen provenances could be divided into three groups. Group Ⅰ included JXDN, which possessed large sized seeds, high soluble sugar and high starch. Group Ⅱ included AHQM, Jiangxi Xinfeng (JXXF), Zhejiang Kaihua (ZJKH) and Guangdong Lianping (GDLP), which had small sized seeds, high soluble sugar and low starch groups; the other eight provenances fell into group Ⅲ, exhibiting medium sized seeds, and medium soluble sugar and starch contents. Adjacent provenances did not cluster together preferentially, indicating that there is no obvious geographical variation of C. carlesii.【Conclusion】 The phenotypic diversity of C. carlesii was the result of genetic and environmental factors. In addition, the variation in seeds was mainly influenced by longitude, annual mean temperature, and precipitation of the coldest quarter. The genetic variation within provenances was the main source of genetic variations of seed characteristics; therefore, the selection and utilization of superior individual plants should be strengthened in the genetic improvement of C. carlesii. JXDN has the characteristics of large seeds and high nutrition, and offers the potential for excellent provenances.

Key words: Castanopsis carlesii, seed, morphological characteristic, nutritional content, provenance

CLC Number:

S722
S792

SUN Rongxi, PAN Xinhao, ZHONG Xiaoru, LI Guisheng. Variations in seed morphological characteristics and nutritional content of Castanopsis carlesii from different provenances[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(2): 27-34.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Table 2

The analysis of seed morphological characteristics and nutritional contents of C. carlesii"

代码 code	种子长/cm seed length	种子宽/cm seed width	长宽比 length- width ratio	体积/cm³ volume	表面积/cm² surface area	千粒质量/g 1 000-seed weight	m(淀粉)/ %	m(可溶性糖)/%
ZJKH	0.96±0.05 cd	0.90±0.06 b	1.07±0.03 a	0.40±0.08 bc	2.09±0.27 bc	487.85±94.42 bcd	31.65±4.00 cde	26.71±4.37 a
JXDN	1.02±0.07 a	0.93±0.07 a	1.10±0.05 abc	0.46±0.10 a	2.32±0.32 a	599.67±125.27 a	33.18±4.28 abcd	26.24±8.38 a
GDLP	0.95±0.05 cd	0.86±0.07 cde	1.11±0.07 bc	0.36±0.07 cdef	1.97±0.25 cde	458.65±87.63 d	33.87±4.06 abc	27.13±1.32 a
JXXF	0.93±0.04 d	0.84±0.02 ef	1.11±0.05 bcd	0.33±0.02 ef	1.87±0.09 de	405.10±15.41 e	28.62±4.44 fg	27.31±9.94 a
JXCY	0.97±0.06 c	0.82±0.07 f	1.19±0.08 ef	0.33±0.07 f	1.88±0.27 de	406.53±89.37 e	32.25±3.63 bcde	18.21±9.31 bc
JXQN	0.98±0.03 c	0.90±0.04 b	1.10±0.05 abc	0.42±0.04 b	2.18±0.14 b	467.12±47.89 cd	35.28±4.71 a	18.23±4.87 bc
GDXF	1.02±0.07 ab	0.89±0.05 bcd	1.16±0.10 de	0.41±0.06 b	2.16±0.20 b	514.08±72.64 bc	31.14±3.92 cdef	13.88±3.04 cd
HNCJ	1.02±0.08 ab	0.84±0.06 ef	1.21±0.10 f	0.36±0.07 cdef	2.01±0.25 cd	442.50±82.97 de	34.89±3.91 ab	17.05±8.56 bc
JXLN	0.98±0.05 c	0.85±0.06 ef	1.16±0.09 de	0.36±0.06 def	1.97±0.21 cde	446.18±78.28 de	30.21±4.48 ef	21.06±6.16 c
AHQM	0.93±0.05 d	0.82±0.06 f	1.14±0.08 cd	0.32±0.06 f	1.83±0.21 e	397.15±76.36 e	27.0.8±4.10 g	30.40±4.62 a
JXDX	0.97±0.05 cd	0.89±0.04 bc	1.08±0.05 ab	0.39±0.07 bcd	2.05±0.25 bc	491.66±101.24 bcd	32.36±4.90 bcde	20.74±4.66 c
FJHA	0.99±0.03 bc	0.91±0.07 ab	1.09±0.02 ab	0.42±0.04 b	2.16±0.15 b	532.56±46.10 b	30.50±5.05 def	17.06±4.31 bc
HNHY	1.02±0.08 ab	0.86±0.06 def	1.19±0.06 ef	0.37±0.07 bcde	2.05±0.26 bc	473.62±75.03 cd	30.11±5.93 ef	12.22±2.76 d
均值mean	0.98±0.06	0.87±0.06	1.13±0.08	0.38±0.08	2.04±0.26	470.52±97.78	31.80±4.84	21.76±8.94
CV/%	5.54	6.46	5.58	16.45	10.82	16.16	14.06	30.62
F	8.926^**	10.920^**	11.968^**	10.910^**	10.585^**	15.688^**	8.256^**	14.696^**

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Fig.1

References 36

[1]	方燕鸿. 武夷山米槠、甜槠常绿阔叶林的物种组成及多样性分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2005, 13(2):148-155.
	FANG Y H. Species composition and diversity of evergreen broad-leaved forest of Castanopsis carlesii and C.eyrei in Wuyishan National Nature Reserve,Fujian,China[J]. Chin Biodivers, 2005, 13(2):148-155.
[2]	罗坤水, 杨春霞, 林小凡, 等. 壳斗科树种育苗技术研究[J]. 江西林业科技, 2008, 36(6):6-9.
	LUO K S, YANG C X, LIN X F, et al. Studies on the breeding technology of Fagaceae species[J]. Jiangxi For Sci Technol, 2008, 36(6):6-9.DOI:10.16259/j.cnki.36-1342/s.2008.06.015.
[3]	曹展波, 林小凡, 杨桦, 等. 米槠人工培育技术[J]. 南方林业科学, 2015, 43(2):17-19.
	CAO Z B, LIN X F, YANG H, et al. Techniques for artificial cultivation of Castanopsis carlesii[J]. South China For Sci, 2015, 43(2):17-19.DOI:10.16259/j.cnki.36-1342/s.2015.02.006.
[4]	黄文标. 米槠容器扦插繁殖技术试验研究[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2015, 38(5):56-58.
	HUANG W B. Study on the experimental technology of cutting propagation of Castanopsis carlesii container[J]. Inn Mong For Investig Des, 2015, 38(5):56-58.DOI:10.13387/j.cnki.nmld.2015.05.022.
[5]	康建生. 米槠生物量空间结构特征的研究[J]. 江西林业科技, 2011, 39(3):33-35.
	KANG J S. Study on biomass spatial structure of Castanopsis carlesii[J]. Jiangxi For Sci Technol, 2011, 39(3):33-35.DOI:10.16259/j.cnki.36-1342/s.2011.03.011.
[6]	李丽婷. 皆伐对一代和二代人促米槠林分特征的影响[J]. 山地学报, 2004, 22(3):310-314.
	LI L T. Effects of clear-cutting on Castanopsis carlesii of first and second generation[J]. J Mt Res, 2004, 22(3):310-314.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2004.03.009.
[7]	LIU X F, LIN T C, YANG Z J, et al. Increased litter in subtropical forests boosts soil respiration in natural forests but not plantations of Castanopsis carlesii[J]. Plant Soil, 2017, 418(1):141-151.DOI:10.1007/s11104-017-3281-2.
[8]	李伟, 刘小飞, 陈光水, 等. 凋落物对中亚热带米槠天然林和人工林土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(11):11-18.
	LI W, LIU X F, CHEN G S, et al. Effects of litter manipulation on soil respiration in the natural forests and plantations of Castanopsis carlesii in mid-subtropical China[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2016, 52(11):11-18.DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161102.
[9]	张建和. 福建木兰溪源自然保护区米槠群落凋落物热值及能量归还动态[J]. 福建农业学报, 2016, 31(2):194-198.
	ZHANG J H. Calorific value and energy-recycling of litterfall in Castanopsis carlesii community at Mulanxi water conservation area in Fujian[J]. Fujian J Agric Sci, 2016, 31(2):194-198.DOI:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.02.018.
[10]	胡双成, 熊德成, 黄锦学, 等. 福建三明米槠次生林在不同更新方式下的初期细根产量[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(11):3259-3267.
	HU S C, XIONG D C, HUANG J X, et al. Fine root production in initial stage of Castanopsis carlesii under different regeneration modes in Sanming,Fujian Province,China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2015, 26(11):3259-3267.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150915.004.
[11]	陈云玉, 熊德成, 黄锦学, 等. 中亚热带不同演替阶段的马尾松和米槠人工林的细根生产量研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(11):1071-1081.
	CHEN Y Y, XIONG D C, HUANG J X, et al. Fine root production of Pinus massoniana plantation and Castanopsis carlesii plantation at different successional stages in subtropical China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2015, 39(11):1071-1081.
[12]	熊德成, 黄锦学, 陈光水, 等. 中亚热带米槠和杉木细根分泌物研究初报[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2015, 10(1):83-86.
	XIONG D C, HUANG J X, CHEN G S, et al. A preliminary report on fine root exudates of Castanopsis carlesii and Cunninghamia lanceolata in subtropical zone[J]. J Subtrop Resour Environ, 2015, 10(1):83-86.DOI:10.19687/j.cnki.1673-7105.2015.01.012.
[13]	魏翠翠, 刘小飞, 林成芳, 等. 凋落物输入改变对亚热带两种米槠次生林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(6):692-702.
	WEI C C, LIU X F, LIN C F, et al. Response of soil enzyme activities to litter input changes in two secondary Castanopsis carlessii forests in subtropical China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(6):692-702.
[14]	李晓杰, 刘小飞, 熊德成, 等. 中亚热带杉木人工林和米槠次生林凋落物添加与去除对土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(5):447-457.
	LI X J, LIU X F, XIONG D C, et al. Impact of litterfall addition and exclusion on soil respiration in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation and secondary Castanopsis carlesii forest in mid-subtropical China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(5):447-457.DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0404.
[15]	ZHAO H Y, CHEN Y Y, XIONG D C, et al. Fine root phenology differs among subtropical evergreen broadleaved forests with increasing tree diversities[J]. Plant Soil, 2017, 420(1):481-491.DOI:10.1007/s11104-017-3399-2.
[16]	周华, 徐国良. 九连山米槠群落结构特征分析[J]. 山东林业科技, 2010, 40(3):22-26.
	ZHOU H, XU G L. Analysis of community structure characteristics of Castanopsis carlesii in Jiulianshan Mountain[J]. Shandong For Sci Technol, 2010, 40(3):22-26.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2010.03.006.
[17]	周嘉聪, 刘小飞, 郑永, 等. 氮沉降对中亚热带米槠天然林微生物生物量及酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(1):127-135.
	ZHOU J C, LIU X F, ZHENG Y, et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition on soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities in Castanopsis carlesii natural forests in subtropical regions[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(1):127-135.DOI:10.5846/stxb201608181684.
[18]	韩世忠, 高人, 李爱萍, 等. 中亚热带地区米槠天然林土壤微生物群落结构的多样性[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2015, 23(6):653-661.
	HAN S Z, GAO R, LI A P, et al. Soil microbial community structure diversities of Castanopsis carlesii nature forests in the mid-subtropics of China[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2015, 23(6):653-661.DOI:10.11926/j.issn.1005-3395.2015.06.009.
[19]	纪淑蓉, 郭剑芬, 万菁娟, 等. 水分对米槠天然林土壤有机碳矿化和微生物群落的影响[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2015, 10(1):34-42.
	JI S R, GUO J F, WAN J J, et al. Effects of changing soil water content on soil organic carbon mineralization and microbial communities in a natural Castanopsis carlesii forest[J]. J Subtrop Resour Environ, 2015, 10(1):34-42.DOI:10.19687/j.cnki.1673-7105.2015.01.005.
[20]	FAN Y X, LIN F, YANG L M, et al. Decreased soil organic P fraction associated with ectomycorrhizal fungal activity to meet increased P demand under N application in a subtropical forest ecosystem[J]. Biol Fertil Soils, 2018, 54(1):149-161.DOI:10.1007/s00374-017-1251-8.
[21]	FAN Y X, ZHONG X J, LIN F, et al. Responses of soil phosphorus fractions after nitrogen addition in a subtropical forest ecosystem:insights from decreased Fe and Al oxides and increased plant roots[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 337:246-255.DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.028.
[22]	YE X M, BU W S, HU X F, et al. Species divergence in seedling leaf traits and tree growth response to nitrogen and phosphorus additions in an evergreen broadleaved forest of subtropical China[J]. J For Res, 2022:1-14.DOI:10.1007/s11676-021-01437-2.
[23]	曾伟, 熊彩云, 肖复明, 等. 中亚热带常绿阔叶林优势树种幼树光合特性季节动态[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(5):157-160.
	ZENG W, XIONG C Y, XIAO F M, et al. Seasonal dynamic study on photosynthetic characteristics of dominant evergreen broadleaved forest[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2014, 38(5):157-160.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.05.031.
[24]	SUN R X, YE X M, WANG Z L, et al. The complete chloroplast genome of Castanopsis carlesii (Hemsl.) Hay[J]. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour, 2019, 4(2):2591-2592.DOI:10.1080/23802359.2019.1641437.
[25]	BANKS S C, CARY G J, SMITH A L, et al. How does ecological disturbance influence genetic diversity?[J]. Trends Ecol Evol, 2013, 28(11):670-679.DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2013.08.005.
[26]	PAULS S U, NOWAK C, BÁLINT M, et al. The impact of global climate change on genetic diversity within populations and species[J]. Mol Ecol, 2013, 22(4):925-946.DOI:10.1111/mec.12152.
[27]	沈浩, 刘登义. 遗传多样性概述[J]. 生物学杂志, 2001, 18(3):5-7,4.
	SHEN H, LIU D Y. Summary of genetic diversity[J]. Joural Biol, 2001, 18(3):5-7,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1736.2001.03.002.
[28]	叶学敏, 陈伏生, 孙荣喜, 等. 基于MaxEnt模型的南酸枣潜在适生区预测[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2019, 41(3):440-446.
	YE X M, CHEN F S, SUN R X, et al. Prediction of potential suitable distribution areas for Choerospondias axillaris besed on MaxEnt model[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2019, 41(3):440-446.DOI:10.13836/j.jjau.2019052.
[29]	吕锋, 解孝满, 韩彪, 等. 麻栎天然群体种子表型变异分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2021, 34(2):174-179.
	LYU F, XIE X M, HAN B, et al. Phenotypic variation analysis of Quercus acutissima natural population seeds[J]. For Res, 2021, 34(2):174-179.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.02.019.
[30]	厉月桥, 李迎超, 吴志庄. 不同种源蒙古栎种子表型性状与淀粉含量的变异分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(4):528-532.
	LI Y Q, LI Y C, WU Z Z. Variation in phenotype characters and starch content of Quercus mongolica fisch seed from different provenances[J]. For Res, 2013, 26(4):528-532.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2013.04.022.
[31]	熊仕发, 吴立文, 陈益存, 等. 不同种源白栎果实形态特征和营养成分含量变异分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(2):93-102.
	XIONG S F, WU L W, CHEN Y C, et al. Variation in morphological characters and nutrient contents of Quercus fabri fruits from different provenances[J]. For Res, 2020, 33(2):93-102.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.02.012.
[32]	季琳琳, 陈素传, 吴志辉, 等. 山核桃果实主要经济性状和养分含量的差异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 46(1) : 131-137.
	JI L L, CHEN S C, WU Z H, et al. Variation and cluster analysis on the main economic characters and nutrients of fruit from Carya cathayensis and C. dabieshanensis fine trees[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 46(1) : 131-137.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012044.
[33]	江锡兵, 龚榜初, 刘庆忠, 等. 中国板栗地方品种重要农艺性状的表型多样性[J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(4):641-652.
	JIANG X B, GONG B C, LIU Q Z, et al. Phenotypic diversity of important agronomic traits of local cultivars of Chinese chestnut[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2014, 41(4):641-652.DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014.04.008.
[34]	刘娟, 李悦, 于志民, 等. 圆齿野鸦椿种子性状变异及子代苗生长表现[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40(4):734-742.
	LIU J, LI Y, YU Z M, et al. Variation of seed characters and seedling growth of Euscaphis konishii[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2018, 40(4):734-742.DOI:10.13836/j.jjau.2018093.
[35]	李洪果, 陈达镇, 许靖诗, 等. 濒危植物格木天然种群的表型多样性及变异[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4):69-83.
	LI H G, CHEN D Z, XU J S, et al. Phenotypic diversity and variation in natural populations of Erythrophleum fordii,an endangered plant species[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2019, 55(4):69-83.DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190408.
[36]	李伟, 林富荣, 郑勇奇, 等. 皂荚南方天然群体种实表型多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(1):61-69.
	LI W, LIN F R, ZHENG Y Q, et al. Phenotypic diversity of pods and seeds in natural populations of Gleditsia sinensis in southern China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(1):61-69.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00007.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

序号 No.	种源代码 code of provenance	种源位置 provenance location	采种株数 individual number for seed collection	经度(E)/ (°) longitude	纬度(N)/ (°) latitude	海拔/m altitude	年均温度/℃ annual mean temperature	昼夜温差月均值/℃ mean diurnal range	最暖月最高温/℃ max temperature of the warmest month	年均降水量/ mm annual precipitation	最冷季降水量/ mm precipitation of the coldest quarter	湿润频率/% wet-day frequency
1	HNCJ	海南昌江	30	109.14	19.12	600	22.2	7.9	29.8	1 497	48	8.19
2	JXCY	江西崇义	30	114.26	25.79	250	18.8	8.3	33.5	1 528	187	14.32
3	JXDN	江西定南	30	115.14	24.92	300	19.4	8.6	32.2	1 681	194	11.63
4	JXDX	江西德兴	30	117.69	28.85	150	17.2	8.6	32.8	1 829	254	12.67
5	GDXF	广东新丰	30	114.12	24.13	600	17.6	8.3	32.8	2 007	192	10.12
6	ZJKH	浙江开化	31	118.5	29.14	350	16.4	8.0	32.1	1 738	241	13.62
7	HNHY	湖南衡阳	9	112.69	27.25	380	16.0	7.3	31.3	1 753	221	15.30
8	JXLN	江西龙南	30	114.43	24.57	500	19.1	8.6	31.3	1 799	195	11.32
9	GDLP	广东连平	30	114.45	24.47	550	19.1	8.6	31.0	1 832	194	11.01
10	AHQM	安徽祁门	25	117.27	29.98	550	14.1	7.4	29.1	1 751	200	10.84
11	JXQN	江西全南	30	114.46	24.61	480	18.9	8.5	31.1	1 797	195	11.39
12	JXXF	江西信丰	30	115.21	25.24	350	19.0	8.5	32.4	1 650	193	12.23
13	FJHA	福建华安	22	117.29	24.56	200	20.8	7.1	31.8	1 553	155	10.23

性状 traits	方差分量 variance component			方差分量百分比/% proportion of variance component			V_st/%
性状 traits	种源间 among provenance	种源内 between provenance	随机误差 random errors	种源间 among provenance	种源内 between provenance	随机误差 random errors	V_st/%
种子长 seed length	0.001	0.003	0.004	12.50	37.50	50.00	25.00
种子宽 seed width	0.001	0.003	0.004	12.50	37.50	50.00	25.00
长宽比length-width ratio	0.002	0.005	0.006	15.38	38.46	46.15	28.57
体积 volume	0.002	0.004	0.005	18.18	36.36	45.45	33.33
表面积 surface area	0.019	0.051	0.064	14.18	38.06	47.76	27.14
千粒质量1 000-seed weight	2 631.921	6 177.806	569.764	28.06	65.87	6.07	29.88
平均值mean				16.80	42.29	40.91	28.15

性状 trait	淀粉含量 starch content	可溶性糖含量 soluble sugar content	千粒质量 1 000-seed weight	种子长 seed length	种子宽 seed width	体积 volume	表面积 surface area	长宽比 length- width ratio
淀粉含量starch content	1
可溶性糖含量soluble sugar content	-0.078	1
千粒质量1 000-seed weight	0.112^*	-0.034	1
种子长seed length	0.165^**	-0.184^**	0.655^**	1
种子宽seed width	0.121^*	-0.024	0.876^**	0.505^**	1
体积volume	0.137^**	-0.054	0.915^**	0.667^**	0.971^**	1
表面积surface area	0.157^**	-0.085	0.908^**	0.757^**	0.937^**	0.990^**	1
长宽比length width ratio	0.019	-0.149^**	-0.323^**	0.389^**	-0.595^**	-0.410^**	-0.293^**	1

性状 trait	经度(E) longitude	纬度(N) latitude	海拔 altitude	年均温度 annual mean temperature	昼夜温差月均值 mean diurnal range	最暖月最高温 max temperature of the warmest month	年均降水量 annual precipitation	最冷季降水量 precipitation of the coldest quarter	湿润频率 wet-day frequency
千粒质量1 000-seed weight	0.171	-0.088	-0.316	0.210	0.048	0.104	0.162	0.115	-0.082
种子长seed length	-0.573^*	-0.522	0.100	0.362	-0.112	-0.205	-0.014	-0.389	-0.153
种子宽seed width	0.340	0.023	-0.341	0.152	0.127	0.155	0.241	0.248	-0.063
表面积surface area	0.161	-0.114	-0.242	0.222	0.113	0.075	0.204	0.118	-0.108
体积volume	0.040	-0.199	-0.177	0.261	0.079	0.015	0.191	0.035	-0.132
长宽比length width ratio	-0.809^**	-0.455	0.420	0.153	-0.210	-0.318	-0.260	-0.572^*	-0.069
淀粉含量 starch content	-0.420	-0.547	0.077	0.578^*	0.431	0.124	-0.083	-0.315	-0.222
可溶性糖含量soluble sugar content	0.493	0.390	0.020	-0.262	0.252	0.097	-0.008	0.269	-0.046

Variations in seed morphological characteristics and nutritional content of Castanopsis carlesii from different provenances

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 36

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

[1]	GUO Congcong, SHEN Yongbao, SHI Fenghou. Effects of temperature on stored substance metabolism and enzyme activity during germination of Pinus bungeana seeds [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 25-34.
[2]	WANG Zhangrong, JI Kongshu, XU Li’an, ZOU Bingzhang, LIN Nengqing, LIN Jingquan. New management model of construction techniques, realistic genetic gain and low cost multi-generation improvement in seedling seed orchard of Pinus massoniana [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 9-16.
[3]	WEI Yajuan, GUO Jing, DANG Xiaohong, Xie Yunhu, WANG Ji, LI Xiaole, WU Huimin. Morphological characteristics and influencing mechanisms of Nitraria tangutorum nebkhas at different sandy land types in desert oasis ecotone of Jilantai [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 172-180.
[4]	LIU Jialei, BAI Run’e, ZHANG Kai, WEN Caiyi, YAN Fengming. Description of common whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on Osmanthus fragrans in China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 237-244.
[5]	ZHOU Qun. Breeding of a new cultivar of Bougainvillea ‘Zhongmin 2’ [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 268-270.
[6]	YANG Suzhi, DUAN Lei, ZHANG Li, FENG Zhaohui, LU Xin, HAN Lihua, BAI Yuru, WU Zhiyan. New Xanthoceras sorbifolium cultivars ‘Mengguan No.1’ and ‘Mengguan No.2’ [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 262-264.
[7]	GAI Junpeng, CHEN Dongsheng, JIA Weiwei, WANG Zheng. Developing height growth model of Larix kaempferi based on genetic and climate effects [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 51-60.
[8]	BAO Qin, XU Tao, SHI Fenghou, SHEN Yongbao. Malus‘Zanchun’: a new ornamental crabapple cultivar [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 234-236.
[9]	QIU Jing, LI Jiabao, ZHU Dahai, CHEN Xin. Taxonomic implications of genome sizes and micromorphological characteristics of leaf epidermis of species in Sorbus Sect. Alnifoliae [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 77-86.
[10]	HUANG Ziliang, XU Ziheng, SUN Caowen. Study on seasonal dynamics of seed rain and characteristics of soil seed banks in Cyclocarya paliurus [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(2): 18-26.
[11]	LIU Xiangquan, ZHAO Renfei, ZHU Yanfang, DENG Shiming, LI Jitao, DENG Zhijun. Mechanisms of seed vigour changes in the canopy seed bank of Koelreuteria bipinnata [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(2): 35-41.
[12]	LIU Miao, GAO Handong, GAO Yan, XUE Xiaoming. Study on the physiological and biochemical changes of Phoebe sheareri seed during its dormancy breaking [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(2): 9-17.
[13]	KONG Xin, WANG Aiying, HAO Guangyou, NING Qiurui, WANG Miao, YIN Xiaohan, ZHOU Yongjiao. Coordinated responses of hydraulic architecture and photosynthetic characteristics in Fraxinus mandschurica seedlings to change of light intensity irradiance [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(1): 83-91.
[14]	SUN Wei, WANG Bin, CHU Xiuli, WANG Xiuhua, ZHANG Dongbei, WU Xiaolin, ZHOU Zhichun. Response and association of the growth and nutrient traits of Pinus massoniana container seedlings to phosphorus addition and inoculation of mycorrhizal fungi [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(1): 226-233.
[15]	WANG Haoyu, GAO Yunpeng, ZHU Mingwei, WU Yang, XU Linqiao, LI Shuxian. Effects of endogenous inhibitors on seed germination of Cercis canadensis [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(5): 104-112.